Brazilian pellet exports rise in 2020

  • Market: Biomass
  • 01/11/21

Brazilian wood pellet exports hit new highs in 2020, as deliveries to the UK nearly trebled and the number of export destinations rose.

Brazil exported 361,000t of wood pellets in 2020, up by 65.6pc on 2019. Fourth-quarter exports more than doubled on the year to 114,000t, and were up by 14pc on July-September. December exports totalled 25,000t, up by 8.7pc on the year.

Exports hit fresh highs for three of four quarters, with only April-June deliveries weaker on the year.

Export growth was underpinned by a rise in deliveries to the UK, following a sharp fall in 2019. Shipments to the UK rose to 187,000t in 2020, up from 64,000t a year earlier.

Brazilian producer Tanac operates a 400,000 t/yr facility in the south of the country and began delivering under a contract with UK utility Drax in October 2017, although these exports have never reached the full contracted volume.

Italy, the world's largest importer of residential-grade wood pellets, was the second-largest recipient of Brazilian cargoes in 2020. Fourth-quarter exports to Italy rose by 22.6pc on the year to 65,000t, while full-year 2020 exports grew by 11pc to 171,000t, as Brazil increased its premium wood pellet production capacity.

There were 13 operational EN plus pellet production facilities in Brazil at the end of 2020, up from 10 at the end of 2019. And Brazil widened its export portfolio, shipping pellets to 15 countries in 2020, compared with just eight in 2019.

Rio Grande was Brazil's busiest wood pellet export port in 2020, with throughputs of 192,000t, against 68,000t in 2019. The majority of exports from Rio Grande were destined for the UK.

Throughputs at Brazil's second-busiest pellet port, Sao Francisco do Sul, fell by 10.9pc to 114,000t.

Wood pellet handling at the port of Itajai in the state of Santa Catarina rose to 52,000t in 2020, up from just 9,000t in 2019.

The average fob Brazil wood pellet price fell by 5.3pc on the year to $154.86/t in 2020, and by 7.6pc on the year to $155.26 in the fourth quarter, as growth in industrial grade exports outpaced that of typically higher-priced EN plus material.

Brazil wood pellet exports t

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
02/13/24

Japan adds biomass power capacity in Jul-Sep 2023

Japan adds biomass power capacity in Jul-Sep 2023

Tokyo, 13 February (Argus) — Japan's biomass power generation capacity under its feed-in-tariff (FiT) and feed-in-premium (FiP) rose during July-September 2023. Japan added around 152MW of biomass power capacity during the quarter, lifting the total commercial capacity under the FiT and FiP schemes to 6,302MW as of the end of September, according to trade and industry ministry data. The capacity addition during July-September was below the 311MW increment in the same period in 2022 and the 201MW increase the previous quarter. The installed capacity fed by general woody biomass and crop residue totalled 3,716MW at the end of September, higher by 31.4pc from the previous year. Capacity firing with unused woody biomass climbed by 12pc from a year earlier to 534MW. Methane gas fermentation rose by 13pc to 97MW, while capacity fed by general waste increased by 15pc to 508MW. Capacity using construction waste also climbed by 57pc to 135MW. Japan's operational biomass power capacity totalled 7,178MW as of the end of September, including 876MW that was installed before the FiT was introduced in July 2012 but not transferred to receive support from the schemes. This total capacity accounts for 90pc of Japan's new biomass power target of 8,000MW by the April 2030-March 2031 fiscal year. Total purchase costs for biomass power supplies under the FiT scheme reached ¥3.53 trillion ($23.6bn) for 136.4TWh from July 2012 to September 2023. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read More
News

