Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US ethane exports to Mexico reach record high

  • Market: LPG, Petrochemicals
  • 30/10/25

US ethane exports to Mexico reached a record high in October, just months after Braskem inaugurated its new ethane import terminal in Mexico.

The US shipped 40,000 b/d of the petrochemical feedstock to Mexico so far in October, the highest for any month since at least 2016, Kpler data shows.

Most of the October volumes that arrived in the port of Coatzacoalcos, Mexico, were aboard the Brilliant Future and Brave Future, which are both Brazilian petrochemical firm Braskem's dedicated ethane vessels.

The Mexican port is home to Braskem's 80,000 b/d (1.6mn t/yr) ethane import terminal that was inaugurated earlier this year and supplies the company's Mexico-based petrochemical plants.

The terminal is part of Braskem's broader efforts to shift away from naphtha as a feedstock and tackle the long-standing ethane supply shortages in Mexico, which stems from a slowdown in domestic ethane production.

Mexico's state-owned Pemex's output has declined steadily over the past few years owing to mature oil and gas fields, leading Pemex and private-sector firms to become more reliant on imports. Pemex's ethane production fell to an average of 40,000 b/d from January to September, down from 43,000 b/d the same months a year earlier, and well below the 71,000 b/d it produced in 2020, according to the latest Pemex data.

US ethane exports to Mexico could continue to grow as Braskem's trading arm expects delivery of an additional four ethane ships for Braskem's feedstock requirements in 2026.

Braskem is also considering adding another PE unit in Mexico, further boosting ethane demand.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
13/11/25

US LPG loses market share in Brazil

US LPG loses market share in Brazil

Houston, 13 November (Argus) — US LPG suppliers lost market share in Brazil to imports from Argentina despite a decline in US Gulf coast propane and butane prices. Brazil imported 982,240t of LPG year-to-date October this year, Vortexa data shows. Argentinian supplies comprised 49.5pc of Brazil's imports at 486,400t for the 10-month period, up 17.8 percentage points from a year earlier. Brazil took 47.2pc of its LPG from the US at 463,700t year-to-date October, down by 18.3 percentage points from the same period a year earlier. Brazil's shift toward Argentinian-sourced LPG comes even as prices decreased for full-propane and split butane/propane cargoes loading at the US Gulf coast. US propane export cargo prices slid to $429.1/t year-to-date October this year, from $487.7/t in the same months a year earlier. US split butane/propane loaders dipped to $442.8/t from $499.2/t in the same time period. Brazil's shift away from lower priced US supplies suggests Argentinian cargoes may be more price competitive. Part of the price competitiveness may stem from more economically favorable freight rates for short-haul distances given Argentina's geographical advantage that allows Brazil to offtake Argentina's growing LPG supplies. Brazil may continue to import more LPG from neighboring Argentina as domestic demand there is expected to grow between 5-8pc with the government's incoming Gas do Povo subsidy scheme, according to LPG association Sindigas president Sergio Bandeira de Mello. The subsidy scheme will distribute vouchers for free LPG cylinders to more than 15mn qualifying low-income homes in remote areas of Brazil in an effort to push families away from cooking with firewood and charcoal. The country's four main distributors — Copa Energia, Nacional Gas, Supergasbras and Ultragaz — account for nearly 90pc of the domestic market and have already confirmed that demand under the program will be met by LPG imports. This will come from countries other than the US, most notably from nearby Argentina. By Giovann Rosales Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Braskem 3Q sales down, eyes feedstock switch


