Reporting market moving events as they happen

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well- informed decisions.

Our world-class team of market reporters and journalists specialise in the coverage of commodity markets across the globe. We are in constant contact with industry participants, revealing, reporting and analysing the events that shape the global energy and commodities landscape.

With our news and market commentary opportunities to further your strategies are uncovered and clarified. We illuminate specific aspects of the markets directly relevant to your business.

Global coverage through a local lens

icon

143,000+ news, commentary and analysis articles published each year

As markets move, so does our coverage. Every day of every month of every year, we are tracking, analysing and commentating on every market

icon

800+ news stories published every day

We are constantly publishing insightful new stories throughout the day, reporting events that shape the global energy and commodities markets

icon

500+ editorial staff globally

Our specialist team of reporters and journalists are located where the action happens, reporting from every key energy and commodity hub across the globe

Latest news

Explore the latest market moving news from Argus.

Latest news
17/12/25

Viewpoint: Dutch ticket move to help low-emission fuels

Viewpoint: Dutch ticket move to help low-emission fuels

London, 17 December (Argus) — A change in the EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) is pushing the Netherlands, a key renewable fuel ticket market in Europe, to pivot from compliance based on energy share to greenhouse gas (GHG) savings, and should benefit fuels with higher emission savings. The Netherlands will switch to GHG-based ERE tickets on 1 January 2026. The mandate will apply retroactively if the legislation is passed beyond that date. The move more closely aligns Dutch compliance with Germany's THG quota and accelerates a broader shift to reward fuels with high greenhouse gas (GHG) savings, as well as RED Annex IX Part A feedstock status, positioning advanced Fame, hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) and biomethane as front-runners. RED III's overall 2030 target gives EU member states the option to reduce their GHGs by 14.5pc, or to have a 29pc renewable energy share in their overall fuel mix. This is a significant step-up from RED II, which only required states to have 14pc renewable energy in their mix by 2030. Most major states incentivise the uptake of RED targets through the use of renewable fuel ticket systems. Tickets are used by companies supplying liquid or gaseous fossil fuels in the country and are obligated to pay excise duty or energy tax on fuels. They can be traded to meet obligations and are primarily generated via the blending of renewable fuels into fossil fuels, with additional sources of tickets including electricity used to charge e-vehicles. The Dutch change will benefit fuels with higher emissions savings and move away from a more simplistic approach where one HBE ticket is equal to 1 GJ of energy use, with multipliers available based on feedstock type. The current four HBE categories will expand to 16 types of ERE tickets , defined by transport sector — land, inland waterways and maritime — as well as feedstock. An HBE-to-ERE ratio of 1:46, as per the Dutch Emissions Authority's (NEa) guidance, has already begun to guide transitional pricing. All 2025 HBEs must be submitted by 30 April, after which any non-redeemed HBEs will be converted into EREs, subject to a legal cap on the amount that can be carried from year to year. Premiums for RED Annex IX Part A fuels should grow as demand for corresponding ERE-Gs does the same. But ERE-B values — comprising fuels from RED Annex IX Part B feedstocks — will be affected by a mismatch between RED III vs FuelEU Maritime rules . Shipping mismatch Under FuelEU, a separate legislation from RED III, Part B fuels remain eligible, whereas the domestic transposition of RED III means EREs count the same as using fossil fuel for only the maritime obligation. Shipping vessels are likely to either bunker elsewhere, or opt for Part A fuels that can meet both mandates. Maritime suppliers can source up to 0.9pc of their mix from road and inland waterways, preserving a narrow role for Part B fuels via cross-sector ERE flows. But EREs from shipping cannot be used by land suppliers. Aviation fuel blending will no longer generate Dutch tickets, removing a source of Part B tickets, as the bio-component of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) has mostly been produced from used cooking oil. Overall, liquidity in the Netherlands will fragment by sector — LREs for land, BREs for inland shipping and ZREs for maritime shipping — all taking a Dutch acronym. Across the EU, GHG-based transport fuel mandates with tight feedstock caps should tighten supply of Part A fuels and renewable fuels from non-biological origin (RFNBOs), while remaining energy-based systems may lean on conventional and Part B biofuels. The Dutch-German axis, as the largest GHG-based ticket markets, may increasingly anchor to Part A fuel tickets. Advanced biofuel suppliers will be monitoring which market provides better ticket value for their fuel at a given time. France also plans to replace its energy-based TIRUERT tickets with GHG-based IRICCs in 2027 . Outside the RED III remit, the UK is consulting on whether to follow suit as it updates its RTFO scheme; consultation updates are expected in early 2026, and any resulting changes are expected in 2027. By Madeleine Jenkins Fuel ticket systems in Europe GHG-based renewable fuel ticket systems Germany – THG (€/t CO₂e) Austria - THG (€/t CO₂e) Netherlands – ERE (€/kg CO₂e) Energy-based renewable fuel ticket systems Belgium – HEE (€/megajoule) Ireland – RTFO (€/megajoule) Italy – CIC (€/10 Gcal) France - TIRUERT (€/m3, €/MWh) Spain – CCRs (€/toe) Portugal – TbD (€/toe) Volumetric-based renewable fuel ticket systems UK – RTFO (£/litre) Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
Latest news

