South African spot prices halt declines

  • Market: Coal
  • 06/09/19

An expected increase in Indian seaborne coal demand helped support South African spot prices this week, as the origin's competitive price advantage has boosted offtake from Indian port stocks in recent weeks.

NAR 6,000 kcal/kg fob Richards Bay (RB) spot prices ended five consecutive weeks of falls this week, rebounding by $2.78/t to $58.96/t.

Further ahead, two API 4 index-linked deals were concluded. A 50,000 t/month calendar 2020 loading deal changed hands at a 70¢/t discount to API 4 on 2 September, followed by a 50,000 t/month first-quarter 2020 trade at an 80¢/t discount to the benchmark the following day.

API 4 first quarter 2020 and calendar 2020 swaps settled at $63.80/t and $67.85/t, respectively, on 6 September.

Stockpiles at the Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT) rose by about 650,000t on the week to more than 4.6mn t — the highest level since February — on reduced vessel loadings and steady rail deliveries to the port, market participants said.

August loadings from the terminal fell to about 4.8mn t, shipping data show, from less than 5mn t a year earlier and a 2015-17 August average of 5.8mn t.

But vessel loadings scheduled for the first seven days of this month indicate an average load rate of just 77,100 t/d, down from 156,300 t/d in August.

Indian buying interest in prompt-loading South African cargoes was quiet this week, although recent sales from Indian port stocks could revive demand for seaborne supply in the near term.

Sellers traded South African NAR 4,800 kcal/kg supplies from some east coast port stocks at about $50/t cfr to buyers, market participants said. And some power producers have procured NAR 4,800 kcal/kg South African supply from port inventories.

But not all utilities can consume South African coal because of its lower-volatile matter, so are likely opting to blend this origin with higher-volatile-matter domestic supply or Indonesian seaborne coal.

Some utilities have been interested in this grade given its increasing cost advantage over spot Indonesian GAR 5,000 kcal/kg supplies, which were assessed at $46.11/t fob this week or around $55.30/t on an India-landed basis, Argus calculates.

Argus assessed the NAR 4,800 kcal/kg fob RB market at a $12.50/t discount to API 4 front month swaps this week, or $38.97/t.

This would value India-landed NAR 4,800 kcal/kg coal at around $52.70/t, up to a $2.70/t premium to recent stock-and-sale trades from Indian inventories and a $2.60/t discount to Indonesian GAR 5,000 kcal/kg supplies.

Over the previous three weeks, India-delivered, including taxes and railing, NAR 4,800 kcal/kg South African spot cargoes were priced at about a $5.20/t discount to Indonesian GAR 5,000 kcal/kg supplies. This was wider than the $1/t average discount in July, but still narrow compared with the average $7.40/t discount over the first half of this year, under Argus estimates.

But when including taxes, rail freight and energy-adjusted to NAR 5,500 kcal/kg, the lower grade South African coal was still at a premium of around $1.50/t to its NAR 5,500 kcal/kg counterpart. This suggests that future Indian spot demand for seaborne NAR 4,800 kcal/kg cargoes could be limited given its lack of an energy-adjusted price advantage.

Even amid the recent stock-and-sale interest from buyers, stockpiles at some Indian ports remain high. Coal inventories at Gangavaram port rose to 4.15mn t at the end of August, of which thermal coal accounted for 3.6mn t, data from shipbroker Interocean show. By contrast, overall coal stockpiles were 3.65mn t in early September 2018 and averaged 2.84mn t at month's end in January-July.

Gangavaram's thermal coal arrivals are predominately composed of South African supplies, shipping data show, with one market participant estimating that South African tonnes could account for roughly 2mn t the port's total coal inventories.

Gangavaram imported 9.89mn t of thermal coal in January-August, climbing from 8.2mn t a year earlier, provisional data from e-commerce firm Mjunction show.

But coal evacuation from ports has slowed on lower industrial activity, with output from some sponge iron firms down by 50-60pc as a result of lower margins, market participants said.

While industrial activity typically drops off during the June-September monsoon rains, funding challenges and cash shortages could continue to weigh on industrial output and associated fuel demand. But some market participants anticipate stronger Indian buying interest for prompt cargoes from the second half of September as the monsoon season draws to a close and amid expectations that government spending on infrastructure could pick up.

European spot markets gain

Meanwhile, European-delivered spot prices surged on the week as November entered the assessment window.

Argus assessed the weekly NAR 6,000 kcal/kg cif Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) market at $56.88/t, climbing by $8.25/t on the week.

Spot prices rose despite sluggish coal burn in August. Total coal-fired generation across Germany, Spain, the UK and France dropped by 6.7TWh to 3.6TWh in August, a fall of nearly a third of what it was during the same period last year.

