Compensation adds to Singapore bunker contamination row
Shipowners that have suffered losses from taking contaminated high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) in Singapore are uncertain how they will be compensated, as a market tightness sees delivered premiums for the marine fuel spike.
Singapore's Maritime and Port Authority (MPA) on 13 April named trading firm Glencore as the initial supplier of the contaminated HSFO in Singapore, the world's largest bunkering hub. The contaminated fuel was then supplied to Chinese bunker supplier PetroChina, which in turn supplied about 200 vessels in Singapore, with about 80 suffering fuel pump and engine damage because of the presence of chlorinated compounds.
Market participants said that shipowners will possibly see debunkering and replacement of cargo costs met by the supplier of the contaminated fuel, but not the demurrage or potential mechanical repair costs incurred by the vessel.
Oslo-based marine insurance provider Skuld said on 1 April that it had seen an "increased number of protection and indemnity and hull claims related to high-sulphur fuel oil at Singapore and which were found to be contaminated with chlorinated compounds." But when contacted by Argus regarding a potential spread of the contamination beyond Singapore, it declined to offer further comment beyond that already published on its website.
Market participants are varied in their views of how long the situation will take to be resolved, with some saying it will possibly last until the end of May. Others said it could take many months to be finalised. There is no blanket fix, with any compensation to parties involved having to be handled on a case-by-case basis, they added.
Most shipowners are already paying a premium for Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) pre-testing, an advanced and more expensive fuel quality test compared with conventional ISO 8217 tests. The results of these tests are usually available in a day. But this has increased to 2-3 days as a result of increased demand following the contamination crisis, further increasing demurrage costs.
Vessels that have taken on contaminated fuel can still sail and usually can make their way to the nearest port for debunkering. It is uncertain what then happens to the contaminated fuel once offloaded. Suppliers might blend down the contaminants in the reclaimed contaminated fuel, although it will be a complicated process requiring large volumes, said market participants.
Glencore placed daily bids for HSFO cargoes in online trading in the first two weeks of April, although it could not be confirmed if this was related to the contamination.
"Contaminated fuel oil retains some of its value, and it might get sold in the market at the cargo price minus $100-150/t or so", said a local buyer whose vessels had also been affected.
Tightness spurs firmer prices
Singapore 180cst HSFO margins against Dubai crude values entered positive territory for the first time since November 2020 at $0.83/bl on 1 April, which was around when the contamination was discovered, on expectations of a tightening of supplies. They then widened to a record $4.38/bl on 12 April, the highest since Argus started assessments in July 2006. They fell to -$0.57/bl on 25 April, probably because of rare regional exports. But this is still higher than average -$6.06/bl margins in the second half of 2021.
The delivered premium, or the additional price of delivered bunker fuel over the cargo price, has averaged $65/t so far this month compared with a more typical $10-15/t. HSFO delivered premiums last reached such levels in September 2019-January 2020 when the marine fuel market was anticipating and navigating the International Maritime Organisation's 2020 global sulphur cap.
Bunker fuels have always been an important component for freight, as it affect shipowners' earnings and at times comprises a sizable portion of the freight cost. The higher fuel costs and uncertainty surrounding the contamination issue have led to shipowners increasing their offer levels, freight participants said. The long downtime taken by vessels as they repair or replace their failed fuel pumps and engines will have reduced the amount of available tonnages, adding further pressure to already tight supply woes in Asia-Pacific.
More stringent regulations by Singapore's MPA are expected to prevent future fuel contamination crises. One such measure could be making GCMS testing mandatory, which a majority of bunker buyers support based on a survey by UK-based bunker broker NSI.
Related news posts
Lyondell Houston refinery to run at 95pc in 2Q
Lyondell Houston refinery to run at 95pc in 2Q
Houston, 26 April (Argus) — LyondellBasell plans to run its 264,000 b/d Houston, Texas, refinery at average utilization rates of 95pc in the second quarter and may convert its hydrotreaters to petrochemical production when the plant shuts down in early 2025. The company's sole crude refinery ran at an average 79pc utilization rate in the first quarter due to planned maintenance on a coking unit , the company said in earnings released today . "We are evaluating options for the potential reuse of the hydrotreaters at our Houston refinery to purify recycled and renewable cracker feedstocks," chief executive Peter Vanacker said on a conference call today discussing earnings. Lyondell said last year a conversion would feed the company's two 930,000 metric tonnes (t)/yr steam crackers at its Channelview petrochemicals complex. The company today said it plans to make a final investment decision on the conversion in 2025. Hydrotreater conversions — such as one Chevron completed last year at its 269,000 b/d El Segundo, California, refinery — allow the unit to produce renewable diesel, which creates renewable naphtha as a byproduct. Renewable naphtha can be used as a gasoline blending component, steam cracker feed or feed for hydrogen producing units, according to engineering firm Topsoe. Lyondell last year said the Houston refinery will continue to run until early 2025, delaying a previously announced plan to stop crude processing by the end of 2023. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EU adopts Net-Zero Industry Act
EU adopts Net-Zero Industry Act
