US refiners push cash to turnarounds, investor returns
US refiners expect to spend big on turnarounds and shareholder returns this year as the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic reverberate well past 2020.
Major US refiners were eager to herald the return of domestic road fuel demand in outlooks presented over the past month alongside 2021 earnings. Valero expects gasoline and diesel markets to remain "very tight" in 2022, and Marathon Petroleum said it is "less concerned about the pace of recovery and transportation fuels demand" as Covid-19 heads towards an endemic phase in the future. After sustaining nearly two years of demand shocks related to the virus, refiners suggested the pandemic may have ended with a whimper— Phillips 66, Valero, and Marathon all strode to fourth-quarter profits in the face of Omicron.
But there are bills left to pay. Refiners envisage entering a catch-up phase of facility maintenance in 2022, after delaying projects amid the pandemic to conserve cash flow. PBF Energy, Phillips 66 and ExxonMobil are expected to perform busy maintenance schedules after stretching five-year turnaround cycles in recent years, according to research from US bank Wells Fargo.
Marathon expects an active turnaround schedule at its US Gulf coast refineries in the second half, with full-year expenses exceeding the "normal range" of $600mn-700mn. Phillips 66 plans to spend $800mn-900mn on maintenance in 2022 — a record high. "We were able to stretch runs [after the pandemic] and put a lot of work in making sure we could do it from a mechanical integrity standpoint," Phillips 66 refining head Robert Herman said of the company's move to delay full facility turnarounds at its Ferndale, Washington, and Billings, Montana, refineries. "But you cannot do that forever."
The delayed maintenance trend has already caused slowdowns that are tamping refining utilisation in the US, despite the closure of a handful of older, less-efficient refineries in 2020 and 2021 that should have helped raise combined utilisation. "We see an issue in terms of where utilisation is versus closures," Valero senior vice-president of refining Lane Riggs said last month. "There are probably some slowdowns that are occurring, maybe because of maintenance deferrals or turnaround deferrals in the industry."
The net effect is bullish for margins, even if higher operating costs will eat into refiners' profits. US refining margins should rise with increased maintenance, as restricted throughputs will further pressure product stocks that are already in a relatively thin state. That could tempt some refiners to continue to stretch turnaround timelines, as CVR Energy did late last year by kicking a planned 2022 turnaround at its 132,000 Coffeyville, Kansas, refinery into 2023.
Investor incentives
And what will companies do with cash gathered on the back of strong margins? Return it to shareholders, most likely. Marathon has announced a new $5bn share buyback plan it will execute alongside a $10bn buyback launched last year. Those plans mean restricted growth — the firm has earmarked just $1.7bn in capital expenditure (capex) this year, 72pc below its pre-Covid 2019 level.
Phillips 66 built a hefty debt load during the pandemic, but that may not stop it from joining the buyback line. The company aims to pay down debt to within $1bn of a $12bn debt target this year, after its liabilities ballooned to nearly $16bn at the end of 2020. But it expects to introduce a buyback programme around the mid-year if refining returns remain strong, while 2022 capex of $1.9bn will trail far behind its 2019 level of $3.9bn. "It is time to step back into those [share repurchases]," chief executive Greg Garland says. "For all the right reasons, we want to keep capital constrained across the portfolio for the next couple of years."
