Macro uncertainty complicates coke forecast

  • Market: Coal, Petroleum coke
  • 14/10/20

Geopolitical and pandemic-related uncertainties are having an outsized effect on the petroleum coke market, making forecasting price direction difficult, speakers said at last week's Cemprospects 2020 virtual conference.

The world's recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic is the biggest unknown. While a vaccine could be available as soon as early next year, there appear to be some long-term shifts in company policies around teleworking and business travel that will outlast the pandemic. The degree to which these changes affect coke demand will depend on the characteristics of various markets, Advisian group manager Ben Ziesmer said. In Japan for instance, reduced commuting will have little effect on gasoline demand, as most workers use public transportation. But in the US, where so many workers commute by car, Advisian expects a transition to remote work to reduce gasoline demand by 8-10pc. Most other markets will be somewhere in between, Ziesmer said.

Cembureau energy consultant Frank Brannvoll said his forecast predicts business and transport can return to almost pre-Covid levels by the second half of next year. But this assumes a vaccine becomes available. Brannvoll does not expect refineries to come back with increased coke production until at least the second or third quarter of next year. Stockpiles are very low and refineries will be focused on fulfilling term contracts at the beginning of 2021, including some rolled over from this year.

US election questions remain

The outcome of the US presidential election is another uncertainty.

Advisian expects the election could have a major effect on US Gulf coke production because of its potential to determine the fate of the long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline. If President Donald Trump is re-elected to another four-year term, Advisian expects TC Energy will finally be able to complete the pipeline bringing heavy Canadian crude from Alberta to the US Gulf. This additional heavy crude would result in a 3-4mn t/yr increase in coke production in the US Gulf by 2023, Ziesmer said. That amounts to about 10pc of annual US output. Trump's opponent, Democratic former vice president Joe Biden, opposes the pipeline.

But Argus Consulting does not share the view that the pipeline would necessarily result in so much additional coke, as there are a number of other variables that will affect refineries over the next three years.

A Democratic Party-controlled government could usher in other green policies unfavourable to coke production. Biden has pledged to focus on clean-energy initiatives, including investing $2 trillion to support renewable energy, have the US rejoin the Paris climate agreement, and restore energy regulations loosened during the Trump presidency. But Trump's administration has also made some policy moves unfavourable to refiners, such as denying dozens of requests from small refineries to waive past biofuel blending obligations. Refinery group AFPM president Chet Thompson called the move a "betrayal" of union workers at refineries that could result in the closure of some facilities. Some refiners are already turning to a chemicals focus or transitioning to renewable fuel production, which will permanently cut coke supply.

In Europe, coke production is not expected to recover until the second half of next year, and some refineries there are likely to close permanently, Ziesmer said. But these will likely be less complex refineries without cokers, unlike in the US, where coking refineries in Wyoming and California have announced closures.

Coke discount to remain rather narrow

While the supply side is complicated by unknowns such as the US election and the timing of a Covid vaccine's approval and distribution, the demand side will largely be driven by coke's discount to coal.

Coke prices have risen on extreme supply tightness as a result of inventory drawdowns early this year, lower production as refineries cut back during Covid lockdowns, and more recently shutdowns at US Gulf refineries as a result of hurricanes in the region. This rise has caused coke prices to surpass coal in nearly all regions, turning what is normally a discount for coke into a premium, on a heat-adjusted basis.

Coke may become even more expensive compared with coal in the short term, Brannvoll said, as supply will remain tight at least for the rest of this year and into the first quarter of next year. Cement plants for which it is relatively easy to switch to coal will have already done so. Some will also accelerate the switch to alternative fuels.

These shifts could be difficult to reverse in the near term, as cement buyers who have made a switch to coal will want to see a particularly large discount for coke in order to switch back. The continued tight supply in the forecast for most of next year makes such wide discounts unlikely. Brannvoll forecasts that the discount for fob US Gulf coast 6.5pc sulphur coke to the API 4 coal price on a heat-adjusted basis will widen back out next year, but only to an average of 30pc. This is the minimum of what he considers a "neutral" discount. Anything less means coke is expensive compared with coal.

Brannvoll's model shows that the average discount for coke to coal over the last 10 years has been 40pc, and the discount typically ranges between 30-50pc. For 2021, he expects it will range between 25-40pc. He forecasts the 6.5pc sulphur US Gulf fob price will average $52/t next year.

