Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

SE Asian POME sellers seek support from EU legislators

  • Market: Biofuels
  • 25/05/21

Southeast Asian palm oil mill effluent (POME) producers are eyeing legislative developments in Europe with concern after Germany decided to not double count the product towards its renewable mandate.

Germany is increasing its greenhouse gas reduction obligation to 25pc by 2030 from 6pc currently with a minimum 2.6pc share of advanced feedstocks, which include POME, listed under Annex IX part A of the Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II).

But anything blended above the minimum share will be eligible for double counting towards mandates, except for POME, and Berlin is calling for it to be struck off the list completely.

POME is considered an advanced feedstock because it is derived from waste water generated from the palm oil production process and thus has a much smaller carbon footprint than crop-based feedstocks.

But its lingering connotations with palm oil make it politically toxic for many stakeholders as environmental groups cite long-running deforestation and sustainability concerns with its cultivation. The US even banned Malaysian palm oil producers Sime Darby and FGV last year because of alleged human rights abuses at their plantations, heaping further scorn on the vegetable oil.

RED II already states that palm oil should be phased out of the biofuels mix by 2030 because of its high indirect land use change cost and several EU member states are bringing this target forward despite Malaysian and Indonesian palm oil producers contesting the changes with the World Trade Organisation.

Germany will ban palm-based biofuels from 2023, following in the footsteps of France, Austria and the Netherlands, which have either already administered or planned banishment of the vegetable oil by next year.

There has also been additional scrutiny surrounding the quality of POME with reports of bad batches being delivered, off-specification product or supplies mixed with other cheaper oils, further denting its reputation.

But POME suppliers maintain that their wares are a waste material that will be produced anyway and in doing so offers much higher greenhouse gas (GHG) savings than palm oil, which is why it is listed under part A in the first place.

Traders also pointed out that POME is not widely used in Germany and that it will still contribute to the 2.6pc part A target so the impact may be limited, though their optimism was tempered by the possibility of a domino effect across other EU countries, which may follow the lead of the German parliament in disincentivising the product.

This would not be without precedent as palm fatty acid distillate was once in a similar position where it was being double counted towards European mandates, before attitude towards it soured and governments one by one reined in stimulus packages, with Finland the only country that still classifies it as a waste product.

If the same scenario plays out for POME, it may cause havoc for biofuels producers and blenders already struggling with a dearth of waste-based feedstocks.

Of the raw materials listed under part A, POME has so far been the most scalable and widely used, with a huge chunk going to Chinese renewable diesel producers, which then ship their product to Europe. But because of their processes, Chinese producers — which use multiple feedstocks, mainly POME and UCO — will find it difficult to separate the final product according to the feedstock used.

Actual POME consumption in the biofuels mix is difficult to establish as it trades and is listed under various HS codes, but the maximum potential volumes out of Malaysia and Indonesia are estimated at around 1.2mn-1.3mn t/yr.

If these supplies are no longer available, blenders across Europe will struggle to meet ambitious renewable transport targets, particularly in the short to medium term, until other part A feedstocks are able to pick up the slack.

Pressure will be further heaped on used cooking oil (UCO), which is already the most widely used waste-based feedstock and trading at record-high prices of close to $1,300/t fob China bulk because of excess demand.

UCO is listed under Annex IX part B and so while it is double counted towards mandates, it has a soft cap of 1.7pc under RED II, though several countries have stipulated in excess of this, including Germany pitching a 1.9pc share of the renewable transport fuel mix.

A detrimental impact on POME prices will also be inevitable, the extent of which will depend on legislative support, or lack thereof, provided by European governments.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

US Senate bill would cut extra subsidy for SAF


16/06/25
News
16/06/25

US Senate bill would cut extra subsidy for SAF

New York, 16 June (Argus) — The US Senate tax-writing committee is proposing cutting a tax credit's extra subsidy for low-carbon jet fuels over road fuels and introducing less-restrictive limits on foreign biofuel feedstocks, major shifts from current law and the House version of the bill. Republicans have planned to use a far-reaching budget bill this year to alter climate policies from the Inflation Reduction Act, which created a new tax credit for clean fuel producers known as "45Z". The House passed its version of the bill last month, which would have kept the general structure of that incentive — upping fuel subsidies as emissions fall — and extended the incentive by four additional years through 2031. The credit took effect this year. But the Senate Finance Committee in draft language released Monday floated its own changes, suggesting that Republican lawmakers are not yet aligned on how to alter the subsidy just weeks before President Donald Trump has pushed lawmakers to pass the major bill into law. The Senate draft proposes offering a maximum subsidy of $1/USG for all fuels based on their carbon intensities starting next year. The House made no changes to that part of the law, which currently offers road fuels up to $1/USG and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) up to $1.75/USG, plus inflation adjustments for all types of fuel. That change would reduce the incentive's upfront costs — potentially alleviating concerns among some conservative lawmakers that the bill would add to the budget deficit — but could reduce alternative fuel availability for airlines and upend many refiners' plans to convert more renewable diesel output to SAF. "We have always supported tech-neutral biofuel incentives and at first blush the Senate draft seems to be moving toward making 45Z truly tech-neutral," said David Fialkov, executive vice president of government affairs at the National Association of Truck Stop Operators, which had opposed treating aviation fuels differently than road fuels. The Senate proposal would also scrap a provision in the House bill that starting next year would restrict eligibility to fuels derived from North American feedstocks. Instead, the Senate committee has proposed cutting subsidies for fuels from foreign feedstocks by 20pc while still allowing them some credit. That change would provide more flexibility than the House bill to refineries that have scaled up biofuel production in recent years by relying on foreign inputs like used cooking oil and tallow. The Senate draft is just a proposal and could be changed. Both bills notably would extend 45Z and prevent regulators from considering indirect land use change emissions. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US biofuel feed prices jump on blending plan