Gas-fired generation rose by 4.6TWh on the year to 21.3TWh in the same four countries as the fuel retained a significant cost advantage for thermal generation. This increased its share of total power generation and thermal output to 19pc and 64pc, respectively, from 14pc and 43pc last year.

The average front-month clean dark spread (CDS) for German 40pc-efficient coal-fired plants recovered slightly but remained negative at minus 76¢/MWh in August, from minus €1.65/MWh in July. And the fourth-quarter 2019 CDS stood at €2.83/MWh, well down compared with €9.93/MWh during the same period a year ago.

Forward prices suggest that coal-fired plants may be able to compete with lower-efficiency gas-fired plants in the fourth quarter of this year, with the expected rise in seasonal demand helping support winter prices at the German NCG gas hub at a wide premium to the spot market.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
18/04/24

Australia’s Queensland legislates emissions targets

Australia’s Queensland legislates emissions targets

Sydney, 18 April (Argus) — Australia's Queensland state today approved two separate laws setting renewable energy and emissions reduction targets over the next decade, as it transitions away from a coal-fired dependent power generation system. Queensland set net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets of 30pc below 2005 levels by 2030, 75pc by 2035 and zero by 2050 under the Clean Economy Jobs Act, while theEnergy (Renewable Transformation and Jobs) Act sets renewable energy targets of 50pc by 2030, 70pc by 2032 and 80pc by 2035. The state is on track to surpass the 2030 emissions target, latest data show, as it achieved a 29pc reduction in 2021. Even though the share of renewables in the power mix last year was the lowest across Australia at 26.9pc, it has been increasing consistently since 2015 when it was 4.5pc, according to data from the National Electricity Market's OpenNem website. Coal-fired generation has been steadily falling, down to 42.9TWh or a 65.7pc share in 2023 from 52.9TWh or 83pc in 2018. Most of Queensland's coal-fired plants belong to state-owned utilities, which the previous Labor party-led government of Annastacia Palaszczuk indicated would stop burning coal by 2035 . The new Labor party premier Steven Miles disclosed the 75pc emissions reduction target by 2035 in his first speech as leader last December. The Energy Act locks in public ownership of electricity assets, ensuring that at least 54pc of power generation assets above 30MW remain under state control, as well as 100pc of all transmission and distribution assets and 100pc of so-called "deep storage" assets — pumped hydro plants with at least 1.5GW of capacity. The government will need to prepare and publish a public ownership strategy for the July 2025-June 2030 and July 2030-June 2035 periods. A fund totalling A$150mn ($97mn) will also be set up to ensure workers at existing state-owned coal-fired power plants and associated coal mines have access to new jobs and training or financial assistance during the transition. The Clean Economy Jobs Act sees the government receiving advice from an expert panel on the measures needed to reduce emissions. The government will need to develop and publish sector plans by the end of 2025 with annual progress reports to Queensland's parliament. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Q&A: Ramaco adding production, sees market growth


