Northeast Asian base oil prices face supply challenge

  • Market: Oil products
  • 13/01/20

The northeast Asian base oils market faces the prospect in 2020 of managing a wave of new supplies that came on line in 2019.

Northeast Asian Group I base oil prices fell in 2019, with bright stock sliding the most. Group II prices ended the year at a similar level to the start of 2019, after falling mid-year.

Demand was slow at the start of the year as buyers waited for prices to bottom out from a slump during the last few weeks of 2018. Prices had fallen sharply in December 2018 in response to sliding crude prices during the fourth quarter of that year.

Buyers delay stockbuild

The drop in prices prompted buyers to hold off moves to replenish stocks until the start of 2019 rather than during the last few months of 2018. The previous year they had begun building stocks in late 2017, ahead of the spring oil-change season in early 2018.

The move to delay building stocks left buyers with lower than usual inventories just weeks ahead of a seasonal pick-up in demand from around the end of the first quarter of the year. The prolonged three-month shutdown of a Group II base oils unit in south China from February removed a major supply source from the market.

The start-up of several new base oil plants in China was also pushed back further until later in the year. They had originally been scheduled to start operations in the fourth quarter of 2018.

But, unlike in early 2017, there was no supply squeeze or significant rise in prices. Chinese buyers were instead able to secure with ease a wave of surplus supplies from other producers throughout the region. They secured the supplies at unusually competitive price levels. Imports increased from markets like South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore.

Buyers were also confident that they could secure sufficient supplies as and when required. They were also confident that prices would remain in a narrow range. This reduced their need to hold larger stocks. The strategy in turn spread over a longer period a seasonal pick-up in demand, reducing its market impact.

Imported cargo prices for Group II base oils edged slightly higher during the first quarter of the year. But the increase was small relative to the larger rise in prices in other markets like India. The increase also outpaced unusually steady domestic prices in the Chinese market during the first three months of 2019.

Tax cut benefit proves limited

Regional producers sought to benefit from a seasonal pick-up in Chinese demand from March and a subsequent cut in China's value-added tax on base oils from the start of April last year. But they struggled to raise their prices after the tax cut lowered Chinese buyers' purchasing costs. Distributors instead had to pass on the cost saving through lower prices.

A wave of new Chinese base oils production capacity then began to start commercial operations or test runs from the end of the first quarter. This trend continued during the second quarter. The new plants included Shanxi Lu'an's 300,000 Group III+ coal-to-liquids base oils unit and Hengli Petrochemical's Group III unit in northeast China.

New plants close arbitrage

The availability of these new supplies at competitive prices put pressure on rival domestic producers and overseas refiners alike. Term buyers in China sought to divert some of these overseas supplies to other markets instead in response to the closed arbitrage to the country.

The subsequent rise in regional supplies put pressure on imported cargo prices. These then fell steadily from May. By the end of the first half of 2019, Group II cargo prices had fallen below price levels at the start of the year to their lowest levels since 2017. These weak prices forced domestic refiners in China to cut run rates and offer more of their supplies as white oils. They also forced regional producers to target other markets instead where prices were at higher levels.

Chinese demand remained unusually weak throughout the third quarter of the year. Blenders and distributors preferred to work down stocks and delay any replenishment plans. The moves triggered a slump in Chinese base oil imports in July to their lowest level since 2013.

The lack of buying interest prompted a wave of Group II shipments from Taiwan to move to India instead during the third quarter. Falling domestic Group III prices in China also halted shipments to this market from the UAE.

Demand revives from September

Chinese buying interest revived from September as blenders and distributors moved to replenish depleted stocks. Besides lower imports, supplies had tightened after some Chinese refiners trimmed output because of weaker margins. Lower prices for light-grade base oils relative to diesel also boosted the attraction of blending these supplies with diesel.

Prices also got support from rising demand for supplies classified as base oils. Most of China's new plants were offering their supplies as white oils to benefit from avoiding the cost of China's consumption tax. But a repercussion was more limited availability of base oils. Buyers turned instead to imported supplies, and especially shipments from Taiwan.

Firmer demand for base oils supported a steady rise in China's domestic Group II prices from September. These climbed to levels that made the arbitrage more feasible to import supplies from Asia-Pacific. The firmer demand and higher prices prompted Taiwan to direct most of its supplies to China in the fourth quarter. A repercussion was a sharp drop in supplies to other markets like India.

The Group I base oils market also faced sustained pressure throughout the year because of muted demand and competitive prices for Group II base oils. Buying interest focused mostly on bright stock, for which China is structurally short.