16/06/25
News
16/06/25

US biofuel feed prices jump on blending plan

Houston, 16 June (Argus) — Prices for US biofuel feedstocks have risen sharply since the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) late last week proposed ambitious biofuel blending targets for the next two years along with lower incentives for using foreign feedstocks. Futures prices for soybean oil, the most widely used input for biodiesel production, have led the feedstock gains as the market prices in potentially higher demand. The Nymex front-month contract for soybean oil rose by 6.3pc on 13 June and by an additional 7.8pc on Monday to 54.6¢/lb, the highest since October 2023. The proposed targets , released on 13 June, would mandate that an equivalent amount of 5.61bn USG of biomass-based diesel be blended in 2026 and 5.86bn USG in 2027. The proposed volumes exceeded most market expectations and industry requests of 5.25bn USG and were significantly higher than the current-year mandate of 3.35bn USG, fueling expectations for increased biofuel feedstocks demand. In addition, domestic feedstocks may face reduced competition from foreign feedstocks under the proposal, which would cut federal Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credit generation by 50pc for imported biofuels or fuels produced from foreign feedstocks. Biomass-based diesel D4 RINs for the current year rallied Monday morning, trading between 127-132¢/RIN, up significantly from Friday's close of 109¢/RIN. Used cooking oil (UCO) railcar volumes to the US Gulf coast were reported trading at 59¢/lb early Monday morning, a 3.5pc jump from Friday's closing price of 57¢/lb, with additional selling interest emerging in the 60s¢/lb. UCO offers for volumes into California were noted in the high 60s¢/lb, up from last week's close in the high 50s¢/lb. Distillers corn oil (DCO) fob truck volumes in the Midwest traded at 61¢/lb on Monday morning, reflecting a 9pc jump from Friday's close of 56¢/lb. Poultry fat fob truck volumes in the southeast were offered in the low 50s¢/lb, up from last week's closing levels in the low 40s¢/lb, but buying interest has not emerged at those levels. Activity for other renewable feedstocks remains limited for now, but market participants anticipate increased trading later this week, driven by the recent proposal and gains in futures markets. The EPA proposal is currently in an open comment period, with a public hearing scheduled for 8 July. By Payne Williams and Jamuna Gautam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK's Ensus warns of biofuels plant closure threat


16/06/25
News
16/06/25

UK's Ensus warns of biofuels plant closure threat

London, 16 June (Argus) — The UK's second largest bioethanol producer, CropEnergies' Ensus, said today it is at risk of imminent closure as result of the US-UK trade deal agreed at the beginning of May. The US-UK agreement removes import tariffs on 1.4bn l/yr of US ethanol entering the UK, equivalent of the country's entire demand. This has "fundamentally undermined" Ensus' business, it said. The company's plant at Wilton in northeast England is capable of producing 400mn l/yr. Ensus UK chairman Grant Pearson called for the UK government "to find a solution to a crisis of its own making." The call comes shortly after ABF Sugar said it is prepared to shut its 416mn l/yr Saltend plant, again unless the government intervenes. Ensus said it and ABF subsidiary Vivergo Fuels have held talks with the UK government, looking for ways to boost UK ethanol demand above the US quota level. Earlier this month ABF Sugar chief executive Kenward suggested raising the UK's ethanol blending mandate from E10 to E15, saying this would give the industry "room to breathe". Vivergo Fuels told Argus an E15 mandate would increase demand by 660mn l/yr, and said there is "significant potential for increased use of bioethanol in other transport modes such as marine and aviation." Kenward also proposed a support package , estimating the bioethanol sector would need £75mn/yr ($100mn) for up to two years. Vivergo said a ongoing review of the UK Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) "is an opportunity to both increase its overall ambition and ensure it is working effectively to achieve its primary aim of greenhouse gas reduction." By Toby Shay Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EPA proposes record US biofuel mandates: Update


