API 2 upside limited, but tight margins to slow losses

  • Market: Coal
  • 09/01/20

The new year-ahead API 2 calendar 2021 contract has begun the year on a firm note, although risks remain skewed to the downside as strong competition from natural gas along the forward curve continues to weigh on the European demand outlook.

The new year-ahead swap settled at $62.35/t in its first session of the year. This was down by $19.80/t compared with its predecessor at the start of 2019, although the swap has since gained 3pc in value and recorded six consecutive daily increases over 31 December-8 January.

API 2 calendar 2021 fell by nearly $6/t in December and looks to have found some technical support after plunging below its 50-day and 100-day simple moving averages at the end of last year. Rising oil prices amid heightened geopolitical tension in the Middle East also lent support to global energy commodities, including coal, early in 2020.

But the European coal market continues to face downside price risk as power sector demand is unlikely to recover while natural gas prices remain more competitive for base-load generation. Forward API 2 coal prices are currently at a level that will make it difficult for a 40pc-efficient coal plant to compete with 55pc-efficient gas-fired generation throughout most of the 2020-23 period (see chart).

Growth in open interest on API 2 calendar 2021 via the Ice has also slowed during the latest rebound, suggesting that counterparties may have been closing short positions to take profit rather than building long positions early this year. Calendar 2021 fell by $6.60/t to as low as $62.15/t over 26 November-30 December, with open interest rising by around 3.9mn t to 16mn t across the month. But open interest slipped to 15.7mn t by 8 January following the recent price recovery.

Rising renewable capacity and strong competition from natural gas amid high stocks and firm LNG supply means European power sector coal demand is unlikely to recover the ground it lost in 2019, but prices and consumption are also unlikely to fall as sharply as they did last year.

The scope for additional coal-to-gas fuel switching across some of the biggest European power markets is likely to be limited in 2020 after a significant proportion of coal was displaced by gas from March 2019. The biggest year-on-year declines will come early in the year, as aggregate coal-fired generation of 12.5GW across Germany, Spain, the UK and France during the first quarter of last year will be heavily reduced in 2020 as a result of gas' current cost advantage for base-load generation.

Coal-fired generation across the four markets averaged 6.4GW in April-December 2019, down from 13.7GW in the same months of the previous year. But coal demand may stabilise in 2020 as flexible coal-fired generation was already largely displaced from the generation stack during the second half of 2019, meaning there is limited potential for further fuel switching this summer.

A more stable demand profile could steady API 2 coal prices in 2020, following a volatile year in 2019 that saw the year-ahead shed around a third of its value in January-December. The calendar 2020 swap began the year at $82.15/t and settled at $56.45/t on 31 December.

Coal price weakness is also likely to be limited by an adjustment in seaborne supply availability in the Atlantic, with US exports set to fall again in 2020. Strong seaborne coal prices through 2018 and early last year helped to sustain European imports early in 2019 as some US volumes were hedged forward, but the same is not true in 2020.

The EU imported a net 1.6mn t/month from the US in 2018 and nearly 1mn t/month in the first quarter of 2019, but the rate fell to 500,000 t/month in the seven succeeding months and is unlikely to recover at current price levels. Colombian supply to Europe has also slowed in the past year, falling to an average of 900,000 t/month in January-October 2019 from 1.7mn t/month in the same period of 2018.

Thermal coal imports to the EU fell to their lowest since 2000 last summer at around 5.4mn t/month and are likely to fall considerably short of the 9.3mn t/month average recorded in the first quarter of 2019. This may help to balance the likely drop in power sector consumption in the near term and thereby limit future downside price risk, compared with the drop seen in 2019.

Price support may also come from increasingly tight margins for producers in Russia — the EU's biggest supplier of seaborne coal. Argus' NAR 6,000 kcal/kg netback price to the Kuzbass production region from Murmansk ports was below $1/t at the end of 2019, compared with $26.16/t at the start. This means that costs to transport coal from Kuzbass mines to export ports are nearly as high as fob export prices available in the spot market, making exports to Europe increasingly challenging.

API 2 liquidity stable in 2019

API 2 swaps liquidity slipped by 2pc on the year in 2019 to 1.26bn t, according to data collated by Argus.

This was comparatively stable compared with 2018's 14pc annual decline and the 50pc reduction in trade to 1.49bn t in 2017.

Ice exchange trade accounted for a third of total API 2 liquidity, with 39pc of trade cleared through the same exchange and the remaining 28pc handled by the CME.

Of the 899mn t of exchange-executed and cleared trade handled by the Ice, 566mn t of liquidity was on calendar year delivery contracts, which was down from 734.3mn t in 2018. Forward hedging activity among utilities was likely depressed as the year-ahead API 2 swap was uncompetitive with gas for power generation throughout nearly all of the second half of the year.