| US refiner throughputs | 000 b/d | |||||
| 4Q21 | 4Q20 | 4Q19 | FY21 | FY20 | FY19 | |
| Phillips 66 | 1,800 | 1,500 | 2,100 | 1,800 | 1,700 | 2,000 |
| Valero | 3,000 | 2,500 | 3,000 | 2,800 | 2,500 | 2,950 |
| Marathon Petroleum | 2,900 | 2,500 | 3,000 | 2,800 | 2,500 | 3,100 |
| PBF Energy | 869 | 677 | 843 | 834 | 727 | 823 |
| — company earnings | ||||||
| US refiner profits | ||||||
| 4Q21 | 4Q20 | 4Q19 | FY21 | FY20 | FY19 | |
| Phillips 66 | $1.3bn | -$539mn | $736mn | $1.3bn | -$3.97bn | $3bn |
| Valero | $1.01bn | -$359mn | $1.01bn | $1.01bn | -$1.4bn | $2.4bn |
| Marathon Petroleum | $774mn | $285mn | $443mn | $9.7bn | -$9.8bn | $2.6bn |
| PBF Energy | $189mn | -$286mn | $69mn | $315mn | -$1.3bn | $428mn |
| — company earnings | ||||||
Related news posts
Brazil's Rio Grande do Sul reallocates gas supply
Brazil's Rio Grande do Sul reallocates gas supply
Sao Paulo, 17 May (Argus) — Natural gas supply in Brazil's Rio Grande do Sul had to be redistributed because of the historic floods in the state, with diesel potentially making its way back as an power plant fuel to leave more gas available for LPG production. Gasbol, the natural gas transportation pipeline that supplies Brazil's south, does not have capacity to meet demand from the 201,000 b/d Alberto Pasqualini refinery (Refap), state-controlled Petrobras' Canoas thermal power plant and natural gas distributors in the region, according to Petrobras' then-chief executive Jean Paul Prates said earlier this week. The Santa Catarina state gas distributor has adjusted its own local network to meet peak demand in neighboring Rio Grande do Sul via the pipeline transportation network. The Canoas thermal plant is running at its minimum generation at 150GW, with 61pc coming from its gas turbine. The plant was brought on line to reinstate proper power supply after transmission lines in the south were affected by the floods. Petrobras plans to use a diesel engine to increase power generation. The current approved fuel cost (CVU) for diesel in the Canoas plant is of R1,115.29/MWh. Petrobras is also operating Refap at 59pc of its maximum installed capacity, at 119,506 b/d. Heavy showers in Rio Grande do Sul since 29 April brought unprecedented flooding to the state, causing a humanitarian crisis and infrastructure damage. The extreme weather has left 154 people dead, 98 missing and over 540,000 people displaced, according to the state's civil defense. By Rebecca Gompertz Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Houston area refiners weather hurricane-force winds
Houston area refiners weather hurricane-force winds
Houston, 17 May (Argus) — Over 2mn b/d of US refining capacity faced destructive winds Thursday evening as a major storm blew through Houston, Texas, but the damage reported so far has been minimal. Wind speeds of up to 78 Mph were recorded in northeast Houston and the Houston Ship Channel — home to five refineries with a combined 1.5mn b/d of capacity — faced winds up to 74 Mph, according to the National Weather Service . Further South in Galveston Bay, where Valero and Marathon Petroleum refineries total 818,000 b/d of capacity, max wind speeds of 51 Mph were recorded. Chevron's 112,000 b/d Pasadena refinery on the Ship Channel just east of downtown Houston sustained minor damage during the storm and continues to supply customers, the company said. ExxonMobil's 564,000 b/d Baytown refinery on the Ship Channel and 369,000 b/d Beaumont, Texas, refinery further east faced no significant impact from the storm and the company continues to supply customers, a spokesperson told Argus . Neither Phillips 66's 265,000 b/d Sweeny refinery southwest of Houston nor its 264,000 b/d Lake Charles refinery 140 miles east in Louisiana were affected by the storm, a spokesperson said. There was no damage at Motiva's 626,000 b/d Port Arthur, Texas, refinery according to the company. Marathon Petroleum declined to comment on operations at its 593,000 b/d Galveston Bay refinery. Valero, LyondellBasell, Pemex, Total, Calcasieu and Citgo did not immediately respond to requests for comment on operations at their refineries in the Houston area, Port Arthur and Lake Charles. A roughly eight-mile portion of the Houston Ship Channel from the Sidney Sherman Bridge to Greens Bayou closed from 9pm ET 16 May to 1am ET today when two ships brokeaway from their moorings, and officials looked in a potential fuel oil spill, according to the US Coast Guard. The portion that closed provides access to Valero's 215,000 b/d Houston refinery, LyondellBasell's 264,000 b/d Houston refinery and Chevron's Pasadena refinery. By Nathan Risser Houston area refineries Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Texas barge collision shuts GIWW section: Correction
Texas barge collision shuts GIWW section: Correction
