Pertamina, Japanese firms to study biomethane business

  • Market: Biofuels, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 25/04/22

Indonesian state-owned energy supplier Pertamina today signed an agreement with Japanese firms to study the feasibility of a clean natural gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Indonesia involving the production of biomethane from palm oil mill effluent (POME).

Three Japanese firms — gas utility Osaka Gas, upstream firm Inpex and engineering company JGC — have partnered with Pertamina to jointly study the capture and collection of methane gas emitted from POME at plants in Sumatra and Kalimantan, and to provide it as biomethane to consumers in Java by using existing natural gas pipelines. They are also considering the export of bio-LNG made from liquefied biomethane to Japan, while reviewing the use of bio-LNG as a marine fuel.

The companies plan to complete the feasibility study by November, and develop a timeline for commercialisation during the study. The firms target to produce 100,000 t/yr of biomethane by 2030.

JGC and Pertamina also signed an agreement today to study the feasibility of a joint decarbonisation business involving hydrogen, ammonia, biogas and carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS).


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
14/05/24

Falling D4 RIN values alter RD strategy

Falling D4 RIN values alter RD strategy

Houston, 14 May (Argus) — Soaring US renewable diesel production is cutting renewable fuel credit prices and pressuring biofuel production margins, potentially curbing industry growth. Renewable diesel (RD) production in North America last year jumped by 36pc to a record 3.45bn USG, and output this year is expected to climb by another 28pc to 4.43bn USG, according to Argus estimates. Rising production has cut the value of biomass-based diesel D4 credits, or renewable identification numbers (RINs), by 75pc over the past year, as credit generation from renewable diesel production has outpaced the the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) biofuel blending targets. D4 RINs credits reflect compliance costs of biofuel that has been blended with diesel, used by fuel suppliers in accordance with the EPA's annual Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) mandates. They also act as an incentive for renewable fuel production, as producers can sell RINs once their biofuels are blended with conventional road fuels. Lower prices on D4 RINs generate less revenue for the biofuels industry and also reduce compliance costs for obligated parties. Some refiners have shifted their strategic focus to compensate for lower RIN values, with some cutting back on renewable fuels production. Vertex Energy plans to idle renewable diesel production at its Mobile, Alabama, facility as the company anticipates generating wider margins by returning a converted hydrocracker back to fossil fuel production. Vertex remains open to restarting its renewable diesel production if market conditions improve. CVR Energy is considering changing feedstocks to improve its renewable diesel margins, possibly substituting corn oil for soybean oil. Chevron has shared similar sentiments, saying feedstock flexibility can be a major advantage across its operations. The company recently closed two biodiesel facilities in the US midcontinent as attention shifts to more profitable renewable diesel in the long term. Valero is nearly finished converting its renewable diesel unit to sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) at its Diamond Green Diesel joint venture facility in Port Arthur, Texas. The venture with Darling Ingredients is the largest producer of renewable diesel in North America and a major contributor to the increase in supply over the past two years. Valero views the D4 RIN market as in persistent oversupply due to the growth of renewable diesel, but the company remains optimistic due to other clean fuels incentives, including state-level low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) programs that provide incentives for reducing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels. "The long-term outlook of RD is still positive, because you look at the number of LCFS programs that are still being contemplated by legislation this year," Valero executive vice president Gary Simmons said. More renewable diesel capacity is expected to come online by the end of this year. Marathon Petroleum's Martinez, California, refinery is undergoing a full conversion from conventional petroleum refining to renewable fuels and is currently running at 50pc of capacity. Phillips 66 has taken a similar approach with the conversion of their Rodeo, California, plant, with 30,000 b/d of renewable diesel online. With EPA biofuel blending targets fixed through 2025, an aggregate decrease in renewable diesel production and subsequent lower generation of D4 RINs could counter the weakened RIN prices that are contributing to the industry's depressed production margins. By Matthew Cope Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

