Aramco, ZPC pursue delayed China refinery investment
State-controlled Saudi Aramco is facing delays closing its planned purchase of a stake in China's biggest private-sector refining complex, but remains committed to the deal despite pullbacks elsewhere.
Aramco signed an initial agreement in October 2018 to buy a 9pc stake in the 400,000 b/d ZPC refining complex at Zhoushan in the eastern province of Zhejiang, which is led by private-sector firm Rongsheng.
Aramco and ZPC are both committed to the stake sale but the process of finalising the agreement has hit delays, according to officials with direct knowledge of the deal. Issues with local bureaucracy and the expiry of some initial approvals may have held up the process, one official close to the deal said, although this could not be confirmed with the parties involved.
Due diligence for Aramco's stake purchase has "basically" finished but details are still being discussed, Rongsheng said in its results briefing last month. Petrochemical-focused Rongsheng owns 51pc of ZPC.
Aramco declined to comment directly on the status of the deal. "China remains an important market and we intend to continue to grow our downstream presence in that region", it told Argus.
Aramco is buying the 9pc stake from local government-owned Zhoushan Marine Development and Investment, which will exit the project after the sale goes through. The deal process is continuing, a local government official said, without providing more details. The remainder of the project is owned by Shanghai-listed Zhejiang Tongkun and local government-owned Juhua, which each hold 20pc stakes.
The value of Aramco's stake purchase was never released. But the oil market has changed significantly since the deal was signed in October 2018, prompting Aramco to rethink its overseas expansion plans. Its investment in another Chinese project, a 300,000 b/d greenfield refinery and petrochemical complex at Panjin in the northeast province of Liaoning, is now in doubt.
The ZPC project presents a stronger investment case, given a more bullish outlook for fuel demand in eastern than northeastern China and the fact that ZPC is already operating. The refinery started up in 2019 and is planning to start trial runs at a second 400,000 b/d phase by the end of this year, which will take capacity to 800,000 b/d and make it the single-largest refinery in China.
Aramco signed a separate agreement with government-owned Zhejiang Energy in 2019 to invest in a retail fuel network, which will be integrated with ZPC as an outlet for the refined products.
Aramco has tied up crude supply deals with several Chinese refineries. The ZPC deal also includes a supply agreement, under which Aramco will supply up to 60pc of ZPC's crude feedstock — equivalent to as much as 480,000 b/d when the project reaches its full capacity — and use the refinery's crude storage facilities to serve its Asia-Pacific customers.
Aramco also has a long-term contract to supply the 400,000 b/d Dalian Changxing plant operated by private-sector Hengli, the other major new petrochemical-focused refinery to come on line in China. Both private-sector refineries are designed to run almost wholly on Saudi crude.
Downstream investment stalls
But Aramco's direct downstream investments in China have stalled since it took a 25pc stake in state-controlled Sinopec's 240,000 b/d Fujian refinery and 22.5pc of an associated retail network in 2007. Years of talks to invest in state-controlled PetroChina's 260,000 b/d Anning refinery in southwest Yunnan came to nothing, partly over the issue of marketing rights.
Saudi Arabia lost its position as China's top crude supplier to Russia in 2016-18, after independent refineries won import rights from the government in 2015, boosting Russian purchases. But Saudi sales to China surged in 2019, thanks partly to the start-up of the ZPC and Hengli refineries.
Aramco had been targeting $500bn in global upstream and downstream investments in the next decade, including new petrochemical projects in Asia's two most important growth engines, China and India. But the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on oil demand has forced it to reduce capital expenditure to close to $25bn this year, from a previously planned $35bn-40bn, with further significant cuts to follow.
| Crude imports from Saudi Arabia and Russia | mn b/d | |
| Saudi Arabia | Russia | |
| 2017 | 1.04 | 1.19 |
| 2018 | 1.55 | 1.85 |
| 2019 | 1.67 | 1.55 |
| 2020 (Jan-July) | 1.73 | 1.76 |
| — China customs | ||
Related news posts
New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads
New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads
Washington, 30 April (Argus) — US rail regulators today issued a final rule designed to help customers switch railroads in cases of poor rail service, but it is already drawing mixed reviews. Reciprocal switching, which allows freight shippers or receivers captive to a single railroad to access to an alternate carrier, has been allowed under US Surface Transportation Board (STB) rules. But shippers had not used existing STB rules to petition for reciprocal switching in 35 years, prompting regulators to revise rules to encourage shippers to pursue switching while helping resolve service problems. "The rule adopted today has broken new ground in the effort to provide competitive options in an extraordinarily consolidated rail industry," said outgoing STB chairman Martin Oberman. The five-person board unanimously approved a rule that would allow the board to order a reciprocal switching agreement if a facility's rail service falls below specified levels. Orders would be for 3-5 years. "Given the repeated episodes of severe service deterioration in recent years, and the continuing impediments to robust and consistent rail service despite the recent improvements accomplished by Class I carriers, the board has chosen to focus on making reciprocal switching available to shippers who have suffered service problems over an extended period of time," Oberman said today. STB commissioner Robert Primus voted to approve the rule, but also said it did not go far enough. The rule adopted today is "unlikely to accomplish what the board set out to do" since it does not cover freight moving under contract, he said. "I am voting for the final rule because something is better than nothing," Primus said. But he said the rule also does nothing to address competition in the rail industry. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) is reviewing the 154-page final rule, but carriers have been historically opposed to reciprocal switching proposals. "Railroads have been clear about the risks of expanded switching and the resulting slippery slope toward unjustified market intervention," AAR said. But the trade group was pleased that STB rejected "previous proposals that amounted to open access," which is a broad term for proposals that call for railroads to allow other carriers to operate over their tracks. The American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association declined to comment but has indicated it does not expect the rule to have an appreciable impact on shortline traffic, service or operations. Today's rule has drawn mixed reactions from some shipper groups. The National Industrial Transportation League (NITL), which filed its own reciprocal switching proposal in 2011, said it was encouraged by the collection of service metrics required under the rule. But "it is disheartened by its narrow scope as it does not appear to apply to the vast majority of freight rail traffic that moves under contracts or is subject to commodity exemptions," said NITL executive director Nancy O'Liddy, noting it was a departure from the group's original petition which sought switching as a way to facilitate railroad economic competitiveness. The Chlorine Institute said, in its initial analysis, that it does not "see significant benefit for our shipper members since it excludes contract traffic which covers the vast majority of chlorine and other relevant chemical shipments." By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
