Global steel carbon standards needed: SDI
The world needs to enact global carbon standards for green steel to level the playing field, Steel Dynamics' (SDI) chief financial officer said today at a conference.
Carbon reduction pushes from regulators, investors, and customers are combining to push carbon reduction in steelmaking, chief financial officer Theresa Wagler told participants of the Global Steel Dynamics Forum in New York today. A lack of a global standard is lessening the ability of lower carbon steel producers to take advantage and see financial gain from a premium price from these initiatives.
"You have to define premium steel," Wagler said. "We need a global standard. If we're lowering the carbon inputs across the global economy, we have to measure things apples to apples."
Wagler said that North American steel producers should be categorized separately from the rest of the world because the region is producing the majority of its steel using scrap-based electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking, which has a lower carbon intensity than traditional basic oxygen furnace/blast furnace-based (BOF/BF) steelmaking. The majority of global steelmaking is BOF/BF-based.
The industry needs to also create better measurement tools to allow for comparisons between different steelmakers for buyers like original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and steel service centers.
Twenty percent of SDI's investor base is European and Asian, Wagler said — two regions that are particularly interested in making carbon reductions
Additionally, most of the decarbonization focus currently is on the flat-rolled side of the steel industry, with long products not facing as much scrutiny, Wagler said.
Related news posts
UK will not bank ‘surplus’ from third carbon budget
UK will not bank ‘surplus’ from third carbon budget
London, 21 May (Argus) — The UK overachieved on emissions reduction targets under its third carbon budget, but it will not carry forward the emissions ‘surplus' to the next carbon budget, the government said today. A carbon budget is a cap on emissions over a certain period. The UK's third carbon budget covered 2018-22, while the fourth carbon budget covers 2023-27. UK emissions over 2018-22 stood at 2.15bn t/CO2 equivalent (CO2e) — 319mn t/CO2e below the third carbon budget cap. Emissions on average over the period were 47pc lower than emissions in 1990 — the baseline year. "By the end of the period in 2022, UK net greenhouse gas emissions were 50pc lower than base year emissions", the government said. The country is also on track to overachieve during the fourth carbon budget, it added. "The government decision not to carry forward the surplus keeps the UK within its ambitious target with no additional headroom to emit greenhouse gases over the coming years", the government said. The UK has made progress on cutting emissions, including phasing out coal. But the surplus was largely down to external factors, including the Covid-19 pandemic, the independent advisory Climate Change Committee (CCC) found previously. The UK has a legally-binding target to reach net zero emissions by 2050. It also has targets to cut emissions by 68pc by 2030 and 77pc by 2035, both from the 1990 base level. The CCC warned in February that the government should not carry forward any surplus from the third carbon budget, to avoid weakening action on decarbonisation. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
States have duty to cut GHGs, protect oceans: Court
States have duty to cut GHGs, protect oceans: Court
London, 21 May (Argus) — States that are party to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) have an obligation to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to protect oceans, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea said today in an advisory opinion. The opinion was requested by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law in December 2022. The tribunal found unanimously that states party to Unclos "have the specific obligation to take all measures necessary to ensure that anthropogenic GHG emissions under their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage by pollution to other states and their environment". The group of small island states welcomed the outcome, and said they saw it as a victory. Small island states are extremely vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Unclos has 169 parties — including the EU, China and almost all G20 nations. But the US — the second-highest emitter — is not a party to the convention. Countries must submit new national climate plans — known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — by early next year to UN climate body the UNFCCC. "Today's outcome will be instrumental to push the countries most responsible for the climate crisis to ramp up their ambition", lawyer at environmental law firm ClientEarth Lea Main-Klingst said. "And because business must follow where governments lead, companies and financial institutions are going to feel a knock-on effect from this development, too", Main-Klingst added. Similar cases, focused on climate change, are awaiting an advisory opinion or ruling from various international courts. The Inter-American Court is hearing arguments on how climate change is affecting human rights this month, while the International Court of Justice will consider a similar question later this year. The European Court of Human Rights ruled last month that signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) must protect their citizens from the "serious adverse effects of climate change", in a landmark ruling for climate litigation. The ocean is the world's biggest carbon sink, capturing emissions and much of the excess heat generated by GHGs. Sea surface temperatures have hit record highs in recent months, while the global temperature was in 2023 on average 1.45°C higher than pre-industrial levels , the World Meteorological Organisation said earlier this year. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia opens up ACCU method development
