Viewpoint: Asia fails to ramp up Paris pledges in 2020

  • : Emissions
  • 21/01/25

Joe Biden took executive action to rejoin the global Paris climate agreement in one of his first moves as US president, signalling a term of renewed climate leadership from the world's second-largest greenhouse gas emitter.

A co-ordinated ramp-up in action is needed if the agreement's goal of limiting global temperatures' increase to between 1.5-2°C is to be met. Without additional policies, warming is set to surpass 3°C by the end of the century despite a 7pc emissions dip because of the Covid-19 pandemic this year, according to the UNEP's 2020 emissions gap report. But Asia-Pacific nations unanimously failed to strengthen emissions reduction targets by 2020, the agreement's first rolling five-year deadline.

Major emitters India and China neglected to update climate pledges by the end of 2020, while Japan, South Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, Vietnam and Australia did submit new targets on time but did not increase ambitions, according to climate policy analyst Carbon Brief.

Signatories to the 2015 Paris agreement approved a "ratchet mechanism" that requires they each update emissions targets and policies or nationally determined contributions (NDCs) every five years to steadily raise ambition over time, after governments formally acknowledged their collective commitments from 2015 would not meet the agreement's goal.

China

China, the world's largest emitter, has yet to formally register its new NDC with the UN despite accelerating climate commitments in recent months. Beijing pledged the country would reach peak emissions before 2030 and be carbon neutral by 2060 in September, shortly followed by a long-awaited nationwide emissions trading scheme that starts from February.

But China's unofficial revised 2030 target mentioned at December's UN climate action summit sets it up for overachievement, with ambiguous language contrasting with its bold, clear-cut decarbonisation pledge. At December's summit President Xi Jinping said China aims to cut GDP emissions intensity by "more than" 65pc by 2030 from 2005 levels, up from 60-65pc in its previous NDC. Ambition appears weak given the country has already slashed emissions intensity by over 50pc from the 2005 baseline and at a rate of 20-22pc during recent five-year periods. To achieve the new target, intensity will need to drop by 16pc for each five-year period over the next decade.

But the addition of "more than" is far from negligible and leaves room to scale up efforts. While a 65pc intensity reduction will still allow absolute emissions to rise by around 15pc over the next decade, a 69pc drop will halt emissions growth. China's ministry of ecology and environment is still engrossed in hashing out its climate change strategy and should clarify its plan to 2030 and beyond after the country's parliamentary 2021 two sessions in early March.

Japan, South Korea

Japan and South Korea were among 10 major emitters — contributing over 1pc of global greenhouse gases annually — that met the 2020 deadline, although both resubmitted NDCs unchanged from 2016.

Japan aims to lower emissions by 26pc below 2013 levels by 2030, while South Korea by the same year plans to bring emissions 37pc below business-as-usual (BAU) levels. Independent climate policy tracker Climate Action Tracker (CAT) rates these targets as "highly insufficient", meaning if all governments took a similar approach, warming will reach between 3-4°C by 2100. But both nations have said they will update NDCs in 2021. Ambition in these new targets will be seen as a litmus test of their commitment to decarbonise after they announced plans to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 late last year.

Australia

Australia also left its NDC flat from 2016 and deliberately downplayed rather than ramped up ambitions. Its new submission states the country is "on track to meet and beat [its] 2030 target" of reducing emissions by 26-28pc below a 2005 baseline.

But critics point out this target warranted revisiting in 2020 as it is not yet in line with the Paris agreement goals. The government has also faced criticism for making the target weaker in absolute emissions terms by adjusting historical emissions data between 2016 and 2020 submissions. It set the 2005 baseline at 598mn t of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) in 2016 but later hiked this up to 611mn t CO2e on changed assumptions about land use emissions.

Unlike large northeast Asian economies, Australia has stressed that it will not revisit its target again before 2025.

Singapore

Singapore altered its 2030 NDC to an absolute emissions cap of 65mn t CO2e from its prior GDP intensity cut target of 36pc from 2005 levels. Absolute emissions targets guarantee reductions regardless of economic growth, but in this case ambitions remain similar despite the change in metric. Singapore is set to overachieve without any policy changes, with 2030 emissions already on course to peak up to 24pc below target at 48.3mn-49.7mn t CO2e in 2030.

New Zealand

New Zealand put forward an unchanged NDC rated as "insufficient" by CAT, though further edits are likely following advice from the country's independent climate change commission due in early 2021. The government has sought to position itself as a global leader in climate policy by enshrining its net-zero emissions by 2050 target into law in the 2019 Zero Carbon Act, although the exemption of methane that makes up 40pc of total emissions weakens this commitment.