16/04/24
News
16/04/24

Q&A: Ramaco adding production, sees market growth

New York, 16 April (Argus) — Randall Atkins is a founder and chief executive of metallurgical coal producer Ramaco Resources. He also has been involved in energy-related investment and financing activity for over 40 years. In this Q&A, edited for length and clarity, he discusses effects from the Francis Scott Key bridge collapse, his outlook for coal and the company's research projects. What effect has the Key bridge collapse and Port of Baltimore closing had on Ramaco and the US coal industry in general? Like most things of that tragic nature, it is going to take longer than everyone expects to actually solve the problem. I think where it is going to impact producers probably more is on the rails. There will be a need for...producers to rearrange stockpiles and to rearrange where they are going to try and ship, even at reduced levels. Particularly, CSX is going to have an immense logistical complexity to deal with over the near-term. We do not ship from Baltimore. We have not seen any problems, knock on wood, with our rail shipments post the incident. What are your long-term projections for metallurgical coal given expectations that low-volatile coal reserves will shrink in coming decades and the steel industry could be in oversupply? Low vol coal has traditionally been the highest priced coal and the dearest, if you will. High vol A coal has over the last few years grown in importance, and to the extent that there is any new increase in production in the US, it's high vol. What we perceive is that there is going to be a crowding in the high vol space. As a result, our increase in production is primarily in low vol. As far as the demand side is concerned, we do not believe that blast furnace steel demand is going to decline anytime soon. There's a lot of noise from the green community that hydrogen is going to replace coal in blast furnaces. We took some advice on that from the IEA…and when that question was posed (to IEA), the answer that was given was it would take about $1.5 trillion to build a pilot plant using hydrogen by 2035 and probably about another equal or greater sum to build a commercial facility by 2040. So, I don't lose a lot of sleep on the demand for coal for blast furnaces. What I do see shifting, however, is the US has held relatively steady at about 20mn short tons (18.1mn metric tonnes) of met coal demand over the last 10 to 15 years. The growth is clearly overseas, and the growth is clearly at the moment in Asia. When we started back in 2017, and 2018 was really our first year of production, we predominantly sold coal domestically; I think 80pc of our coal went to US steel mills. Now that is almost reversed. We're going to sell probably this year, 70pc overseas, and about a third or less domestically. With Europe moving towards electric arc furnace technology and significant new blast furnace capacity coming online in Asia, what kind of role will the US play as a coal supplier over the coming years? It is cheaper to use a blast furnace than electric arc. And the steel that they (Asian companies) mostly require is the heavier steel for cars and buildings and things of that nature. So, they have a bias towards blast furnace capacity. The US and Europe are very developed economies that are trying to go and wean away from coal, (while) the rest of the world is aggressively moving further into coal. People will shake their heads at the cost that European and American consumers will start to have to pay for that privilege. We see market growth is still there, but it's a different kind of growth. It will be more in the Asian markets, predominantly some in Europe, some in South America and Africa. The low vol coal demand in Asia is extremely strong because while they are able to buy high vol product from Australia very inexpensively, they do not have the low vol production. They need that to blend up to get the proper mix in their blast furnaces. There is a very good future for low vol, and that is the direction we are positioning ourselves. How confident is Ramaco about securing its investments in the longer run given the emphasis on ESG? What I see is sort of a dichotomy. In the thermal coal business, there's not a lot of investment in new mining there for the obvious reason that their customer base is declining. On the met side, it is a bit shortsighted from an investment standpoint because of the composition of the ownership of met coal companies. Virtually every major metallurgical coal producer except for us went through bankruptcy and post-bankruptcy proceedings. Their board composition became essentially distressed debt investors...Their interest was not developing a long-term coal company. Strategically their vision was: "How can we most quickly get money back out of that coal company?" We are certainly the only coal company that is doubling in size. We produced a little under 4mn st last year. We will be at about 4.5mn st this year. We can maybe go higher, depending upon the market. The market is not strong right now. The other issue (for coal producers) even when they weren't doing special dividends, is they've now shifted to doing large-scale share buybacks. You are starting to see the cost curve increase for most domestic coal producers. What you haven't seen, but I think you will probably find over the next probably 18 to 24 months, is you will begin to see depletion kick in. The amount of coal that they are able to produce from their existing operation will begin to decline. And that is strictly a result of not investing in new mine production. My approach was to kind of be a little bit of an outlier and then approach coal to products as an alternative use, certainly for thermal coal. And that, of course, brought us to rare earth (mineral extraction). Do you have funding for Ramaco's rare earth materials projects? Let me step back one step. We introduced the idea that we actually had rare earth (deposits) in May 2023….When we sent the samples to be tested, they tested them as if they were hard minerals. In other words, they did not combust off the organic material. What we have done since then, is we went back and we had samples that were probably 200-300 parts per million. From a commercial standpoint, we have kind of crossed the Rubicon that this is indeed sufficiently concentrated that it makes commercial sense. Now what we are doing is we are going through a process of further chemical analysis and testing to determine what is the best extraction and refinement technique. And the last point you raised was financing. We have a very nice growing mining metallurgical business, which can provide the funding to do whatever we want to do on rare earth. I am not too concerned about our financing capability. Any updates on your coal-to-carbon product projects ? We have looked at a number of different things with the national labs. We started looking at carbon fiber, which could be made from coal and we have got some patents around some very interesting processes. The areas that we are now focusing on...are using coal to make synthetic graphite. The other thing we are working on is using coal for direct air capture. We are considering going into a pilot phase sometime starting later this year with Oak Ridge National Laboratory on a synthetic graphite plant. As far as direct air capture, we probably have more work to do. We are also working on that with Oak Ridge. But I would hope that sometime by 2025, certainly 2026, we would perhaps have our first product, quote unquote, to be able to offer into the market. And it would be delightful if it was synthetic graphite. By Elena Vasilyeva Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australian new environment agency to speed up approvals


