China customs maintains restrictions on coal imports

  • Market: Coal, Coking coal
  • 15/11/18

China's customs will maintain strict volume quotas for coal in an effort to reverse growth in imports that run counter to the policy goals of the country's main planning agency.

This year's coal import quota will not be extended to February 2019 as some market participants expected, but customs will maintain restrictions at south China ports for the rest of this year and step up restrictions at north China ports.

The strictest controls on coal imports have previously been placed on south China ports, as the coastal steel producers and power plants import the largest amount of coal. China's coal imports have risen by 11pc to 252.04mn t during January-October, according to customs data. But importers face a quota set to no more than the 2017 total of 270.9mn t. Coking coal accounted for 70mn t of the 2017 total.

The general administration of customs stressed during meetings yesterday in various Chinese provinces that strict controls will have to be maintained because there is just 9mn t of coal import quotas remaining for all Chinese ports this year.

Participants in the coking coal market have stressed that these import restrictions are aimed towards limiting thermal coal imports so that domestic thermal coal prices do not come off too much. But since Chinese customs do not differentiate between thermal and coking coal imports, any restrictions on coal imports will have a ripple effect on coking coal.

Officials from China's main economic planning agency the NDRC at the meetings yesterday dismissed as untrue earlier discussions about a complete ban on all coal imports, saying existing policies on coal imports are unchanged.

North China sees delays

Restrictions at north China ports have been slowly coming up before meetings yesterday, market participants said. There is no outright ban on coal imports, but vessels have begun to see extended waiting times to berth and to clear customs inspections. The delays are aimed at discouraging coal imports by making it more difficult for buyers.

In some ways, power plants are expected to have some leeway in maneuvering through restrictions.

"Should a utility really need to import a cargo of thermal coal for instance, customs will allow them to do so but on a case-by-case basis, depending on the actual demand and needs of the utility in question," an attendee at one of the meetings said. "But the authorities' stand on coking coal is clearly a negative, coking coal is not an essential commodity in their eyes."

The changes will have the biggest impact at Jingtang port in Hebei province, which until now remained one of the few ports that trading firms could berth and unload coking coal cargoes with little limits. Portside coking coal trades at Jingtang port have been active over the past month, driven by high seaborne cargo offers and long waiting times to berth vessels shifting buyers to portside markets.

"We heard that Jingtang port will temporarily only allow locally registered companies to declare their cargoes to customs. Companies registered in other cities will not be allowed to declare cargoes," a Beijing-based trader said. "There is also talk of Jingtang port possibly further tightening their policies on coal imports soon."

"We do not expect these enhanced restrictions to change our procurement strategy much," a south China steel producer said. "At the very most we will just put off procuring December-loading cargoes until the situation becomes clearer."

December cargoes affected

North China steel producers that previously had intentions to import premium low-volatile hard coking coals might have to postpone these plans.

Prior to the meetings, some Chinese steel producers had planned to buy top-tier seaborne coking coal cargoes loading in December, in anticipation of port import quotas being reset at the end of the calendar year. With about 20 days required for cargoes to reach China from Australia, any cargoes loaded in December will arrive in China just after the start of the 2019 when there is more than sufficient quota volumes.

But steel producers are apprehensive as they are now poised to lose an important alternative source of coking coal.

"We do not import much seaborne coal, but the quality of Australian coking coal is virtually unmatched," the same south China steel producer said. "We have complained to the authorities that we might face problems producing if we are barred from importing coal, but their response is simply for us to buy up the remaining domestic coking coal inventories from north China ports."

"The quality of domestic coking coal quality can never match that of Australia," he added. "Domestic coals are simply too high in sulphur and phosphorus for us to use them without flouting environmental protection rules. We are being squeezed from both sides."

"We have two more imported coking coal cargoes that will arrive by the end of this year, so we're currently liaising with customs to see how we can manage the situation," a north China steel producer said. "But we're not too worried as we have enough inventories."


