Carbon price to impact biofuels markets: Ieta
The range of legal proposals aligning climate and energy legislation with the EU's 55pc emissions-reduction target by 2030 — including the revision of the bloc's emissions trading system (ETS) — will impact the biofuels markets, Adam Berman, EU policy director at the International Emissions Trading Association (Ieta), told Argus.
How important is carbon pricing for biofuels markets?
Carbon pricing is really important as a tool for climate action in the road transport sector. But it is not the silver bullet and needs to be complemented by sector specific policies to make alternatives, such as biofuels, price-competitive. On top of an enhanced ETS, with a separate road transport and buildings ETS, changes to energy taxation and other mechanisms will enable cost competitive biofuels to be rolled-out at scale.
Is there enough political support for road transport under the EU ETS?
Let's be clear, there is no direct inclusion of road transport or buildings into the general ETS. The commission's proposal is to establish a separate ETS for road transport and buildings. Sectors predominantly covered by the ETS have reduced emissions by over 30pc since 1990. For road transport, emissions have gone up by over 33pc since 1990. So a carbon price will provide a strong signal alongside enhanced policies like higher renewables ambition levels. Ultimately, the EU ETS covers 40pc of emissions, works well and provides really significant revenues for decarbonisation.
Will there not be political push-back?
It is a precarious moment politically. A reasonable carbon price for transport is needed that increases over time with revenues redistributed in a meaningful way to low-income households. Mitigating push back might also include moderating the proposed price structure.
As it stands the commission's proposal allows, from the very first day, for the road transport/building ETS price to float freely. We have no idea what that price could be with estimates ranging from €50 to even €150 per tonne. Germany has a good national ETS for road transport with a fixed price and price corridor. All said, there's a good chance that the ETS for road transport and buildings will get through. Otherwise it'll be very hard to reach the overall GHG emission reduction targets.
Will there be enough of an ETS carbon price signal to push biofuels?
This separate ETS for road transport and buildings is more suited to the higher abatement costs in the transport sector. It is a quicker path to biofuel usage than if regulation alone were used or if road transport had been put into the general ETS. Over time, there will almost certainly be a higher road transport/housing ETS price, because of the higher abatement costs with those sectors.
The general ETS is multi-sector so it would take some time before solutions like biofuels would equate to where the [separate road transport] abatement cost is. I would not want to hazard a guess as to the exact carbon price if the market is allowed to float freely, but it may well be above €100/t.
What will carbon pricing do for sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs)?
Carbon pricing is part of the picture. At the moment, the International Civil Aviation Organisation's (ICAO) Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (Corsia) scheme is at an early stage. SAFs and other solutions have to be brought in. But it is very hard to know at exactly what carbon price solutions like SAFs become cost-effective as a result of fuel price fluctuations, national regulation and more.
And it is not just about SAFs getting cheaper but also about traditional emitting fuels getting more expensive, also via carbon pricing. The EU ETS will not reach the point of driving change towards SAFs very soon. Still, only three years ago, we were at an ETS price of less than €10/t. The higher the ETS price gets, the more acceptable solutions like SAFs become for hard-to-abate sectors.
Is there impact from inclusion of maritime shipping under the ETS?
The expansion of the ETS to cover maritime shipping will quite substantially increase the biofuels market. The maritime industry has not achieved significant decarbonisation. Placing shipping under a carbon price is a starting point and sends a very clear signal to biofuel producers that they need to be ready at scale with solutions. Maritime is likely to be a net purchaser of allowances. So firms will be shown quite quickly that the carbon price signal is strong enough to incentivise low-carbon solutions like biofuels.