11/11/25
News
11/11/25

Braskem 3Q sales down, eyes feedstock switch

Sao Paulo, 11 November (Argus) — Brazilian petrochemical company Braskem faced a turbulent third quarter in 2025, marked by operational challenges, strategic uncertainty and efforts to reposition its feedstock strategy. Menwhile, the company is navigating a potential restructuring and sale while managing the fallout from the closure of its chlor-alkali operations in Alagoas and ongoing low utilization rates across its production assets. Braskem completed technical studies on using liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) derivatives — specifically propane and ethane — sourced from Argentina's Vaca Muerta shale formation as a feedstock, the company said during its third quarter earnings call. Preliminary data suggest a potential cost reduction of $110/t compared to petrochemical naphtha, which is currently used in several of Braskem's facilities. The company already uses propane from Vaca Muerta at its Copesul plant in Triunfo, Rio Grande do Sul, where trials are underway to assess long-term viability. Feedstock selection will depend on pricing and logistics, with other Argentinian raw materials also under evaluation, chief executive Roberto Ramos said. The shutdown of Braskem's chlor-alkali plant in Alagoas between September and October led to layoffs and added pressure to its vinyls operations. To stabilize this segment, Braskem announced a strategic agreement with US-based Olin for the supply of ethylene dichloride (EDC). The deal supports Braskem's chlor-alkali and vinyl asset restructuring in Brazil. While supply volumes were not disclosed, the company expects the partnership to enhance competitiveness and sustainability in its PVC operations. Olin was selected for its cost-efficient EDC production, based on US shale gas ethane, and favorable logistics. Ramos cited these factors as decisive in formalizing the agreement. Average utilization rates across Braskem's petrochemical complexes fell to 65pc in the quarter, down 9 percentage points from the subsequent quarter and 8 points from a year prior. The decline was driven by scheduled maintenance at the Rio de Janeiro complex and a strategic reduction in naphtha-based production amid weak demand. Operational idle time costs the company approximately $60mn per quarter, Institutional relations director Rosana Avolio estimated. Braskem Idesa PE sales fall In Mexico, PE sales through the Braskem Idesa joint venture fell by 30pc year on year to 146,000t, mostly because of lower product availability, while spreads in the international market remained stable. Braskem Idesa's plant utilization rate fell to 47pc, down by 27 percentage points from a year earlier, because of a scheduled maintenance shutdown and reduced ethane supply from Mexico's state-owned Pemex, which fell to 11,300 b/d from 28,900 b/d in the previous year. The company's new ethane terminal, Terminal Quimica Puerto Mexico (TQPM), began supplying ethane to Braskem Idesa. TQPM, still in the commissioning phase, received approximately 11,300 b/d. The ethane supply from TQPM the Braskem Idesa plant is now operating above nominal capacity, which should support Ebitda growth in the coming quarters, Ramos said. Resin sales, prices down Braskem's Brazil resin sales fell by 9pc to 787,000t in the third quarter from a year before, with volumes also down in the US, Europe, and Mexico. International resin price references during the period were lower, impacting the profitability of its domestic sales, Braskem said in its preliminary third-quarter production and sales report. The company posted a R26mn ($4.9mn) loss for the quarter, narrowing from a R592mn loss in the third quarter of 2025 and from a R267mn loss in the second quarter this year. By Fred Fernandes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

State AGs: Groups' recycling work 'anticompetitive'


07/11/25
News
07/11/25

State AGs: Groups' recycling work 'anticompetitive'

Houston, 7 November (Argus) — A multistate coalition of US state attorneys general led by Florida are accusing environmental organizations of potentially violating state and federal antitrust laws by coordinating with large US corporations to impose "anticompetitive recycling practices." In a 29 October letter sent to the US Plastics Pact, The Consumer Goods Forum, and the Green Blue Institute, Florida attorney general James Uthmeier and attorneys general from Texas, Iowa, Nebraska and Montana said that by pushing major corporations to "align on restrictive plastic production and packaging standards" the environmental organizations are taking actions that could "unlawfully restrain competition, increase costs, and limit consumer choice." The letter states that by "collectively dictating what materials are deemed ‘recyclable'" the groups have driven up prices for consumers. "Radical environmental activists do not have the right, nor the avenue, to suppress business operations in our market," Uthmeier said in a separate statement, claiming the three groups were hindering the states' economic prosperity by coordinating business behavior, which he said would violate Florida's antitrust laws. The letters ask the environmental groups to explain how their "coordinated market activities" comply with state and federal antitrust laws, providing supporting documentation. The environmental groups targeted by the AGs promote voluntary packaging standards for major retail brands, offer recyclability guidelines and design frameworks that support sustainability. The Consumer Goods Forum said it has received the letter and will cooperate fully with the attorneys general to address the questions raised. The group said its programs are voluntary, transparent, and backed by antitrust compliance measures. The US Plastics Pact said it is reviewing the letter with legal counsel and remains confident its work complies with all applicable laws. Green Blue Institute has not responded to a request for comment. By Dona Davis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Nigeria Dangote ramps up gasoline output ahead of works


07/11/25
News
07/11/25

Nigeria Dangote ramps up gasoline output ahead of works

Lagos, 7 November (Argus) — Nigeria's 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery has ramped up gasoline production since mid-October and is building reserves, ahead of a potential planned maintenance shutdown. The plant's gasoline-producing RFCC unit restarted in October after around a month out of service. A source at the refinery said the unit may have to go offline again to fix some long-standing issues, and this may coincide with a shutdown of the crude distillation unit (CDU). Regulatory data show Dangote's gasoline production was 176,000 b/d on 14 October, post-resumption, and it averaged 195,000 b/d in the next four days. Output then averaged 252,000 b/d between 26–31 October and hit an all-time high of 283,000 b/d on 1 November. Regulatory data shows Dangote stored all the gasoline it produced on 14 October, the day its output ramp-up started. Road tanker and coastal tanker gasoline loadings between 15–31 October averaged 92,000 b/d and 41,000 b/d, respectively, indicating that most of the gasoline produced is going into storage. The RFCC may have to shut again, a refinery source said, for as long as 40 days across December and January, because of instability relating to its design and requirements that have been compounded by a too aggressive start-up pace. Dangote said on 26 October that a refinery debottlenecking process will be completed by early 2026, which suggests a planned CDU shutdown later this year. The two units could be offline at the same time, when gasoline demand is high for the Christmas period. Dangote can produce gasoline blendstock from three other units, and output averaged 151,000 b/d leading up to the RFCC restart. Other regulatory reports seen by Argus show average gasoline production of 129,000 b/d and 170,000 b/d in April and July, respectively. A source at the regulator said Dangote crude receipts have dipped recently, and the gasoline ramp-up has relied on a stock of low-sulphur straight-run (LSSR) fuel oil that was built up deliberately earlier in the year and passively while the RFCC was out. Argus tracking shows Dangote crude receipts edging down since August, and averaging 420,000 b/d in January-September. But Dangote told Argus on 31 October that the highest it had run its CDU at that point was 570,000 b/d. A local oil trader told Argus that if the RFCC stays up for as long as Dangote seems to intend, the refiner should be able to contribute to adequate gasoline supply in the holiday season. Another said Nigerian consumption is well within what Dangote can supply. Dangote said on 26 October, and again on 1 November, that there will be adequate gasoline supply during the holiday period. By Adebiyi Olusolape Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US high court questions Trump's tariff powers