US court upholds RFS blending targets for 2020-22


14/05/24
News
14/05/24

US court upholds RFS blending targets for 2020-22

Washington, 14 May (Argus) — A federal appeals court has affirmed biofuel blending requirements for 2020-22 under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), rejecting lawsuits from refineries and renewable fuel producers challenging the standards. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acted within its authority in the rule when it revised the biofuel blending targets to account for small refinery exemptions it expected it would award in the future, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit said today in a 2-1 ruling. The court rejected a complaint by refineries that argued EPA could only revise the annual biofuel blending targets based on exemptions it had already approved in the past. "The statute does not confine EPA to the Refiner Petitioners' preferred method of accounting for small refinery exemptions," DC Circuit judge Cornelia Pillard wrote on behalf of the majority. "EPA's choice to account for them both retrospectively and prospectively is not arbitrary or capricious." The ruling leaves intact a 2022 rule that required renewable fuel blending to increase to 20.63bn USG by 2022, up from 17.13bn USG in 2020. For the first time under the RFS, the rule used a new formula that tried to avoid a recurrent issue under which EPA failed to account for upcoming requests from small refineries for exemptions from the RFS. EPA has subsequently decided to start denying all small refinery exemptions, under a new argument that small refiners do not face a disproportionate hardship from complying with the RFS. But if the courts throw out that finding in a pending lawsuit , the formula at issue in today's court ruling could take on a greater relevance for how EPA accounts for small refinery exemptions when setting biofuel blending targets. The DC Circuit rejected a separate lawsuit by cellulosic ethanol producers that said EPA should have required increased blending of cellulosic ethanol, based in part on the availability of carryover compliance credits. The court found EPA had adequate authority to waive volumetric targets set by the US Congress in 2007 based on its finding there were inadequate domestic supplies of the fuel, which is produced from plant fibers. Judge Gregory Katsas, who dissented from the ruling, said he believed the biofuel blending requirements for 2022 were set "arbitrarily high." Katsas cited EPA's finding that those standards would impose an estimated $5.7bn in additional costs for fuel but only deliver $160mn in energy security benefits. Katsas also faulted EPA for increasing the biofuel blending targets by 250mn USG in 2022 to "cancel out a legal error" from biofuel blending targets in 2016. Katsas said there was no authority to transfer volume requirements from one year to another. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Banks’ 2023 fossil fuel funding rises to $705bn: Study


13/05/24
News
13/05/24

Banks’ 2023 fossil fuel funding rises to $705bn: Study

London, 13 May (Argus) — Fossil fuel financing by the world's 60 largest banks rose to $705bn in 2023, up by 4.8pc from $673bn in 2022, with the increase largely driven by financing for the LNG sector. This brings the total funding for fossil fuels since the Paris agreement was signed in 2015 to $6.9 trillion. The 15th annual Banking on Climate Chaos (BOCC) report was released on 13 May by a group of non-governmental and civil society organisations including the Rainforest Action Network and Oil Change International, and it analyses the world's 60 largest commercial and investment banks, according to ratings agency Standard and Poor's (S&P). Funding had previously dropped in 2022 to $673bn from $742bn in 2021, but this was because higher profits for oil and gas companies had led to reduced borrowing. JPMorgan Chase was the largest financier of fossil fuels in 2023 at $40.9bn, up from $38.7bn a year earlier, according to the report. It also topped the list for banks providing financing to companies with fossil fuel expansion plans, with its commitments rising to $19.3bn from $17.1bn in 2022. Japanese bank Mizuho was the second-largest financier, increasing funding commitments to $37bn for all fossil fuels, from $35.4bn in 2022. The Bank of America came in third with $33.7bn, although this was a drop from $37.3bn a year earlier. Out of the 60 banks, 27 increased financing for companies with fossil fuel exposure, with the rise driven by funding for the LNG sector — including fracking, import, export, transport and gas-fired power. Developers have rallied support for LNG projects as part of efforts to boost energy security after the Russia-Ukraine war began in 2022, and banks are actively backing this sector, stated the report. "The rise in rankings by Mizuho and the prominence of the other two Japanese megabanks — MUFG [Mitsubishi UFG Financial Group] and SMBC [Sumitomo Mitsui Banking] — is a notable fossil fuel trend for 2023," the report said. Mizuho and MUFG dominated LNG import and export financing, providing $10.9bn and $8.4bn respectively, to companies expanding this sector. Total funding for the LNG methane gas sector in 2023 was $121bn, up from $116bn in 2022. Financing for thermal coal mining increased slightly to $42.2bn, from $39.7bn in 2022. Out of this, 81pc came from Chinese banks, according to the report, while several North American banks have provided funds to this sector, including Bank of America. Some North American banks have also rolled back on climate commitments, according to the report. Bank of America, for example, had previously committed to not directly financing projects involving new or expanded coal-fired power plants or coal mines, but changed its policy in late 2023 to state that such projects would undergo "enhanced due diligence" and senior-level reviews. The report also notes that most banks' coal exclusions only apply to thermal coal and not metallurgical coal. Total borrowing by oil majors such as Eni, ConocoPhillips, Chevron and Shell fell by 5.24pc in 2023, with several such as TotalEnergies, ExxonMobil and Hess indicating zero financing for the year. The BOCC report's finance data was sourced from either Bloomberg or the London Stock Exchange between December 2023 and February 2024. UK-based bank Barclays, which ranks ninth on the list with $24.2bn in fossil fuel funding, said that the report does not recognise the classification of some of the data. Its "financed emissions for the energy and power sectors have reduced by 44pc and 26pc respectively, between 2020-23," it said. In response to its increase in financing for gas power, "investment is needed to support existing oil and gas assets, while clean energy is scaled," the bank said. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan’s Daio Paper to explore biorefinery