Related news posts
Australia to delay mandatory climate reporting to 2025
Australia to delay mandatory climate reporting to 2025
Sydney, 28 March (Argus) — Australia's biggest companies will likely face mandatory climate reporting from 1 January 2025, six months later than originally planned, according to a bill the Australian federal government introduced in parliament. Under the revised proposal, the country's largest companies and financial institutions will need to start disclosing their climate-related risks and opportunities, including scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, within their annual sustainability reports from 1 January 2025 instead of 1 July as previously intended . Scope 3 emissions disclosure will continue to be required from the second year of reporting. Companies will be arranged in three groups, with group 1 entities including companies meeting at least two of three criteria: more than A$500mn ($324mn) of annual revenues, over A$1bn of gross assets, 500 or more employees. Group 2 companies will have lower thresholds — above A$200mn of revenues, $500mn of assets and 250 employees — and will start reporting from the financial year starting on 1 July 2026. Reporting for group 3 entities — those with more than A$50mn of revenues, $25mn of assets and 100 employees — will begin from 1 July 2027. The 1 January 2025 start date might be pushed further to 1 July 2025, if the bill does not become law before 2 December. It will now be debated in parliament and needs to pass both houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives, before receiving royal assent. Its approval will support more investment in renewable energy as well as help companies and investors manage climate risks, the government said. Companies are currently not required to report their scope 3 emissions under Australia's National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act, which is used to measure and report GHG emissions and energy production and consumption. Scope 3 can include emissions within supply chains that occur inside or outside Australia, such as emissions from the combustion of Australian coal or LNG exported to other countries. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Brazil, France launch €1bn program to protect Amazon
Brazil, France launch €1bn program to protect Amazon
Sao Paulo, 27 March (Argus) — Brazil and France launched a four-year, €1bn ($1.1bn) investment program to protect the Amazon rainforest using private and public funds, the countries said on Tuesday as French president Emmanuel Macron is visiting the South American nation. "Gathered in Belem, in the heart of the Amazon, we, Brazil and France, Amazonian countries, have decided to join forces to promote an international roadmap for protection of tropical forests," the two countries said. Under the program, Brazil's public banks — such as the Bndes development bank — and the French development agency will form "technical and financial partnerships." The two countries also agreed to develop new research projects on sustainable sectors and create a research hub to share technologies to develop the bioeconomy. Macron and Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva visited Belem — near the mouth of the Amazon and the host city of Cop 30 — on 26 March. During the trip, indigenous leader and environmental campaigner Raoine Metuktire, of the Kayapo tribe, urged Lula to prevent construction of the 900km (559-mile) Ferrograo railroad , which could lower costs of transporting grains from Mato Grosso state, Brazil's largest agricultural producer. Macron will also visit Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo and capital Brasilia. This is his first trip to Brazil, as he had cut ties with the South American country during former president Jair Bolsonaro's administration. Bolsonaro put little focus on environmental protections during his term, policies that his successor has reversed. Brazil now aims to reach zero deforestation by 2030. It reduced deforestation in the Amazon by almost 50pc last year, according to government data. Deforestation in the region hit 196km² in January-February, a 63pc drop from the same period in 2023 and a six-year low, according to NGO Imazon, which focuses on research to promote climate justice in the Amazon. By Lucas Parolin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Ethanol constraints minor on Baltimore closure: Update
Ethanol constraints minor on Baltimore closure: Update
Houston, 27 March (Argus) — Ethanol flows in the US northeast may only see minor near term constraints following the closure of the Port of Baltimore due to the collapse of a bridge at the mouth of the waterway. Producers and other market participants expect longer local transit times for trucks carrying hazardous materials — including ethanol — to retail stations because of the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which carried nearly 12.4mn cars and trucks in 2023, according to Maryland state data. This will lead to higher associated costs, but market sources say the region's supply chain flexibility, rail access and available stocks should mitigate near-term ethanol supply interruptions. Ethanol rail deliveries into the Baltimore market are expected to increase, offsetting the loss of barge supply for the duration of the port's closure. Railroads Norfolk Southern and CSX have rail access at the Port of Baltimore, while Kinder Morgan operates the primary transload terminal. US east coast ethanol stocks in March are at their highest monthly average since April 2020 at 8.76mn bl, according to the Energy Information Administration. By Payne Williams Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Ethanol constraints minor from Baltimore port closure
Ethanol constraints minor from Baltimore port closure
Houston, 27 March (Argus) — Ethanol flows in the US northeast may only see minor near term constraints following the closure of the Port of Baltimore due to the collapse of a bridge at the mouth of the waterway. Producers and other market participants expect longer local transit times for trucks carrying hazardous materials — including ethanol — because of the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which carried nearly 12.4mn cars and trucks in 2023, according to Maryland state data. This will lead to higher associated costs, but market sources say the region's supply chain flexibility, rail access and available stocks should mitigate near-term ethanol supply interruptions. Ethanol rail deliveries into the Baltimore market are expected to increase, offsetting the loss of barge supply for the duration of the port's closure. Railroads Norfolk Southern and CSX have rail access at the Port of Baltimore. US east coast ethanol stocks in March are at their highest monthly average since April 2020 at 8.76mn bl, according to the Energy Information Administration. By Payne Williams Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more