US argues against Citgo sale: Update

  • Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 17/07/20

Adds detail from hearing.

Advancing the sale of Venezuela's US refining subsidiary Citgo could damage US foreign policy goals and that country's struggling opposition beyond repair, President Donald Trump's administration wrote in an 11th-hour filing ahead of today's oral arguments on the refiner's future.

Letters from the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US Special Representative for Venezuela Elliott Abrams argued that establishing a process to satisfy an international arbitration award with shares of the roughly 770,000 b/d refining business would only complicate US strategy there.

Moving forward with efforts by defunct Canadian mining firm and arbitration winner Crystallex would instead damage Venezuelan support for the US-recognized opposition working to remove President Nicolas Maduro from power, Abrams wrote.

"Every Venezuelan knows of this company and it is viewed, as are Venezuela's oil reserves, as a central piece of the national patrimony," Abrams wrote. "The impact on [US-recognized interim president Juan] Guaido, the interim government and US foreign policy goals in Venezuela would be greatly damaging and perhaps beyond recuperation."

Abrams supported Guaido's arguments that his US-recognized leadership should dissolve a 2018 ruling exposing Citgo to the billions of dollars sought by Venezuela's creditors. And OFAC denied Crystallex arguments that determining how to proceed with a sale would help the office decide whether to grant the company a license to execute it.

Opposition leaders have long hoped for executive branch assistance in the US District of Delaware case that has come perilously close to ending Venezuelan control of one of its most valuable overseas assets. Yesterday's late filing arrived more than seven months after an initial invitation from the court to respond, two months after another solicitation of executive interest and less than 15 hours before today's teleconference on whether to develop sale proceedings on shares of Citgo to help satisfy a $1.4bn arbitration award.

"The US sincerely apologizes to the court and the parties for any inconvenience caused by filing so close to the hearing date," the Justice Department said.

US attorneys participated in the hearing but did not expand on letters filed last night.

US support of Guaido is not news to the court, which accepted the opposition leader's representatives on behalf of Venezuela soon after the executive branch recognized him as interim president in January 2019. Guaido's appointed ad hoc boards represent Citgo and Venezuelan national oil firm PdV in US courts.

His representatives argued unsuccessfully against a sale in appeals last summer before the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, and failed to attract consideration from the US Supreme Court this year.

But the opposition government can still persuade the US District Court of Delaware that circumstances have changed enough to remove a ruling argued in 2018 by Maduro representatives.

The court at that time determined that Maduro's government had so closely controlled Citgo that it functioned as an alter ego of the state. The decision pierced the corporate legal structure that normally protects such companies in the US from that exposure. Crystallex, now controlled by New York hedge fund Tenor Management, could seek shares of Citgo's holding company to satisfy an international award for mining interests expropriated under former president Hugo Chavez in 2011.

Has Venezuela changed?

The case proceeded on two tracks this summer.

The first considers whether circumstances have changed enough, as Guaido argues, to throw out the 2018 ruling. Though Venezuela has lost appeals of that decision, the judge could determine that enough has changed in Citgo's circumstances, as argued by Abrams, to render the original, proper decision now moot. US judge Leonard Stark asked why the case should go forward given the consequences that the government warned.

"It is not a malefactor cleaning up its act — it is a new sheriff in town," Venezuelan counsel Donald Virrelli said. "It is a new sovereign government asserting authority at considerable risk to its leaders in order to rescue the country from disaster and restore the rule of law."

Crystallex has pointed to the Guaido government's lack of control over any Venezuelan institutions outside the US. The opposition has no access to Citgo's revenue and cannot ship its gasoline to Venezuela because of US sanctions. The court must follow Trump's recognition of the Guaido government as the accepted representatives of Venezuela. But the court did not need to also ignore the reality of the opposition control, or further delay Crystallex's certified award to hope for conditions to change, Crystallex attorney Miguel Estrada said.

"Mr. Abrams may care intensely for the new, fledgling regime in Venezuela," Estrada said. "That is not a legal argument."

US judge Leonard Stark questioned arguments by Citgo and Venezuelan national oil company PdV that the companies were not in possession of the shares Crystallex sought and that arguments should shift to state law considerations. The attorney agreed with Stark that the parties had previously made the court aware that the "illegal Maduro regime" could have the shares in their possession, because they had not received any clear answers until Guaido appointed a new board.

"Why should Crystallex and the court have any confidence, based on the arguments you are making, that these shares are not really attached and are going to be transacted?" Stark asked.