Bright stock faces sustained pressure

A closed arbitrage from Europe and a heavy round of plant maintenance in Japan prompted buyers to focus on covering requirements with supplies from producers in southeast Asia during this period.

Even with the more limited supply options, these volumes proved to be sufficient. Imported cargo prices rose by some $50-60/t in the two months to April in response to the seasonal pick-up in demand, before steadying. Prices then began a sustained slide from the end of this month to early September amid slower demand and a lack of alternative outlets.

Bright stock prices edged up at the end of the third quarter ahead of several plant shutdowns in southeast Asia in the fourth quarter. But supplies from the Mideast Gulf then supplemented steady availability in Asia-Pacific during the last few months of 2019. The ample availability put renewed pressure on prices at the end of the year.

By Iain Pocock


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
24/04/24

Cepsa supplies HVO bunker fuel in Algeciras

Cepsa supplies HVO bunker fuel in Algeciras

London, 24 April (Argus) — Spanish refiner and bunker fuel supplier Cepsa has recently delivered 150t of 100pc hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) by truck to the Ramform Hyperion at the port of Algeciras. The supply follows market participants reporting firmer buying interest for HVO as a marine fuel from ferry lines in the Mediterranean in recent sessions. The supplied HVO is said to be of class II, with used cooking oil (UCO) as the feedstock. Cepsa added that the supply was completed in cooperation with Bunker Holding subsidiary Glander International Bunkering, and could bring about a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction of up to 90pc compared with conventional fuel oil. Cepsa will also look to obtain capability to supply marine biodiesel blends exceeding 25pc biodiesel content by the end of the year, delegates heard at the International Bunker Conference (IBC) 2024 in Norway. This also follows plans by Cepsa to build a 500,000 t/yr HVO plant in Huelva , set to start production in the first half of 2026. Argus assessed the price of class II HVO on a fob Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) basis at an average of $1,765.54/t in April so far, a premium of $906.41/t to marine gasoil (MGO) dob Algeciras prices in the same month. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

New ISO 8217 eyes wider scope for alternative fuels


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

New ISO 8217 eyes wider scope for alternative fuels

London, 24 April (Argus) — The 7th edition of ISO 8217, to be published in the second quarter of this year, will outline a broader integration of marine biodiesel blending, delegates heard at the International Bunker Conference (IBC) 2024 in Norway. Tim Wilson, principal specialist fuels of Lloyds Register's fuel oil bunkering analysis and advisory service (FOBAS), presented on the upcoming iteration of the ISO 8217 marine fuel specification standard, which will be released at IBC 2024. The new edition will incorporate specification standards for a wide range of fatty acid methyl ester (Fame)-based marine biodiesel blends up to B100, 100pc hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), as well as synthetic and renewable marine fuels. This will also include additional clauses to cover a wider scope, and briefly touch on biodiesel specifications that do not entirely align with road biodiesel EN-14214 specifications. This follows the emergence of widening price spreads for marine biodiesel blends because of specification differences and the lack of a marine-specific standard for the blends. The new edition of ISO 8217 is also expected to remove the limit of 7pc Fame when blended with distillate marine fuels such as marine gasoil (MGO) which was in place in the previous ISO 8217:2017. Other changes to distillate marine biodiesel blends include changes to the minimum Cetane Index, oxidation stability alignment to be connected to either ISO 15751 for blends comprising 2pc or more of Fame biodiesel and ISO 12205 for blends comprising a Fame component of under 2pc. Cold-filter plugging point (CFPP) properties will be determined by the vessel's fuel storage tanks' heating capabilities and requirements will be set in place to report the CFPP for distillate marine biodiesel grades, according to the new edition of the marine fuel specification standard. Wilson said that a minimum kinematic viscosity at 50°C will be in place for various forms of residual bunker fuel oil along with a viscosity control alerting suppliers to inform buyers of the exact viscosity in the supplied fuel. He said they have seen delivered fuel viscosity come in at much lower levels than ordered by the buyers, which was the reasoning behind the viscosity control monitoring requirement. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Peninsula eyes B100 marine fuel supply in Barcelona


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Peninsula eyes B100 marine fuel supply in Barcelona

