Central Applachian steam coal market may tighten

  • Market: Coal
  • 04/06/21

Central Appalachian thermal coal buyers could face a shortage of the fuel as production continues to fall.

Some sellers and buyers say they foresee demand potentially outpacing supply despite the basin's shrinking customer base. Producers are struggling to stay afloat, they said, and no substantial reductions in coal-fired capacity are expected over the next few years.

Central Appalachian mines produced 48.6mn short tons (44mn t) of coal last year, US Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) data show. That was the lowest since at least 2001.

It is unclear exactly how much of last year's Central Appalachian coal output was thermal, but domestic utility-scale facilities took a little over 12mn st of Central Appalachian coal in 2020 and steam coal exports out of Hampton Roads, Virginia — the primary exit point for Central Appalachian exports — totaled 3.5mn st, US Energy Information Administration (EIA) fuel receipts and Census Bureau data show. Both figures were down from averages for the previous five years.

While some of the drop in Central Appalachian steam coal shipments last year was a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, basin producers have also generally moved away thermal coal. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, formerly known as Contura Energy, said last year it expects to be a full-fledged coking coal producer by the end of 2022 and Arch Coal rebranded itself as Arch Resources to reflect its shift to the metallurgical market.

Coal producers in the basin appear to be holding back on new projects, and a lack of cash flow is preventing them from replacing or repairing new equipment, sources said. In addition, the number of Central Appalachian mines that produced coal has shrunk over the past six years, to 260 from 400, according to MSHA data.

"I see a shortage, for sure. No one is putting money to invest in these operations," a Central Appalachian coal producer said.

Low coal prices also are "not helping," another seller said.

Producers say Central Appalachian thermal coal prices need to be above $60/st to turn a profit, and they have not surpassed that mark in over two years despite steady gains since reaching multi-year lows in June 2020. Argus assessed prompt quarter CSX coal with 12,500 Btu/lb at $56.30/st last week. A year earlier, it was $35.70/st.

Coal-fired unit retirements and fuel switching are expected to slow over the next few years. But the relief to Central Appalachian coal shipments may be temporary.

At least 15 more power plants that use Central Appalachian coal may close through 2035, with the bulk of projected retirements occurring between 2027-34. Only two of the 15 plants are scheduled to close within the next couple of years.

One of the major Central Appalachian coal buyers said it is reviewing how the decline in production could affect its generation system. But no decisions have been made, the utility said.

Other market participants are not so sure there will be a supply shortage. An Appalachian coal trader noted that most generators can burn higher sulfur coal as a fallback.

A number of power plants blend Central Appalachian coal with lower-priced Northern Appalachian or Illinois basin coal. And a few have switched solely to coal from other basins. Georgia Power's Bowen coal plant, for example, burned almost 1.5mn st of Central Appalachian coal in 2015, EIA data show. But it now primarily uses Illinois basin coal. The plant is capable of consuming coal from either basin, and no modifications were needed to switch between the coals.

Similarly, Dominion Energy's Chesterfield power plant in Virginia has stopped burning Central Appalachian coal and uses Northern Appalachian coal instead.

Dominion's Cope, Wateree and Williams plants in South Carolina are one of the few that still only use Central Appalachian coal, according to EIA data. The three facilities took about 1.4mn st of coal from southern West Virginia and eastern Kentucky last year.

Dominion said it is not currently concerned about a shortage. Overall Central Appalachian coal production for domestic utility demand is "likely sufficient based on existing generation sourcing" from the basin, the utility said.

Utility Duke Energy did not express concern either, citing its fuel flexibility programs, which allow its plants in North Carolina to burn different quantities of coal from other regions.

"This has proven to be successful and effective in preparing us for a prudent and dynamic fuel procurement strategy for the future," the company said.

Duke's six generating stations in North Carolina, which took 3.6mn st of Central Appalachian coal in 2020, have differing degrees of fuel flexibilities and capabilities. Each station requires varying amounts of Central Appalachian coals, ranging from 0-50pc, in the blending scenarios for optimal operating conditions, Duke said.

The utility has also upgraded units at three of the stations to burn natural gas in addition to coal.

Alpha's planned exit from Central Appalachian steam coal could present an opportunity for other producers to secure additional business, but they may lack the ability to scale up production.

"It is hard to invest in anything long term when you have no commitment from utilities and no investment from banks," a market participant said. "There is not much light at the end of the tunnel for Central Appalachian coal producers."