Corrects volume of oil carried by barge in fourth paragraph. Houston, 16 May (Argus) — Authorities closed a six-mile section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) near Galveston, Texas, because of an oil spill caused by a barge collision with the Pelican Island causeway bridge. The section between mile markers 351.5 and 357.5 along the waterway closed, according to the US Coast Guard. A barge broke away from the Philip George tugboat and hit the bridge between Pelican Island and Galveston around 11am ET today. Concrete from the bridge fell onto the barge and triggered an oil leak. The barge can hold up to 30,000 bl oil, but it was unknown how full the barge was before the crash, Galveston County county judge Mark Henry said. It was unclear when the waterway would reopen. An environmental cleanup crew was on the scene along with the US Coast Guard and Texas Department of Transportation to assess the damage. Multiple state agencies have debated the replacement of the 64-year-old bridge for several years, Henry said. The rail line alongside the bridge collapsed. Marine traffic does not pass under the bridge. By Meghan Yoyotte Intracoastal Waterway at Galveston Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option
Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option
New York, 16 May (Argus) — Ship owners are ordering new vessels equipped with methanol-burning capabilities, largely in response to tightening carbon emissions regulations in Europe. But despite the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings that low-carbon methanol provides, it cannot currently compete on price with grey methanol or conventional marine fuels. Ship owners operate 33 methanol-fueled vessels today and have another 29 on order through the end of the year, according to vessel classification society DNV. All 62 vessels are oil and chemical tankers. DNV expects a total of 281 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028, of which 165 will be container ships, 19 bulk carrier and 14 car carrier vessels. Argus Consulting expects an even bigger build-out, with more than 300 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028. A methanol configured dual-fuel vessel has the option to burn conventional marine fuel or any type of methanol: grey or low-carbon. Grey methanol is made from natural gas or coal. Low-carbon methanol includes biomethanol, made of sustainable biomass, and e-methanol, produced by combining green hydrogen and captured carbon dioxide. The fuel-switching capabilities of the dual-fuel vessels provide ship owners with a natural price hedge. When methanol prices are lower than conventional bunkers the ship owner can burn methanol, and vice versa. Methanol, with its zero-sulphur emissions, is advantageous in emission control areas (ECAs), such as the US and Canadian territorial waters. In ECAs, the marine fuel sulphur content is capped at 0.1pc, and ship owners can burn methanol instead of 0.1pc sulphur maximum marine gasoil (MGO). In the US Gulf coast, the grey methanol discount to MGO was $23/t MGO-equivalent average in the first half of May. The grey methanol discount averaged $162/t MGOe for all of 2023. Starting this year, ship owners travelling within, in and out of European territorial waters are required to pay for 40pc of their CO2 emissions through the EU emissions trading system. Next year, ship owners will be required to pay for 70pc of their CO2 emissions. Separately, ship owners will have to reduce their vessels' lifecycle GHG intensities, starting in 2025 with a 2pc reduction and gradually increasing to 80pc by 2050, from a 2020 baseline. The penalty for exceeding the GHG emission intensity is set by the EU at €2,400/t ($2,596/t) of very low-sulplhur fuel oil equivalent. Even though these regulations apply to EU territorial waters, they affect ship owners travelling between the US and Europe. Despite the lack of sulphur emissions, grey methanol generates CO2. With CO2 marine fuel shipping regulations tightening, ship owners have turned their sights to low-carbon methanol. But US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol was priced at $2,317/t MGOe in the first half of May, nearly triple the outright price of MGO at $785/t. Factoring in the cost of 70pc of CO2 emissions and the GHG intensity penalty, the US Gulf coast MGO would rise to about $857/t. At this MGO level, the US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol would be 2.7 times the price of MGO. By comparison, grey methanol with added CO2 emissions cost would be around $962/t, or 1.1 times the price of MGO. To mitigate the high low-carbon methanol costs, some ship owners have been eyeing long-term agreements with suppliers to lock in product availabilities and cheaper prices available on the spot market. Danish container ship owner Maersk has lead the way, entering in low-carbon methanol production agreements in the US with Proman, Orsted, Carbon Sink, and SunGaas Renewables. These are slated to come on line in 2025-27. Global upcoming low-carbon methanol projects are expected to produce 16mn t by 2027, according to industry trade association the Methanol Institute, up from two years ago when the institute was tracking projects with total capacity of 8mn t by 2027. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more