Largest north China gas storage facility starts up
China's state-controlled Sinopec's Wei11 gas storage facility commenced operations on 18 October, marking the completion of the largest group of underground gas storage facilities in north China with total storage capacity of 10.03bn m³.
This puts China on track to having sufficient gas storage for use during the 2021-22 winter season. This is especially important for north China where winter temperatures are typically the lowest and most extreme in the country.
Wei11 is one of the three storage facilities that make up the Zhongyuan gas storage facility. The other two include the first phase of fellow Chinese state-controlled PipeChina's Wen23 that has hit its injection target earlier than planned last month, and Sinopec's Wen96.
The newly-commissioned Wei11 gas storage facility has a design capacity of 1.009bn m³ including cushion gas and a maximum daily peak capacity of 5mn m³, which can meet the gas consumption needs of 10mn households daily Construction began in February.
Sinopec's other gas storage facilities such as Wen13 West and Bai9 in the Zhongyuan oilfield area will be completed and begin operations by the end of 2021, adding another 1.116bn m³ of storage capacity. Sinopec will hold 1.69bn m³ of working gas in its storage sites by the end of October, 15.5pc higher than the same period last year.
Sinopec plans to procure up to 24.2bn m³ of LNG from overseas, and run its LNG terminals at full capacity in order to secure China's heating needs during the 2021-22 winter season.
China's main economic planning agency the NDRC has also approved construction of Sinopec's 6mn t/yr Longkou LNG terminal project, which is connected to the Wen23 gas storage facility.
Related news posts
Australia’s Woodside records weaker Jan-Mar LNG output
Australia’s Woodside records weaker Jan-Mar LNG output
Sydney, 19 April (Argus) — Australian independent Woodside Energy's January-March output dropped against a year earlier and the previous quarter, as reliability fell at its 4.9mn t/yr Pluto LNG project offshore Western Australia. Woodside produced 494,000 b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) across its portfolio for January-March, 5pc below the 522,000 boe/d reported during October-December and 4pc below its 2023 full-year figure of 513,000 boe/d. Lower production at its Bass Strait, Pyrenees and Pluto assets was partially offset by increased production at the 140,000 b/d Mad Dog phase 2 oil field in the US Gulf of Mexico, which hit peak production of 130,000 b/d during the quarter. Reliability at Pluto was 94.6pc for the quarter because of an offshore trip and an onshore electrical fault. Woodside made a final investment decision (FID) on the Xena-3 well to support Pluto production during the quarter. The 16.9mn t/yr North West Shelf (NWS) LNG achieved 97pc reliability for the quarter with NWS' joint-venture partners taking a FID on the Lambert West field, which will support continuing production. Lower seasonal market demand and offshore maintenance activity saw production drop at the firm's Bass Strait fields, while production ended at the Gippsland basin joint venture's West Kingfish platform because of slowing oil output from Kingfish field. The Pyrenees floating production storage and offloading vessel began planned maintenance in early March and will return to crude production for April-June, Woodside said. Two 550,000 bl cargoes of Pyrenees crude loaded each quarter during 2023. Revenue dropped by 31pc to $2.97bn from $4.33bn a year earlier and 12pc from $3.36bn during October-December. Woodside's total average realised price dipped to $63/boe, 6pc down on the previous quarter's $67/boe and 26pc below the year-earlier figure of $85/boe. Woodside's average realised price for LNG produced was $10.40/mn Btu or 10pc down on the previous quarter's $11.50/mn Btu. The firm is more heavily exposed to spot prices and gas hub pricing than fellow domestic LNG producer Australian independent Santos, with about 30pc of Woodside's equity-produced LNG sold at these spot prices. By Tom Major Woodside LNG production (mn boe) NWS Pluto Wheatstone* Total Jan-Mar '24 8.2 11.8 2.4 22.3 Oct-Dec '23 7.8 12.4 2.5 22.7 Jan-Mar '23 9.7 12.2 2.5 24.3 2023 32.8 45.6 10.2 88.6 2022 29.7 46.2 9.2 85.1 y-o-y % ± -15 -3 -4 -8 q-o-q % ± 5 -5 -4 -2 Source: Woodside *Woodside controls a 13pc interest in Wheatstone LNG Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Oil firm ReconAfrica agrees to class action settlement
Oil firm ReconAfrica agrees to class action settlement
Cape Town, 18 April (Argus) — Africa-focused, Canada-based upstream firm ReconAfrica has agreed to pay $10.8mn in total to eligible shareholders to settle class action lawsuits lodged in different jurisdictions over allegations that the company made misleading statements. The company will pay $7.05mn to investors who bought its shares on the US over-the-counter (OTC) markets and $3.7mn to shareholders who bought securities in the firm on Canada's TSX Venture Exchange and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange within specified class periods. In Canada, parties reached the proposed settlement after a full-day mediation in October 2023, without any admission of liability by ReconAfrica. A hearing has been scheduled on 20 June for the British Columbia Supreme Court to approve the settlement. The plaintiffs allege that between May 2020 and September 2021, ReconAfrica released misleading statements, including its plans to undertake hydraulic fracturing of "unconventional" resources and "shale" deposits within Namibia. The firm failed to disclose that Namibia has never before allowed fracking. The plaintiffs further claim that ReconAfrica did not disclose data from its test wells that revealed poor prospects for achieving commercially viable oil and gas production. The company also stands accused of undertaking unlicensed drilling and illegal water usage, as well as other environmental and human rights violations. It denies all these allegations. ReconAfrica has a current market capitalisation of C$204.7mn. Earlier this month, it raised C$17.25mn in a public share offering. The firm plans to undertake a multi-well drilling campaign this year, with the first well in Namibia's Damara Fold Belt scheduled for June. The company controls the entire Kavango sedimentary basin, which spans over 300km from the northeast of Namibia to northwest Botswana. Early estimates claimed the basin could hold as much as 31bn bl of oil, of which 22.3bn bl are in Namibia and 8.7bn bl in