Speak to a specialist

Register and we will customize a solution that meets your exact needs. When you speak to one of our experts, you may be qualified to sample our industry-leading products on a no-cost basis.

You can unsubscribe from these updates at any time. We manage your personal data in accordance with our privacy policy.
Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Drawback could support Brazil tallow exports

  • Market: Biofuels, Chemicals
  • 31/07/25

Brazilian market participants expect beef tallow exports to the US to continue under a duty drawback mechanism, but they could also sell more to the domestic biodiesel industry.

On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to implement a 50pc tariff on Brazilian imports effective 6 August.

Until now, it was more profitable for US producers to import beef tallow and use it as an input to produce biofuel that would be supplied to the domestic market because of the tax incentives granted to waste-based biofuels in the US. With a 50pc tariff on Brazilian imports, the scenario changes and it becomes unfeasible to use Brazilian beef tallow in the production of fuels that will be used in the US.

But US biofuel producers could claim a "duty drawback" if the fuel produced from Brazilian beef tallow is later exported, meaning they could receive a refund up to 99pc of the duties, taxes and fees paid during the import process. Now, US industries use tallow to produce hydrotreated vegetable oil and sustainable aviation fuel for Europe.

If the feedstock is redirected to Brazil, biodiesel producers believe they can increase the share of beef tallow used in their plants if the product is sold at a discount to soybean oil prices.

Brazil used over 231,000 metric tonnes (t) of beef tallow to produce in the first half, which represents 5.6pc of total biofuel production, according to oil regulator ANP. More than 230,000t of beef tallow were exported to the US in the same period — nearly the same amount that was used in Brazilian production — according to trade and industry ministry MDIC.

If this volume had remained in Brazil, the feedstock with low acidity could have been used by the biodiesel industry. MDIC does not detail the acidity of the exported tallow.

Some market participants believe in an eventual suspension of the tariff. But other sources told Argus that the pressure to lift the tariff will likely be lower than previously expected since the US government exempted around 700 products from the additional tariff, totaling almost 45pc of products exported by Brazil, such as orange juice and pulp, fertilizers, crude, beans and rice.

New markets to explore

Brazilian tallow exporters are looking for new markets to explore, focused mainly on Europe.

But there are challenges. Beef tallow shipped from Brazil to the EU has a higher freight cost and the product does not receive the same tax incentives as it would in the US, meaning prices would have to be significantly lower for this flow to be possible.

By Natalia Dalle Cort and João Marinho

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
11/12/25

Commodity rail shippers push for more train data

Commodity rail shippers push for more train data

Houston, 11 December (Argus) — Industrial shippers of commodities like grain and petrochemicals want federal regulators to widen the scope of proposed rules that would require Class I railroads to report more data on their on-time service performance. US rail regulator the Surface Transportation Board (STB) in September put the industry on notice that it intends to issue rules to require that each of the six biggest railroads, including Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, report two new categories of performance data to the agency. The first would benchmark railroads' shipments against their original estimated time of arrival (OETA) and the second would measure "industry spot and pull" data, or ISP, to determine whether shipments are picked up and delivered within their planned service window. The board action aims to address rail shippers' long-running concerns that unpredictable rail service is a wild card in their supply chains, as many shippers rely nearly completely on rail to get their goods to market. The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), an industry group that lobbies for US refiners and petrochemical manufacturers, applauded the STB for working to address "chronic freight rail service failures." The OETA is meant to track a carrier's targeted arrival time when it dispatches a cargo and then flag the percentage of weekly shipments that reach their destinations no later than 24 hours after an intended target, the STB said in its proposal. The AFPM, whose members include companies like Dow, Occidental Chemical and Ineos who collectively ship about 2.5mn carloads a year, said OETA data should be broken out by region, terminal, and corridor "to reveal localized bottlenecks often masked by system averages." As proposed, the STB's OETA measurement would apply to manifest train service, where trains haul an assortment of railcar types, and not to unit trains, which exclusively haul one railcar type or bulk commodity, such as coal, grain or crude. Grain shippers and the US Department of Agriculture disagreed with the STB's decision to exclude unit train shipments from the OETA measurement. The National Grain and Feed Association, whose members include Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge and other biofuels makers, said that late unit train deliveries of commodities like grain, ethanol or coal "can result in proportionally greater harm to the shipper/receiver" than smaller manifest shipments. The USDA agreed that unit train shipments should be included in the OETA measurement, and pointed out that about 75pc of US railed corn and soybean shipments in 2023 traveled in trains hauling more than 75 railcars, which would not be captured by manifest shipment data. Demand for agricultural products is highly seasonal, and missed delivery windows "can halt processing lines, disrupt export programs, and force shippers to carry excess private car inventory to buffer uncertainty," the agency said. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), which lobbies on behalf of Class I railroads, pushed back on industry requests to widen the OETA to include unit train shipments, and told the STB that several railroads do not currently generate the metrics. Adding the reporting requirements "would add regulatory burden, waste resources, and misrepresent service on the network," the AAR said. By Chris Baltimore Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Q&A: Huntsman sees stronger 2026 on US, China recovery