This is slightly above the $46.80/t 2021 average that Argus consultant Hayden Atkins forecast for this specification in the latest monthly [Argus Petroleum Coke Outlook](https://direct.argusmedia.com/pdfissue/get/957192) published on 1 October. But Atkins' forecast largely matches Brannvoll's. "Ultimately, we still see petcoke prices adjusting lower as the marginal tonne supplied needs to be more competitive against coal prices," Atkins wrote. "But in the interim, the risks to prices in the short term still appear skewed to the upside."


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans

Houston, 24 April (Argus) — Barges are facing lengthy delays at the Algiers lock near New Orleans as vessels reroute around closures at the Port Allen lock and the Algiers Canal. Delays at the Algiers Lock —at the interconnection of the Mississippi River and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway— have reached around 37 hours in the past day, according to the US Army Corps of Engineers' lock report. Around 50 vessels are waiting to cross the Algiers lock. Another 70 vessels were waiting at the nearby Harvey lock with a six-hour wait in the past day. The closure at Port Allen lock has spurred the delays, causing vessels to reroute through the Algiers lock. The Port Allen lock is expected to reopen on 28 April, which should relieve pressure on the Algiers lock. Some traffic has been rerouted through the nearby Harvey lock since the Algiers Canal was closed by a collapsed powerline, the US Coast Guard said. The powerline fell on two barges, but no injuries or damages were reported. The wire is being removed by energy company Entergy. The canal is anticipated to reopen at midnight on 25 April. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel

Cheyenne, 24 April (Argus) — The Port of Baltimore is preparing to open another, deeper temporary shipping channel this week so at least some of the vessels that have been stranded at the port can depart. The new 35-ft deep Fort McHenry Limited Access Channel is scheduled to be open to commercially essential vessels from 25 April until 6am ET on 29 April or 30 April "if weather adversely impacts vessel transits," according to a US Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin. The channel will then be closed again until 10 May. The channel also will have a 300-ft horizontal clearance and 214-ft vertical clearance. This will be the fourth and largest channel opened since the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The Unified Command has said that the new limited access channel should allow passage of about 75pc of the types of vessels that typically move through the waterway. Vessels that have greater than 60,000 long tons (60,963 metric tonnes) of displacement will likely not be able to move through the channel and those between 50,000-60,000 long tons of displacement "will be closely evaluated" for transit. There were seven vessels blocked from exiting the port as of 27 March, including three dry bulk carriers, one vehicle carrier and one tanker, according to the US Department of Transportation. Two of the bulk carriers at berth in Baltimore are Kamsarmax-sized coal vessels, data from analytics firm Kpler show. The US Army Corps of Engineers still expects to reopen the Port of Baltimore's permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel by the end of May. The Key Bridge collapsed into the water late last month when the 116,851dwt container ship Dali lost power and crashed into a bridge support column. Salvage teams have been working to remove debris from the water and containers from the ship in order to clear the main channel. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules

Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement

Manila, 24 April (Argus) — Early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants in the Philippines has advanced with utility Ayala Energy's 246MW South Luzon Thermal Energy eligible for the US-based Rockefeller Foundation's coal to clean credit initiative (CCCI). The Rockefeller Foundation is a non-profit philanthropic group that creates and implements programmes in partnership with the private sector across different industries aimed at reversing climate change. Ayala has been working with the foundation to further shorten South Luzon's operating life from an original decommissioning date of 2040 to 2030. Doing so could result in the reduction of up to 19mn t of carbon emissions, Ayala said. An assessment by the Rocky Mountain Institute, the technical partner of the foundation for its energy-related projects, found that an early retirement date of 2030 instead of the original retirement date of 2040 could yield positive financial, social and climate outcomes. But decommissioning by this date will require carbon finance. Carbon financing will need to cover costs associated with the early retirement of the power plant's power supply contract, costs associated with 100pc clean replacement of the plant's power generation, plant decommissioning and transition support for workers affected by the plant's early closure, Ayala said. Ayala's listed arm ACEN welcomed the plant's eligibility for the CCCI programme, as its retirement is part of the company's goal to have its power generation portfolio composed solely of 100pc renewable sources by 2025. The Philippines' Department of Energy (DOE) said if successful, the pilot programme could serve as a basis for the development of other early retirement efforts as part of the country's plan to reduce carbon emissions. The DOE is seeking the early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants older than 20 years with a combined total capacity of 3.8GW by 2050, as part of the Philippines' transition to clean energy. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more