Alliance pipeline seeks new rate structure
The long-haul Alliance pipeline has asked Canada's National Energy Board (NEB) to approve a new toll structure that would divide the pipeline into three rate zones, a major change that the pipeline said is needed for its long term economic survival.
The new structure would allow some shippers to share the risk of basis changes in the price of gas between western Canada and the Chicago market, which spiked substantially in the winter of 2013-14 as prices at Chicago Citygates peaked at above $42/mmBtu.
The NEB has set a schedule for the rate case and recently released a list of participants in the proceedings. The agency plans to make a final decision in April.
Alliance, a 2,311-mile (3,719km) system, carries liquids-rich natural gas from western Canada and the US midcontinent to the Great Lakes market. It was constructed primarily as a bullet line to ship gas from a single basin to the Aux Sable gas processing and fractionation plant at the pipeline's terminus in Channahon, Illinois. But Alliance also has found itself well-positioned to carry liquids-rich gas from developing unconventional formations such as the Bakken shale, primarily in North Dakota.
The pipeline said that changes in the natural gas market, including declining production in western Canada and increased use of gas in the Alberta oil sands industry, have decreased the overall availability of gas for export.
In addition, growing production from northeast US shale fields, including the Marcellus and the Utica, have greatly increased competition for western Canadian gas, including in the Great Lakes region, Alliance said in its NEB application filed in May.
"The development of both formations has and will continue to impact the overall natural gas supply and demand balance at the Chicago energy hub and in eastern Canada, requiring that Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin producers compete in these markets with Marcellus and Utica shale gas supply," Alliance said.
Alliance is a relatively new pipeline. It has been in commercial service since December 2000. The construction and operation of the Alliance system was supported by 15-year firm service contracts from 37 shippers.
In 2010, the majority of the pipeline's shippers declined to exercise their renewal rights under the transportation contracts. As a result, effective 1 December 2015, about 92pc of previously contracted capacity will become available to the market, Alliance said.
In an effort to attract shippers, the pipeline's new rate structure will offer new services and tolling flexibility, moving from a traditional cost of service model to a "market based model," Alliance said.
Tolling on the Canadian portion of the pipeline will be divided into three zones – two for receipt and one for delivery to the US-Canada border.
Zone 1, the gathering zone in Alberta, includes all receipt points downstream of the Blueberry Hill compressor station near the Alberta-British Columbia border. Zone 2 is the gathering zone in British Columbia, including all points downstream of Blueberry Hill.
Gas received in zones 1 and 2 will be delivered through to the US-Canada border through a new Alliance delivery zone. The three zones can be levied separately for services or added together for service to the US border.
The new toll structure also includes changes to the calculations of certain revenues including depreciation, return on equity and capital structure and a toll proposal that allows shippers to share with Alliance the risk of regional gas price changes.
Under the proposal, shippers agreeing to a minimum 5-year commitment would pay a lower floor toll, plus a risk-sharing mechanism based on a 50pc share of the increase above the toll floor of the western Canada‐Chicago basis.
The spot gas price premium at Chicago Citygates against the NIT/AECO hub in Alberta averaged $2.90/mmBtu during winter 2013-14 as several bouts of extreme cold caused record high prices in the Great Lakes region. Chicago's premium to NIT/AECO peaked at $37.95/mmBtu on 27 January.
The premium has narrowed significantly during the injection season, as mild temperatures and growing inventories put downward pressure on midcontinent prices. Chicago's premium to NIT/AECO from 1 April to 8 October averaged 32¢/mmBtu, down by 67pc from the same period a year earlier.
Alliance is taking on significant risk under the new rate proposal, but has little choice because "they have to attract shippers somehow," said Cameron Gingrich, director of gas services at the Calgary-based consultant group Ziff Energy.
Gingrich said that increasing competition in the Chicago market, including the planned partial reversal of the Rockies Express (Rex) pipeline, leaves little market share for a liquids-rich pipeline such as Alliance.
Several companies have applied to be a part of the rate case proceedings, including BP, which objected to Alliance's original application, saying that it was incomplete.
BP said in a filing to the NEB that the application lacked "solid and detailed evidence of substantial commercial support, such as a negotiated settlement, that demonstrates that the proposed tolls would be just and reasonable."
Other shippers on Alliance, including Noble Americas Gas & Power, Tenaska Marketing Canada, and Canadian Natural Resources filed letters in support of the rate proposal.
