Rapid coal rise narrows petroleum coke premium

  • Market: Coal, Petroleum coke
  • 07/06/21

Coal prices have risen at a much faster rate than petroleum coke prices in recent months, eroding coal's competitive edge in some key demand hubs.

Argus' cif Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) 6,000kcal/kg coal assessment rose to $107/t today, a nearly 10-year high. This is a 55pc increase since 1 April. Similar quality coal on an fob Black Sea basis was assessed at $97.81/t on 4 June, a 40pc increase over the same period. The fob Puerto Bolivar Colombian 6,000 kcal/kg coal price has increased by nearly 28pc since the start of May.

In comparison, the US Gulf 6.5pc sulphur and 4.5pc sulphur weekly coke prices increased by just 12pc and 13pc since the beginning of April, respectively. On a delivered basis, the delivered ARA 6.5pc coke price rose by 17pc and the cfr Turkey coke 4.5pc sulphur price increased by only 10pc over that period.

Coal's more rapid rise could bring coke back to a discount on an ARA basis for the first time since early July 2020. As of the last assessment on 2 June, the Argus calculated price for 6.5pc sulphur petroleum coke on a del ARA basis was $122.50/t while 4.5pc sulphur was $127/t. Coke has roughly 25pc higher heat content than 6,000kcal/kg coal, which implies coke will hold a competitive edge against coal into the ARA region as long as its price remains below $133.75/t. As recently as 10 March, del ARA 6.5pc coke was 133pc of the cost of coal, while 4.5pc sulphur coke on an ARA basis was 141pc.

Mid-sulphur coke in Turkey was still at a slight premium to coal as of the last assessment. But as recently as 17 March, cfr Turkey 4.5pc sulphur coke was 122pc of the cost of coal, when adjusted for the two fuels' differing heat content. This premium could narrow further or also switch to a discount in the coming days.

The sudden increase in coal markets is presenting a difficult choice for buyers who had expected coke prices to begin to fall in the second half of the year as US Gulf coke output rises on higher transport fuel demand and strong coker margins. Coke instead continues to rise to new heights, with the US Gulf 6.5pc sulphur price reaching $95/t on 2 June, nearly $10/t above the previous record high in weekly assessments going back to 2013.

The coke price is now testing the all-time highs reached in 2011, when Argus only assessed on a monthly basis. Between January and July 2011, the US 6.5pc sulphur, 40 HGI price ranged from $95-$112/t. These are the highest levels in pricing going back to 2001. The market is now wondering if the coke price could reach or exceed these levels in the next few months, if coal prices continue to provide such strong support.

But even though spot prices for coke may fall below coal this week, it is difficult for most buyers to make a purchase on a fixed price basis. Most coke supply remains in the hands of traders with term contracts who largely prefer to sell on an index-linked basis with large premiums tacked on, making the final cost difficult to budget.

But besides costs alone, coke could be more easily available than coal in the near term, despite how tight coke supply has been. Labour unrest in Colombia has blocked shipments there, with some supply uncertainty lingering. Russian coal supply is also limited. This may draw more buyers back into the coke market.

"There is no coal at all. That is why people are looking at coke," one trader said. "Coal might be cheaper on paper, but there is a shortage."

Coal vs coke on ARA basis $/t

ARA, Turkey coke % of coal, heat adjusted %

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans

Houston, 24 April (Argus) — Barges are facing lengthy delays at the Algiers lock near New Orleans as vessels reroute around closures at the Port Allen lock and the Algiers Canal. Delays at the Algiers Lock —at the interconnection of the Mississippi River and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway— have reached around 37 hours in the past day, according to the US Army Corps of Engineers' lock report. Around 50 vessels are waiting to cross the Algiers lock. Another 70 vessels were waiting at the nearby Harvey lock with a six-hour wait in the past day. The closure at Port Allen lock has spurred the delays, causing vessels to reroute through the Algiers lock. The Port Allen lock is expected to reopen on 28 April, which should relieve pressure on the Algiers lock. Some traffic has been rerouted through the nearby Harvey lock since the Algiers Canal was closed by a collapsed powerline, the US Coast Guard said. The powerline fell on two barges, but no injuries or damages were reported. The wire is being removed by energy company Entergy. The canal is anticipated to reopen at midnight on 25 April. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel

Cheyenne, 24 April (Argus) — The Port of Baltimore is preparing to open another, deeper temporary shipping channel this week so at least some of the vessels that have been stranded at the port can depart. The new 35-ft deep Fort McHenry Limited Access Channel is scheduled to be open to commercially essential vessels from 25 April until 6am ET on 29 April or 30 April "if weather adversely impacts vessel transits," according to a US Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin. The channel will then be closed again until 10 May. The channel also will have a 300-ft horizontal clearance and 214-ft vertical clearance. This will be the fourth and largest channel opened since the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The Unified Command has said that the new limited access channel should allow passage of about 75pc of the types of vessels that typically move through the waterway. Vessels that have greater than 60,000 long tons (60,963 metric tonnes) of displacement will likely not be able to move through the channel and those between 50,000-60,000 long tons of displacement "will be closely evaluated" for transit. There were seven vessels blocked from exiting the port as of 27 March, including three dry bulk carriers, one vehicle carrier and one tanker, according to the US Department of Transportation. Two of the bulk carriers at berth in Baltimore are Kamsarmax-sized coal vessels, data from analytics firm Kpler show. The US Army Corps of Engineers still expects to reopen the Port of Baltimore's permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel by the end of May. The Key Bridge collapsed into the water late last month when the 116,851dwt container ship Dali lost power and crashed into a bridge support column. Salvage teams have been working to remove debris from the water and containers from the ship in order to clear the main channel. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules

Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement


24/04/24
News
24/04/24

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement

Manila, 24 April (Argus) — Early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants in the Philippines has advanced with utility Ayala Energy's 246MW South Luzon Thermal Energy eligible for the US-based Rockefeller Foundation's coal to clean credit initiative (CCCI). The Rockefeller Foundation is a non-profit philanthropic group that creates and implements programmes in partnership with the private sector across different industries aimed at reversing climate change. Ayala has been working with the foundation to further shorten South Luzon's operating life from an original decommissioning date of 2040 to 2030. Doing so could result in the reduction of up to 19mn t of carbon emissions, Ayala said. An assessment by the Rocky Mountain Institute, the technical partner of the foundation for its energy-related projects, found that an early retirement date of 2030 instead of the original retirement date of 2040 could yield positive financial, social and climate outcomes. But decommissioning by this date will require carbon finance. Carbon financing will need to cover costs associated with the early retirement of the power plant's power supply contract, costs associated with 100pc clean replacement of the plant's power generation, plant decommissioning and transition support for workers affected by the plant's early closure, Ayala said. Ayala's listed arm ACEN welcomed the plant's eligibility for the CCCI programme, as its retirement is part of the company's goal to have its power generation portfolio composed solely of 100pc renewable sources by 2025. The Philippines' Department of Energy (DOE) said if successful, the pilot programme could serve as a basis for the development of other early retirement efforts as part of the country's plan to reduce carbon emissions. The DOE is seeking the early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants older than 20 years with a combined total capacity of 3.8GW by 2050, as part of the Philippines' transition to clean energy. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more