11/12/25
News
11/12/25

Q&A: Huntsman sees stronger 2026 on US, China recovery

Bahrain, 11 December (Argus) — Chemicals producer Huntsman expects 2026 to bring a steadier business environment, with tariff-related uncertainty easing and interest rates stabilising. Speaking to Argus on the sidelines of the 19th Gulf Petrochemicals and Chemicals Association (GPCA) forum in Bahrain, chief executive officer Peter Huntsman said the company sees gradual improvement in the US construction sector, anticipates a recovery in consumer confidence in China, and is implementing price increases to address the ongoing pricing pressure in Europe. In your latest earnings report, you mentioned continued weakness in the construction and industrial sectors, particularly in Europe. Today, you also spoke about high interest rates in the US. Do you expect these headwinds to improve in 2026? During last year's construction season, we faced higher interest and mortgage rates along with significant economic uncertainty — particularly in spring 2025 around tariffs. That created a lot of volatility and questioning in the US economy. In 2026, I don't expect that same tariff-related uncertainty. I think the waters have settled, and people have adjusted to interest rates. They may even decline a little, or at least stop rising. So overall, I expect the business environment in 2026 to be better than in 2025. Huntsman cited pricing pressure across the portfolio in the third quarter. What trends are you seeing this quarter, and are certain product lines or markets feeling the impact more than others? Most of the pricing pressure is in Europe, where there is little growth and people are producing more than what the market can absorb. So there is a price war going on. We don't see this dynamic in North America or China. We are currently implementing a series of price increases in the European market to address this. You've noted that Europe's chemical sector requires greater collaboration in light of higher energy costs and regulatory hurdles. What type of collaboration works best and how is Huntsman positioning itself? We expect energy-intensive chemical production — aromatics, olefins, and other basic raw materials — to continue shifting out of Europe. These materials will increasingly be produced in the Middle East, China, and the US, and then imported into Europe. European producers will focus more on downstream activities such as formulation and blending. That's the type of collaboration and restructuring I'm referring to. You'll see capacity closures in Europe and more investment in the Middle East, China and North America. Turning to China, how are weak consumer confidence and excess capacity impacting your margins and demand? Our businesses in China are currently the strongest we have globally, in both consumption levels and margins. I expect the Chinese economy to improve next year as consumer confidence gradually recovers. I believe 2026 will end stronger than 2025. Regarding Europe's regulations — such as REACH and sustainability policies — are these a greater challenge than energy costs? Regulations are the easier of the two to control, but high energy costs — especially LNG — will take longer to resolve. Both, however, are significant drags on the European economy. Europe could change how it operates if it chose to, but so far we hear more discussion than action. How do US tariffs and export controls impact your business, especially in China? We produce a lot of products in China and a lot in North America, but we don't trade much between the two; products made in China largely stay in China, and products made in North America stay in North America. The same is true for Europe. So tariffs don't significantly affect our raw materials. They do affect our customers, though, particularly in sectors like the automotive sector, where manufacturing is now shifting to the US. Some of their assemblies are moving there as well. For us, the total volume may remain the same, but we see changes in where that volume is produced and consumed. So we are seeing tariffs impact our customers, but not on our raw materials. Looking ahead to next year, which segments do you expect to drive the most growth, and how will you prioritise investments? We expect continued recovery in aerospace and in materials sold into the tech and semiconductor industries, for cleaning solutions and similar applications. Insulation and energy-conservation products should also perform well. We anticipate a gradual improvement in US construction in 2026 as well. How is Huntsman actively positioning itself for the clean-energy transition? Are there any new pilot projects, near-term targets, or strategic investments underway? We will continue producing highly energy-efficient materials and inputs for insulation, solar, electrical-grid infrastructure, EVs, and more. These will remain growth areas for us. But many publicly stated targets — for example, Europe selling only EVs within a few years — are unrealistic. Consumers aren't adopting EVs at the expected pace, and governments shouldn't force them. When I say the conversation [around sustainability] isn't based on reality, I mean that we cannot eliminate hydrocarbons entirely. Claims that we can move "beyond petroleum" are not realistic. By Rithika Krishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japanese, Chinese firms partner on marine biodiesel