Vietnam

Vietnam submitted a slightly improved NDC in 2020 but is still set to vastly outperform its new target, which uses an inaccurate emissions baseline inflated far above its real BAU trajectory. Annual emissions are heading for 448mn-496mn t CO2e by 2030, 40-50pc beneath its NDC target in absolute emissions terms but still consistent with 2-3°C warming.

But the country's revised environmental protection law passed in November 2020 may pave the way for stronger climate policy and deeper emissions cuts. Under the law, which takes effect from 1 January 2022, the government seeks to become the first developing nation to establish carbon pricing, although details have not yet been specified.

India

Though India has not indicated it will update its initial NDC, it is one of the few nations assessed by CAT with a 2030 target in line with 1.5-2°C warming as targeted by the Paris agreement. It is also on track to overperform, as emissions intensity should drop to 37-39pc below 2005 levels by 2030, largely spurred by strong investments in solar and wind power.

But India must plan for a full phase-out of coal by 2040 to remain Paris-compliant beyond the next decade. The agreement requires that signatories peak emissions in the first half of the century and reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

Asia-Pacific emissions, NDCs(mn t CO2e)
Latest historical GHG emissions excl forestryGlobal emissions share %Projected 2030 emissions current post-Covid policy2016 initial NDC to 20302020 updated NDC to 2030Latest NDC in absolute emissions by 2030Latest NDC warming equivalent<2C compatible absolute emissions by 2030
Japan1,238 (2018)2.6905-1,03626% emissions cut below 2013 Unchanged; updates expected 20211,079.03-4°C<327
South Korea714 (2017)1.3665-74337% emissions cut below BAU Unchanged; updates expected 20215393-4°C<316
Australia557 (2017)1.1487-50626-28% emissions cut below 2005 Unchanged445-4673-4°C<386
New Zealand79.6 (2017)0.165-72.130% emissions cut below 2005 Unchanged67.52-3°C<58
Singapore49.3 (2014)0.148.3-49.736% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005Peak emissions at 65mn t CO2e 653-4°C<5.9
Vietnam325 (2014)0.6448-4968% emissions cut below BAU; 25% with international assistance9% emissions cut below BAU; 27% with international assistance903; 748 with assistance>4°C<375
China13,442 (2018)24.312,922-14,66660-65% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005>65% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005 * not official13,744-15,1943-4°C<10,715
India2,993 (2018)6.93,837-4,06633-35% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005No update expected5,350-5,6821.5-2°C<6,463
Malaysia158 (2016) 0.6Unassessed35% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005; 45% with international assistance No update expectedUnassessedUnassessedUnassessed
Indonesia856 (2016)4.71,073-1,32629% emissions cut below BAU; 41% with international assistanceNo update expected1,8173-4°C<1,127

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/04/18

Canada furthers investment in GHG reductions

Canada furthers investment in GHG reductions

Houston, 18 April (Argus) — The Canadian government plans to have C$93bn ($67.5bn) in federal incentives up and running by the end of the year to spur developments in clean energy technology, hydrogen production, carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) along with a new tax credit for electric vehicle (EV) supply chains. The Canada Department of Finance, in its 2024 budget released on 16 April, said it expects to have the first planned investment tax credits (ITCs), for CCUS and renewable energy investments, in law before 1 June. The ITCs would be available for investments made generally within or before 2023 depending on the credit. The anticipated clean hydrogen ITC is also moving forward. It could provide 15-40pc of related eligible costs, with projects that produce the cleanest hydrogen set to receive the higher levels of support, along with other credits for equipment purchases and power-purchase agreements. The government is pursuing a new ITC for EV supply chains, meant to bolster in-country manufacturing and consumer adoption of EVs with a 10pc return on the cost of buildings used in vehicle assembly, battery production and related materials. The credit would build on the clean technology manufacturing ITC, which allows businesses to claim 30pc of the cost of new machinery and equipment. To bolster reductions in transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the government will also direct up to C$500mn ($363mn) in funding from the country's low-carbon fuel standard to support domestic biofuel production . Transportation is the second largest source of GHG emissions for the country, at 28pc, or 188mn metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent, in 2021. But the province of Alberta expressed disappointment at the pace of development of ITC support that could help companies affected by the country's move away from fossil fuels. "There was nothing around ammonia or hydrogen, and no updates on the CCUS ITCs that would actually spur on investment," Alberta finance minister Nate Horner said. The incentives are intended to help Canada achieve a 40-45pc reduction in GHG emissions by 2030, relative to 2005 levels. This would require a reduction in GHG emissions to about 439mn t/yr, while Canada's emissions totaled 670mn in 2021, according to the government's most recent inventory. The budget also details additional plans for the Canada Growth Fund's carbon contracts for a difference, which help decarbonize hard-to-abate industries. The government plans to add off-the-shelf contracts to its current offering of bespoke one-off contracts tailored to a specific enterprise to broaden the reach and GHG reductions of the program. These contracts incentivize businesses to invest in emissions reducing program or technology, such as CCUS, through the government providing a financial backstop to a project developer. The government and developer establish a "strike price" that carbon allowances would need to reach for a return on the investment, with the government paying the difference if the market price fails to increase. CGF signed its first contract under this program last year , with Calgary-based carbon capture and sequestration company Entropy and has around $6bn remaining to issue agreements. To stretch this funding further, the Canadian government intends for Environment and Climate Change Canada to work with provincial and territorial carbon markets to improve performance and potentially send stronger price signals to spur decarbonization. By Denise Cathey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Scotland abandons 2030 climate target to focus on 2045


