India eyes 20pc ethanol blending by 2025
Mumbai has officially advanced its target for blending 20pc ethanol in gasoline (E20) nationwide to 2025 and published a roadmap for achieving the new mandate.
Prime minister Narendra Modi announced the earlier target during a biofuels-themed webcast to mark World Environment Day on 5 June. The target replaces a previous 2030 deadline for achieving E20, first set in the country's national biofuels policy in 2018.
Modi also released a "Roadmap for ethanol blending in India 2020-2025" at the event, which recommends E10 be made available nationwide by April 2022 until 2025, alongside a phased E20 rollout across the country from April 2023 starting in states with surplus ethanol production. Oil firms have earmarked 11 states including Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Delhi, Goa, Karnataka, Maharashtra and Punjab where E20 will be launched in selected cities by April 2023.
Ethanol supply should reach 10.16bn litres for nationwide E20 in the December 2025-November 2026 supply year according to the report, though the actual volume needed may be lower depending on the penetration of electric vehicles by that year. The roadmap sees the central government's existing loan assistance scheme driving adequate growth in output capacity over the next five years, and expects a 78pc rise in molasses-based and 187pc hike in grain-based distillery capacity by 2025, to 7.6bn l and 7.4bn l respectively. "Special efforts" will be needed to attract investment in grain-based distilleries in India's northeast which lacks a sugarcane industry.
The report suggests a five-year ex-mill price floor for ethanol replace the current annual pricing cycle to give assurance to investors, with favourable ex-mill prices for non-sugarcane feedstocks to promote water savings. Cumbersome environmental clearance processes should be streamlined for new and expanding distilleries, with regulatory hurdles removed for smaller projects and those with zero liquid discharge.
To smooth supply and demand imbalances between regions, 15 of 29 state governments yet to do so should remove regulations blocking inter-state transport of the fuel, and oil companies should increase existing tankage facilities by half to reach 446.4mn l nationwide.
Flex fuel and vehicles compatible with higher blends should be launched and incentivised, with a rollout of E10 engine tuned vehicles from April 2023 and E20 from 2025 suggested in the roadmap. Tax breaks should ensure ethanol remains price competitive against gasoline at the pump even if petroleum costs drop from recent highs.
The roadmap has garnered mixed responses from producers: some have lauded the initiative as providing clear direction to encourage investment, while others point to the many obstacles on the road to nationwide E20.
Capacity addition forecasts may be overblown, as despite government loan aid and a tripartite mechanism with banks, most proposed projects are still refused loans due to poor financials. Only around 40pc of 606 molasses-based and 418 grain-based distilleries approved in-principle since 2018 are likely to materialise according to a leading consultant.
Favourable monsoons for the past few years have boosted sugar, grain and rice output to surplus levels, but a downturn in weather conditions may limit feedstock availability in future years. And some producers have concerns a change in government at the next general election pegged for 2024 may reverse recent pro-ethanol policies, leaving any new distillery investments stranded.
The current leadership frames biofuel blending as crucial to reducing fuel import dependence and drawing down its sugar glut while satisfying farmers. Achieving E20 could shave $4bn/yr off India's petroleum import bill, according to the roadmap. India's net petroleum receipts totalled 185mn t and cost $55bn during April 2020-March 2021, according to government data.