How to sell

The second track would determine the appropriate way to sell shares of Citgo to satisfy the roughly $1bn remaining to be paid on the award. The court will address this at a future hearing after major disruptions from uncontrolled hold music halted the nearly three-hour proceeding twice.

Crystallex has sought a straightforward auction under Delaware law. Venezuela, Citgo and other creditors, including ConocoPhillips, have said such a proceeding could undervalue the refiner — leaving nothing left after satisfying the Crystallex debt. ConocoPhillips proposed a receivership, similar to US bankruptcy. Venezuela argues that if a sale must proceed, it should be carried out by PdV to ensure the highest possible value.

"Crystallex has no incentive to minimize the number of shares sold or respect the due process rights of others, including PdV," the national oil company said.

Such a sale would leave the legitimacy of the opposition government "severely eroded" if it took place with Maduro still in power, Abrams warned.

"Should these assets be advertised for public auction at this time, the Venezuelan people would seriously question the interim government ability to protect the nation's assets, thereby weakening it and US policy in Venezuela today," Abrams said.

Maduro has meanwhile moved to clip Guaido's remaining influence in Venezuela. Guaido's claim as interim president, recognized by dozens of western governments, relies on his leadership of the National Assembly. Venezuela's supreme court ratified a rival leadership in May, and a new Maduro-aligned electoral board was appointed last month. Opposition leaders have not decided whether to recognize or participate in elections under those circumstances later this year.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
02/05/24

US regulator slams executive over Opec 'collusion'

US regulator slams executive over Opec 'collusion'

Washington, 2 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulators for the first time took action against a leading US oil executive over his alleged "collusion" with Opec, but the producers' alliance itself was not a target of investigation. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) today issued a proposed consent order barring former Pioneer Natural Resources chief executive Scott Sheffield from joining the board of ExxonMobil following its $59.5bn takeover of Pioneer. FTC accused Sheffield of organizing "anti-competitive coordinated output reductions between and among US crude oil producers" and members of Opec and the broader Opec+ alliance. "Opec and Opec+ are cartels that exist to control global crude oil production and reserves," FTC said. The specific charges against Sheffield relate to the outspoken executive's frequent public appearances where he opined on US companies' desired production levels, his meetings and frequent communications with Opec officials since 2017 and his advocacy of drastic production cuts by US companies as global demand fell sharply at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Opec under then secretary general Mohammed Barkindo began active outreach to independent US producers, starting in March 2017 with private dinner discussions held on the sidelines of IHS CERAWeek conferences in Houston, Texas. Barkindo hosted similar discussions at CERAWeek in 2018 and 2019, in addition to hosting some of the US companies' chief executives at Opec seminars in Vienna. FTC references Sheffield's public comments following those meetings and alleges that Sheffield kept in frequent touch with Opec officials via messaging service WhatsApp and other means to discuss production levels and prices. Barkindo at the time said that production cuts and prices were never on the agenda of his meetings with the US shale producers and that his organization wanted to better understand the US companies' technological innovation and to compare market outlooks and forecast models. Barkindo in the same time frame held similar discussions with major US hedge funds and money managers. US oil executives polled by Argus in 2017-20 also said that their discussions with Barkindo and other Opec officials revolved around market fundamentals. The US oil industry broadly felt that it was benefiting from a policy of production cuts Opec was implementing as it supported prices at a time when the US domestic production and crude exports grew uninterrupted. Former president Donald Trump took credit for engineering a breakthrough agreement in April 2020 to remove more than 10mn b/d of global crude supply by brokering an agreement between Saudi Arabia, Russia and other Opec+ producers. Even without prodding from Trump, US producers cut back production cuts in 2020 as transportation fuel demand and prices fell sharply in the first months of the pandemic. FTC singled out Sheffield for allegedly coordinating his company's production levels with Opec. Sheffield "held repeated, private conversations with high-ranking Opec representatives assuring them that Pioneer and its Permian basin rivals were working hard to keep oil output artificially low," according to the FTC order. Sheffield, who helped found Pioneer and was its longtime chairman, served as chief executive from 1997 to 2016 and from 2019 through 2023. He remains on the company's board, serving as special adviser to the chief executive since 1 January. The son of an oil executive, Sheffield attended high school in Tehran, Iran. Pioneer shrugged off what it termed a "fundamental misunderstanding" of global oil markets and said that FTC misread "the nature and intent" of Sheffield's actions. Opec declined to comment on FTC's action against Sheffield. FTC is so far the only US regulator to set sights on Opec, even if indirectly. President Joe Biden in 2021 separately tasked FTC with leading an investigation into whether there is price manipulation in gasoline markets. Biden, like many of his predecessors at a time of high gasoline prices, in 2022 accused Opec of uncompetitive behavior in oil markets and expressed support for US legislation allowing antitrust action against the organization by the US Department of Justice. But that acrimony has largely dissipated after global oil and US gasoline prices fell in 2023 from unusually high levels in the previous year. US Congress has not taken significant steps to advance the anti-Opec legislation since 2022. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction


02/05/24
News
02/05/24

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction

Corrects movement of grain loadings from a year earlier in final paragraph. Washington, 2 May (Argus) — Workers at the two major Canadian railroads could go on strike as soon as 22 May now that members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) have authorized a strike, potentially causing widespread disruption to shipments of commodities such as crude, coal and grain. A strike could disrupt rail traffic not only in Canada but also in the US and Mexico because trains would not be able to leave, nor could shipments enter into Canada. This labor action could be far more impactful than recent strikes because it would affect Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) at the same time. Union members at Canadian railroads have gone on strike individually in the past, which has left one of the two carriers to continue operating and handle some of their competitor's freight. But TCRC members completed a vote yesterday about whether to initiate a strike action at each carrier. The union represents about 9,300 workers employed at the two railroads. Roughly 98pc of union members that participated voted in favor of a strike beginning as early as 22 May, the union said. The union said talks are at an impasse. "After six months of negotiations with both companies, we are no closer to reaching a settlement than when we first began, TCRC president Paul Boucher said. Boucher warned that "a simultaneous work stoppage at both CN and CPKC would disrupt supply chains on a scale Canada has likely never experienced." He added that the union does not want to provoke a rail crisis and wants to avoid a work stoppage. The union has argued that the railroads' proposals would harm safety practices. It has also sought an improved work-life balance. But CN and CPKC said the union continues to reject their proposals. CPKC "is committed to negotiating in good faith and responding to our employees' desire for higher pay and improved work-life balance, while respecting the best interests of all our railroaders, their families, our customers, and the North American economy." CN said it wants a contract that addresses the work life balance and productivity, benefiting the company and employees. But even when CN "proposed a solution that would not touch duty-rest rules, the union has rejected it," the railroad said. Canadian commodity volume has fallen this year with only rail shipments of chemicals, petroleum and petroleum products, and non-metallic minerals rising, Association of American Railroads (AAR) data show. Volume data includes cars loaded in the US by Canadian carriers. Coal traffic dropped by 11pc during the 17 weeks ended on 27 April compared with a year earlier, AAR data show. Loadings of motor vehicles and parts have fallen by 5.2pc. CN and CPKC grain loadings fell by 4.3pc from a year earlier, while shipment of farm products and food fell by 9.3pc. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

FTC clears Exxon-Pioneer deal but bars Sheffield


02/05/24
News
02/05/24

FTC clears Exxon-Pioneer deal but bars Sheffield

New York, 2 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulators signaled they will clear ExxonMobil's proposed $59.5bn takeover of Pioneer Natural Resources but banned the shale giant's former chief executive officer from gaining a seat on the board. A proposed consent order from the Federal Trade Commission seeks to stop Scott Sheffield, Pioneer's former chief executive, from taking part in "collusive activity" that would potentially raise crude prices and cause US consumers to pay more at the pump. The order paves the way for ExxonMobil to close its blockbuster deal for Pioneer, which will make it the leading producer in the prolific Permian shale basin of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. It is also the top US oil producer's biggest transaction since Exxon's 1999 merger with Mobil. ExxonMobil's Permian output will more than double to 1.3mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) when the acquisition closes, before increasing to about 2mn boe/d in 2027. The FTC, which has taken a tougher line on mergers under the administration of President Joe Biden, has paid close attention to oil deals announced during the latest phase of shale consolidation. Only this week, Diamondback Energy said it had received a second request for information from the regulator over its $26bn proposed takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources. And Chevron's planned $53bn acquisition of US independent Hess has also been held up. The FTC alleged in a complaint that Sheffield exchanged hundreds of text messages with Opec officials discussing crude pricing and output, and that he sought to align production across the Permian with the cartel. His past conduct "makes it crystal clear that he should be nowhere near Exxon's boardroom," said Kyle Mach, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. ExxonMobil said it learnt about the allegations against Sheffield from the FTC. "They are entirely inconsistent with how we do business," the company said. While Pioneer said it disagreed with the FTC's complaint, which reflects a "fundamental misunderstanding" of US and global oil markets and "misreads the nature and intent" of Sheffield's actions, the company said it would not be taking any steps to stop the merger from closing. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Abu Dhabi’s Adnoc puts crude capacity at 4.85mn b/d