24/04/18
24/04/18

Scotland abandons 2030 climate target to focus on 2045

Edinburgh, 18 April (Argus) — The Scottish government is abandoning its 2030 target to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions after the UK's Climate Change Committee (CCC) said last month Scotland would not be able to meet it, but reiterated "unwavering commitment" to its 2045 net zero goal. Scotland had an ambitious interim target to reduce GHG emissions by 75pc by 2030 from a 1990 baseline and its legally binding 2045 net zero goal date is ahead of the rest of the UK. The CCC said in March that the nation was unlikely to meet its 2030 climate goals as "continued delays" in plans and policies mean the required actions to hit targets are now "beyond what is credible". And today, Scotland's cabinet secretary for net zero Mairi McAllan said that the government "accepts the CCC's recent re-articulations" that the "2030 target is out of reach". "We must now act to chart a course to 2045 at a pace and scale that is feasible, fair and just." She said that the government will bring forward "expediting legislation" to remove the 2030 target, calling it "a minor legislative change". McAllan said climate actions are backtracking at the UK level and blamed "severe budget restrictions" by the UK government and the "constrains of devolution". Scotland is a member nation of the UK, and the Scottish parliament has some devolved powers. But energy, for example, remains a reserved matter in the UK, and decisions — including licensing, regulation and policy — are taken by the UK parliament. She said that Scotland was trying to achieve societal and economic transformation with "one hand tied behind our back". Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said there was no intention to "roll back" on the target to achieve net zero emissions by 2045, saying that Scotland has made faster progress than any other nation in the UK during 2019-21, but that 2030 was a "stretched" target. McAllan said annual reporting on progress will be kept but by introducing a target approach based on "five-yearly carbon budgets" — a cap on the amount of GHG emitted over a five-year period — in a similar way to the rest of the UK. Scotland missed its annual emissions-reduction target in 2021, for the eighth time in the last 12 years. The CCC's interim chair Piers Forster said today that the removal of the 2030 target was "deeply disappointing". "We are reassured that the net zero target remains in place but interim targets and plans to deliver against them are what makes any net zero commitment credible," he said. McAllan announced a series of measures that the government wants to introduce, including reducing methane emissions in farming, a Scotland-wide integrated transport ticketing system, and the quadrupling of electric car charging points. But it is unclear what will happen to Scotland's delayed climate strategy, which was due at the end of 2023. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

NSTA fines Neo Energy for North Sea methane venting


24/04/18
24/04/18

NSTA fines Neo Energy for North Sea methane venting

London, 18 April (Argus) — UK offshore regulator the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) has fined UK upstream firm Neo Energy £100,000 for breaching its methane venting permit at North Sea fields. The company emitted 1,200t of methane in excess of its permit from the Donan, Lochranza and Balloch fields in the first nine months of 2022. Neo had permission to vent 378t of methane from installations at these fields in that year, but incorrectly assigned volumes vented through unlit flares to its flaring consent, the NSTA found. Neo showed a "lack of oversight" by failing to detect the licence breach for seven months, NSTA said. The company reached its annual limit by 21 March 2022, but continued venting without authorisation until October 2022. The company said it did not update its flare and vent allocation process to reflect NSTA guidance updated in 2021, and as such was still assigning its flaring and venting according to previous guidance. Neo becomes the fourth company to be fined by the NSTA over breaches relating to flaring and venting consents. The regulator in 2022 sanctioned Equinor and EnQuest and last year fined Spanish utility Repsol for consent breaches. The four companies have been fined a total of £475,000 for the breaches. And the regulator in February had four more investigations under way for breaches of vent consents. Neo Energy's fine is equivalent to £2.98/t of CO2e emitted, assuming a global warming potential of methane that is 28 times that of CO2 on a 100-year time scale, compared with a UK emissions trading system price of £34.40/t of CO2e on 17 April. The UK offshore industry targets a 50pc reduction in production emissions of greenhouse gases by 2030, from a 2018 baseline. And it intends to end all routine venting and flaring by that year. The regulator last year warned that "further, sustained action" would be needed to reach the 2030 emissions reduction goal. Methane emissions from offshore gas fell in recent years, to 1mn t in 2022 from 1.6mn t in 2018, according to NSTA data. Roughly half of methane emissions in the sector in recent years has been produced by venting, while flaring makes up about a quarter of the emissions. The UK government is a member of the Global Methane Pledge group of countries that aims to reduce methane emissions by 30pc by 2030 from a 2020 baseline. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia’s Queensland legislates emissions targets