First TMX cargo booked on Aframax to China
First TMX cargo booked on Aframax to China
Houston, 30 April (Argus) — The first cargo shipped on the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) crude pipeline is scheduled to load on an Aframax in Vancouver, British Columbia, beginning 18 May for June delivery in China, according to sources with knowledge of the transaction. Suncor provisionally booked the Aframax Dubai Angel for a Vancouver-China voyage at $3.5mn lumpsum, equivalent to $6.39/bl for Access Western Blend, market participants said. In March, China's state-run Sinochem purchased the first TMX cargo — 550,000 bl of Canadian Access Western Blend — for June delivery. The shipping fixture would mark the first Vancouver-China crude delivery since May 2023, according to Vortexa, a possible indicator of steady Asia-Pacific demand to come with increased maritime access for Canadian oil producers. China already receives heavy sour Canadian crude re-exported from the US Gulf coast, with about 110,000 b/d arriving in 2023, Vortexa data show. The new 590,000 b/d pipeline begins commercial service on 1 May, with three Aframax-capable berths at Vancouver's Westridge Marine Terminal, up from one previously. An oversupply of Aframax crude tankers on the west coast of the Americas in anticipation of TMX-driven demand pressured Vancouver-loading rates to six-month lows on 19 April , according to Argus data, but market participants expect demand to increase beginning in the second half of May. Three regulatory approvals remained under assessment by the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) on 30 April. The applications concern piping, valves and other components at two pipeline inspection device traps and the mainline pipe between the two traps. The traps were added for safety assurance when the operator was allowed by CER to use a smaller diameter pipe as part of the Mountain 3 deviation. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Canada’s TMX awaits regulator OK on eve of service
Canada’s TMX awaits regulator OK on eve of service
Calgary, 30 April (Argus) — Regulatory approvals needed for the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) crude pipeline in western Canada are coming down to the wire on the eve of entering commercial service. The major crude pipeline last week maintained its plan to start commercial operations on 1 May, but three filings remain under assessment by the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) with less than 24 hours to go. Federally-owned Trans Mountain requires all sections, called spreads, of the pipeline to receive regulatory blessing before the line can be put into service. Outstanding are applications pertaining to Spread 5B Part 3, which runs from kilometer post 1064 to 1067, according to CER's website. The segment is near Hope, British Columbia, about 140 kilometers (87 miles) east of the line's terminus in Burnaby. The three applications concern piping, valves and other components at two pipeline inspection gauge (pig) traps and the mainline pipe between the two traps. The traps were added for safety assurance when the operator was allowed by CER to use a smaller diameter pipe as part of the Mountain 3 deviation. Mountain 3 was the last segment of the pipeline to be constructed because of delays relating to difficult terrain while tunneling. TMX will nearly triple the existing 300,000 b/d Trans Mountain system that connects oil-rich Alberta to the docks in Burnaby, British Columbia. Importantly, the line will provide Canadian oil sands producers with a significant export outlet without having to first go through the US. The "golden weld" marking the end of construction occurred on 11 April, according to Trans Mountain. A group of shippers last week expressed concern that TMX would not be ready for commercial service by 1 May. Spreads 6, 7A and 7B stretching from kilometer post 1075 to 1180 were approved earlier in the week, bringing the total number of approvals up to 39. The expansion was first conceived more than a decade ago with the intention of being operational by late-2017, but that date slipped amid cost overruns and repeated delays. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US crude output rebounds by 4.6pc in February: EIA
US crude output rebounds by 4.6pc in February: EIA
Calgary, 30 April (Argus) — US crude output rebounded by 4.6pc in February after freezing temperatures in the prior month took production offline in the three largest producing states. Output averaged 13.15mn b/d in February, up by 578,000 b/d from January, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) said today in its Petroleum Supply Monthly report. February's production was up by 622,000 b/d from February 2023 but remained short of the 13.3mn b/d record high set in November 2023. North Dakota was hit particularly hard by winter storms in January, which temporarily knocked as much as 700,000 b/d of production offline. The country's third-largest producing state pumped out 1.29mn b/d during February, up by 173,000 b/d from January and 159,000 b/d higher than in February 2023. About 86pc of North Dakota's production was 40.1°API or higher, according to the EIA. Texas, home to more than 40pc of the country's crude production, pumped out 5.55mn b/d in February. This was up by 172,000 b/d from January and 242,000 b/d higher than February 2023. New Mexico, which shares the prolific Permian basin with Texas, also boosted its output in February with 1.98mn b/d of production. This was up by 120,000 b/d from January and up by 183,000 b/d from February 2023. Similar to North Dakota, about 91pc of crude produced in New Mexico was 40.1°API or higher, while in Texas about 55pc of output fell into that category. About 44pc of all crude produced in Texas fell into the relatively heavier 30.1-40°API range. US output in the Gulf of Mexico came in at 1.8mn b/d in February, up from the 1.78mn b/d produced in the prior month but down by 28,000 b/d from February 2023. Almost all the crude produced in the Gulf of Mexico was 40°API or lower. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more