Botswana. ReconAfrica has a 90pc stake in the PEL 73 licence, which extends 25,000km² across northeast Namibia. The remaining 10pc is held by Namibian state-run company Namcor. The Kavango basin includes part of the ecologically sensitive Okavango Delta, a Unesco World Heritage site. The Okavango watershed consists of the Okavango river and a network of shallow, interlinked aquifers, which is a vital water source for more than a million people. The delta also serves as a habitat and migration path for many endangered animal species. Last year, ReconAfrica received environmental approval to drill 12 more wells in the Kavango. The firm recently completed a technical review of its entire exploration inventory in Namibia and now expects to find a mix of oil and gas. ReconAfrica announced an updated prospective resource estimate for Damara last month, indicating an unrisked 15.4bn bl of undiscovered oil initially-in-place. This compares with a previous estimate that pointed only to prospective natural gas resources amounting to 22.4 trillion ft³. The change "is the result of in-depth analyses of all geochemical data, including cores, cuttings, mud logs, seeps and additional basin modelling studies," ReconAfrica said. The firm has made the updated estimates available to potential joint venture partners and expects to complete this month a farm-out process that it started in December 2023. By Elaine Mills Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
NSTA fines Neo Energy for North Sea methane venting
NSTA fines Neo Energy for North Sea methane venting
London, 18 April (Argus) — UK offshore regulator the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) has fined UK upstream firm Neo Energy £100,000 for breaching its methane venting permit at North Sea fields. The company emitted 1,200t of methane in excess of its permit from the Donan, Lochranza and Balloch fields in the first nine months of 2022. Neo had permission to vent 378t of methane from installations at these fields in that year, but incorrectly assigned volumes vented through unlit flares to its flaring consent, the NSTA found. Neo showed a "lack of oversight" by failing to detect the licence breach for seven months, NSTA said. The company reached its annual limit by 21 March 2022, but continued venting without authorisation until October 2022. The company said it did not update its flare and vent allocation process to reflect NSTA guidance updated in 2021, and as such was still assigning its flaring and venting according to previous guidance. Neo becomes the fourth company to be fined by the NSTA over breaches relating to flaring and venting consents. The regulator in 2022 sanctioned Equinor and EnQuest and last year fined Spanish utility Repsol for consent breaches. The four companies have been fined a total of £475,000 for the breaches. And the regulator in February had four more investigations under way for breaches of vent consents. Neo Energy's fine is equivalent to £2.98/t of CO2e emitted, assuming a global warming potential of methane that is 28 times that of CO2 on a 100-year time scale, compared with a UK emissions trading system price of £34.40/t of CO2e on 17 April. The UK offshore industry targets a 50pc reduction in production emissions of greenhouse gases by 2030, from a 2018 baseline. And it intends to end all routine venting and flaring by that year. The regulator last year warned that "further, sustained action" would be needed to reach the 2030 emissions reduction goal. Methane emissions from offshore gas fell in recent years, to 1mn t in 2022 from 1.6mn t in 2018, according to NSTA data. Roughly half of methane emissions in the sector in recent years has been produced by venting, while flaring makes up about a quarter of the emissions. The UK government is a member of the Global Methane Pledge group of countries that aims to reduce methane emissions by 30pc by 2030 from a 2020 baseline. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US LNG growth seen stoking price volatility
US LNG growth seen stoking price volatility
Ponte Vedra Beach, 17 April (Argus) — Natural gas prices in the US and globally will face greater volatility because of LNG export expansions along the US Gulf Coast, according to speakers at the Southeast LDC Gas Forum in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida. LNG export capacity from the US, already the largest provider of LNG into the global market, is set to expand in the coming years, putting an important source of global supply in the path of hurricanes and exposed to pipeline disruptions from key supply areas such as the Permian basin in west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. US baseload LNG export capacity was forecast to increase by the end of 2025 to about 16.7 Bcf/d (473mn m³/d), up by 46pc from the 11.4 Bcf/d of capacity at the end of 2023, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). US LNG production by 2030 will meet about 5pc of global gas demand and 30pc of global LNG demand, Jill Davies, general manager of North America LNG Trading at Shell Energy, told attendees today at the conference. Most of those supplies will depart the US from the Gulf coast. That means a disruption in US exports could cause global prices to rise or domestic prices to crater. More pipelines and storage would allow LNG export terminals to access supply from different regions, defraying some of the price risk, according to speakers at the conference. The potential price volatility highlights the need for greater US political support for new gas infrastructure, Davies said on the sidelines of the conference. Pipeline projects aiming to connect key producing areas to growing demand centers have failed to clear regulatory hurdles in recent years, raising concerns about the potential for supply growth from prolific fields such as the Marcellus and Utica shales. Prices in the US market can also soar on supply disruptions or plunge on downtime at LNG export terminals. Prices have faced downward pressure this spring from ongoing maintenance at the 2.1 Bcf/d Freeport LNG export terminal in Texas. An extended, eight-month-long shutdown of that terminal that began in the summer of 2022 caused prices to fall by backing up supply into the US market. Producers that gain more exposure to exports and, in turn, the global market could "face a tenuous situation when a hurricane stirs up in the Gulf," Zach Inman, vice president of origination for BP said during a panel discussion Wednesday. By Jason Womack Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more