Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Falling LCFS credit price narrows RNG prospects

  • Market: Emissions, Natural gas
  • 20/05/22

Sliding prices may narrow development of one of last year's fastest-growing sources of California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) credits.

Interlocking incentives led by the state's transportation fuel program spurred a nationwide build-out of projects to harvest methane from dairy cattle and swineherds over the past five years to produce more renewable natural gas (RNG).

But a surge in new credits helped cut LCFS prices by nearly half since January 2021. The drop may refocus investment in the largest, cheapest projects.

"Not every dairy farm is created equal," said Tyler Henn, Clean Energy Fuels vice president of business development and renewable natural gas investment.

California's LCFS program reduces the carbon intensity of transportation fuels through steadily falling annual limits on the amount of CO2 emitted during their production and use. Higher-carbon fuels that exceed the annual maximum incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated by distributing approved lower-carbon fuels.

The lower or higher a fuel's score compared with the annual limit, the more credits or deficits it will generate. Dairy methane harvested and supplied to compressed natural gas vehicles has surged, in part due to scores that can place individual projects hundreds of points below the annual limit, many times lower than the nearest low-carbon competitor.

The gap translates to outsized credit generation. RNG made using dairy and other animal methane generated 2.1mn t of LCFS credits in 2021, or about 11pc of all new credits for the year. But dairy digester or animal waste gas made up just 1.5pc of alternative fuel volume in 2021 — displacing less than 2,800 b/d of equivalent diesel. Renewable diesel, which generated three times the credits of dairy and swine RNG last year, displaced more than 20 times the volume of petroleum diesel.

Spot credits have fallen to nearly $100/metric tonne from about $200/t at the beginning of last year. Supplies of new credits from renewable fuels outpaced the demand for higher-carbon gasoline and other fuel in 2021.

Dairy deluge

Thin margins and economies of scale have helped consolidate especially western US dairies to larger herds, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Such concentration can reduce the investments needed to capture, process and connect harvested biomethane to US natural gas pipelines. It takes thousands of cows, either at a single large dairy or clustered across several operations, to produce sufficient gas. Projects need not always build new feeder pipelines — trucks can move compressed gas from some sites for injection.

State regulators need dairies and renewable natural gas infrastructure to capture more. California hosts about 20pc of all US dairies, and the operations produce the largest share of the state's methane emissions. California was on pace to meet just half of a targeted 40pc reduction in dairy methane emissions by 2030, according to California Air Resources Board estimated last year. The agency estimated that at least 160 additional dairies would need to use methane capture and processing to meet state goals.

California utilities also face renewable natural gas requirements. Southern California Gas expects RNG including landfill methane to make up 12pc of the gas it delivers to customers in 2030. Pacific Gas & Electric, California's largest utility, plans for RNG to make up 15pc of its gas by 2030, and already serves 22 CNG stations.

Competition for large or otherwise well-suited dairies soared with the combination of mandates and incentives, said Kevin Dobson, vice president of biomass for DTE Vantage.

"We are part of a big, $10bn company, and we are competing against, literally, people that work off of their kitchen table and drive a pickup truck into the farm," Dobson said.

But some dairies may lack manure management infrastructure, may lack easy access to offtake infrastructure, or need costlier equipment to produce the gas, Henn said.

The falling price environment raises the bar on project selection without halting it, Dobson said.

"You got to sharpen the pencil, you got to be a little bit more efficient," he said.

Reined in

Regulatory action could again curb the RNG boom. California limits methane emissions from landfills via another regulation. To generate LCFS credits, landfills must go beyond the cuts the state already requires. Gas captured from landfills averaged 8,260 b/d of diesel replacement but produced just 624,630 t of credits in 2021.

Regulators could still apply credit-slashing, landfill-style methane reductions to dairies. California's SB 1383, passed in 2016, authorized the state to regulate dairy methane as early as 2024. The state would need to consider dairy prices, the potential for dairies to move to other, less rigorous states, and assure that the regulations were "cost effective."

CARB has focused on incentives in communications about meeting dairy methane goals.

Environmental justice and animal welfare groups insist the incentives perpetuate large-scale agriculture that harms cattle, concentrates odors and wreaks other environmental damage. Some truck operators also question the long-term demand for the fuel.

The industry faces state mandates to electrify its fleets, with requirements that manufacturers making rising numbers of zero-emissions medium- and heavy-duty trucks available beginning in 2024. Major fleets that would otherwise prefer compressed natural gas were wary of heavy spending on those fuel systems, Western States Trucking Association head of regulatory affairs Joe Rajkovacz said.