05/11/25
News
05/11/25

US high court questions Trump's tariff powers

Washington, 5 November (Argus) — President Donald Trump's legal rationale for tariffs targeting major US trading partners ran into a skeptical review during a Supreme Court hearing on Wednesday, including from the justices appointed by him. The high court heard an appeal of two decisions by lower courts that found Trump's administration has overstepped its authority by placing emergency tariffs on most goods imported into the US. Trump has cited a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which previous presidents only used to impose targeted economic sanctions, to impose tariffs on all US trading partners. IEEPA omits references to tariffs. But the Trump administration justifies imposing them by citing two words in the text of the law — that "regulation" of "importation" is among the possible measures that the president can take to address an economic emergency. Tariffs are a foreign policy issue, which the Constitution delegates to the executive branch, solicitor general John Sauer argued on behalf of the administration. Tariffs are not a tax but a regulatory tool, Sauer said. The revenue from tariffs is incidental to the exercise of Trump's regulatory power in foreign policy domain, Sauer said. Both liberal and conservative justices challenged those arguments. Trump's reliance on a law never before used to impose tariffs raises the "major questions doctrine", said Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative. Roberts was referring to recent Supreme Court decisions, which state that it is up to Congress to decide prominent questions of economic significance. The president has a constitutionally granted authority over foreign policy but in this case, he exercised it by imposing "taxes on Americans, and that has always been the core power of Congress," Roberts said. The possibility that future presidents would use tariffs to advance unrelated policy priorities featured prominently in questions from the bench. "Could the president impose a 50pc tariff on gas-powered cars and auto parts to deal with the 'unusual and extraordinary threat' from abroad of climate change?", conservative justice Neil Gorsuch asked. Sauer acknowledged that the scenario was "highly likely", albeit not under Trump, as "this administration would say 'that's a hoax.'" The legal argument advanced by Trump means that former president Joe Biden could have declared a climate emergency, imposed tariffs and then used the tariff revenue for his student loan relief program, liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor said. "That's all Biden would have had to do with any of his programs." Gorsuch also challenged the government's argument that Congress can at any time remove the power of the president to impose tariffs under emergency authorities. "Congress, as a practical matter, can't get this power back once it handed it over," Gorsuch said. An extension of presidential powers can be enacted with a simple majority but has to be removed by a veto-proof majority, Gorsuch said. "It's a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch and away from the people's elected representatives." The legal cases before the court pit the Trump administration against a group of private companies and, separately, a coalition of states, who argued that IEEPA does not explicitly authorize Trump to use the tariffs he imposed. Conservative justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated that he would be open to defending the presidential authority to impose tariffs in at least some specific emergency situations, citing Trump's imposition of a 25pc tariff on imports from India in a bid to stop Indian purchases of Russian oil. Next steps The Supreme Court could take weeks, if not months, to make a decision. Trump's preferred outcome is for the high court to overturn the lower courts' decisions and keep the tariffs he imposed in place. "With a Victory, we have tremendous, but fair, Financial and National Security," Trump posted ahead of the hearing. "Without it, we are virtually defenseless against other Countries who have, for years, taken advantage of us." If the Supreme Court decides to keep the lower courts' decisions in place, Trump's administration would have to immediately lift the so-called "fentanyl" tariffs affecting Canada, Mexico and China and the so-called "reciprocal" tariffs of 10pc and higher, in place since 5 April on nearly every US trading partner. The courts' decisions will not affect tariffs Trump imposed on imports of steel, aluminum, cars and auto parts, as the administration has used other, unequivocal legal trade authorities. The Supreme Court would separately have to decide what to do about the revenue collected from emergency tariffs. One of the lower courts ordered that the defendants who challenged tariffs in courts must receive refunds, while another court ordered that all importers must receive refunds. The US government's tariff revenue ran at about $30bn/month as of August, according to an estimate by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more