EcoCeres exports first SAF output from Malaysia's Johor


17/12/25
Latest news
17/12/25

EcoCeres exports first SAF output from Malaysia's Johor

Singapore, 17 December (Argus) — Hong Kong-based biofuels producer EcoCeres has exported the first sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) volumes produced at its new hydrotreated biofuels plant in Johor, Malaysia, according to a company LinkedIn post and company sources. EcoCeres exported 10,000t of SAF last week, a company source said. The cargo was purchased by Mitsui Energy Trading Singapore (Mets), a subsidiary of Mitsui, and was loaded on a vessel that sailed from Tanjung Langsat and is bound for Europe, EcoCeres said in its LinkedIn post. The Medium Range vessel Stolt Glory loaded 10,000t of SAF from Tanjung Langsat on 5 December, and is due to reach Rotterdam in mid-January, according to Kpler data. But another company source declined to confirm if this was EcoCeres' cargo. The biofuels producer previously produced its first on-specification SAF volumes at Johor in October . The plant, which can produce a maximum of 420,000 t/year of SAF and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), is now running at full rates, a company source said. The Argus fob ARA SAF price fell to nearly four-month lows of $2,247/t on 3 December, but has since risen slightly to $2,281/t as of 16 December. The decline was likely on the back of a lack of urgency among EU suppliers to fulfill mandates at the start of the new obligation year, although some volumes were traded this week , possibly because buyers were locking in deals in advance. EcoCeres also operates another 350,000 t/yr SAF and HVO plant in Jiangsu, China. By Sarah Giam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Latest news

Viewpoint: Global trade shifts to add pressure to MRs


17/12/25
Latest news
17/12/25

Viewpoint: Global trade shifts to add pressure to MRs

London, 17 December (Argus) — Lower US and west African gasoline demand is likely to keep European Medium Range (MR) tanker rates drifting in 2026. The US has become more reliant on domestic gasoline production, as weaker European refinery output made oil products from the region more expensive and uncompetitive. Freight rates on average in 2025 on the UK Continent to US Atlantic coast route stood at $22.46/t, compared with $26.38/t in the same period in 2024, as US gasoline imports on MRs have plunged since mid-2025, slumping to just 90,000 b/d in November from 349,000 b/d in May. Trade on the UK Continent to west Africa MR route has also waned, although it rallied briefly in late 2025 as a result of a now-scrapped Nigerian import tariff on gasoline and diesel and a seasonal increase in demand. Rates averaged $30.84/t in 2025, down from $33.67/t in the same period a year earlier. Nigeria's independently-owned 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery cut its gasoline asking prices from 872 naira/l ($0.60/l) in early November to N828/l ($0.57/l) by 10 November. This will probably keep European imports uneconomical for Nigerian buyers. Dangote said it will supply 50mn litres/d (315,000 b/d) of gasoline in December and January to its domestic market, and 57mn l/d (359,100 b/d) from February, which could make imports from Europe largely redundant. For comparison, gasoline consumption in Nigeria was around 50.9mn l/d (320,670 b/d) in the 12 months to October. But sanctions on Russian oil firms Lukoil and Rosneft have weighed on diesel exports from India and Turkey, creating concerns about European supplies and turned participants' focus towards other exporters. This could provide support to the transatlantic rate, as participants will seek to replace Russian-related product with non-Russian, potentially importing more diesel from the US. US spat US president Donald Trump's build-up of military hardware in Caribbean waters could put 20pc of US Gulf coast refined product exports in shaky territory if tension between the US and Venezuela escalates into open conflict. Over the past 12 months, the Caribbean region — which includes buyers in Colombia, Dominican Republic, the US Virgin Islands, Jamaica and Saint Lucia as well as Central American countries such as Panama — has imported the majority of US Gulf coast refined products at an average of 643,300 b/d, Vortexa data show. These shipments were primarily diesel and gasoline, alongside smaller amounts of naphtha. Venezuela's naphtha imports from the US Gulf in May 2025, when the last of US sanction waivers expired, were 87,500 b/d, according to Vortexa. The product is used to dilute the country's extra-heavy crude. Only 15,000 b/d of naphtha flowed back to Venezuela when Chevron received a new waiver in August. Venezuelan buyers have turned to Russian supply from the Mediterranean carried on larger tankers, removing tonne-mile demand overall from the MR segment while lowering the amount of physical activity within the US Gulf coast spot market. Escalating conflict between the US and Venezuela could add war-risk premium insurance costs to Caribbean islands and Colombian trade, making Russian suppliers more competitive and potentially rerouting some of the 420,900 b/d the US Gulf coast exports to other destinations. This could make suppliers like Russia more competitive for this traditionally US Gulf coast-supplied region. If shipowners avoid the Caribbean region because of a conflict, this could increase competition for west coast South America-bound voyages and could boost Panama Canal transit if demand from Chile and Peru increases. This would raise the average auction cost for the Panamax locks for MRs, which typically carry refined products from the US Gulf coast. By Erika Tsirikou and Ross Griffith Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Latest news