Muddy roads slow PKS deliveries in Indonesia’s Riau


02/08/24
News
02/08/24

Muddy roads slow PKS deliveries in Indonesia’s Riau

Singapore, 8 February (Argus) — Muddy road conditions in Indonesia's Riau province are slowing collection of fresh fruit bunches and impeding palm kernel shell (PKS) deliveries to stockpiles, market participants said. Heavy rain in the region during December and January resulted in flooded palm plantations and roads between plantations, mills and stockpiles, participants said. The slowdown in deliveries has weighed on stockpiles at the Buton and Dumai ports in the region. Some participants observed that some roads between the plantations and mills are more prone to being affected by floods, as they tend to lack proper infrastructure, which turns the roads muddy and soft in wet weather. The rain and floods have resulted in slower trucking, slowing the overall collection of fresh fruit bunches and PKS, with some trucks reported to be stuck in mud and others overturned. At least one supplier has requested to delay shipments, as its stockpile is unlikely to have sufficient stocks for cargoes for March loading and onwards, because trucks are unable to deliver PKS at previously expected rates. But some participants remain unaffected by the road conditions as they had collected sufficient stocks in preparation of the annual monsoon season, which typically sees delays to trucking. Some truck owners were also increasing trucking fees because of the slowdown, while some mills are increasing their offers to make up for the loss of palm fruit volumes caused by the rain, at a time when stockpilers are expected to request additional cargoes owing to the delays in deliveries to stockpiles. The start of the low-yield season is also expected to cause supplies to tighten, with a participant expecting the peak of the season to hit over April-May and end around June, participants said. Argus last assessed the 90-day spot price for PKS meeting Japan's feed-in tariff (FiT) sustainability requirements at $131.28/t fob east coast Sumatra, and the PKS market for material that does not meet Japan's FiT sustainability requirements at $103.77/t fob east coast Sumatra on 7 February. By Deborah Sun Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan’s Renova further delays Omaezaki biomass start-up


02/08/24
News
02/08/24

Japan’s Renova further delays Omaezaki biomass start-up

Tokyo, 8 February (Argus) — Japanese renewable power developer Renova has further delayed the launch of its 75MW Omaezaki biomass-fired power plant to July, as the final adjustment of boiler and turbine units is taking longer than expected. It originally planned to start commercial operations of the power plant in central Japan's Shizuoka prefecture by July 2023 , postponing the schedule to December, then to March before the latest delay. The plant is currently having trial runs. Renova was forced to temporarily halt construction of the plant in February 2023 because of an accident that killed a construction worker. But this did not affect the original timeline to begin commercial operations. Omaezaki is designed to consume an undisclosed volume of palm kernel shells (PKS) and unused woody material to generate around 530,000 MWh/yr of electricity. Power will be sold at a fixed price of ¥24/kWh ($0.16/kWh) generated from PKS and ¥32/kWh from unused woody biomass for 20 years from March 2024. The feed-in tariff period remains unchanged from the previous plan announced in December 2023, meaning Renova will begin power sales during the trial run. Renova also postponed the start-up of the 75MW Ishinomaki Hibarino biomass power plant to March from January. It said the final adjustment of Ishinomaki Hibarino's boiler and turbine units is also taking longer than expected. Japan's PKS imports totalled 2.9mn t in 2023, up by 0.4pc from a year earlier, according to finance ministry data. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU to mull 90pc GHG emissions cut by 2040


02/06/24
News
02/06/24

EU to mull 90pc GHG emissions cut by 2040

Brussels, 6 February (Argus) — The European Commission today presented policy documents confirming its preference for a 90pc net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction by 2040 for the bloc, compared with 1990 levels. Excluding emissions from agriculture and forestry sectors, the commission calculates that net GHG cuts of 90pc would leave remaining EU GHG emissions in 2040 of under 850mn t/CO2 equivalent (CO2e), with carbon removals reaching up to 400mn t/CO2. Removals would include both "land-based and industrial carbon removals", according to the documents. The commission's industrial carbon management strategy, released today, sets out the need for 280mn t/yr of CO2 storage capacity by 2040 for the EU. The commission's carefully worded target refers to a "net GHG emissions reduction of 90pc". To secure a majority in October's European parliament nomination vote, climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra had made a "personal" commitment to defend a "minimum target of at least 90pc" net GHG cuts. The objective of the communication and impact assessment is to launch the political debate on post-2030 legislation, rather than to propose new policy measures or set new sector-specific targets, officials said. Electrification with a fully decarbonised power system by 2040 is portrayed as the main driver of energy transition. The commission calculates that the share of power in final energy consumption would double from 25pc today to 50pc in 2040. Officials project the shares of battery-electric and other zero-emission vehicles will rise to over 60pc for cars, over 40pc for vans and almost 40pc for heavy-duty vehicles by 2040. The documents set out cost estimates for the transition, which amount to "close to €660bn ($709bn) per annum on average" over 2031-50 for energy system investment — equivalent to 3.2pc of gross domestic product (GDP). This is compared with investment of €250bn/yr over 2011-20, although that was "a decade with relatively low investments in the energy system", the commission noted. The documents suggest annual spending on transport would be around €870bn, equivalent to 4.2pc of GDP, which is a similar proportion to transport spend in 2011-20. Progress on the circular economy could cut costs, the commission added. The commission's preferred option of cutting GHG emissions by 90-95pc by 2040, set out in an impact assessment , previously leaked, sets a "clear transition path away from fossil fuels". The commission calculates that 2040 consumption of fossil fuels for energy would decrease by 80pc compared with 2021 — updating a possible error in the leaked documents , which mentioned a baseline year of 1990. Coal would be "phased out" with road, maritime and oil consumption representing 60pc of remaining energy use of fossil fuels. Policies should ensure that "any remaining fossil fuel combustion will be coupled as soon as possible with carbon capture [utilisation] and storage", following the commitment made in December at the UN Cop 28 climate summit on "transitioning away" from fossil fuels, the commission said. The gas market would change with an increasing role for low-carbon and renewable liquid fuels and gases, it added. But the documents give no clear date on a fossil fuel phase out. "This is about as meaningful as a target to prevent lung cancer without any plan to end smoking," Greenpeace EU climate campaigner Silvia Pastorelli said, pointing to the lack of a specific target date to phase out coal, oil and gas, or fossil-fuel subsidies. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brussels, EU states mismatch on bioenergy


