Secondary biodiesel market expanding in Brazil

  • Market: Biofuels, Oil products
  • 10/14/21

Brazilian fuel distributors are adjusting their biodiesel purchasing strategies to include more spot sales between terminals ahead of the opening of the market in January 2022.

Firms are gradually ramping up sales with other distributors amid increased uncertainty while adjusting trading strategies between the country's biodiesel auctions.

Prior to 2021, fuel retailers relied on spot transactions directly in their terminals, mostly to adjust biofuel stocks at the end of the bi-monthly auction periods that guided the industry's supply calendar.

Now retailers are seeking to boost revenue in a market that is already feeling the effects of a transition to an open market aimed at increasing competitiveness and reducing state-controlled Petrobras' overarching presence in the downstream market.

Brazil's biodiesel tender was taking place every two months on the company's digital platform Petronect where biodiesel producers and fuel retailers negotiated supply for a two-month period. The latest auction, which took place between 4-13 October, is set to be the last.

Brazil's national energy policy council CNPE changed the industry supply structure from public auctions to direct sales starting January 2022, with 80pc of market volume under bi-monthly contracts and the remaining 20pc in the spot market.

An Argus survey indicates that the volume of biodiesel traded between the four largest retail chains and their peers outside of the auction totaled 15mn l in September, a 50pc increase over August. The traded volume represents around 1pc of the 1.29bn l of biodiesel acquired in the last auction, according to data from oil regulator ANP.

The growth of this secondary market accelerated in the May-June market supply auction, when the CNPE reduced the mandatory blending mandate to 10pc from 13pc. The resulting mismatch in the schedule of some companies in the middle of a volatile demand recovery scenario brought spot market sales among retailers to the forefront.

Trading between retailers picked up in the week directly following the supply auction. This market becomes particularly active when biodiesel prices between the previous and the next auction are in backwardation, as distributors with a surplus look for potential buyers to draw down stocks at their bases before the turn of the month.

Terminal transfers have been the main basis for negotiations among retailers, particularly in the Paulinia and Araucaria hubs in Sao Paulo state — the most important terminals in the country.

Growth in biodiesel demand among small retailers has been concentrated mainly in Araucaria and in the northeast. Last week, offers in the northeast were scant because of the prospect of higher prices at the final auction held by ANP, which ended on 13 October.

Lower supplies led to higher prices mainly in Parana in the south of Brazil, according to the 8 October Argus assessment. According to Argus data, 945,000 l were sold for R5,650/m³ ($3.88/USG) in Parana, an increase of R5/m³, while in Paulinia the value dropped by R10/m³ to R5,840/m³.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
03/06/24