Viewpoint: Dry weather to ease Australia's coal queues


17/12/25
Latest news
17/12/25

Viewpoint: Dry weather to ease Australia's coal queues

Sydney, 17 December (Argus) — Dry weather and minimal maintenance over January-March 2026 could support coal deliveries to Australia's Newcastle port, as well as exports from the thermal coal hub, which would help it recover from severe disruptions that took place during May–September. Newcastle has a 57pc chance of receiving 339–450mm of rain over the first three months of 2026, slightly above its historical median of 338.5mm but still below levels likely to cause port-side or rail disruptions, data from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) show. The coastal city received approximately 517mm of rain during May–July this year, data from BoM show, during which Newcastle port implemented multiple rounds of vessel movement restrictions. The weather challenges pushed up the average vessel queue at the Port Waratah Coal Services (PWCS) up to 60 ships in July, from 41 vessels a year earlier. PWCS has partly cleared its ship queue since, but it still hovered at 36 vessels in November, up from just 11 vessels a year earlier. Demand in January-March Weaker demand during the first quarter of 2026 could help ease vessel congestion at Newcastle port's coal terminals. Exports to key markets in northeast Asia including Japan, China and South Korea typically decrease in the first quarter, after the peak winter season. La Nina weather conditions in Japan are expected to weaken in the second half of winter, according to the Japan Weather Association (JWA). The country faced a severe cold season in February this year, but the JWA predicts an arrival of spring-like conditions in February 2026. This could ease demand for coal exports to Japan during that period. But weaker demand could put pressure on coal producers if prices fall steeply next year. Newcastle high-calorific value (CV) NAR 6,000 kcal/kg coal prices trended downwards from February-April after the winter season in Japan, reaching its lowest level of $91.71/t fob Newcastle at the end of April. High-CV NAR 6,000 kcal/kg coal is usually exported to Japan and Taiwan, while China mainly imports high-ash NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal from Australia. If the premium between NAR 6,000 kcal/kg and high-ash coal tapers, producers are likely to maximise profits by selling more coal to China. Chinese utilities usually buy Australian coal to take advantage of the price arbitrage compared with domestic Chinese coal supplies delivered from north China ports. But the price of domestic coal in China was volatile from November 2024-January 2025, owing to safety inspections at major coal mines in the country. Thermal coal exports out of Australia averaged 15.4mn t/month in the first quarter of 2025, according to customs data, which is consistent with averages recorded in the first quarters of 2023-25. But this is lower than the yearly average of 16.8mn-17.3mn t/month during 2023-25. Movements to port Producers are also likely to face fewer rail disruptions over the first quarter of next year. Australian state-owned rail operator the Australian Rail Track (ARTC) has just a single maintenance shutdown planned over the period. It will close its Hunter Valley coal lines — which link New South Wales mines to the port — for 72 hours in February (see table) . ARTC conducted four rounds of major maintenance over July–November this year, pushing down deliveries to PWCS' terminals at Newcastle port. Producers sent 87mn t of coal to the terminals in January-November, down by 4.4pc on the year, data from PWCS show. By Avinash Govind and Nadhir Mokhtar ARTC track maintenance Date Lines Length of Time (hrs) 10-13 February Warabrook/Kooragang to Muswellbrook 72 10-13 February Muswellbrook to Ulan 72 10-13 February Muswellbrook to Turrawan 72 30 March-2 April Warabrook / Kooragang to Muswellbrook 48 30 March-2 April Muswellbrook to Ulan 72 30 March-2 April Muswellbrook to Turrawan 72 16–19 May Warabrook/Kooragang to Muswellbrook 72 16–19 May Muswellbrook to Ulan 72 16–19 May Muswellbrook to Turrawan 72 16–19 May Islington Junction to Port Waratah 48 16–19 May Islington Junction to Telarah 72 21-24 July Warabrook / Kooragang to Muswellbrook 72 21-24 July Muswellbrook to Ulan 72 21-24 July Muswellbrook to Turrawan 72 22-25 September Warabrook / Kooragang to Muswellbrook 72 22-25 September Muswellbrook to Ulan 72 22-25 September Muswellbrook to Turrawan 72 17-20 November Warabrook / Kooragang to Muswellbrook 72 17-20 November Muswellbrook to Ulan 72 17-20 November Muswellbrook to Turrawan 72 Source: Australian Rail Track Corportation (ARTC) Australia coal prices 2023-2025 $/t Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Latest news