02/05/24
News
02/05/24

Abu Dhabi’s Adnoc puts crude capacity at 4.85mn b/d

Dubai, 2 May (Argus) — Abu Dhabi's state-owned Adnoc has nudged up its self-reported crude production capacity to 4.85mn b/d, from 4.65mn b/d previously. The UAE state energy giant did not formally announce the increase but updated the figure on its website. It did something similar when its capacity reached 4.65mn b/d in late 2023, up from 4.5mn b/d in the middle of last year. This latest hike takes the company a step closer to its long-term 5mn b/d crude capacity target, which it aims to reach by 2027. Adnoc set the 5mn b/d target back in 2018 when its capacity was 3.5mn b/d. At that time, the company said it was aiming to deliver the increase by 2030, but in November 2022 it brought the timeframe forward by three years, citing the "UAE's robust hydrocarbon reserves". The change in timeline had been expected, with sources telling Argus earlier that year that discussions had been taking place in the upper echelons of Adnoc about significantly accelerating its capacity growth plans . Given the speed at which the company has been delivering capacity gains over the past few years, and how close it is to meeting its target already, it is not inconceivable that Adnoc will reach 5mn b/d ahead of schedule. Put your best foot forward The UAE's rising capacity comes as Opec+ producers engage with independent agencies to update their respective crude output capacities for use in production policy decisions from 2025. At their meeting in June last year, all Opec+ members committed to undergo an external assessment of their sustainable capacities in the first half of 2024 by three independent consultancies, IHS, Wood Mackenzie and Rystad. The updated capacity assessment will help address a key criticism of the Opec+ production restraint agreements in their current format, namely that many of the countries involved have been cutting output from a baseline level of production that they can no longer actually deliver, in most cases due to natural decline. The UAE has been one of a handful of countries in the group that has been raising its capacity over the past few years. This means it should, in theory, benefit from the latest assessment, as a higher accepted capacity will afford it a higher production baseline under any Opec+ agreements struck from 2025 onwards. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining


02/05/24
News
02/05/24

Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell delivered a better-than-expected profit for the first quarter of 2024, helped by a strong performance from its LNG and oil product businesses. The company reported profit of $7.4bn for January-March, up sharply from an impairment-hit $474mn in the previous three months but down from $8.7bn in the first quarter of 2023. Adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items, Shell's profit came in at $7.7bn, 6pc ahead of the preceding three months and above analysts' estimates of $6.3bn-$6.5bn, although it was 20pc lower than the first quarter of 2023 when gas prices were higher. Shell's oil and gas production increased by 3pc on the quarter in January-March and was broadly flat compared with a year earlier at 2.91mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d). For the current quarter, Shell expects production in a range of 2.55mn-2.81mn boe/d, reflecting the effect of scheduled maintenance across its portfolio. The company's Integrated Gas segment delivered a profit of $2.76bn in the first quarter, up from $1.73bn in the previous three months and $2.41bn a year earlier. The segment benefited from increased LNG volumes — 7.58mn t compared to 7.06mn t in the previous quarter and 7.19mn t a year earlier — as well as favourable deferred tax movements and lower operating expenses. For the current quarter, Shell expects to produce 6.8mn-7.4mn t of LNG. In the downstream, the company's Chemicals and Products segment swung to a profit of $1.16bn during the quarter from an impairment-driven loss of $1.83bn in the previous three months, supported by a strong contribution from oil trading operations and higher refining margins driven by greater utilisation of its refineries and global supply disruptions. Shell's refinery throughput increased to 1.43mn b/d in the first quarter from 1.32mn b/d in fourth quarter of last year and 1.41mn b/d in January-March 2023. Shell has maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.344/share. It also said it has completed the $3.5bn programme of share repurchases that it announced at its previous set of results and plans to buy back another $3.5bn of its shares before the company's next quarterly results announcement. The company said it expects its capital spending for the year to be within a $22bn-$25bn range. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more