Australia opens up ACCU method development
Sydney, 21 May (Argus) — The Australian federal government has officially begun to accept proposals for the development of new carbon crediting project methods outside of government, as it looks to boost supply and innovation. Individuals, groups or organisations will now be able to submit method proposals for carbon abatement, which would generate Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) if approved and developed. Climate change and energy minister Chris Bowen made the announcement on 21 May during lobby group Carbon Market Institute (CMI)'s Carbon Farming Industry Forum in Cairns, Queensland. "The proponent-led model aims to encourage more innovative approaches to carbon abatement and will help to boost the supply of ACCUs to support our net zero ambition," Bowen said. The development of new ACCU framework methods has been until now led by the federal government, but this has proved "too slow," CMI's chief executive John Connor said today. None of the five new method priorities for 2022, announced in October 2021, have yet been finalised, Connor said. Opening up the method development process was one of the 16 recommendations made by an independent panel led by the country's former chief scientist Ian Chubb which reviewed the ACCU scheme in 2022-23. Proponents will need to follow a five-stage process, starting with the submission of new ideas for methods or changes to existing methods followed by an expression of interest (EOI) to the Emission Reduction Assurance Committee (Erac), the statutory body responsible for ensuring the integrity of Australia's carbon crediting framework. The Erac will accept EOIs in rounds, with the current one open until 12 July. The Erac will use triage criteria to assess EOIs, including scale of abatement, proposal complexity and whether it would incentivise innovation. The committee will publish its assessment of EOIs on a so-called method development tracker, with successful proponents moving on to the development phase. Finally, the Erac will publish draft methods for public consultation before recommending them to the climate change and energy minister. The proponent-led model announcement comes at a time of increasing concern about future ACCU supply, as the development of new methods or method variations by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) has been taking longer than originally expected — partly because it has been also focusing on implementing the recommendations from the Chubb review. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia's Woodside plans CCS for Browse gas project
Australia's Woodside plans CCS for Browse gas project
Perth, 21 May (Argus) — Australian independent Woodside Energy is planning a carbon capture and storage (CCS) element for its Browse gas project offshore Western Australia (WA), but blamed stalled approval processes for the slow progress. The North West Shelf (NWS) life extension — which was first referred to regulators in 2018 — needed to be approved before Browse could progress further, chief executive Meg O'Neill said at the Australian Energy Producers conference held in WA's capital Perth this week. The life extension would allow the joint venture and third-party users to use the NWS project facilities until around 2070. WA's Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) recommended that the NWS life extension be approved in 2022, if it reduces its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to net zero by 2050. But the process remains incomplete, awaiting state and federal ministers' decisions and a final issuance of conditions for the project. WA's Office of the Appeals Convenor is still working through responses to the EPA's recommendation, which it must then report to the environment minister alongside its own recommendations, a process which was interrupted by the resignation of a senior bureaucrat last year. Woodside wanted to progress the CCS side of the Browse project before the end of 2024, O'Neill said, but the lack of certainty regarding approval timelines affected other elements of the project. "We've been working closely with the [federal government], state regulators and the Browse JV on the right approach to the environmental approvals, there are a couple of possible pathways that we are evaluating and we hope to be lodging the requests for approving that element of the project within this year," O'Neill said on 21 May. "But part of why we've been very disciplined in our work on Browse and not ramped up engineering work is because it is very difficult to get line of sight for when we'll get those approvals. With personnel changes at the appeals convenor we really don't have very good line of sight unfortunately." The 368bn m³ Browse development is considered critical to WA's future as a major LNG exporter and could provide long-term certainty for the 16.9mn t/yr NWS LNG, where partners have already signalled they will close a 2.5mn t/yr train later this year. Average gross GHG emissions from the three Browse fields are between 6.4mn-6.8mn t/yr with an additional 7.7mn t/yr once Browse gas is liquefied, resulting in total emissions of 14.1mn-14.5mn t/yr of CO2 equivalent, according to the environmental impact statement Woodside released in 2022. This necessitates a CO2 solution for it to progress under Canberra's net zero scope 1 emissions rule instituted last year. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more