London, 24 April (Argus) — Marine fuel supplier and trader Peninsula has added a chemical tanker to its fleet in Barcelona, with a view to supply the port with B100 marine biodiesel. Aalborg meets chemical tanker regulations under the International Maritime Organisation (IMO)'s International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Annex II. This means the tanker can supply marine biodiesel blends containing up to 100pc fatty acid methyl ester (Fame), which conventional oil tankers are unable to do . Oil tankers and barges are limited to up to 25pc Fame. Peninsula added that the Aalborg is also used to supply conventional fossil bunker fuels such as very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and marine gasoil (MGO). It is yet to complete a B100 delivery in Barcelona. Market participants pointed to limited demand for B100 in the Mediterranean, but regulatory changes such as the introduction of FuelEU maritime next year may help to support demand for marine biodiesel blends. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

USGC LNG-VLSFO discount to steady itself


23/04/24
News
23/04/24

USGC LNG-VLSFO discount to steady itself

New York, 23 April (Argus) — The premium for US Gulf coast (USGC) very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) to LNG is expected to linger but not widen this spring, maintaining interest in LNG as a bunkering fuel. US Gulf coast LNG prices slipped from a premium to a discount to VLSFO in March 2023 and have remained there since. The discount surpassed 200/t VLSFO-equivalent in January (see chart). Both LNG and VLSFO prices are expected to remain under downward pressure due to high inventories, which could keep the current LNG discount steady. The US winter natural gas withdrawal season ended with 39pc more natural gas in storage compared with the five-year average, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Henry Hub natural gas monthly average prices dropped below $2/mmBtu in February, for the first time since September 2020, Argus data showed. The EIA expects the US will produce less natural gas on average in the second and third quarter of 2024 compared with the first quarter of 2024. Despite lower production, the US will have the most natural gas in storage on record when the winter withdrawal season begins in November, says the EIA. As a result, the agency forecasts the Henry Hub spot price to average less than $2/mmBtu in the second quarter before "increasing slightly" in the third quarter. EIA's forecast for all of 2024 averages about $2.20/mmBtu. US Gulf coast VLSFO is facing downward price pressure as demand falls and increased refinery activity signals a potential supply build . Rising Gulf coast refinery activity was likely behind some of the drop in prices. Gulf coast refinery utilization last week rose to 91.4pc, the highest in 12 weeks and up by 0.9 percentage points from the prior week. US Gulf coast suppliers are also eyeing strong fuel oil price competition from eastern hemisphere ports such as Singapore and Zhoushan, China, importing cheap Russian residual fuel oil. In general, LNG's substantial discount to VLSFO has kept interest in LNG for bunkering from ship owners with LNG-burning vessels high. The EIA discontinued publishing US bunker sales statistics with the last data available for 2020. But data from the Singapore Maritime & Port Authority, where the LNG–VLSFO discount widened to over $200/t VLSFOe in February, showed Singapore LNG for bunkering demand increase 11.4 times to 75,900t in the first quarter compared with 6,700t in the first quarter of 2023 and 110,900t for full year 2022. By Stefka Wechsler US Gulf coast LNG vs VLSFO $/t VLSFOe Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Kuwait’s KPC agrees VLSFO term supply contract with QE


23/04/24
News
23/04/24

Kuwait’s KPC agrees VLSFO term supply contract with QE

Singapore, 23 April (Argus) — Kuwait's KPC has signed a term agreement with fellow state-owned firm Qatar Energy (QE) to supply very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) for loading over July 2024 through to June 2025. The VLSFO supplied amounts to 1.2mn t/yr (21,000 b/d). KPC finalised the term contract at around a $8-9/t premium against the average of Singapore 0.5pc marine fuel spot assessments, according to a source close to the company. QE has expanded its own bunkering infrastructure at the port of Ras Laffan and started relying on VLSFO supplied from Kuwait's 615,000 b/d al-Zour refinery since early last year. The VLSFO supplied is to meet the country's bunkering demand. QE had a previous mini term VLSFO agreement with KPC last year. KPC supplied around 1-2 Medium Range size vessels of VLSFO each month from January 2023 to March this year, according to global trade analytics platform Kpler. The announcement of the term deal left the market unfazed, said a Dubai based fuel oil trader, as KPC has regularly offered term tenders over the year. Supplies to QE has been continuing since last year, with the deal merely being a renewal of their previous agreement, the trader added. This is KPC's third official term contract concluded since the start-up of al-Zour in late 2022. The first term contract was awarded for second-half 2023 loading to Shell, with the second to ExxonMobil for first-half 2024 loading. The terms of the two contracts stated a minimum of 80,000 t/month and a maximum of 720,000 t/month of VLSFO, with KPC having discretion over the total volume. Al-Zour can produce around 11mn-12mn t/yr of VLSFO at full capacity, with around half of it allocated for exports. By Asill Bardh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more