"Those trucks are not even part of the future of what the California Air Resources Board wants to allow," Rajkovacz said.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
24/06/25

Cheaper power key to reach UK’s climate targets

Cheaper power key to reach UK’s climate targets

Edinburgh, 24 June (Argus) — The UK's climate plan credibility has improved slightly but no progress has been made to make electricity cheaper, which is key to hit the country's emissions targets, independent advisory body Climate Change Committee (CCC) said in its progress report. The report assesses the UK's progress towards its net zero goals under the current government, which took power in July 2024. The CCC found the UK's 2050 target remains reachable but climate action needs to accelerate, even though policies to cut greenhouse gas emissions have improved. Only half of the 16 key indicators assessed by the CCC, with a relevant benchmark or target, are on track — including offshore and onshore wind operational capacity, sustainable aviation fuel, electric vehicle (EV) charging points and distances travelled by car. EV car sales, heat pump installations, woodland creation and peatland restoration are "slightly off track", while the ratio of electricity to gas prices for households and industries is "significantly off track", the CCC said. The committee noted no progress has been made on actions to lower the cost of power. The government is planning to consult on this "in due course", but CCC urged for actions and timelines. The CCC has identified "ten priority actions" for the year ahead, with cutting the cost of electricity for households and businesses again at the top. Cheaper power will support industrial electrification and "speed up the uptake of clean electric technologies, such as heat pumps and electric vehicles," the CCC said. The transition to renewables will eventually reduce the country's reliance on volatile wholesale gas prices, which are the main driver of electricity prices, it said. "But the government can take immediate action to accelerate this by moving policy costs associated with past schemes, and those that are not directly related to the cost of electricity generation, off electricity bills," the CCC said. Removing electricity policy costs — levied on the unit price of electricity at 20 times the rate of gas — would reduce annual electricity bills by £190 ($258) for a typical household with a gas boiler and by £490 for a typical household with a heat pump, CCC found. "This would bring UK prices into the range of other countries who are ahead on heat pump roll-out," it said. The CCC report assessed policy development from July 2024 to 23 May 2025, so does not take into account policies announced in the recent spending review nor the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme intended to reduce electricity costs by up to £40/MWh for more than 7,000 electricity-intensive businesses. UK emissions reached 413.7mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) in 2024, including its share of international aviation and shipping, down by 50pc from 1990 and by 2.5pc from 2023, according to the CCC. The year-on-year reductions come mainly from the electricity supply — declining gas generation — and the industry sector. The government will increasingly need to focus on transport, building, agriculture and aviation to reach its emission reduction targets, the CCC said. The report points to encouraging trends in EVs and in heat pump installations, which grew by 56pc on the year, and in woodland creations, but it reiterated action on these fronts must accelerate. Although much of the progress stems from policies set by previous government, the CCC said "bold policies" introduced this year are promising, such as removing planning barriers on renewable deployment and the reinstatement of the 2030 phase-out date for gasoline and diesel vehicles. The market share of new EVs increased on the year in 2024, by nearly 20pc. But CCC noted aviation sector emissions are increasing. The share of sustainable aviation fuel increased to 2.1pc last year from 0.7pc in 2023, but a lot more is required to reach the 10pc SAF mandate by 2030. By Caroline Varin Distribution of past emissions reductions and future emissions savings by sector.pdf Distribution of past emissions reductions and future emissions savings by sector Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Netherlands publishes RED III biofuels draft