London, 26 April (Argus) — Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have adopted Net-Zero Industry Act, which plans to allocate funds towards the production of net-zero technologies. The act provides a pathway to scale up development and production of technologies that are critical towards meeting the EU's recommendation of net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. This would include solar panels, electrolysers and fuel cells, batteries, heat pumps, onshore and offshore wind turbines, grid technologies, sustainable biomethane, as well as carbon capture and storage (CCS). The act is designed to help simplify the regulatory framework for the manufacture of these technologies in order to incentivise European production and supply. It also sets a target of 40pc production within the EU for its annual "deployment needs" of these technologies by 2030. Time limits will be instated on permit grants for manufacturing projects, at 12 months if the manufacturing capacity is under 1 GW/yr and 18 months for those above that. It will introduce time limits of nine months for "net-zero strategic projects" of less than 1 GW/yr and 12 months for those above. This is further complemented by the introduction of net-zero strategic projects for CO2 storage, to help support the development of CCS technology. The act was met with positive reactions from the European Community Shipowners' Association (ECSA), which said the bill will set the benchmark for member states to match 40pc of the deployment needs for clean fuels for shipping with production capacity. ECSA said the Net-Zero Industry Act will be instrumental in supporting the shipping industry to meet targets set under FuelEU Maritime regulations , which are set to come into effect next year. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
New technologies aim to boost SAF production
New technologies aim to boost SAF production
London, 26 April (Argus) — A likely rise in global demand for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), underpinned by mandates for its use, is encouraging development of new production pathways. While hydrotreated esters and fatty acids synthesised paraffinic kerosine (HEFA-SPK) remains the most common type of SAF available today, much more production will be needed. The International Air Transport Association (Iata) estimated SAF output at around 500,000t in 2023, and expects this to rise to 1.5mn t this year, but that only meets around 0.5pc of global jet fuel demand. An EU-wide SAF mandate will come into effect in 2025 that will set a minimum target of 2pc, with a sub-target for synthetic SAF starting from 2030. This week the UK published its domestic SAF mandate , also targeting a 2pc SAF share in 2025 and introducing a power-to-liquid (PtL) obligation from 2028. New pathways involve different technology to unlock use of a wider feedstock base. US engineering company Honeywell said this week its hydrocracking technology, Fischer-Tropsch (FT) Unicracking, can be used to produce SAF from biomass such as crop residue or wood and food waste. Renewable fuels producer DG Fuels will use the technology for its SAF facility in Louisiana, US. The plant will be able to produce 13,000 b/d of SAF starting from 2028, Honeywell said. The company said its SAF technologies — which include ethanol-to-jet , which converts cellulosic ethanol into SAF — have been adopted at more than 50 sites worldwide including Brazil and China. Honeywell is part of the Google and Boeing-backed United Airlines Ventures Sustainable Flight Fund , which is aimed at scaling up SAF production. German alternative fuels company Ineratec said this week it will use South African integrated energy firm Sasol's FT catalysts for SAF production. The catalysts will be used in Ineratec's plants, including a PtL facility it is building in Frankfurt, Germany. The plant will be able to produce e-fuels from green hydrogen and CO2, with a capacity of 2,500 t/yr of e-fuels beginning in 2024. The e-fuels will then be processed into synthetic SAF. Earlier this month , ethanol-to-jet producer LanzaJet said it has received funding from technology giant Microsoft's Climate Innovation Fund, "to continue building its capability and capacity to deploy its sustainable fuels process technology globally". The producer recently signed a licence and engineering agreement with sustainable fuels company Jet Zero Australia to progress development of an SAF plant in north Queensland, Australia. The plant will have capacity of 102mn l/yr of SAF. Polish oil firm Orlen formed a partnership with Japanese electrical engineering company Yakogawa to develop SAF technology . They aim to develop a technological process to synthesise CO2 and hydrogen to form PtL SAF. The SAF will be produced from renewable hydrogen as defined by the recast EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) and bio-CO2 from biomass boilers, Orlen told Argus . By Evelina Lungu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
P66 to sell German, Austrian retail business: Update
P66 to sell German, Austrian retail business: Update
Adds number of Phillips 66-owned gas stations in Germany and Austria, company response. Houston, 26 April (Argus) — US refiner Phillips 66 plans to sell its gas station business in Germany and Austria as part of a broader plan to divest non-core assets, the company said in earnings released today. The company sells to retail and wholesale customers under the JET gas station brand across 1,270 sites in Austria, Germany and the UK, according to the refiner's 2022 annual review. JET operated 813 gas station in Germany as of June 2023, according to the country's federal association of independent petrol stations and 154 sites in Austria according to the company website. Phillips 66 has a further 330 gas stations in Switzerland through a joint venture under the Coop brand, but those are not included in the sales effort. The refiner declined to provide details of the current number of sites for sale in Germany and Austria. Phillips 66 has undertaken multi-year cost-cutting projects and said this year it is considering selling some of its midstream assets to satisfy a planned $3bn in divestments. Late last year hedge fund Elliott Investment Management purchased a $1bn stake in the company, calling on it to refocus on its refining business and reduce operating costs. In Elliott's December activist letter to the refiner, the hedge fund said if Phillips 66 failed to make sufficient progress towards its cost-cutting goals, it would push for management changes and a sale of the company's stake in Chevron Phillips Chemicals (CPChem) — valued at about $15bn-20bn after taxes by the investor — and its European convenience stores and other non-operated midstream assets. Elliott previously targeted Canadian integrated Suncor, pushing for board changes and divestment of its 1,500 retail stores, which ultimately it did not sell. US refiner Marathon, however, agreed to sell its 3,900-store Speedway retail network in 2019 following pressure from Elliott, which had criticised its integrated downstream business model. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more