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel

Cheyenne, 24 April (Argus) — The Port of Baltimore is preparing to open another, deeper temporary shipping channel this week so at least some of the vessels that have been stranded at the port can depart. The new 35-ft deep Fort McHenry Limited Access Channel is scheduled to be open to commercially essential vessels from 25 April until 6am ET on 29 April or 30 April "if weather adversely impacts vessel transits," according to a US Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin. The channel will then be closed again until 10 May. The channel also will have a 300-ft horizontal clearance and 214-ft vertical clearance. This will be the fourth and largest channel opened since the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The Unified Command has said that the new limited access channel should allow passage of about 75pc of the types of vessels that typically move through the waterway. Vessels that have greater than 60,000 long tons (60,963 metric tonnes) of displacement will likely not be able to move through the channel and those between 50,000-60,000 long tons of displacement "will be closely evaluated" for transit. There were seven vessels blocked from exiting the port as of 27 March, including three dry bulk carriers, one vehicle carrier and one tanker, according to the US Department of Transportation. Two of the bulk carriers at berth in Baltimore are Kamsarmax-sized coal vessels, data from analytics firm Kpler show. The US Army Corps of Engineers still expects to reopen the Port of Baltimore's permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel by the end of May. The Key Bridge collapsed into the water late last month when the 116,851dwt container ship Dali lost power and crashed into a bridge support column. Salvage teams have been working to remove debris from the water and containers from the ship in order to clear the main channel. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules

Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement

Manila, 24 April (Argus) — Early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants in the Philippines has advanced with utility Ayala Energy's 246MW South Luzon Thermal Energy eligible for the US-based Rockefeller Foundation's coal to clean credit initiative (CCCI). The Rockefeller Foundation is a non-profit philanthropic group that creates and implements programmes in partnership with the private sector across different industries aimed at reversing climate change. Ayala has been working with the foundation to further shorten South Luzon's operating life from an original decommissioning date of 2040 to 2030. Doing so could result in the reduction of up to 19mn t of carbon emissions, Ayala said. An assessment by the Rocky Mountain Institute, the technical partner of the foundation for its energy-related projects, found that an early retirement date of 2030 instead of the original retirement date of 2040 could yield positive financial, social and climate outcomes. But decommissioning by this date will require carbon finance. Carbon financing will need to cover costs associated with the early retirement of the power plant's power supply contract, costs associated with 100pc clean replacement of the plant's power generation, plant decommissioning and transition support for workers affected by the plant's early closure, Ayala said. Ayala's listed arm ACEN welcomed the plant's eligibility for the CCCI programme, as its retirement is part of the company's goal to have its power generation portfolio composed solely of 100pc renewable sources by 2025. The Philippines' Department of Energy (DOE) said if successful, the pilot programme could serve as a basis for the development of other early retirement efforts as part of the country's plan to reduce carbon emissions. The DOE is seeking the early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants older than 20 years with a combined total capacity of 3.8GW by 2050, as part of the Philippines' transition to clean energy. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US-led carbon initiative misses launch date


23/04/24
News
23/04/24

US-led carbon initiative misses launch date

Houston, 23 April (Argus) — The Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA), a global initiative to use voluntary carbon market revenue to speed the decarbonization of developing countries' power sectors, has missed its planned Earth Day launch but continues to prepare for doing business. At the Cop 28 climate conference in Dubai last year, the initiative's leaders said they hoped to formally launch the program on 22 April 2024 . That didn't happen, but the program's leaders last week announced that the US climate think tank Center for Climate and Energy Solutions will serve as the ETA's new secretariat and that former US special presidential envoy for climate John Kerry will serve as the honorary chair of an eight-member senior consultative group that will advise the ETA's design and operations. The ETA plans to spend 2024 "building" on a framework for crediting projects they released last year. ETA leaders said the initiative could ultimately generate tens of billions of dollars in finances through 2035. The ETA also said the Dominican Republic had formed a government working group to "guide its engagement" as a potential pilot country for investments and that the Philippines would formally participate as an "observer country" rather than as a direct participant immediately. The ETA is still engaging Chile and Nigeria as potential pilot countries too, the initiative told Argus . The ETA is being developed by the US State Department, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Bezos Earth Fund and would be funded with money from the voluntary carbon market. The initiative's ultimate goal is to allow corporate and government offset buyers to help developing countries decarbonize their power sectors through large projects that accelerate the retirement of coal-fired power plants and build new renewable generation. As of now, the ETA's timeline for future changes and negotiations with countries and companies is unclear. The program's goals are ambitious, especially at a time when scrutiny of some voluntary carbon market projects from environmentalists has weighed on corporate offset demand. By Mia Westley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more