24/06/25
News
24/06/25

Netherlands publishes RED III biofuels draft

London, 24 June (Argus) — The Dutch government's updated draft legislation to transpose the EU's revised Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) notably proposes abolishing double-counting renewable energy contributions from Annex IX feedstocks. The draft introduces a greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction mandate for land, inland shipping and maritime shipping, but excludes aviation — which was included in a previous draft . The RED III mandate will take effect in 2026. Obligated parties have to fulfil the mandate by surrendering a sufficient amount of so-called emission reduction units (EREs) in each sector. The mandate's flexible credit allowance allows EREs generated in the land sector to be used to partly meet emission reduction obligations in inland and maritime shipping ( see table ), but EREs from inland and maritime shipping cannot be used by land sector suppliers to fulfil their compliance requirements. Fuel suppliers with overall consumption of more than 500,000 l/yr will need to incorporate a 14.4pc share of renewable fuels in their annual deliveries in 2026. This increases linearly, to reach 27.1pc in 2030. The amount of crop-based biofuels in the land sector will be limited to 1.4pc of the overall energy content of total consumption until 2030, and will not be accepted towards targets in maritime and inland shipping and aviation. The amount of Annex IX Part B biofuels — such as used cooking oil (UCO) and animal fats categories 1 and 2 — that can be counted towards the mandate will be limited to 4.29pc in the land sector and 11.07pc in inland shipping. Obligated parties will be unable to claim EREs from Annex IX Part B fuels used in maritime shipping. The draft also introduces a minimum share of emission reductions that have to be achieved by Annex IX Part A and renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBO), for all sectors. RED III mandates that 5.5pc of all fuels supplied must be advanced biofuels, including at least 1pc RFNBOs by 2030. The Netherlands' draft decouples these targets, to reduce investment uncertainty ( see table ). Refineries that use renewable hydrogen in their production process can claim refinery reduction units — or RAREs — which can be used by a supplier to meet an RFNBO sub-target in various sectors. Correction factor delay The ministry will delay its plans to apply a "correction factor" of 0.4 to its "refinery route" stimulus for hydrogen demand, in order to ensure the measure does not undermine direct use of hydrogen in transport. The correction factor means the value of emissions reductions credits generated through the use of renewable hydrogen for transport fuel production would be limited to a certain percentage of those generated through direct use of renewable hydrogen or derivatives in transport. The government leaves the option open to impose a correction factor from 2030. Although the EU Fuel Quality Directive increases the maximum share of bio-based components to 10pc in diesel, the Dutch government said fuel suppliers must continue to offer B7 — diesel with up to 7pc biodiesel — as a protection grade, because of the large number of cars incompatible with B10. Companies will be able to carry forward any excess EREs to the next compliance year. Companies with an annual obligation can carry forward up to 10pc of the total amount of EREs needed to fulfil their obligation in a year, with registering companies allowed to carry forward 4pc. Dutch renewable fuel tickets (HBEs) carried into 2026 will be converted into EREs on 1 April 2026, the government said. By Evelina Lungu and Anna Prokhorova Overview of future Dutch obligations pc CO2 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Land (Road) Sector-Specific Obligation 14.4 16.4 22.8 24.8 27.1 Flexible Credit Allowance 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Obligation 14.4 16.4 22.8 24.8 27.1 Annex 9A Sub-Obligation 3.1 4.5 5.9 7.3 8.8 RFNBO Sub-Obligation 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.1 Conventional Biofuel Limit 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Annex 9B Limit 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Maritime Sector-Specific Obligation 3 3 4 5 6 Flexible Credit Allowance 1 2 2 2 3 Total Obligation 4 5 6 7 8 Annex 9A Sub-Obligation - - - - - RFNBO Sub-Obligation 0 0 0 0 0 Conventional Biofuel Limit 0 0 0 0 0 Annex 9B Limit 0 0 0 0 0 Inland Waterways Sector-Specific Obligation 3 4 6 8 12 Flexible Credit Allowance 1 1 2 2 3 Total Obligation 4 5 8 10 15 Annex 9A Sub-Obligation - - - - - RFNBO Sub-Obligation 0 0 0 0 0 Conventional Biofuel Limit 0 0 0 0 0 Annex 9B Limit 11 11 11 11 11 The Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management *RFNBO: Renewable fuel of non-biological origin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ontario weighs domestic biomass-based diesel quota


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Ontario weighs domestic biomass-based diesel quota

New York, 23 June (Argus) — Ontario is considering requiring that domestically produced renewable fuels make up 3pc of the province's diesel pool, an effort to help biodiesel producers struggling to adapt to policy changes in the US. Ontario late last week requested input on a proposal to supplement existing provincial biofuel blend requirements with a new mandate for Canadian production, similar to a domestic content rule that took force in British Columbia this year. Ontario already requires that renewables like biodiesel and renewable diesel make up 4pc of diesel consumption each year, but this proposal would require that three-fourths of that mandated volume come from biofuels produced in Canada. The Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks says the proposal is in response to a new clean fuel tax credit that took effect in the US this year, which can only be claimed by US producers. A US Department of Agriculture report late last year said that there were six remaining operational biodiesel plants in Canada and that the industry has historically sent almost all its fuel into the US, which up until this year treated foreign biodiesel as eligible for a federal tax credit. At the same time, US biofuels have increasingly entered Canada to meet demand from low-carbon fuel standards federally and in British Columbia. In those programs, higher-carbon fuels that exceed annual carbon intensity limits incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from approved lower-carbon alternatives. The Canadian biofuel industry has pushed officials to respond. British Columbia as a result began requiring this year that renewables make up a minimum 8pc of diesel fuels supplied in the province, up from 4pc, and that this mandated volume must come from Canadian producers starting in April. British Columbia-based renewable diesel producer Tidewater Renewables has also unsuccessfully pushed Canada to impose duties on US product. The Ontario environment ministry said the domestic mandate, if finalized, would be a "temporary, time-limited measure" that would last as long as US subsidies "threaten Ontario's biodiesel industry." The new US tax credit that excludes foreign refiners is currently set to lapse after 2027, but Republican lawmakers have floated using a massive budget bill they want to pass in the coming weeks to extend the incentive through 2031. While full regulatory text is not available, as is typical for this early stage of the Ontario rulemaking process, it appears the proposal would otherwise keep intact the general structure of the province's biofuel mandate. The program offers more credit to lower-carbon fuels, which led to a slightly lower than 4pc biofuel blend rate for the diesel pool in 2023, according to a report from trade group Advanced Biofuels Canada. The domestic content proposal would also not affect a separate mandate that biofuels make up increasing amounts of the gasoline pool through 2030. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Iran fires missiles at US military base in Qatar


