Viewpoint: Sellers target India with surplus base oils

  • Market: Oil products
  • 28/12/18

Indian base oil prices trended lower in 2018 as a surge in supplies forced sellers to compete to secure buyers in one of the few markets able to absorb a large slice of these surplus volumes.

The persistent availability of surplus supplies contrasted with 2017. Buyers had struggled to secure sufficient volumes that year because of a heavy round of planned and unexpected plant shutdowns. The delayed start-up of a new Group II unit in Saudi Arabia added to the tightness.

The tight supplies forced buyers to bid at increasingly higher levels throughout the second half of 2017. Surging crude prices during this period added to the upwards price trend.

Prices by the start of 2018 were at their highest levels in more than three years. Light-grade prices were also at unusually firm levels versus crude.

Buyers lock in large volumes in 1Q

The supply tightness throughout most of 2017 prompted buyers to lock in large volumes of spot supplies of Group I and Group II base oils from Europe and the US when they became available in late 2017 and early 2018. These supplies helped to cover the peak demand period in India before the end of the 2017-18 fiscal year on 31 March. They also helped to cover against the possibility of a further rise in prices.

But buyers by the end of the first quarter were increasingly aware of the market's different supply fundamentals compared with 2017, and of the limited room for prices to rise much further.

Buyers had already locked in unusually large volumes of supplies from the US. Most of these shipments arrived in March and April. Total imports from the US in the first four months of the year were at a record high of more than 180,000t. The volume was up from 135,000t during the same period the previous year, which had itself been a record high.

Buyers had also secured a large volume of spot supplies from Europe. Total Group I imports from the region were more than 35,000t in the first four months of the year, up from around 6,000t during the same period in 2017.

Saudi exports to India increase

Buyers were also starting to receive an increasingly large wave of Group II supplies from Saudi Arabia. The shipments followed the start-up of the new Group II unit in this market at the end of 2017. Exports from the unit began in February.

The wave of buying left many buyers with maximised credit lines. With their financing used up, they were unable to take more volumes until they liquidated some of the shipments that they had already secured. A major banking fraud case in India then prompted banks to tighten buyers' access to credit facilities. The move slowed further buyers' interest in and ability to secure additional supplies.

Base oil prices were relatively steady at firm levels in the second quarter of the year amid a standoff between buyers and sellers. Buyers targeted lower prices because of their ample stocks and signs of increasingly plentiful supplies. They expected the availability of surplus volumes to rise even more during the third quarter of the year, when demand was to slow in the largest consumer markets — the US, Europe and China.

Sellers struggle to raise prices

But sellers were targeting even higher prices because of pressure from rising feedstock costs. The light-grade base oil premium to gasoil fell to its lowest level in a year. Producers were able to avoid this kind of pressure on margins in 2017 by raising their price offers. They had much less leverage to employ similar moves in 2018 as buyers instead turned to other suppliers.

But buyers continued to top up their inventories throughout the second quarter, especially with geographically closer supplies from the Mideast Gulf. They also picked up a regular flow of US shipments, even if these volumes were much smaller than in the first quarter. They then began to target more US cargoes and some European supplies for delivery in July and late August. These would help to replenish their inventories as the monsoon season drew to a close.

The regular purchases left buyers' stocks brimming as they headed into the third quarter. But they remained comfortable seeking even more volumes to maintain high inventories. The strategy contrasted with previous years, when they typically consumed some of these inventories during the third quarter, before buying replenishment supplies at the end of the quarter.

The change of strategy followed buyers' unusually tight supply situation during the second half of 2017. For 2018 they now preferred to maintain high stocks and keep topping them up. The move exposed them to the danger of lower prices and a drop in the value of their stocks. But the continual buying also enabled them to average up or down the value of their stocks with any such change in cargo prices.

Buyers struggle to absorb oversupply

Even with this strategy, buyers struggled to absorb the wave of supplies they were offered during the third quarter, especially from South Korea. Base oil imports from this market rose in August to a record high, even with a key South Korean plant having maintenance in August and September.

The plentiful availability and buyers' large stocks curbed any impact of the unexpected shutdown of Bharat Petroleum's Group II base oils unit in August following a fire at its Mumbai refinery. The unit remained off line for the rest of the year.

Imported cargo prices began to edge lower from second-half June. But buyers' preference for more light-grade base oils, and persistent availability of heavy grade base oils, supported a faster drop in heavy-grade prices.

By August the Group II heavy grade premium to N150 had narrowed to $60/t from more than $140/t in the fourth quarter of 2017.