02/02/24
News
02/02/24

Brussels, EU states mismatch on bioenergy

Brussels, 2 February (Argus) — There is a mismatch between Brussels' perception of bioenergy and the reality in EU member states, Bioenergy Europe policy director Irene di Padua says in this interview where we discuss industrial carbon management policy, the deforestation directive's impact and progress in implementing the EU's renewable energy directive. Will the debate on the EU's 2040 climate targets touch biomass' zero rating under the EU ETS? There has been a debate, but the zero-rating under the emissions trading system (EU ETS) is in place, provided that the biomass used is compliant with sustainability criteria set out in the renewable energy directive. The scientific community recognises the sustainability and renewable nature of bioenergy. And Europe needs sustainable bioenergy to reach its climate and energy targets. Hasn't the mood shifted against biomass, as with biofuels 10 years ago? There is quite a mismatch between Brussels' perception of bioenergy and the reality in member states. We see the biomass market growing and more projects coming up in different segments, whether residential or industrial woody biomass. Sectors such as energy intensive industries are now looking at biomass as a pragmatic solution to their decarbonisation needs. Another important point to consider here is that of forest management. Forests are becoming less resilient to climate change. We need to actively manage our forests in a sustainable way to improve their resilience to pests, diseases, and wildfires. What does the sector want in EU policy on industrial carbon management? We would like to see a clear distinction between different CO2 sources and define land-based removals and technology-based permanent removals. The EU's strategy is heading in the right direction and should evaluate the necessary financial incentives to enhance carbon removal deployment through subsidies and funds. It should also establish a compliance market with the aim to ensure the sector's competitiveness and contribute to European climate goals. A successful industrial carbon management strategy should also look at international co-operation especially regarding cross-border transport and storage, technological transfer, and in research and innovation. How do you see policy developing for carbon sinks and removals? A 2040 target for carbon removal will be set. The question is what will be the contribution of technological carbon removals? We will not get to climate neutrality without removing CO2 from the atmosphere. In the future, we will need more biomass for energy and industrial decarbonisation. This requires better management to grow our forests and energy from agriculture. Sustainable forest management and agriculture can improve the carbon sink and deliver economic and social benefits, especially in rural areas. Will the EU's deforestation regulation (EUDR) have a major impact on biomass markets? The EUDR goals are admirable. But implementation will be key to avoid distortions. The regulation will primarily impact forest owners as feedstocks are the first to be targeted. Secondly, there is a risk of additional administrative burden, for example in demonstrating due diligence for geolocation. Thirdly, there is a risk in terms of the functioning of the EU's internal market. The regulation specifically prohibits using a mass balance system. Companies will have to provide direct traceability for feedstocks and that is a problem for products like pellets produced from sawdust residue. It is a feedstock to which no-one pays too much attention. But you still have the same geolocation requirements as for wood used in furniture. How do you audit this? How is compliance with the 2018 renewable energy directive (RED II) going? Do you see delays affecting implementation of the latest revision (RED III), due by May 2025? That is the question especially considering the delays on RED II. We expect, or hope, that RED III implementation will go smoother. RED II created many new systems for the sustainability of biofuels, but nothing for solid biomass. Setting up systems and certification was complicated and RED II implementation was made worse by the delays of supporting secondary technical legislations. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.