Related news posts
New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads
New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads
Washington, 30 April (Argus) — US rail regulators today issued a final rule designed to help customers switch railroads in cases of poor rail service, but it is already drawing mixed reviews. Reciprocal switching, which allows freight shippers or receivers captive to a single railroad to access to an alternate carrier, has been allowed under US Surface Transportation Board (STB) rules. But shippers had not used existing STB rules to petition for reciprocal switching in 35 years, prompting regulators to revise rules to encourage shippers to pursue switching while helping resolve service problems. "The rule adopted today has broken new ground in the effort to provide competitive options in an extraordinarily consolidated rail industry," said outgoing STB chairman Martin Oberman. The five-person board unanimously approved a rule that would allow the board to order a reciprocal switching agreement if a facility's rail service falls below specified levels. Orders would be for 3-5 years. "Given the repeated episodes of severe service deterioration in recent years, and the continuing impediments to robust and consistent rail service despite the recent improvements accomplished by Class I carriers, the board has chosen to focus on making reciprocal switching available to shippers who have suffered service problems over an extended period of time," Oberman said today. STB commissioner Robert Primus voted to approve the rule, but also said it did not go far enough. The rule adopted today is "unlikely to accomplish what the board set out to do" since it does not cover freight moving under contract, he said. "I am voting for the final rule because something is better than nothing," Primus said. But he said the rule also does nothing to address competition in the rail industry. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) is reviewing the 154-page final rule, but carriers have been historically opposed to reciprocal switching proposals. "Railroads have been clear about the risks of expanded switching and the resulting slippery slope toward unjustified market intervention," AAR said. But the trade group was pleased that STB rejected "previous proposals that amounted to open access," which is a broad term for proposals that call for railroads to allow other carriers to operate over their tracks. The American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association declined to comment but has indicated it does not expect the rule to have an appreciable impact on shortline traffic, service or operations. Today's rule has drawn mixed reactions from some shipper groups. The National Industrial Transportation League (NITL), which filed its own reciprocal switching proposal in 2011, said it was encouraged by the collection of service metrics required under the rule. But "it is disheartened by its narrow scope as it does not appear to apply to the vast majority of freight rail traffic that moves under contracts or is subject to commodity exemptions," said NITL executive director Nancy O'Liddy, noting it was a departure from the group's original petition which sought switching as a way to facilitate railroad economic competitiveness. The Chlorine Institute said, in its initial analysis, that it does not "see significant benefit for our shipper members since it excludes contract traffic which covers the vast majority of chlorine and other relevant chemical shipments." By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Marathon Martinez refinery at 50pc capacity
Marathon Martinez refinery at 50pc capacity
Houston, 30 April (Argus) — Marathon Petroleum's California renewable fuels joint venture with Neste is running at half of its 48,000 b/d maximum capacity with plans to hit full rates by the end of the year, the refiner said on an earnings call today. The company expects to continue to operate the plant at 50pc capacity in the second quarter, increase rates to 75pc in the middle of the third quarter and reach full capacity by year-end. The refinery was operating at 46pc of its nameplate capacity early in the first quarter , Marathon said in a January earnings call. The Martinez facility has been undergoing a conversion from a traditional petroleum refinery to a renewable fuels plant since March 2021 and was slated to reach full production of mostly renewable diesel (RD) by the end of this year. But two November fires at the plant led to an investigation by the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB). Marathon is continuing to work with local regulators, president Maryann Mannen said on the earnings call this morning. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
HSFO demand supports Rotterdam 1Q bunker sales
HSFO demand supports Rotterdam 1Q bunker sales
