US considering coal exports through military bases

  • Market: Coal
  • 15/10/18

A proposal by US interior secretary Ryan Zinke to use retired military bases in the US as transit points for coal and natural gas exports could enhance opportunities for western energy resources, industry members said today.

"Globally, the coal markets are still growing," said Lucas Pipes, an analyst with investment bank B Riley FBR. He pegged expected growth for seaborne markets at 1pc to 1.5pc/yr over the next 10 years. "And with little supply coming on line, the US is viewed more as a strategic supplier. New port capacity could play a longer-term role" in keeping US coal present in the global market.

The plan, confirmed by the Interior Department today, would potentially allow President Donald Trump's administration to circumvent efforts by environmental groups to halt development of private terminals on the west coast, namely Millennium's Longview terminal in Washington or the Oakland Bulk and Oversized Terminal in California.

"The president and secretary are committed to the men and women of coal country, and it should come as no surprise that secretary Zinke has put a number of options on the table to revitalize these communities and achieve ‘American energy dominance,'" the Interior Department said. It would not elaborate further on the plan.

What affect opening military bases to exporting would have on the coal industry will depend on the locations, among other things, Pipes said.

"What was mentioned was one base in Alaska, and that would have a small implication for coal," he said. "The rail costs to get there are substantial."

To benefit coal production in states such as Wyoming, Montana or Utah, the bases would have to be located in Washington, Oregon or California, Pipes said. He has not studied if any bases would have the required access to rail and the deep water port necessary to export coal.

"I think (the administration proposal) shows how important it is that the US has access to the Asian energy markets," said Wendy Hutchinson, a senior vice president with Millennium Bulk Terminals-Longview, which is attempting to build a coal export facility in Washington. "My preference, of course, would be for the coal to go through our terminal."

US coal producers have become increasingly reliant on exports as the US power sector has turned away from coal-fired generation in favor of renewables and natural gas-fired units.

US exports have climbed over the last two years and are on track to reach a five-year high this year. But the benefit of the increase has largely been limited to Appalachian and Illinois basin producers.

Just 7.8mn short tons (7.07mn metric tonnes) of coal was shipped out of terminals in California, Washington and Alaska from January to August, according to US Census Bureau data. While that was up from 5.63mn st in the same period of 2017, it represented just 3.6pc of what PRB and western bituminous coal producers are estimated to have produced during that time.

More coal was shipped through Westshore Terminals in Vancouver, Canada, but it is unclear how much of the 20mn t of loadings the terminal reported were from US producers.

Meanwhile, exports from eastern US terminals and the Gulf of Mexico totaled 63.3mn st and represented 36pc of Appalachian and Illinois basin coal production.

At the same time, all major US coal basins have been delivering less coal to domestic customers this year, government fuel receipts data show.

Cloud Peak Energy, which operates three coal mines in Wyoming, said it welcomes the effort to increase exports out of the Western United States.

"The development of an export terminal in the Pacific Northwest of the United States would significantly enhance US allies' access to secure, high-quality, low-sulfur coal and should be welcomed on both sides of the Pacific," a spokesman for the company said.

Like a proposal earlier this year to deem coal-fired generation necessary to baseload energy, this plan also cites national security interest because it allows the nation's allies better access to US-produced energy.

Cloud Peak already provides coal to customers in Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong through Westshore Terminals.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans

Houston, 24 April (Argus) — Barges are facing lengthy delays at the Algiers lock near New Orleans as vessels reroute around closures at the Port Allen lock and the Algiers Canal. Delays at the Algiers Lock —at the interconnection of the Mississippi River and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway— have reached around 37 hours in the past day, according to the US Army Corps of Engineers' lock report. Around 50 vessels are waiting to cross the Algiers lock. Another 70 vessels were waiting at the nearby Harvey lock with a six-hour wait in the past day. The closure at Port Allen lock has spurred the delays, causing vessels to reroute through the Algiers lock. The Port Allen lock is expected to reopen on 28 April, which should relieve pressure on the Algiers lock. Some traffic has been rerouted through the nearby Harvey lock since the Algiers Canal was closed by a collapsed powerline, the US Coast Guard said. The powerline fell on two barges, but no injuries or damages were reported. The wire is being removed by energy company Entergy. The canal is anticipated to reopen at midnight on 25 April. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel

Cheyenne, 24 April (Argus) — The Port of Baltimore is preparing to open another, deeper temporary shipping channel this week so at least some of the vessels that have been stranded at the port can depart. The new 35-ft deep Fort McHenry Limited Access Channel is scheduled to be open to commercially essential vessels from 25 April until 6am ET on 29 April or 30 April "if weather adversely impacts vessel transits," according to a US Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin. The channel will then be closed again until 10 May. The channel also will have a 300-ft horizontal clearance and 214-ft vertical clearance. This will be the fourth and largest channel opened since the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The Unified Command has said that the new limited access channel should allow passage of about 75pc of the types of vessels that typically move through the waterway. Vessels that have greater than 60,000 long tons (60,963 metric tonnes) of displacement will likely not be able to move through the channel and those between 50,000-60,000 long tons of displacement "will be closely evaluated" for transit. There were seven vessels blocked from exiting the port as of 27 March, including three dry bulk carriers, one vehicle carrier and one tanker, according to the US Department of Transportation. Two of the bulk carriers at berth in Baltimore are Kamsarmax-sized coal vessels, data from analytics firm Kpler show. The US Army Corps of Engineers still expects to reopen the Port of Baltimore's permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel by the end of May. The Key Bridge collapsed into the water late last month when the 116,851dwt container ship Dali lost power and crashed into a bridge support column. Salvage teams have been working to remove debris from the water and containers from the ship in order to clear the main channel. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules

Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement

Manila, 24 April (Argus) — Early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants in the Philippines has advanced with utility Ayala Energy's 246MW South Luzon Thermal Energy eligible for the US-based Rockefeller Foundation's coal to clean credit initiative (CCCI). The Rockefeller Foundation is a non-profit philanthropic group that creates and implements programmes in partnership with the private sector across different industries aimed at reversing climate change. Ayala has been working with the foundation to further shorten South Luzon's operating life from an original decommissioning date of 2040 to 2030. Doing so could result in the reduction of up to 19mn t of carbon emissions, Ayala said. An assessment by the Rocky Mountain Institute, the technical partner of the foundation for its energy-related projects, found that an early retirement date of 2030 instead of the original retirement date of 2040 could yield positive financial, social and climate outcomes. But decommissioning by this date will require carbon finance. Carbon financing will need to cover costs associated with the early retirement of the power plant's power supply contract, costs associated with 100pc clean replacement of the plant's power generation, plant decommissioning and transition support for workers affected by the plant's early closure, Ayala said. Ayala's listed arm ACEN welcomed the plant's eligibility for the CCCI programme, as its retirement is part of the company's goal to have its power generation portfolio composed solely of 100pc renewable sources by 2025. The Philippines' Department of Energy (DOE) said if successful, the pilot programme could serve as a basis for the development of other early retirement efforts as part of the country's plan to reduce carbon emissions. The DOE is seeking the early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants older than 20 years with a combined total capacity of 3.8GW by 2050, as part of the Philippines' transition to clean energy. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more