24/04/18
24/04/18

Australia’s Queensland legislates emissions targets

Sydney, 18 April (Argus) — Australia's Queensland state today approved two separate laws setting renewable energy and emissions reduction targets over the next decade, as it transitions away from a coal-fired dependent power generation system. Queensland set net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets of 30pc below 2005 levels by 2030, 75pc by 2035 and zero by 2050 under the Clean Economy Jobs Act, while theEnergy (Renewable Transformation and Jobs) Act sets renewable energy targets of 50pc by 2030, 70pc by 2032 and 80pc by 2035. The state is on track to surpass the 2030 emissions target, latest data show, as it achieved a 29pc reduction in 2021. Even though the share of renewables in the power mix last year was the lowest across Australia at 26.9pc, it has been increasing consistently since 2015 when it was 4.5pc, according to data from the National Electricity Market's OpenNem website. Coal-fired generation has been steadily falling, down to 42.9TWh or a 65.7pc share in 2023 from 52.9TWh or 83pc in 2018. Most of Queensland's coal-fired plants belong to state-owned utilities, which the previous Labor party-led government of Annastacia Palaszczuk indicated would stop burning coal by 2035 . The new Labor party premier Steven Miles disclosed the 75pc emissions reduction target by 2035 in his first speech as leader last December. The Energy Act locks in public ownership of electricity assets, ensuring that at least 54pc of power generation assets above 30MW remain under state control, as well as 100pc of all transmission and distribution assets and 100pc of so-called "deep storage" assets — pumped hydro plants with at least 1.5GW of capacity. The government will need to prepare and publish a public ownership strategy for the July 2025-June 2030 and July 2030-June 2035 periods. A fund totalling A$150mn ($97mn) will also be set up to ensure workers at existing state-owned coal-fired power plants and associated coal mines have access to new jobs and training or financial assistance during the transition. The Clean Economy Jobs Act sees the government receiving advice from an expert panel on the measures needed to reduce emissions. The government will need to develop and publish sector plans by the end of 2025 with annual progress reports to Queensland's parliament. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU ETS in pricing ‘no man’s land’


24/04/17
24/04/17

EU ETS in pricing ‘no man’s land’

Florence, 17 April (Argus) — The EU emissions trading system (ETS) is sitting in a period between traditional price signals from the power sector and expected future industrial sources of price direction, delegates at a conference in Florence, Italy, heard today. The EU ETS is "right in the middle" of the transition phase from a power-centric to industrial-driven market, head of carbon markets at Spanish bank BBVA, Ingo Ramming, told the event, pointing to the fall in hedging of carbon allowances by the power sector as a result of renewable capacity buildout and reduced power demand in the current economic slowdown. Improvements in the economy could see more forward hedging by industrials, Ramming said. Aviation and shipping — the other sectors covered by the EU ETS in which decarbonisation has so far been limited — could be further ahead on this if they had synchronised their carbon hedging with their fuel hedging, Ramming added. But until industry steps in to fill the current gap, the EU ETS is "in no man's land", head of research at fund manager Andurand Capital, Mark Lewis, said. "Carbon this year is a price taker, not a price maker," head of market research and analysis at environmental commodities trading firm Vertis, Stefan Feuchtinger, said. "Carbon doesn't matter to the carbon price." But while Lewis sees this gap leaving space in the market open to the financial sector, attributing recent price direction and volatility to speculators, Feuchtinger believes there is still "significant" power hedging in the EU ETS, even if at much lower levels than in the past. Feuchtinger expects the carbon market to continue to be priced by the utility sector until 2026-27, when there is no longer sufficient coal in the market to justify this and pricing shifts to the industrial side. Where the carbon price will sit once it is set by industrials is "less straightforward", Feuchtinger said. Carbon capture and storage is key to this, he said, but depends on where it is based and which technology is used, requiring carbon prices in a range of €90-150/t of CO2 equivalent. And while carbon prices sitting well below these levels mean less action is currently being taken to develop solutions for industrial decarbonisation, this time delay will lead to larger price spikes in the future, he said. By Victoria Hatherick Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more