11/12/25
News
11/12/25

Japanese, Chinese firms partner on marine biodiesel

Tokyo, 11 December (Argus) — Japanese shipping firm Mitsui OSK Lines (Mol), trading house Marubeni and Chinese state-controlled fuel supplier Sinopec Zhejiang Zhoushan Petroleum have signed an initial agreement to establish a long-term supply chain for marine biodiesel. Sinopec and Marubeni will ensure a stable supply of biodiesel and develop infrastructure infrastructures including ports to store, deliver and supply the fuel, Mol said said on 11 December. Meanwhile, the Japanese shipping firm will use the biodiesel that Sinopec and Marubeni procure in China. China is a key supplier of biodiesel feedstocks, and Marubeni holds the largest share in marine fuel sales to Japanese shipowners in China, Mol said. Biodiesel is a "drop-in" fuel, which is compatible with existing engines on vessels. Mol considers biodiesel as key to significantly cutting CO2 emissions, given that it aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions from its transportation by 45pc in 2035 compared with 2019 levels, before achieving net-zero emissions in 2050. By Kohei Yamamoto Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US fuel groups eye compromise in E15 talks

10/12/25
News
10/12/25

US fuel groups eye compromise in E15 talks

New York, 10 December (Argus) — Major US fuel groups agree on the framework for a bill that would authorize a higher ethanol blend in gasoline and revamp a separate program requiring biofuel blending. But there is more work ahead before a final deal can be reached, sources told Argus . The American Petroleum Institute withdrew support earlier this year for a slimmer bill allowing year-round sale of gasoline blends with 15pc ethanol (E15), kickstarting a new round of negotiations. The group has since been pitching the White House and biofuel groups on a larger bill that would both allow E15 and restrict small refiners' ability to skirt biofuel quotas. The oil group, ethanol advocates and fuel retailers last week publicly endorsed the general framework of a bill to allow year-round E15 and limit small refinery blending exemptions, and negotiations are ongoing. The issue has the attention of President Donald Trump, who asked a farmer at a White House event this week if E15 would be "a big deal". The US requires oil companies to annually blend biofuels, while allowing small refiners to seek hardship exemptions. Sales of ethanol blends above 10pc are limited in the summer due to smog rules. Whether the groups can compromise and persuade Congress to act will shape crop demand, biofuel production margins and retail fuel prices in the coming years. Past proposals to legalize E15 year-round, a longtime priority for the ethanol industry, have failed. The idea The American Petroleum Institute's pitch for reining in exemptions is to reduce the number of eligible companies and to make it harder for them to prove distress, according to five people familiar with the group's lobbying. A Trump administration plan that would require refiners without exemptions to blend more biofuels to compensate for refiners with exemptions has raised the stakes of the debate and riled larger oil companies. The oil group has floated restricting exemptions to companies with limited collective refining capacity, excluding larger enterprises like Delek that own multiple smaller units. The group has also proposed scrapping a Department of Energy hardship scoring system that has yielded unpredictable results over the years and that a 2022 Government Accountability Office study found was "critically flawed". Instead, refiners would have to prove that hardship stems directly from the biofuel program, and regulators could offer "proportional" exemptions based on the evidence, three of the people said. The US currently waives either all or half of the blend mandates for refiners that prove hardship. The Trump administration this year granted dozens of requests for exemptions from prior-year mandates, and more petitions are pending. More work ahead While these ideas address longstanding concerns from biofuel and crop groups that waivers curb demand for their products, the American Petroleum Institute also wants to permanently bar regulators from requiring other oil companies offset biofuel volumes lost to exemptions — a tougher sell in the Farm Belt. Another concern is timing. The American Petroleum Institute initially pushed for the exemption changes and ban on redistributing biofuel obligations to take effect next year. But some energy lobbyists want a delay until 2028, fearing that immediate changes could delay the Trump administration's work to finalize new biofuel blend mandates, three people said. New quotas for 2026 and 2027 are already late. Oil interests outside the American Petroleum Institute could also push back if negotiations advance. Refiners so far have been divided. Some want to protect their ability to win lucrative exemptions, while others have long taken issue with special rules for their competitors and hotly oppose Trump's plan to make them blend more biofuels to compensate. Even if the groups reach a deal, convincing Congress is its own challenge. An E15 proposal last year was pulled out of a larger spending package at the last minute , and farm-state lawmakers have been unsuccessful more recently in their efforts to add E15 to a defense bill. One option lobbyists have eyed is adding any new E15 agreement to legislation to fund the government after 30 January. The Renewable Fuels Association, which represents ethanol producers, said that it "continues to have serious discussions with multiple stakeholder groups and we are encouraged by the progress of those conversations". The American Petroleum Institute and ethanol industry group Growth Energy declined to comment. The Environmental Protection Agency said it is "committed to strengthening American energy security and supporting American farmers" but noted that changing rules around E15 and small refinery exemptions "requires an act of Congress". It is not clear how much more ethanol drivers would burn if the US permitted year-round E15. Most gas stations do not currently offer the blend, which advocates blame on regulatory hurdles deterring retailers from investing in new infrastructure. Rising vehicle fuel efficiency and electric vehicle sales have also cut into liquid fuel demand. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Netherlands slashes 2026 biomarine mandate