This heavy-grade premium to light grades then continued to narrow over the following months as producers competed increasingly aggressively for outlets. By September the spread had narrowed to $20/t and then to close to parity by the start of the fourth quarter.

Seasonal rise in demand lags expectations

Indian base oil demand typically rises from the end of the third quarter as buyers replenish stocks ahead of the peak demand period in the fourth quarter of the year. But this pick-up in requirements was much weaker than usual because buyers had kept their stocks brimming throughout.

Weak demand and plentiful availability continued to curb producers' leverage to raise their prices. This trend coincided with the sustained surge in crude prices during the third quarter. These reached a four-year high by the start of October.

Margins improve at year's end

Prices initially steadied from the start of the fourth quarter. By then cfr India prices for N70 had fallen to a discount to Singapore gasoil prices, from a premium of more than a $140/t premium early in the third quarter. The weak base oils price prompted more refiners to pour their light grades back into the diesel pool, or to hold back supplies. But the rise in base oil prices was relatively muted.

But base oil values then rebounded versus feedstock values following the sharp drop in crude price in October and early November. Some producers faced pressure to lower their prices. But even these adjustments were smaller the size of the fall in crude prices.

Prices then fell in December as Asia-Pacific producers sought to clear a wave of supplies before the end of the year. But even then the size of the drop was smaller than the fall in crude prices, leaving light-grade values especially at much firmer levels.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
02/05/24

Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining

Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell delivered a better-than-expected profit for the first quarter of 2024, helped by a strong performance from its LNG and oil product businesses. The company reported profit of $7.4bn for January-March, up sharply from an impairment-hit $474mn in the previous three months but down from $8.7bn in the first quarter of 2023. Adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items, Shell's profit came in at $7.7bn, 6pc ahead of the preceding three months and above analysts' estimates of $6.3bn-$6.5bn, although it was 20pc lower than the first quarter of 2023 when gas prices were higher. Shell's oil and gas production increased by 3pc on the quarter in January-March and was broadly flat compared with a year earlier at 2.91mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d). For the current quarter, Shell expects production in a range of 2.55mn-2.81mn boe/d, reflecting the effect of scheduled maintenance across its portfolio. The company's Integrated Gas segment delivered a profit of $2.76bn in the first quarter, up from $1.73bn in the previous three months and $2.41bn a year earlier. The segment benefited from increased LNG volumes — 7.58mn t compared to 7.06mn t in the previous quarter and 7.19mn t a year earlier — as well as favourable deferred tax movements and lower operating expenses. For the current quarter, Shell expects to produce 6.8mn-7.4mn t of LNG. In the downstream, the company's Chemicals and Products segment swung to a profit of $1.16bn during the quarter from an impairment-driven loss of $1.83bn in the previous three months, supported by a strong contribution from oil trading operations and higher refining margins driven by greater utilisation of its refineries and global supply disruptions. Shell's refinery throughput increased to 1.43mn b/d in the first quarter from 1.32mn b/d in fourth quarter of last year and 1.41mn b/d in January-March 2023. Shell has maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.344/share. It also said it has completed the $3.5bn programme of share repurchases that it announced at its previous set of results and plans to buy back another $3.5bn of its shares before the company's next quarterly results announcement. The company said it expects its capital spending for the year to be within a $22bn-$25bn range. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads


30/04/24
News
30/04/24

New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads

Washington, 30 April (Argus) — US rail regulators today issued a final rule designed to help customers switch railroads in cases of poor rail service, but it is already drawing mixed reviews. Reciprocal switching, which allows freight shippers or receivers captive to a single railroad to access to an alternate carrier, has been allowed under US Surface Transportation Board (STB) rules. But shippers had not used existing STB rules to petition for reciprocal switching in 35 years, prompting regulators to revise rules to encourage shippers to pursue switching while helping resolve service problems. "The rule adopted today has broken new ground in the effort to provide competitive options in an extraordinarily consolidated rail industry," said outgoing STB chairman Martin Oberman. The five-person board unanimously approved a rule that would allow the board to order a reciprocal switching agreement if a facility's rail service falls below specified levels. Orders would be for 3-5 years. "Given the repeated episodes of severe service deterioration in recent years, and the continuing impediments to robust and consistent rail service despite the recent improvements accomplished by Class I carriers, the board has chosen to focus on making reciprocal switching available to shippers who have suffered service problems over an extended period of time," Oberman said today. STB commissioner Robert Primus voted to approve the rule, but also said it did not go far enough. The rule adopted today is "unlikely to accomplish what the board set out to do" since it does not cover freight moving under contract, he said. "I am voting for the final rule because something is better than nothing," Primus said. But he said the rule also does nothing to address competition in the rail industry. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) is reviewing the 154-page final rule, but carriers have been historically opposed to reciprocal switching proposals. "Railroads have been clear about the risks of expanded switching and the resulting slippery slope toward unjustified market intervention," AAR said. But the trade group was pleased that STB rejected "previous proposals that amounted to open access," which is a broad term for proposals that call for railroads to allow other carriers to operate over their tracks. The American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association declined to comment but has indicated it does not expect the rule to have an appreciable impact on shortline traffic, service or operations. Today's rule has drawn mixed reactions from some shipper groups. The National Industrial Transportation League (NITL), which filed its own reciprocal switching proposal in 2011, said it was encouraged by the collection of service metrics required under the rule. But "it is disheartened by its narrow scope as it does not appear to apply to the vast majority of freight rail traffic that moves under contracts or is subject to commodity exemptions," said NITL executive director Nancy O'Liddy, noting it was a departure from the group's original petition which sought switching as a way to facilitate railroad economic competitiveness. The Chlorine Institute said, in its initial analysis, that it does not "see significant benefit for our shipper members since it excludes contract traffic which covers the vast majority of chlorine and other relevant chemical shipments." By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

HSFO demand supports Rotterdam 1Q bunker sales


30/04/24
News
30/04/24

HSFO demand supports Rotterdam 1Q bunker sales

London, 30 April (Argus) — Total sales of fossil bunker fuels and marine biodiesel blends at the port of Rotterdam were 2.45mn t in the first quarter this year, up by 13pc compared with the final three months of 2023 but 9pc lower year on year, according to official port data. Sales firmed across the board quarter on quarter, even though market participants had described spot bunker fuel demand in the region as "mostly limited" and shipping demand as lacklustre. High-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) sales rose the most. Disruption in the Red Sea resulted in many vessels re-routing around the southern tip of Africa, increasing the incentive of bunkering with HSFO as opposed to very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and marine gasoil (MGO), according to market participants. The longer journeys meant that vessels on the route increased their fuel consumption to reduce delivery delays, supporting conventional bunker fuel sales at Rotterdam. Higher prices for HSFO in Singapore also helped support HSFO demand in Rotterdam. Marine biodiesel sales at Rotterdam increased by 13pc on the quarter and by 76pc on the year in January-March, despite the Dutch government's decision to half the Dutch renewable tickets (HBE-G) multiplier for shipping at the turn of the year. The move has led to a substantial increase in prices for advanced fatty acid methyl ester (Fame) 0 blends in the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) hub. The inclusion of shipping in the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS) from January may have lent support to demand for biofuel blends. Marine biodiesel made up 11pc of total bunker fuel sales at Rotterdam in the first quarter, the same share as the previous quarter, which was a record high. LNG bunker sales at Rotterdam in January-March soared by 45pc on the quarter and by 150pc on the year. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Rotterdam bunker sales t Fuel 1Q24 4Q23 1Q23 q-o-q% y-o-y% VLSFO & ULSFO 857,579 847,862 1,205,288 1 -29 HSFO 818,028 643,218 809,871 27 1 MGO/MDO 383,409 361,585 468,373 6 -18 Biofuel blends 262,634 233,108 149,206 13 76 Total 2,453,610 2,177,078 2,685,515 13 -9 LNG (m³) 131,960 91,305 52,777 45 150 Port of Rotterdam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

