California considers jet fuel carbon
California's bid to boost greener jet fuel demand could line up a dogfight with airlines and federal regulators.
The state's rekindled interest in lifting sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) demand with its Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) has scrambled airline opposition. A trade association warned that assigning penalties to petroleum jet fuel would run afoul of federal regulators. But state leaders have directed the California Air Resources Board to consider it.
"It is clear that achieving carbon neutrality means looking at reductions across all sectors," the agency told Argus. "We would be remiss not to consider aviation, especially intrastate aviation fuels."
LCFS programs require steady reductions in transportation fuel carbon intensity. California targeted a 20pc carbon intensity reduction by 2030 expected to begin setting tougher future standards early next year.
Higher-carbon, conventional fuels that exceed the annual carbon intensity limit incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from the distribution of low-carbon alternatives.
CARB allowed SAF to generate LCFS credits starting in 2019. Regulators at the time considered but decided against imposing deficits on petroleum jet fuel use. Staff in 2018 cited federal preemption in explanations of the decision to allow only SAF credits.
Federal law grants the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) top regulatory authority over US jet fuel. But while state regulators such as California's may develop detailed standards for gasoline components in their markets, FAA requires jet fuel to meet specifications tested and qualified by engine manufacturers. The agency also limits SAF to 50pc synthetic blends.
Sustainability does not figure into those regulations. SAF is often misunderstood to describe a unique finished fuel, said Gurhan Andac, engineering technical leader for aviation fuels and additives at General Electric Aviation and chair of an ASTM task force studying fully synthetic jet fuel.
Sustainable SAF instead refers to the non-petroleum feedstocks and processes that produce jet fuel qualified for use in aircraft engines. The end result must look the same as petroleum jet fuel.
"The standards are about flight safety — is this jet fuel that we can accept into an engine on an airframe and have a safe flight?" Andac said. "The sustainability part — carbon index or in whatever form it might come — it's a separate platform."
Federal authority allows SAF to earn LCFS credits but preempts any state regulations shifting the composition of jet fuel, industry group Airlines for America warned early this year. The comments followed a December 2021 CARB workshop seeking feedback on adding targets for petroleum jet fuel. The association declined to comment beyond its filed remarks.
The US transportation, environment and energy agencies last month issued a roadmap to increase SAF production to roughly 196,000 b/d by 2030 and 2.3mn b/d by 2050. California reported 1mn bl of SAF use in the first quarter — 270 b/d.
Federal policies offer production tax credits to make the emerging output more competitive with petroleum fuel, similar to support for renewable diesel. The agencies' roadmap even briefly contemplates a future, federal LCFS to further encourage jet fuel use. But federal policies stop short of a mandate for airlines to use synthetic blends.
Governor Gavin Newsom (D) last month vetoed legislation directing CARB to contemplate new strategies to increase California's SAF use.
"While my administration appreciates the intent of this bill," Newsom wrote in a message explaining his veto, "there are existing opportunities for credit generation from sustainable aviation fuel production under the state's Low Carbon Fuel Standard."
Sky-high credit supply
California's LCFS credit prices have fallen under a record glut of credits. Rising supplies of renewable diesel, renewable natural gas and other fuels have headed west to capture the combination of state and federal incentives. Sluggish demand for CARBOB, which generated nearly 80pc of all new LCFS deficits last year, has meant credit retirements have not kept pace. Total unused LCFS credits surpassed 10.3mn in the first quarter of this year — more than double the new deficits generated during the quarter. The credits do not expire. Without offsetting jet fuel deficits, California could face another new, heavily incentivized fuel adding more weight to LCFS credit generation.
CARB staff have repeatedly stated that an upcoming rulemaking will seek tougher targets. Staff floated a 30pc reduction by 2030 in a July workshop. The agency has also entertained changes to both credit and deficit sources.
"We are exploring our ability to regulate instate fuels for all sectors," the agency said.