US SEC adopts weaker climate disclosure rule

US SEC adopts weaker climate disclosure rule

Washington, 6 March (Argus) — Far fewer companies will be required to begin disclosing climate-related information under a rule the US Securities and Exchange (SEC) finalized today, in a retreat from more ambitious climate reporting requirements proposed in 2022. Publicly traded companies will still have to disclose to investors if they have "material" climate-related risks, under the final rule adopted today, in addition to whether they have processes to manage those risks. But in a major change from the proposal, the SEC will only require companies to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions data if they would be material to investors, with no reporting at all of "scope 3" emissions that arise from a company's supply chain. The rollback of the rule marks a victory for oil companies, manufacturers and business groups that said the proposed rule — which the agency initially estimated could cost more than $6bn/yr — was too burdensome and was unlikely to offer useful information to investors. Critics were particularly opposed to SEC's initial push for some disclosure of scope 3 emissions, which they said would create a dragnet forcing companies to collect emissions data across their supply chains, even from private and small companies that might consider that data confidential. The final rule also aligns closer with the status quo. Many large companies, including major oil companies, already voluntarily disclose their direct "scope 1" and "scope 2" greenhouse gas emissions to their investors through annual reports, in addition to other information related to any material climate-related risks they face. But SEC chairman Gary Gensler said the rule, approved in a 3-2 vote, will offer investors more "consistent, comparable and decision-useful information" on a company's greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related risks. Investors will end up having far more useful information as a result of the rule, he said, replacing an existing voluntary structure under which companies decided on their own what climate information to tell investors. Despite the rule's rollbacks, state-level Republicans are preparing to challenge the rule in court, based partly on complaints that the SEC has veered away from its investor protection mandate and instead is trying to set climate policy. West Virginia attorney general Patrick Morrisey, who plans to file a lawsuit on behalf of at least nine states later today in the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, said one problem with the rule is it would be "virtually impossible" for companies to decide if their emissions are material to investors. Environmentalists also said they are considering filing a lawsuit challenging the removal of the stringent sectons of the rule, while also defending the SEC's authority to require climate disclosures for publicly traded companies. The SEC's two Republican commissioners voted in opposition. The rule marks the culmination of activist attempts to "hijack" securities laws to further climate-related goals, commissioner Mark Uyeda said. The disclosure mandate will result in a "flood of climate-related" data that will "overwhelm" investors but not necessarily offer useful information, SEC commissioner Hester Peirce said. 'Bare minimum' Environmentalists say the disclosure requirement could be useful but would be far more effective if it was finalized as proposed, concerns echoed by Gensler's fellow Democratic commissioners. The final rule is the "bare minimum" for climate-related disclosure and was "better for investors than no rule at all," SEC commissioner Caroline Crenshaw said in explaining her decision to support the new climate rule. Under the rule, companies with at least $700mn in outstanding shares will have to disclose material climate-related risks in fiscal year 2025. Those companies will also have to begin disclosing material "scope 1" and "scope 2" greenhouse gas emissions — which come from direct operations and buying electricity — in fiscal year 2026, but with reporting deferred until their second quarterly report to offer time to gather data. The climate risk disclosures will take effect a year later for companies with at least $75mn of outstanding shares, and those companies do not have to begin disclosing material greenhouse gas data until fiscal year 2028. Any smaller publicly held companies will have to report climate-related risks in fiscal year 2027, with no disclosures required at all of greenhouse gas data. The SEC had initially proposed requiring greenhouse gas reporting for all public companies, with no materiality requirement. The SEC retained requirements for companies to report more information if they have plans to reach climate-related targets and goals. If a company is using carbon offsets or renewable energy credits as a "material component" of its climate goals, it will have to start disclosing any relevant costs and losses. In another part of the rule, the SEC will require companies to disclose in financial statements any costs, charges and losses in excess of a 1pc threshold that arise as a result of severe weather, droughts, wildfires, sea-level rise or other natural conditions. The rule's importance has somewhat diminished in the years since the SEC first proposed the mandate. California last year enacted a law to require public and private companies with business in the state and at least $1bn/yr in revenue to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions, including scope 3 emissions, starting as soon as 2026. The SEC rule will not preempt state disclosures, agency staff said. The SEC initially aimed to finalize the rule by the end of 2022. But the agency repeatedly delayed that timeline amid a shifting legal environment, including the US Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in a separate climate lawsuit that embraced the "major questions doctrine" that raised doubts over novel regulatory initiatives. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

WTO asks EU to adjust RED II over palm oil: Update


03/06/24
News
03/06/24

WTO asks EU to adjust RED II over palm oil: Update

Adds Malaysia's reaction London, 6 March (Argus) — A World Trade Organisation (WTO) panel said the EU must adjust its Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) because certain aspects of the act are inconsistent with WTO rules. The decision was made in a claim brought by Malaysia against the EU concerning palm oil and oil palm crop-based biofuels in renewable energy consumption targets. Palm oil was classified as a high indirect land use change (ILUC) risk feedstock in 2019, which means it is subject to a crop cap and must be phased out by 2030. ILUC can occur when pasture or agricultural land previously destined for food and feed markets is diverted to biofuel production. In a decision that can be appealed, the WTO found that the procedure used in identifying ILUC-risk criteria, among other things, "accords less favourable treatment to palm oil-based biofuel from Malaysia than that accorded to like products of EU origin", and "does not accord an advantage to palm oil-based biofuel from Malaysia that is accorded to like products imported from third countries". The EU said it will "take the necessary steps to adjust the Delegated Act". The Malaysian Ministry of Plantation and Commodities said it will "closely monitor the EU's changes to its regulations to bring it in line with the WTO's findings, and pursue compliance proceedings if necessary". The ruling "demonstrates that Malaysia's claims of discrimination are indeed justified", the ministry added. By Evelina Lungu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK bitumen consumption lowest since 2016 last year