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Iran fires missiles at US military base in Qatar

London, 23 June (Argus) — Iran today fired missiles at a US base in Qatar in retaliation for the weekend attack on its nuclear facilities. The Iranian military said the US' Al-Udeid base was its target. The Qatari government said it intercepted the missiles and there were no deaths or injuries. Tensions in the region have been stretched since the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities at the weekend. US president Donald Trump today again expressed a desire for regime change in Tehran, which in turn said US military interests were now legitimate targets. Earlier, Qatar closed its airspace and the US and UK embassies there issued safety warnings to their citizens, suggesting this Iranian attack was flagged and expected. The price of Ice Brent crude fell by as much as 4.5pc in the wake of the Iranian attack to an intraday low of $72.48/bl, having hit a five-month high of $81.40/bl earlier in the day. The Iranian move echoes its attacks on US military targets in Iraq after the US' killing of senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in January 2020. Perhaps mindful of this, foreign firms operating in Iraq today started removing some employees from the country. Regional airlines began cancelling and rerouting flights across the Middle East, with flight tracking showing almost no flights in the air above the Mideast Gulf. By Ben Winkley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump again brings up regime change in Iran


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Trump again brings up regime change in Iran

Washington, 23 June (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is trying to articulate what it ultimately aims to achieve in Iran, after directly involving the US in the Israel-Iran war over the weekend. Senior administration officials took to the TV news shows on Sunday to assert that Washington is not trying to topple the government in Iran. They claimed that the US bombing raids, in the early hours of Sunday Tehran time, caused irreparable damage to Iran's nuclear program. And they suggested that the US will not carry out additional air strikes unless Iran retaliates against US interests in the region or targets vessel traffic in the strait of Hormuz. But Trump then contradicted his own administration's message by posting on his social media platform: "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Iran has responded with tough rhetoric to the US air strikes but did not hit back at US interests across the region, even though Iran and Israel continued to exchange missile attacks. Tehran said today that US airstrikes have expanded the range of legitimate military targets for its armed forces, while a senior Iranian lawmaker said the parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed". The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through on that rhetoric. In the past, Tehran has targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Crude oil futures, which in the run-up to the US attack already reflected risk premiums associated with potential disruption to oil flows from the Mideast Gulf, rose in early trading in Asia today but eased later in the day. Trump, who has frequently touted declines in oil prices during his second administration, posted today: "EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!" He then posted, "To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!" The Energy Department cannot mandate how much crude US oil companies produce, but it does control the US emergency oil stocks. Uncertainty ahead The Pentagon has been more restrained than Trump and his national security advisers in providing an assessment of the air strikes. Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, general Dan Caine said on Sunday that initial assessments indicated that Iran's nuclear facilities suffered "extremely severe damage and destruction" but noted that it was too early to say whether Iran maintains any nuclear capability. Trump by contrast posted about "monumental damage" and asserted that "obliteration is an accurate term" in reference to Iran's nuclear sites. "Sometimes we have a tendency to think that a military solution can insert some certainty into a situation," said retired general Joe Votel, who commanded Middle East-based US forces in 2016-19. "But I think what we're seeing here is that there still is a significant amount of uncertainty about what is going to take place." It will take time to accurately assess the impact of US air strikes on Iran's nuclear program, Votel said today during a discussion hosted by think tank the Middle East Institute. The UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said on 22 June that no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US strikes. The eventual shape of Iran's response is a further cause of uncertainty, Votel said. "Do they have a surprise for us, if they held something in reserve that we're going to see revealed here?" An Iranian counter-attack aimed at the US would invite more US strikes. But if Iran's response proves muted or non-existent, "will we be going back?," he asked. "And then, how does all this conclude?" The US embassy in Qatar today issued a "shelter in place" warning to US citizens in the country, which hosts the largest US air force base in the region. The US embassy did not cite a specific threat, noting that the warning was out of an "abundance of caution". The UK embassy issued a similar warning to British citizens. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more