16/04/24
News
16/04/24

Australian new environment agency to speed up approvals

Sydney, 16 April (Argus) — The Australian federal government announced today it will introduce new legislation in the coming weeks to implement the second stage of its Nature Positive Plan, which includes setting up a national environment protection agency to speed up approval decisions. The planned Environment Protection Australia (EPA) will initially operate within the Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water until it transitions to become an independent statutory agency, with "strong new powers and penalties" to better enforce federal laws, the government said on 16 April. The EPA chief will be an independent statutory appointment, similar to the Australian federal police commissioner, so that "no government can interfere" with the new agency's enforcement work. The agency will be able to audit businesses to ensure they are compliant with environment approval conditions and issue environment protection orders to anyone breaking the law. Penalties will be increased, with courts able to impose fines of up to A$780mn ($504mn) or jail terms for up to seven years in cases of extremely serious intentional breaches of federal environment law. EPA will also be tasked with speeding up development decisions, including project assessments in areas such as renewable energy and critical minerals. Almost A$100mn will be allocated to optimise the approval processes, with its budget directed to support staff to assess project proposals and help businesses comply with the law. A new independent body Environment Information Australia (EIA) will also be created to provide environmental data to the government and the public through a public website. EIA will need to develop an online database giving businesses quicker access to data and helping EPA to make faster decisions. It will also need to publish state of environment reports every two years. The government said that an audit ordered by environment minister Tanya Plibersek last year found that around one in seven developments could be in breach of their offset conditions, when a business had not properly compensated for the impact a development was having on the environment, highlighting "the need to urgently strengthen enforcement". The planned new legislation is part of the federal government's reform of Australia's environmental laws including the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Resource project decisions are currently made by the environment minister, with the move to an independent agency will removing any perception of political interference in such decisions, the government said when it first announced the reforms in late 2022. The first stage of the reform was completed late last year with new laws passed to create the Nature Repair Market, with further stages expected to be implemented in the future, the government said. Tight timing Resources industry body the Chamber of Minerals and Energy of Western Australia (CMEWA) welcomed the announcement that the federal government will take a "staged approach" to the implementation of the reforms but noted the timing of EPA's implementation was "tight". "We continue to hold reservations about the proposed decision-making model and will continue to advocate for a model that balances ecologically sustainable development considerations and includes the [environment] minister as the decision maker," CMEWA chief executive Rebecca Tomkinson said. The Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) said that it had been advocating for the creation of EIA, whose future collated data "will provide greater certainty and reduced costs for both government and project proponents", which "may shave years off project development". But it was cautious about potential "unintended consequences" stemming from more bureaucracy. "Australia has one of the most comprehensive environmental approvals processes in the world and the MCA has been clear about the significant risks of duplicative, complex and uncertain approvals processes pose to the minerals sector, the broader economy and the environment if we do not get this right," it warned. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Engie to switch Chile coal plant to energy storage


11/04/24
News
11/04/24

Engie to switch Chile coal plant to energy storage

Santiago, 11 April (Argus) — French utility Engie is investing approximately $180mn to convert its former Tocopilla coal plant in northern Chile's Antofagasta region into a 116MW standalone battery energy storage system (BESS). The BESS Tocopilla plant will be able to store 660MWh captured from significant solar and wind curtailment in the north, which has risen by almost 250pc to 1,699GWh in the year-to-date compared to a year ago. The project involves installing 240 lithium ion-based containers on the former coal plant's site and making use of infrastructure synergies such as its transmission assets. Construction is scheduled to start in June. BESS Tocopilla will have an average annual generation capacity of 211GWh, the equivalent of supplying almost 90,000 Chilean homes with power, avoiding the emission of 51,231 t/yr of carbon dioxide equivalent, said Engie. Engie disconnected the 268MW Tocopilla coal and fuel oil plant in September 2022. Its 394MW combined-cycle Tocopilla gas plant, part of the same complex, continues to operate. Engie is the country's fourth-largest generator with an installed capacity of almost 2.5GW. BESS Tocopilla is its fourth industrial-scale storage project in Chile, one of which is already in operation and another two under construction. By Emily Russell Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

April-May maintenance to close Australian coal systems


10/04/24
News
10/04/24

April-May maintenance to close Australian coal systems

Sydney, 10 April (Argus) — Australian rail firm Aurizon will close the 50mn t/yr Blackwater coal system in Queensland over 13-17 April for maintenance, with further closures scheduled for May. The firm, which operates the Central Queensland Coal Network (CQCN), confirmed that it plans to close its 60mn t/yr Goonyella system during 1-3 May, its 15mn t/yr Moura system for 14-16 May and Blackwater again during 27-29 May, as part of an annual planned maintenance programme. The only CQCN system not included in the maintenance programme is the 15mn t/yr Newlands system. Blackwater and Moura deliver coal to the port of Gladstone from the southern end of the Bowen basin. Goonyella delivers to the adjacent ports of Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal, which is a multi-user facility, and BHP-operated Hay Point from the central Bowen basin. Newlands delivers to Abbot Point from the northern Bowen basin. Aurizon, Pacific National, BHP and some smaller coal haulage operators use the CQCN. Aurizon is targeting a 5pc year-on-year growth in coal haulage by its fleet across the CQCN and New South Wales/southern Queensland in the 2023-24 fiscal year to 30 June. This implies a target of 194mn t for 2023-24. It hauled 94mn t during July-December, leaving it a target of 100mn t for January-June. By Jo Clarke Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more