The NEB last month issued a list of participants in the proceedings, including BP Canada, TransCanada, Apache, Encana, Shell Canada, Talisman Energy, Aux Sable Liquids Products, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Canadian Natural Resources, and the Alberta provincial government.
emb/dcb/fn
Send comments to feedback@argusmedia.com
If you would like to review other ArgusMedia.com content options, request more information about Argus' energy news, data and analysis services.
Copyright © 2014 Argus Media Ltd - www.ArgusMedia.com - All rights reserved.
Related news posts
CEE gas operators begin binding capacity offer process
CEE gas operators begin binding capacity offer process
London, 2 May (Argus) — Gas transmission system operators (TSOs) across central and eastern Europe have launched the start of binding incremental capacity processes aimed at facilitating larger gas flows from south to north. Romanian, Bulgarian, Hungarian, Moldovan and Ukrainian operators have published joint documents outlining the necessary conditions for participating in the upcoming annual auctions on 1 July. Bulgarian and Romanian TSOs Bulgartransgaz and Transgaz will offer an additional roughly 123 GWh/d of capacity from Bulgaria to Romania at Negru Voda 1-Kardam on top of existing available capacity of 126-142 GWh/d depending on the year ( see BG-RO table ). In the event of a successful auction and subsequent economic test, the TSOs hope to reach a final investment decision (FID) in the third quarter of this year and commission the upgrades in the third quarter of 2026. Commercial operations could begin in the fourth quarter, aligning with the start of the 2026-27 gas year. This timeline has been moved forward by one year from the original proposals earlier this year . Transgaz, along with Hungary's FGSZ, will offer up to 73 GWh/d of additional capacity from Romania to Hungary at Csanadpalota on top of existing available capacity of 5-71 GWh/d depending on the year ( see RO-HU table ), but maintained its three-tiered approach elaborated in an earlier market consultation . Depending on the level of capacity to which firms commit at the auction, capacity could increase by 9.5 GWh/d, 47.3 GWh/d or 72.5 GWh/d. The smallest project could start commercial operations in the first quarter of 2028, the middle level in the third quarter of 2028, and the highest level in the third quarter of 2029. These timelines are pushed back by roughly one year from the originally-proposed dates in the February consultation. And Transgaz, along with Ukraine's GTSOU, will offer an additional 77 GWh/d of capacity from Romania to Ukraine at Isaccea 1-Orlovka 1 on top of existing available capacity of 97-109 GWh/d depending on the year ( see RO-UA table ). The TSOs aim to reach FID in the third quarter of this year and commission the project in the fourth quarter of 2028. Commercial operations could begin in October 2028. GTSOU and its Moldovan counterpart Vestmoldtransgaz will offer 173 GWh/d towards Moldova from Ukraine at Kaushany starting from the 2027-28 gas year, while simultaneously offering 159 GWh/d of capacity from Moldova towards Ukraine at Grebenyky. By Brendan A'Hearn Available and incremental capacity at Negru Voda/Kardam GWh/d/yr Gas year Available existing cap Incremental cap Total 2024-25 141 - 141 2025-26 141 - 141 2026-27 142 123 265 2027-28 142 123 265 2028-29 142 123 265 2029-30-2042 126 123 249 — Bulgartransgaz, Transgaz; numbers rounded Available and incremental capacity at Csanadpalota GWh/d/yr Gas year Available existing cap Incremental cap Total 2024-25 43 - 43 2025-26 46 - 46 2026-27 71 - 71 2027-28 13 - 142 2028-29 13 - 13 2029-30 5 73 78 2030-31 34 73 107 2031-32 34 73 107 2032-33-2039 63 73 136 — FGSZ, Transgaz; numbers rounded Available and incremental capacity at Isaccea/Orlovka GWh/d/yr Gas year Available existing cap Incremental cap Total 2024-25 109 - 109 2025-26 109 - 109 2026-27 109 - 109 2027-28 109 - 186 2028-29 109 77 186 2029-30-2039 97 77 174 — GTSOU, Transgaz; numbers rounded Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining
Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining
London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell delivered a better-than-expected profit for the first quarter of 2024, helped by a strong performance from its LNG and oil product businesses. The company reported profit of $7.4bn for January-March, up sharply from an impairment-hit $474mn in the previous three months but down from $8.7bn in the first quarter of 2023. Adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items, Shell's profit came in at $7.7bn, 6pc ahead of the preceding three months and above analysts' estimates of $6.3bn-$6.5bn, although it was 20pc lower than the first quarter of 2023 when gas prices were higher. Shell's oil and gas production increased by 3pc on the quarter in January-March and was broadly flat compared with a year earlier at 2.91mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d). For the current quarter, Shell expects production in a range of 2.55mn-2.81mn boe/d, reflecting the effect of scheduled maintenance across its portfolio. The company's Integrated Gas segment delivered a profit of $2.76bn in the first quarter, up from $1.73bn in the previous three