G7 countries put timeframe on 'unabated' coal phase-out


30/04/24
News
30/04/24

G7 countries put timeframe on 'unabated' coal phase-out

London, 30 April (Argus) — G7 countries today committed to phasing out "unabated coal power generation" by 2035 — putting a timeframe on a coal phase-out for the first time. The communique, from a meeting of G7 climate, energy and environment ministers in Turin, northern Italy, represents "an historic agreement" on coal, Canadian environment minister Steven Guilbeault said. Although most G7 nations have set a deadline for phasing out coal-fired power, the agreement marks a step forward for Japan in particular, which had previously not made the commitment, and is a "milestone moment", senior policy advisor at think-tank E3G Katrine Petersen said. The G7 countries are Italy — this year's host — Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US. The EU is a non-enumerated member. But the pledge contains a caveat in its reference to "unabated" coal-fired power — suggesting that abatement technologies such as carbon capture and storage could justify its use, while some of the wording around a deadline is less clear. The communique sets a timeframe of "the first half of [the] 2030s or in a timeline consistent with keeping a limit of 1.5°C temperature rise within reach, in line with countries' net-zero pathways". OECD countries should end coal use by 2030 and the rest of the world by 2040, in order to align with the global warming limit of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels set out in the Paris Agreement, according to research institute Climate Analytics. The countries welcomed the outcomes of the UN Cop 28 climate summit , pledging to "accelerate the phase out of unabated fossil fuels so as to achieve net zero in energy systems by 2050". It backed the Cop 28 goal to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030 and added support for a global target for energy storage in the power sector of 1.5TW by 2030. The group committed to submit climate plans — known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — with "the highest possible ambition" from late this year or in early 2025. And it also called on the IEA to "provide recommendations" next year on how to implement a transition away from fossil fuels. The G7 also reiterated its commitment to a "fully or predominantly decarbonised power sector by 2035" — first made in May 2022 and highlighted roles for carbon management, carbon markets, hydrogen and biofuels. Simon Stiell, head of UN climate body the UNFCCC, urged the G7 and G20 countries to lead on climate action, in a recent speech . The group noted in today's outcome that "further actions from all countries, especially major economies, are required". The communique broadly reaffirmed existing positions on climate finance, although any concrete steps are not likely to be taken ahead of Cop 29 in November. The group underlined its pledge to end "inefficient fossil fuel subsidies" by 2025 or earlier, but added a new promise to "promote a common definition" of the term, which is likely to increase countries' accountability. The group will report on its progress towards ending those subsidies next year, it added. Fostering energy security The communique placed a strong focus on the need for "diverse, resilient, and responsible energy technology supply chains, including manufacturing and critical minerals". It noted the important of "guarding against possible weaponisation of economic dependencies on critical minerals and critical raw materials" — many of which are mined and processed outside the G7 group. Energy security held sway on the group's take on natural gas. It reiterated its stance that gas investments "can be appropriate… if implemented in a manner consistent with our climate objectives" and noted that increased LNG deliveries could play a key role. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Pemex fuel output surges, imports down in March


29/04/24
News
29/04/24

Pemex fuel output surges, imports down in March

Mexico City, 29 April (Argus) — Mexico's state-owned Pemex increased its gasoline and diesel output by 32pc in March from a year earlier, cutting its road fuels imports by 25pc year over year. Pemex's gasoline and diesel output at its six domestic refineries amounted to 562,300 b/d in March, up from 427,100 b/d in the same month of 2023, according to the company's monthly data published on 26 April. Gasoline production rose by 27pc to 350,400 b/d in March year over year. Gasoline output increased by 13pc from February. Pemex's gasoline imports fell by 16pc in March from a year prior, driven by increased domestic production. On a monthly basis, gasoline imports fell by 18pc from February. The company's diesel output surged by 40pc to 211,900 b/d in March year over year, driving imports down by 43pc to 112,500 b/d (see table) . Diesel production was 26pc higher in March compared with February. Road fuels output increased as Pemex's refining system processed 23pc more crude — 1.06mn b/d — in March from the prior year, as result of billion-dollar investments since 2019 to rehabilitate Pemex's refineries and a decline in crude exports . Pemex's regular 87-octane gasoline domestic sales remain almost steady at 527,400 b/d in March from a year earlier. In contrast, 92-octane premium gasoline sales rose by 11pc to 132,800 b/d year over year, as demand for premium gasoline in Mexico has increased this year. The company's diesel sales ticked up by 1pc in March from a year earlier and were 3pc above February sales. Pemex's domestic sales of refined products accounted for 75.6pc of the company's total revenue in the first quarter, Pemex said during its earnings call on 26 April. This compares to a 70.8pc share in full-year 2023, the company said. By Antonio Gozain Pemex fuel production, imports and sales '000 b/d Product Mar 24 Feb 24 Mar 23 YOY ±% Monthly ±% Production Gasoline 350 310 275.5 27.2 12.9 Diesel 212 168 152 39.8 26.0 LPG 110.0 104.0 100.3 9.7 5.8 Jet fuel 38 38 46 -17.1 1.6 Imports Gasoline 307 376 366.0 -16.1 -18.4 Diesel 112 119 196 -42.5 -5.1 LPG 69 100 101 -31.8 -31.1 Internal sales Regular gasoline 527 520 527 0.1 1.5 Premium gasoline 133 134 120 10.9 -0.7 Diesel 261.0 254.0 258 1.2 2.8 ULSD 30.0 28 32 -4.8 8.3 Jet fuel 95 97 94 1.0 -2.3 LPG 167 194 164 2.0 -13.8 Jet fuel and premium gasoline imports and ULSD imports and production are not broken out Pemex Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more