13/05/24
News
13/05/24

Japan’s Daio Paper to explore biorefinery

Tokyo, 13 May (Argus) — Japanese paper manufacturer Daio Paper is planning a trial biorefinery, aiming to begin commercial production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), second-generation bioethanol and biodegradable plastic feedstock by the April 2032-March 2033 fiscal year. Daio, in partnership with domestic biorefinery venture Green Earth Institute (GEI), plans to develop technology to demonstrate manufacturing the bioproducts by 2030. Daio Paper plans to use wooden biomass, waste paper and paper sludge as feedstock. The company declined to disclose any planned commercial output capacity, as well as location of the biorefinery. The project is financed by Japan's state-owned research institute Nedo. Daio Paper is attempting to achieve decarbonisation, while weakening paper demand has forced the industry to seek new business opportunities. Fellow Japanese paper producer Nippon Paper has also tried to develop biorefinery technology with GEI, targeting to begin commercial production of bioethanol for SAF and petrochemical feedstock by 2027-28. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

APA defers FID for Australian gas pipeline's stage 3


13/05/24
News
13/05/24

APA defers FID for Australian gas pipeline's stage 3

Sydney, 13 May (Argus) — Australian pipeline operator APA has deferred a final investment decision (FID) for stage 3 of its planned east coast grid expansion, given potential rule changes for the South West Queensland pipeline (SWQP). APA is pushing back the FID by about 6-12 months to the first-half of 2025, and was likely initially planning to make the FID this year. The operator postponed the FID because of recent action by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER), which said it might recommend rule changes for the SWQP. A review was announced in February and is not expected to be completed until November at the earliest, APA said. The firm opposes any further regulation of the SWQP , maintaining that it does not return excessive profits. APA said the lack of a single arbitration case involving the facility since such a regime was instituted in 2017 is evidence that its customers accept present arrangements. "We've probably got around six to 12 months at the very most for us to work through and hopefully there's no change to regulation, but basically the time frame is we need to get started pretty much early next year on building stage 3," APA's chief executive Adam Watson said on 9 May. If the AER decides to make the lightly regulated SWQP subject to reference price regulation, an access arrangement would need to be determined which will take 2-3 years to complete, APA said. This means any changes would be instituted in the fiscal year to 30 June 2028. The SWQP can carry 440 TJ/d (11.75mn m³/d) in a westerly direction from Wallumbilla to the Moomba hub, from where gas can enter the APA-operated Moomba-Sydney and Epic Energy-owned Moomba-Adelaide pipelines for transport to southeastern facilities. Expanding the capacity of pipelines allowing the north-south transit of gas is considered critical to avoiding shortfalls owing to the depletion of Gippsland basin fields this decade. Stage 1 of APA's east coast grid expansion was completed in 2023, with stage 2 also now operational in line with guidance. These two stages increased capacity by 25pc, allowing about 50 TJ/d more gas to flow on the SWQP to southern markets, with similar increased volumes expected from stages 3 and 4. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more