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel

Cheyenne, 24 April (Argus) — The Port of Baltimore is preparing to open another, deeper temporary shipping channel this week so at least some of the vessels that have been stranded at the port can depart. The new 35-ft deep Fort McHenry Limited Access Channel is scheduled to be open to commercially essential vessels from 25 April until 6am ET on 29 April or 30 April "if weather adversely impacts vessel transits," according to a US Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin. The channel will then be closed again until 10 May. The channel also will have a 300-ft horizontal clearance and 214-ft vertical clearance. This will be the fourth and largest channel opened since the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The Unified Command has said that the new limited access channel should allow passage of about 75pc of the types of vessels that typically move through the waterway. Vessels that have greater than 60,000 long tons (60,963 metric tonnes) of displacement will likely not be able to move through the channel and those between 50,000-60,000 long tons of displacement "will be closely evaluated" for transit. There were seven vessels blocked from exiting the port as of 27 March, including three dry bulk carriers, one vehicle carrier and one tanker, according to the US Department of Transportation. Two of the bulk carriers at berth in Baltimore are Kamsarmax-sized coal vessels, data from analytics firm Kpler show. The US Army Corps of Engineers still expects to reopen the Port of Baltimore's permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel by the end of May. The Key Bridge collapsed into the water late last month when the 116,851dwt container ship Dali lost power and crashed into a bridge support column. Salvage teams have been working to remove debris from the water and containers from the ship in order to clear the main channel. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules

Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement

Manila, 24 April (Argus) — Early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants in the Philippines has advanced with utility Ayala Energy's 246MW South Luzon Thermal Energy eligible for the US-based Rockefeller Foundation's coal to clean credit initiative (CCCI). The Rockefeller Foundation is a non-profit philanthropic group that creates and implements programmes in partnership with the private sector across different industries aimed at reversing climate change. Ayala has been working with the foundation to further shorten South Luzon's operating life from an original decommissioning date of 2040 to 2030. Doing so could result in the reduction of up to 19mn t of carbon emissions, Ayala said. An assessment by the Rocky Mountain Institute, the technical partner of the foundation for its energy-related projects, found that an early retirement date of 2030 instead of the original retirement date of 2040 could yield positive financial, social and climate outcomes. But decommissioning by this date will require carbon finance. Carbon financing will need to cover costs associated with the early retirement of the power plant's power supply contract, costs associated with 100pc clean replacement of the plant's power generation, plant decommissioning and transition support for workers affected by the plant's early closure, Ayala said. Ayala's listed arm ACEN welcomed the plant's eligibility for the CCCI programme, as its retirement is part of the company's goal to have its power generation portfolio composed solely of 100pc renewable sources by 2025. The Philippines' Department of Energy (DOE) said if successful, the pilot programme could serve as a basis for the development of other early retirement efforts as part of the country's plan to reduce carbon emissions. The DOE is seeking the early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants older than 20 years with a combined total capacity of 3.8GW by 2050, as part of the Philippines' transition to clean energy. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US-led carbon initiative misses launch date


23/04/24
News
23/04/24

US-led carbon initiative misses launch date

Houston, 23 April (Argus) — The Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA), a global initiative to use voluntary carbon market revenue to speed the decarbonization of developing countries' power sectors, has missed its planned Earth Day launch but continues to prepare for doing business. At the Cop 28 climate conference in Dubai last year, the initiative's leaders said they hoped to formally launch the program on 22 April 2024 . That didn't happen, but the program's leaders last week announced that the US climate think tank Center for Climate and Energy Solutions will serve as the ETA's new secretariat and that former US special presidential envoy for climate John Kerry will serve as the honorary chair of an eight-member senior consultative group that will advise the ETA's design and operations. The ETA plans to spend 2024 "building" on a framework for crediting projects they released last year. ETA leaders said the initiative could ultimately generate tens of billions of dollars in finances through 2035. The ETA also said the Dominican Republic had formed a government working group to "guide its engagement" as a potential pilot country for investments and that the Philippines would formally participate as an "observer country" rather than as a direct participant immediately. The ETA is still engaging Chile and Nigeria as potential pilot countries too, the initiative told Argus . The ETA is being developed by the US State Department, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Bezos Earth Fund and would be funded with money from the voluntary carbon market. The initiative's ultimate goal is to allow corporate and government offset buyers to help developing countries decarbonize their power sectors through large projects that accelerate the retirement of coal-fired power plants and build new renewable generation. As of now, the ETA's timeline for future changes and negotiations with countries and companies is unclear. The program's goals are ambitious, especially at a time when scrutiny of some voluntary carbon market projects from environmentalists has weighed on corporate offset demand. By Mia Westley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more