13/06/25
News
13/06/25

EPA proposes record US biofuel mandates: Update

Updates with new pricing, reactions throughout. New York, 13 June (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration today proposed requiring record biofuel blending into the US fuel supply over the next two years, including unexpectedly strong quotas for biomass-based diesel. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal, which still must be finalized, projects oil refiners will need to blend 5.61bn USG of biomass-based diesel to comply with requirements in 2026 and 5.86bn USG in 2027. Those estimates — while uncertain — would be a 67pc increase in 2026 and a 75pc increase in 2027 from this year's 3.35bn USG requirement, above what most industry groups had sought. The proposal alone is likely to boost biofuel production, which has been down to start the year as biorefineries have struggled to grapple with uncertainty about future blend mandates, the halting rollout of a new clean fuel tax credit, and higher import tariffs. The National Oilseed Processors Association said hiking the biomass-based diesel mandate to the proposed levels would bring "idled capacity back online" and spur "additional investments" in the biofuel supply chain. The EPA proposal also would halve Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits generated from foreign biofuels and biofuels produced from foreign feedstocks, a major change that could increase US crop demand and hurt renewable diesel plants that source many of their inputs from abroad. US farm groups have lamented refiners' rising use of Chinese used cooking oil and Brazilian tallow to make renewable diesel, and EPA's proposal if finalized would sharply reduce the incentive to do so. Biofuel imports from producers with major refineries abroad, notably including Neste, would also be far less attractive. The proposal asks for comment, however, on a less restrictive policy that would only treat fuels and feedstocks from "a subset of countries" differently. And EPA still expects a substantial role for imported product regardless, estimating in a regulatory impact analysis that domestic fuels from domestic feedstocks will make up about 62pc of biomass-based diesel supply next year. The Renewable Fuel Standard program requires US oil refiners and importers to blend biofuels into the conventional fuel supply or buy credits from those who do. One USG of corn ethanol generates one RIN, but more energy-dense fuels like renewable diesel can earn more. In total, the rule would require 24.02bn RINs to be retired next year and 24.46bn RINs in 2027. That includes a specific 7.12bn RIN mandate for biomass-based diesel in 2026 and 7.5bn in 2027, and an implied mandate for corn ethanol flat from prior years at 15bn RINs. EPA currently sets biomass-based diesel mandates in physical gallons but is proposing a change to align with how targets for other program categories work. US soybean oil futures surged following the release of the EPA proposal, closing at their highest price in more than four weeks, and RIN credits rallied similarly on bullish expectations for higher biofuel demand and domestic feedstock prices. D4 biomass-diesel credits traded as high as 117.75¢/RIN, up from a 102.5¢/RIN settle on Thursday, while D6 conventional credits traded as high as 110¢/RIN. Bids for both retreated later in the session while prices still closed the day higher. Proposed targets are less aspirational for the cellulosic biofuel category, where biogas generates most credits. EPA proposes lowering the 2025 mandate to 1.19bn RINs, down from from 1.38bn RINs previously required, with 2026 and 2027 targets proposed at 1.30bn RINs and 1.36bn RINs, respectively. In a separate final rule today, EPA cut the 2024 cellulosic mandate to 1.01bn RINs from 1.09bn previously required, a smaller cut than initially proposed, and made available special "waiver" credits refiners can purchase at a fixed price to comply. Small refinery exemptions The proposal includes little clarity on EPA's future policy around program exemptions, which small refiners can request if they claim blend mandates will cause them disproportionate economic hardship. EPA predicted Friday that exemptions for the 2026 and 2027 compliance years could total anywhere from zero to 18bn USG of gasoline and diesel and provided no clues as to how it will weigh whether individual refiners, if any, deserve program waivers. The rule does suggest EPA plans to continue a policy from past administrations of estimating future exempted volumes when calculating the percentage of biofuels individual refiners must blend in the future, which would effectively require those with obligations to shoulder more of the burden to meet high-level 2026 and 2027 targets. Notably though, the proposal says little about how EPA is weighing a backlog of more than a hundred requests for exemptions stretching from 2016 to 2025. An industry official briefed on Friday ahead of the rule's release said Trump administration officials were "coy" about their plans for the backlog. Many of these refiners had already submitted RINs to comply with old mandates and could push for some type of compensation if granted retroactive waivers, making this part of the program especially hard to implement. And EPA would invite even more legal scrutiny if it agreed to biofuel groups' lobbying to "reallocate" newly exempted volumes from many years prior into future standards. EPA said it plans to "communicate our policy regarding [exemption] petitions going forward before finalization of this rule". Industry groups expect the agency will try to conclude the rule-making before November. The proposed mandates for 2026-2027 will have to go through the typical public comment process and could be changed as regulators weigh new data on biofuel production and food and fuel prices. Once the program updates are finalized, lawsuits are inevitable. A federal court is still weighing the legality of past mandates, and the Supreme Court is set to rule this month on the proper court venue for litigating small refinery exemption disputes. Environmentalists are likely to probe the agency's ultimate assessment of costs and benefits, including the climate costs of encouraging crop-based fuels. Oil companies could also have a range of complaints, from the record-high mandates to the creative limits on foreign feedstocks. American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers senior vice president Geoff Moody noted that EPA was months behind a statutory deadline for setting 2026 mandates and said it would "strongly oppose any reallocation of small refinery exemptions" if finalized. By Cole Martin and Matthew Cope Proposed 2026-2027 renewable volume obligations bn RINs Fuel type 2026 2027 Cellulosic biofuel 1.30 1.36 Biomass-based diesel 7.12 7.50 Advanced biofuel 9.02 9.46 Total renewable fuel 24.02 24.46 Implied ethanol mandate 15 15 — EPA Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more