10/12/25
News
10/12/25

Netherlands slashes 2026 biomarine mandate

London, 10 December (Argus) — The Netherlands' government will cut GHG reduction mandates for international maritime and inland shipping supplies from the proposed draft earlier this year , according to a communication from the ministry of infrastructure and water management sent to market participants and seen by Argus , citing delays in Belgian transposition causing concerns of an uneven playing field for fuel suppliers. The statement confirmed that the new renewable energy directive (RED) III mandates will come into effect on 1 January, and will apply retroactively from that date if passed later. Maritime fuel suppliers will be subject to a 2.9pc GHG reduction target in 2026 compared with 3.6pc initially, 0.9pc of which will be a flexible credit allowance that can be fulfilled by overcompliance in other sectors. The inland shipping obligation will be reduced to a 2.5pc greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target from a previously announced 3.8pc, with 0.5pc flexible credit allowance. The statement added that obligations from 2027 onwards will apply as previously announced in the draft bill. The previously announced ban on 9B feedstocks for international maritime is to remain in place, with the Netherlands to explore whether the overall Annex 9B biofuels cap can be increased to create leeway. Despite an initial agreement between Belgium and the Netherlands to align on marine targets under RED III, some divergence has already emerged as the Netherlands will treat 9B feedstock biofuels as fossil volumes under the maritime obligation — while Belgium may count such volumes as zero when calculating the overall fuel supply. Initial reactions from market participants pointed to expectations of some marine fuels demand shifting from Dutch ports towards neighbouring ports, as the German cabinet passed a version of RED III legislation today that excludes international maritime from the country's targets. Belgium has also yet to finalise its RED III transposition, with updates to come following the conclusion of a public consultation on 14 November. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Related Products

Argus Methanol

Argus Methanol

Key contracts, spot price assessments, news and analysis for the methanol market on a daily basis
Find out more

Argus Specialised Freight

Argus Specialised Freight

Data, insights and unique tools to help manage freight risk in biofuels, renewable feedstocks and chemicals markets
Find out more

Argus Carbon

Carbon price benchmarks, policy and project news, and deep analysis, on a daily basis.
Find out more

Argus Low Carbon Hydrogen Strategy Report

Part Three: Americas. An in-depth analysis of the key sectors, countries and policies enabling hydrogen growth. 
Find out more

Argus North American Long-Term Natural Gas Forward Curves 

Independent market valuation tool to support investment and trading decisions on North America Electricity markets
Find out more
Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more