Australia coal, Fe prices to fall; LNG up: Treasury


17/12/25
Latest news
17/12/25

Australia coal, Fe prices to fall; LNG up: Treasury

Sydney, 17 December (Argus) — Australian iron ore, coking coal, and thermal coal prices are expected to decline by the end of December 2026, while LNG prices may rise from current levels, according to Treasury forecasts released on 17 December. Australian commodity prices are expected to return to long-run fundamental levels, Treasury said in its Mid-Year Fiscal and Economic Outlook for the 2025-26 financial year ending 30 June. Thermal Coal Australia's thermal coal prices have been supported by ex-China demand since Treasury released its July 2025-June 2026 budget on 25 March, Treasury said. But it does not expect this trend to continue. Treasury forecasts Australian thermal coal spot prices will fall to $70/t on a fob basis by the end of December 2026, down from current levels. Argus ' Australian NAR 6,000 kcal/kg fob Newcastle price was last assessed at $108.46/t on 16 December, up from $95.62/t on 25 March. Australian thermal coal exports to China fell 11pc on the year in January-October ( see table ), while shipments to Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, and Malaysia rose, data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show. Steelmaking Inputs Chinese economic policy support has lifted iron ore and metallurgical coal prices since March, Treasury said. But it expects Australian iron ore and coking coal spot prices to fall to $60/t and $140/t fob, respectively, by the end of 2026. Argus ' metallurgical coal premium hard low-volatile fob Australia price was last assessed at $215.10/t on 16 December, while its iron ore fines 61pc Fe (ICX) fob Australia netback price was last assessed at $90.55/t. Treasury also expects mining investment to remain unchanged over the next two years, largely because of the iron ore and coking coal sectors. Iron ore producers may invest in projects to maintain production, but coking coal producers are expected to run down their capital stock, Treasury said. Producers are looking to sell or finance around six Queensland coking coal mines, a market participant told Argus on 2 December. Petroleum LNG prices have declined since March because of China's shift toward non-Australian gas, Treasury said. Australian LNG spot prices are expected to reach $10/mm Btu by the end of December 2026, according to Treasury forecasts. Argus ' Gladstone fob price — an LNG netback indicator — was last assessed at $9.01/mm Btu on 16 December, down from $12.90/mm Btu on 25 March. China plans to prioritise pipeline and domestic gas over LNG imports in the coming years, PetroChina International's global head of LNG Yaoyu Zhang said on 4 December. Treasury also expects global oil prices to hover around $66/bl over the next four years, down from its March estimate of $81/bl. Australia's government will raise less revenue from its petroleum resource rent tax than previously expected because of the downgrade, the agency added. The tax is forecast to generate A$1.5bn in 2025-26, down from the earlier estimate of A$1.95bn. By Avinash Govind Treasury Commodity Forecasts (Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook) $ Commodity Argus Price (most recent)* Forecasted Price* Change (%) Coking Coal 215.1/t 140/t -35.0 Thermal Coal 95.62/t 70/t -26.8 Iron Ore 90.55/t 60/t -33.7 LNG 9.01/mm Btu 10/mm Btu 11.0 * Argus' Australian NAR 6,000 kcal/kg fob Newcastle; metallurgical coal premium hard low-volatile fob Australia; Argus' Gladstone fob; Iron ore fines 61pc Fe (ICX) fob Australia netback * fob Australia basis, at end of December 2026 Argus, Commonwealth of Australia Australian thermal coal exports mn t Market Jan - Oct '25 Jan - Oct '24 YTD Change (%) China 53 60 -11 India 2.9 3.4 -16 Japan 59 59 0.5 South Korea 11 9.7 12 Vietnam 13 9.6 37 Malaysia 5.9 5.4 11 Australian Bureau of Statistics Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more