Related news posts
Canada furthers investment in GHG reductions
Canada furthers investment in GHG reductions
Houston, 18 April (Argus) — The Canadian government plans to have C$93bn ($67.5bn) in federal incentives up and running by the end of the year to spur developments in clean energy technology, hydrogen production, carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) along with a new tax credit for electric vehicle (EV) supply chains. The Canada Department of Finance, in its 2024 budget released on 16 April, said it expects to have the first planned investment tax credits (ITCs), for CCUS and renewable energy investments, in law before 1 June. The ITCs would be available for investments made generally within or before 2023 depending on the credit. The anticipated clean hydrogen ITC is also moving forward. It could provide 15-40pc of related eligible costs, with projects that produce the cleanest hydrogen set to receive the higher levels of support, along with other credits for equipment purchases and power-purchase agreements. The government is pursuing a new ITC for EV supply chains, meant to bolster in-country manufacturing and consumer adoption of EVs with a 10pc return on the cost of buildings used in vehicle assembly, battery production and related materials. The credit would build on the clean technology manufacturing ITC, which allows businesses to claim 30pc of the cost of new machinery and equipment. To bolster reductions in transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the government will also direct up to C$500mn ($363mn) in funding from the country's low-carbon fuel standard to support domestic biofuel production . Transportation is the second largest source of GHG emissions for the country, at 28pc, or 188mn metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent, in 2021. But the province of Alberta expressed disappointment at the pace of development of ITC support that could help companies affected by the country's move away from fossil fuels. "There was nothing around ammonia or hydrogen, and no updates on the CCUS ITCs that would actually spur on investment," Alberta finance minister Nate Horner said. The incentives are intended to help Canada achieve a 40-45pc reduction in GHG emissions by 2030, relative to 2005 levels. This would require a reduction in GHG emissions to about 439mn t/yr, while Canada's emissions totaled 670mn in 2021, according to the government's most recent inventory. The budget also details additional plans for the Canada Growth Fund's carbon contracts for a difference, which help decarbonize hard-to-abate industries. The government plans to add off-the-shelf contracts to its current offering of bespoke one-off contracts tailored to a specific enterprise to broaden the reach and GHG reductions of the program. These contracts incentivize businesses to invest in emissions reducing program or technology, such as CCUS, through the government providing a financial backstop to a project developer. The government and developer establish a "strike price" that carbon allowances would need to reach for a return on the investment, with the government paying the difference if the market price fails to increase. CGF signed its first contract under this program last year , with Calgary-based carbon capture and sequestration company Entropy and has around $6bn remaining to issue agreements. To stretch this funding further, the Canadian government intends for Environment and Climate Change Canada to work with provincial and territorial carbon markets to improve performance and potentially send stronger price signals to spur decarbonization. By Denise Cathey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Scotland abandons 2030 climate target to focus on 2045
Scotland abandons 2030 climate target to focus on 2045
Edinburgh, 18 April (Argus) — The Scottish government is abandoning its 2030 target to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions after the UK's Climate Change Committee (CCC) said last month Scotland would not be able to meet it, but reiterated "unwavering commitment" to its 2045 net zero goal. Scotland had an ambitious interim target to reduce GHG emissions by 75pc by 2030 from a 1990 baseline and its legally binding 2045 net zero goal date is ahead of the rest of the UK. The CCC said in March that the nation was unlikely to meet its 2030 climate goals as "continued delays" in plans and policies mean the required actions to hit targets are now "beyond what is credible". And today, Scotland's cabinet secretary for net zero Mairi McAllan said that the government "accepts the CCC's recent re-articulations" that the "2030 target is out of reach". "We must now act to chart a course to 2045 at a pace and scale that is feasible, fair and just." She said that the government will bring forward "expediting legislation" to remove the 2030 target, calling it "a minor legislative change". McAllan said climate actions are backtracking at the UK level and blamed "severe budget restrictions" by the UK government and the "constrains of devolution". Scotland is a member nation of the UK, and the Scottish parliament has some devolved powers. But energy, for example, remains a reserved matter in the UK, and decisions — including licensing, regulation and policy — are taken by the UK parliament. She said that Scotland was trying to achieve societal and economic transformation with "one hand tied behind our back". Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said there was no intention to "roll back" on the target to achieve net zero emissions by 2045, saying that Scotland has made faster progress than any other nation in the UK during 2019-21, but that 2030 was a "stretched" target. McAllan said annual reporting on progress will be kept but by introducing a target approach based on "five-yearly carbon budgets" — a cap on the amount of GHG emitted over a five-year period — in a similar way to the rest of the UK. Scotland missed its annual emissions-reduction target in 2021, for the eighth time in the last 12 years. The CCC's interim chair Piers Forster said today that the removal of the 2030 target was "deeply disappointing". "We are reassured that the net zero target remains in place but interim targets and plans to deliver against them are what makes any net zero commitment credible," he said. McAllan announced a series of measures that the government wants to introduce, including reducing methane emissions in farming, a Scotland-wide integrated transport ticketing system, and the quadrupling of electric car charging points. But it is unclear what will happen to Scotland's delayed climate strategy, which was due at the end of 2023. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
NSTA fines Neo Energy for North Sea methane venting
NSTA fines Neo Energy for North Sea methane venting
London, 18 April (Argus) — UK offshore regulator the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) has fined UK upstream firm Neo Energy £100,000 for breaching its methane venting permit at North Sea fields. The company emitted 1,200t of methane in excess of its permit from the Donan, Lochranza and Balloch fields in the first nine months of 2022. Neo had permission to vent 378t of methane from installations at these fields in that year, but incorrectly assigned volumes vented through unlit flares to its flaring consent, the NSTA found. Neo showed a "lack of oversight" by failing to detect the licence breach for seven months, NSTA said. The company reached its annual limit by 21 March 2022, but continued venting without authorisation until October 2022. The company said it did not update its flare and vent allocation process to reflect NSTA guidance updated in 2021, and as such was still assigning its flaring and venting according to previous guidance. Neo becomes the fourth company to be fined by the NSTA over breaches relating to flaring and venting consents. The regulator in 2022 sanctioned Equinor and EnQuest and last year fined Spanish utility Repsol for consent breaches. The four companies have been fined a total of £475,000 for the breaches. And the regulator in February had four more investigations under way for breaches of vent consents. Neo Energy's fine is equivalent to £2.98/t of CO2e emitted, assuming a global warming potential of methane that is 28 times that of CO2 on a 100-year time scale, compared with a UK emissions trading system price of £34.40/t of CO2e on 17 April. The UK offshore industry targets a 50pc reduction in production emissions of greenhouse gases by 2030, from a 2018 baseline. And it intends to end all routine venting and flaring by that year. The regulator last year warned that "further, sustained action" would be needed to reach the 2030 emissions reduction goal. Methane emissions from offshore gas fell in recent years, to 1mn t in 2022 from 1.6mn t in 2018, according to NSTA data. Roughly half of methane emissions in the sector in recent years has been produced by venting, while flaring makes up about a quarter of the emissions. The UK government is a member of the Global Methane Pledge group of countries that aims to reduce methane emissions by 30pc by 2030 from a 2020 baseline. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Korea’s Hyundai starts operations at biodiesel plant
Korea’s Hyundai starts operations at biodiesel plant
Singapore, 18 April (Argus) — South Korean refiner Hyundai Oilbank has started commercial operations at its 130,000 t/yr biodiesel plant at Daesan as of 17 April, according to a source from the company. The plant is currently being fed with palm oil fatty acid distillates (Pfad). Most of the produced biodiesel will likely be kept to meet domestic demand, said other South Korea-based market sources. Hyundai had been trialing feedstocks at the plant since last December, which include Pfad, used cooking oil (UCO) and soybean oil. It previously entered an agreement with food manufacturer Lotte Confectionery in 2022, which involved Lotte supplying UCO as feedstock to the plant. The refiner said earlier this year that it is also considering co-processing biofuels at its 520,000 b/d Daesan refinery. It has plans for another 500,000 t/yr plant that can produce renewable diesel, sustainable aviation fuel and bio-naphtha, initially scheduled to come on line in the middle of the decade. But a final investment decision has yet to be reached for this plant. By Sarah Giam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more