03/06/24
News
03/06/24

UK bitumen consumption lowest since 2016 last year

London, 6 March (Argus) — UK bitumen consumption fell to its lowest for seven years last year thanks to low government funding for road construction projects and higher bitumen costs. The latest provisional UK data showed the country consumed 1.54mn t of bitumen last year, a 24,000t fall from 2022, but down nearly 300,000t from a peak of 1.84mn t in 2021, following a surge in activity after delays during the Covid-19 lockdowns. Bitumen consumption was the lowest since 2016. The average UK delivered bitumen truck price was around £372/t ($474/t) in 2021, £502/t in 2022 and £496/t last year. UK bitumen production also fell last year, by 147,000t on the year to just 373,000t, the lowest since records began in 1995 as Prax's 105,700 b/d Lindsey refinery ceased bitumen production in early 2023. Even with lower bitumen consumption, production levels fell faster and the UK market has become ever more import dependent. This has led to a number of new and expanded bitumen storage options along the UK coastline including Continental Bitumen's new storage facility near Bristol and TotalEnergies' terminal expansion at Navigator Terminals' Teesside facility. The one-time cost of bringing roads in England and Wales up to a "reasonable" standard increased by nearly 11pc year on year to £14.02bn in 2022 , according to the latest Annual Local Authority Road Maintenance (Alarm) survey published in March 2023, its highest ever. This cost is likely to increase. By Tom Woodlock Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

WTO asks the EU to adjust RED II in palm oil decision


03/06/24
News
03/06/24

WTO asks the EU to adjust RED II in palm oil decision

London, 6 March (Argus) — A World Trade Organisation (WTO) panel said the EU must adjust the Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) because certain aspects of the act are inconsistent with WTO rules. The decision was made in a claim brought by Malaysia against the EU concerning palm oil and oil palm crop-based biofuels in renewable energy consumption targets. Palm oil was classified as a high indirect land use change (ILUC) risk feedstock in 2019, which means it is subject to a crop cap and must be phased out by 2030. ILUC can occur when pasture or agricultural land previously destined for food and feed markets is diverted to biofuel production. In a decision that can be appealed, the WTO found that the procedure used in identifying ILUC-risk criteria, among other things, "accords less favourable treatment to palm oil-based biofuel from Malaysia than that accorded to like products of EU origin", and "does not accord an advantage to palm oil-based biofuel from Malaysia that is accorded to like products imported from third countries". The EU said it will "take the necessary steps to adjust the Delegated Act". By Evelina Lungu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Unique New York GHG market rules risk linkage


03/05/24
News
03/05/24

Unique New York GHG market rules risk linkage

New York, 5 March (Argus) — New York's economy-wide carbon market could include a variety of unique rules, potentially jeopardizing regulators' goal of designing the new program to be able to join similar cap-and-trade systems elsewhere. Governor Kathy Hochul (D) has said she wants New York's new program to be "linkage-ready" when it launches next year. But various features that the administration plans to include differ from those existing systems, such as California, Quebec and Washington state, making linkage later this decade less likely, according to various stakeholders in comments on draft program rules and emissions modeling. For one, regulators have only modeled scenarios with relatively modest price ceilings that range from $14-23/metric tonne in 2025 and rise to $40-86/t by 2035. But California and Washington both have annually increasing price ceilings in their respective markets that are already above $88/t, creating a significant gulf that could make linkage with New York "completely incompatible," according to the International Emissions Trading Association. Shell agreed, saying that alignment around the price ceilings is "necessary for linkage to take place." Another barrier, according to commenters, is how New York measures greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which forms the basis for compliance obligations. The state tracks GHG emissions on a unique 20-year warming timeline that emphasizes shorter-lived methane emissions, while North American jurisdictions with carbon markets in place use a more typical 100-year warming timeline. Hochul has criticized the GHG accounting method for potentially increasing carbon market costs, but it is required by state law and her administration has signaled that changes are not a priority for budget negotiations this year. This accounting "presents a significant issue" and "would prevent further linkage to other programs," according to the US environmental services company Waste Management. The Clean Fuels Alliance America agreed, saying that New York's unique GHG accounting, which also treats biofuels differently than other states, and the state's plan to not exempt biofuels from allowance holding obligations make linkage "very challenging." Programs do not have be identical to link, but too many bespoke rules would make linkage more complicated. Differing again from California and Washington, New York has said it plans to not allow the use of offsets toward compliance, to impose minimum hold times on allowance purchases, and to potentially restrict allowance trading for sources near disadvantaged communities. Beyond policy concerns, linkage could also run into political backlash from New York environmental groups wary of altering state climate targets and GHG accounting methods. Multiple commenters, including the environmental groups Sierra Club and Earthjustice, suggested that linkage could violate state climate law by allowing sources to buy allowances from out of state and thus exceed mandatory statewide GHG limits. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.