months and $2.41bn a year earlier. The segment benefited from increased LNG volumes — 7.58mn t compared to 7.06mn t in the previous quarter and 7.19mn t a year earlier — as well as favourable deferred tax movements and lower operating expenses. For the current quarter, Shell expects to produce 6.8mn-7.4mn t of LNG. In the downstream, the company's Chemicals and Products segment swung to a profit of $1.16bn during the quarter from an impairment-driven loss of $1.83bn in the previous three months, supported by a strong contribution from oil trading operations and higher refining margins driven by greater utilisation of its refineries and global supply disruptions. Shell's refinery throughput increased to 1.43mn b/d in the first quarter from 1.32mn b/d in fourth quarter of last year and 1.41mn b/d in January-March 2023. Shell has maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.344/share. It also said it has completed the $3.5bn programme of share repurchases that it announced at its previous set of results and plans to buy back another $3.5bn of its shares before the company's next quarterly results announcement. The company said it expects its capital spending for the year to be within a $22bn-$25bn range. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US Fed signals rates likely to stay high for longer
US Fed signals rates likely to stay high for longer
Houston, 1 May (Argus) — Federal Reserve policymakers signaled they are likely to hold rates higher for longer until they are confident inflation is slowing "sustainably" towards the 2pc target. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) held the federal funds target rate unchanged at a 23-year high of 5.25-5.5pc, for the sixth consecutive meeting. This followed 11 rate increases from March 2022 through July 2023 that amounted to the most aggressive hiking campaign in four decades. "We don't think it would be appropriate to dial back our restrictive policy stance until we've gained greater confidence that inflation is moving down sustainably," Fed chair Jerome Powell told a press conference after the meeting. "It appears it'll take longer to reach the point of confidence that rate cuts will be in scope." In a statement the FOMC cited a lack of further progress towards the committee's 2pc inflation objective in recent months as part of the decision to hold the rate steady. Despite this, the FOMC said the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals "have moved toward better balance over the past year," shifting prior language that said the goals "are moving into better balance." The decision to keep rates steady was widely expected. CME's FedWatch tool, which tracks fed funds futures trading, had assigned a 99pc probability to the Fed holding rates steady today while giving 58pc odds of rate declines beginning at the 7 November meeting. In March, Fed policymakers had signaled they believed three quarter points cuts were likely this year. Inflation has ticked up lately after falling from four-decade highs in mid-2022. The consumer price index inched back up to an annual 3.5pc in March after reaching a recent low of 3pc in June 2023. The employment cost index edged up in the first quarter to the highest in a year. At the same time, job growth, wages and demand have remained resilient. The Fed also said it would begin slowing the pace of reducing its balance sheet of Treasuries and other notes in June, partly to avoid stress in money markets. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
FERC OK’s Virginia Transco gasline expansion
FERC OK’s Virginia Transco gasline expansion
New York, 1 May (Argus) — The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) today gave Williams the green light to expand natural gas capacity to Virginia by 101mn cf/d (2.9mn m3/d) on its Transco pipeline. The project, called the Commonwealth Energy Connector, involves the construction of 6.3 miles of new pipeline within Transco's existing right-of-way in southeast Virginia, near the border with North Carolina. The project also includes adding horsepower at compressor station 168, west of the new pipeline segment. Williams plans to begin construction this winter and put the project into service by the end of 2025. Environmental advocacy group Sierra Club opposed the project, arguing FERC failed to assess its potential greenhouse gas emissions, rendering its National Environmental Policy Act analysis moot. FERC disagreed, conceding that although the project's final Environmental Impact Statement demonstrated it would contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, the effects of those emissions on the environment could not be measured because FERC lacks the methodology to do so. The US south-Atlantic gas market has become more volatile in recent years as gas and power demand have soared, outpacing pipeline capacity expansions in the region. The combined gas consumption of Virginia and North and South Carolina in 2022 averaged 4.7 Bcf/d, up by 69pc from a decade earlier, US Energy Information Administration data show. Regional gas and power consumption is widely expected to continue climbing through the end of the decade on a massive build-out of data centers , especially in Virginia. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more