But API 2 liquidity through the Ice grew on the year for monthly, quarterly and seasonal delivery periods, the bourse's data show. Some 260.6mn t of trade on quarters was done, compared with 207.2mn t in 2018, with 71.7mn t on the monthly swaps, up from 70.1mn t a year earlier. And 450,000t on seasonal swaps was traded, compared with just 30,000t in 2018.

API 2: Calendar 2021 $/t

European coal prices vs coal-gas fuel switch €/MWh

Net EU thermal coal imports mn t

API 2 paper liquidity bn t

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

India’s Adani Power raises imported coal use in Jan-Mar


06/05/24
News
06/05/24

India’s Adani Power raises imported coal use in Jan-Mar

Singapore, 6 May (Argus) — India's leading private sector utility Adani Power more than doubled its use of imported thermal coal during January-March and in the April 2023-March 2024 fiscal year to meet rising power demand. The Bombay Stock Exchange-listed firm used 5.19mn t of imported coal over January-March, more than twice that of 1.99mn t a year earlier. Domestic coal burn also rose by nearly 18pc on the year to 8.83mn t during January-March, following higher availability of local fuel and increased dispatches to utilities. Adani Power consumed 19.44mn t of imported coal over India's April 2023-March 2024 fiscal year. This was also more than double that of 7.66mn t in 2022-23. Its domestic coal burn increased by 10pc on the year to 31.72mn t in 2023-24. Higher imports came on the back of a sharp drop in seaborne prices. The Argus -assessed Indonesian GAR 4,200 kcal/kg coal averaged $57.88/t fob Kalimantan over April 2023-March 2024, down by over 31pc from an average of $84.45/t in the year earlier. The company's fuel cost stood at 3.33 rupees/kWh sold (0.04¢/kWh sold) in January-March, down from Rs5.30/kWh sold a year earlier because of lower blended fuel costs, following a decline in seaborne coal prices. Fuel cost for 2023-24 stood at Rs3.59/kWh compared with Rs4.78/kWh in the previous year. Lower imported coal prices also boosted power offtake under imported coal-based power purchase agreements. The company sold 22.13bn units of electricity in January-March, up significantly from 14.25bn units sold a year earlier. It sold 79.27bn units in 2023-24, up from 53.39bn units in the year earlier. Higher volumes during January-March and the fiscal year were driven by its Mundra, Udupi, Raipur, and Mahan plants — apart from the incremental contribution of the Godda unit — which were commissioned in April 2023. Domestic power sales volumes were driven by growing power demand across the country, the company said. Utility demand could continue to support imports by utilities and lift overall Indian demand for seaborne coal. India imported 14.27mn t of thermal coal in March, up by 8pc from 13.2mn t a year earlier, according to shipping broker Interocean data. Thermal power expansion plans Adani Power operates 15.25GW of thermal generation capacity in the Gujarat and Maharashtra states of west India, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh in central India, Rajasthan in north India, Karnataka in south India and Jharkhand in eastern India. The firm is eyeing a capacity of more than 24GW by 2029. It is undertaking a brownfield thermal capacity expansion of 1.6GW at its 1.2GW Mahan power project in Madhya Pradesh. It has started developing a 1.6GW expansion at its existing 600MW unit in Chhattisgarh. Adani Power has also emerged as the frontrunner to acquire thermal generation capacity and an under-construction project from domestic debt-ridden Lanco Amarkantak Power. Lanco owned and operated a 600MW thermal power plant in central India's Chhattisgarh state and was planning 1.32GW of generating capacity under the second phase of the project. Adani is in the process of acquiring a 1.2GW debt-ridden thermal power project in south India's Tamil Nadu state. Plant operator Coastal Energen is also having a corporate resolution insolvency process. It is evaluating an organic expansion of 1.6GW, besides considering other inorganic acquisition opportunities, to meet strong demand for thermal power in the coming years, the company said. By Ajay Modi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction


02/05/24
News
02/05/24

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction

Corrects movement of grain loadings from a year earlier in final paragraph. Washington, 2 May (Argus) — Workers at the two major Canadian railroads could go on strike as soon as 22 May now that members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) have authorized a strike, potentially causing widespread disruption to shipments of commodities such as crude, coal and grain. A strike could disrupt rail traffic not only in Canada but also in the US and Mexico because trains would not be able to leave, nor could shipments enter into Canada. This labor action could be far more impactful than recent strikes because it would affect Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) at the same time. Union members at Canadian railroads have gone on strike individually in the past, which has left one of the two carriers to continue operating and handle some of their competitor's freight. But TCRC members completed a vote yesterday about whether to initiate a strike action at each carrier. The union represents about 9,300 workers employed at the two railroads. Roughly 98pc of union members that participated voted in favor of a strike beginning as early as 22 May, the union said. The union said talks are at an impasse. "After six months of negotiations with both companies, we are no closer to reaching a settlement than when we first began, TCRC president Paul Boucher said. Boucher warned that "a simultaneous work stoppage at both CN and CPKC would disrupt supply chains on a scale Canada has likely never experienced." He added that the union does not want to provoke a rail crisis and wants to avoid a work stoppage. The union has argued that the railroads' proposals would harm safety practices. It has also sought an improved work-life balance. But CN and CPKC said the union continues to reject their proposals. CPKC "is committed to negotiating in good faith and responding to our employees' desire for higher pay and improved work-life balance, while respecting the best interests of all our railroaders, their families, our customers, and the North American economy." CN said it wants a contract that addresses the work life balance and productivity, benefiting the company and employees. But even when CN "proposed a solution that would not touch duty-rest rules, the union has rejected it," the railroad said. Canadian commodity volume has fallen this year with only rail shipments of chemicals, petroleum and petroleum products, and non-metallic minerals rising, Association of American Railroads (AAR) data show. Volume data includes cars loaded in the US by Canadian carriers. Coal traffic dropped by 11pc during the 17 weeks ended on 27 April compared with a year earlier, AAR data show. Loadings of motor vehicles and parts have fallen by 5.2pc. CN and CPKC grain loadings fell by 4.3pc from a year earlier, while shipment of farm products and food fell by 9.3pc. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan's trading firms see metals prices cutting profits


02/05/24
News
02/05/24

Japan's trading firms see metals prices cutting profits

Tokyo, 2 May (Argus) — Major Japanese trading houses are expecting lower profits from their metals businesses during the April 2024-March 2025 fiscal year, mostly because of lower prices of commodities such as iron ore and coking coal . Japanese trading house Mitsui forecast profits for its metal and natural resource business falling by 14pc on the year to ¥290bn ($1.87bn) during 2024-25, primarily because of lower iron ore prices. Mitsui plans to cut iron ore output by 0.3pc on the year to 60.9mn t at its mining projects where the company owns production ri ghts or a production stake during 2024-25 . This includes the joint venture project Robe River in Australia with Australian iron ore producer Rio Tinto. Japanese trading house Sojitz also expects profits from its metal and natural resource business to decline to ¥35bn, down by 20pc on the year, mostly because of a bearish coking coal market. The company said its overall coal business can cut production costs during 2024-25, partly because it plans larger-scale output at the Gregory Crinum coking coal mine in Australia, without disclosing further details. But Sojitz said it cannot generate higher profits because of lower coking coal prices. The trading house expects the average coking coal price to fall to $230/t during 2024-25, according to the company's chief financial officer Makoto Shibuya, down by $57/t from a year earlier. The company reiterated that the price is not necessarily their selling price. Sumitomo expects profits from its natural resource business would remain flat at ¥72bn on the year, mostly as its nickel production in Madagascar recovers from the output cuts in 2023 , with an aim to produce 19,000t of nickel during 2024-25, up by 9.8pc on the year. A rebound in nickel production could offset possible losses from coal and coking coal prices falling to $266/t and $133/t respectively in the ordinary market, down by $21 and $9, according to the trading house. Sumitomo plans to increase coking coal production by 9.1pc to 1.2mn t but reduce coal output by 4.8pc to 4mn t during 2024-25. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US southbound barge demand falls off earlier than usual


01/05/24
News
01/05/24

US southbound barge demand falls off earlier than usual

Houston, 1 May (Argus) — Southbound barge rates in the US have fallen on unseasonably low demand because of increased competition in the international grain market. Rates for voyages down river have deteriorated to "unsustainable" levels, said American Commercial Barge Line. Southbound rates declined in April to an average tariff of 284pc across all rivers this April, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), which is below breakeven levels for many barge carriers. Rates typically do not fall below a 300pc tariff until May or June. Southbound freight values for May are expected to hold steady or move lower, said sources this week. Southbound activity has increased recently because of the low rates, but not enough to push prices up. The US has already sold 84pc of its forecast corn exports and 89pc of forecast soybean exports with only five months left until the end of the corn and soybean marketing year, according to the USDA. US corn and soybean prices have come down since the beginning of the year in order to stay competitive with other origins. The USDA lowered its forecast for US soybean exports by 545,000t in its April report as soybeans from Brazil and Argentina were more competitively priced. US farmers are holding onto more of their harvest from last year because of low crop prices, curbing exports. Prompt CBOT corn futures averaged $435/bushel in April, down 34pc from April 2023. Weak southbound demand could last until fall when the US enters harvest season and exports ramp up southbound barge demand. Major agriculture-producing countries such as Argentina and Brazil are expected to export their grain harvest before the US. Brazil has finished planting corn on time . unlike last year. The US may face less competition from Brazil in the fall as a result. Carriers are tying up barges earlier than usual to avoid losses on southbound barge voyages. Carriers that have already parked their barges will take their time re-entering the market unless tariffs become profitable again. The carriers who remain on the river will gain more southbound market share and possibly more northbound spot interest. By Meghan Yoyotte and Eduardo Gonzalez Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more