London, 30 April (Argus) — Total sales of fossil bunker fuels and marine biodiesel blends at the port of Rotterdam were 2.45mn t in the first quarter this year, up by 13pc compared with the final three months of 2023 but 9pc lower year on year, according to official port data. Sales firmed across the board quarter on quarter, even though market participants had described spot bunker fuel demand in the region as "mostly limited" and shipping demand as lacklustre. High-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) sales rose the most. Disruption in the Red Sea resulted in many vessels re-routing around the southern tip of Africa, increasing the incentive of bunkering with HSFO as opposed to very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and marine gasoil (MGO), according to market participants. The longer journeys meant that vessels on the route increased their fuel consumption to reduce delivery delays, supporting conventional bunker fuel sales at Rotterdam. Higher prices for HSFO in Singapore also helped support HSFO demand in Rotterdam. Marine biodiesel sales at Rotterdam increased by 13pc on the quarter and by 76pc on the year in January-March, despite the Dutch government's decision to half the Dutch renewable tickets (HBE-G) multiplier for shipping at the turn of the year. The move has led to a substantial increase in prices for advanced fatty acid methyl ester (Fame) 0 blends in the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) hub. The inclusion of shipping in the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS) from January may have lent support to demand for biofuel blends. Marine biodiesel made up 11pc of total bunker fuel sales at Rotterdam in the first quarter, the same share as the previous quarter, which was a record high. LNG bunker sales at Rotterdam in January-March soared by 45pc on the quarter and by 150pc on the year. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Rotterdam bunker sales t Fuel 1Q24 4Q23 1Q23 q-o-q% y-o-y% VLSFO & ULSFO 857,579 847,862 1,205,288 1 -29 HSFO 818,028 643,218 809,871 27 1 MGO/MDO 383,409 361,585 468,373 6 -18 Biofuel blends 262,634 233,108 149,206 13 76 Total 2,453,610 2,177,078 2,685,515 13 -9 LNG (m³) 131,960 91,305 52,777 45 150 Port of Rotterdam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
G7 countries put timeframe on 'unabated' coal phase-out
G7 countries put timeframe on 'unabated' coal phase-out
London, 30 April (Argus) — G7 countries today committed to phasing out "unabated coal power generation" by 2035 — putting a timeframe on a coal phase-out for the first time. The communique, from a meeting of G7 climate, energy and environment ministers in Turin, northern Italy, represents "an historic agreement" on coal, Canadian environment minister Steven Guilbeault said. Although most G7 nations have set a deadline for phasing out coal-fired power, the agreement marks a step forward for Japan in particular, which had previously not made the commitment, and is a "milestone moment", senior policy advisor at think-tank E3G Katrine Petersen said. The G7 countries are Italy — this year's host — Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US. The EU is a non-enumerated member. But the pledge contains a caveat in its reference to "unabated" coal-fired power — suggesting that abatement technologies such as carbon capture and storage could justify its use, while some of the wording around a deadline is less clear. The communique sets a timeframe of "the first half of [the] 2030s or in a timeline consistent with keeping a limit of 1.5°C temperature rise within reach, in line with countries' net-zero pathways". OECD countries should end coal use by 2030 and the rest of the world by 2040, in order to align with the global warming limit of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels set out in the Paris Agreement, according to research institute Climate Analytics. The countries welcomed the outcomes of the UN Cop 28 climate summit , pledging to "accelerate the phase out of unabated fossil fuels so as to achieve net zero in energy systems by 2050". It backed the Cop 28 goal to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030 and added support for a global target for energy storage in the power sector of 1.5TW by 2030. The group committed to submit climate plans — known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — with "the highest possible ambition" from late this year or in early 2025. And it also called on the IEA to "provide recommendations" next year on how to implement a transition away from fossil fuels. The G7 also reiterated its commitment to a "fully or predominantly decarbonised power sector by 2035" — first made in May 2022 and highlighted roles for carbon management, carbon markets, hydrogen and biofuels. Simon Stiell, head of UN climate body the UNFCCC, urged the G7 and G20 countries to lead on climate action, in a recent speech . The group noted in today's outcome that "further actions from all countries, especially major economies, are required". The communique broadly reaffirmed existing positions on climate finance, although any concrete steps are not likely to be taken ahead of Cop 29 in November. The group underlined its pledge to end "inefficient fossil fuel subsidies" by 2025 or earlier, but added a new promise to "promote a common definition" of the term, which is likely to increase countries' accountability. The group will report on its progress towards ending those subsidies next year, it added. Fostering energy security The communique placed a strong focus on the need for "diverse, resilient, and responsible energy technology supply chains, including manufacturing and critical minerals". It noted the important of "guarding against possible weaponisation of economic dependencies on critical minerals and critical raw materials" — many of which are mined and processed outside the G7 group. Energy security held sway on the group's take on natural gas. It reiterated its stance that gas investments "can be appropriate… if implemented in a manner consistent with our climate objectives" and noted that increased LNG deliveries could play a key role. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more