LNG cargo delays shrugged off as Suez traffic restarts
The restart of vessel traffic following the freeing of the ultra-large container ship Ever Given that ran aground in the Suez Canal on 23 March weighed further on Asian LNG prices, even though LNG vessels waiting to transit the critical waterway might still face delays in reaching their destinations.
Market participants have shrugged off the impact of potential delays to deliveries, expecting available spot supply availability for May to be sufficient to meet demand as more supply tenders for May cargoes have emerged.
Asian spot LNG prices posted two consecutive days of gains from 23 March following news of the canal blockage. But they eased from 25 March as more supplies emerged and European gas hub prices posted losses.
The front half-month of the ANEA price, the Argus assessment for spot deliveries to northeast Asia, rose by around 6.8pc to $7.055/mn Btu for second-half April on 25 March from $6.605/mn Btu on 23 March. But it has since dipped by around 2.1pc, standing at $6.905/mn Btu on 29 March.
There were expectations at the end of last week that it could take days or even weeks to dislodge the Ever Given, raising the prospect of delays to LNG loadings at export facilities in Qatar and the US and affecting deliveries to Europe and Asia, mainly in May. The Ever Given had been blocking the canal and holding up shipments since 23 March.
Around 14 LNG vessels are waiting to transit the Suez Canal in the southbound direction. Eight of these vessels belong to state-controlled Qatargas and are heading to the 77mn t/yr Ras Laffan facility, while the remainder, including one from the US Gulf Coast, are going to Asia, according to a shipbroker. A shipment in the southbound direction from the Suez Canal would head towards Asia and the Middle East. Around six northbound vessels - three ballast and three laden - are heading to Belgium, the UK, Italy and elsewhere in Europe. All three laden cargoes are from Ras Laffan.
Market participants expect it to still take between three and five days for traffic at both ends of the canal to clear, delaying deliveries.
Two Qatar-bound vessels had diverted away from the Suez Canal late last week and taken the longer Cape of Good Hope route to Ras Laffan when it remained unclear when the Ever Given would be dislodged and freed.
The 210,185m³ Al Bahiya and 210,184m³ Al Nuama LNG tankers were originally scheduled to arrive at Ras Laffan before 20 April via the Suez Canal route, before they made a sharp U-turn in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea on 26 March as vessel traffic waiting to transit the canal built up. The Al Bahiya and Al Nuama are now signalling arrival at Ras Laffan on 21 April and 23 April, respectively.
The diversion would potentially add around 13-18 days to each vessel's journey, meaning they could have been able to make it to Ras Laffan earlier had they stayed in the queue at the Suez Canal.
The 3-5-day wait to transit the Canal and diversions via the Cape of Good Hope are expected to push back loadings meant to take place at Ras Laffan between the end of March and early April to the second half of April and first half of May, which will mean that second-half April and first-half May deliveries to northeast Asia may be delayed to the second half of May or even June, market participants said. A shipment from Qatar to northeast Asia takes around 2-3 weeks.
But even with the likely delay of Qatari deliveries and strong consumer demand for May cargoes, spot supply availability to northeast Asia appears ample. Around 10 northeast Asian consumers are showing interest in buying May cargoes.
Spot supplies for delivery to northeast Asia are on offer through tenders from the 6.9mn t/yr PNG LNG project in Papua New Guinea (PNG) and Australia's 8.9mn t/yr Ichthys LNG facility. And at least three other May cargoes are expected to be offered by producers in Australia and Russia in the near term.
Related news posts
Von der Leyen puts forward EU commissioner candidates
Von der Leyen puts forward EU commissioner candidates
Brussels, 17 September (Argus) — European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen today presented candidates for commissioner posts, confirming names put forward for portfolios including climate, energy, agriculture and trade. Von der Leyen — who was confirmed by European Parliament as Commission president on 18 July — has committed to doubling down on climate and energy policy. Her 2024-29 mandate stipulates greenhouse gas emissions cuts of at least 90pc by 2040 compared with 1990. Her commissioners, if appointed, will implement those policies. She is nominating Teresa Ribera to oversee competition policy but also "clean, just and competitive transition" that would include energy, climate, environment and other Green Deal files. Ribera is Spain's deputy prime minister and responsible for the country's ecological transition. Von der Leyen has proposed the current EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra for the portfolio of climate, net-zero and clean growth. Hoekstra, who replaced previous Green Deal commissioner Frans Timmermans , will also be responsible for taxation. Other nominees include former Danish climate minister Dan Jorgensen, up for energy and housing commissioner. Former Swedish minister for EU affairs Jessika Roswall is proposed for a portfolio including environment and circular economy, and Luxembourgish Christophe Hansen, a former member of EU parliament, is proposed as agriculture and food commissioner. Von der Leyen now needs to ensure that candidate-commissioners are approved by parliamentary committees and then by plenary. Hearings will also focus on candidates' abilities to implement policies. "Parliamentary scrutiny will not cut corners," European Parliament president Roberta Metsola said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
East Timor takes stake in Bayu-Undan gas field
East Timor takes stake in Bayu-Undan gas field
Darwin, 17 September (Argus) — The partners in the Bayu-Undan joint venture (BUJV) gas project have agreed to transfer a 16pc stake to East Timorese state-owned firm Timor Gap. A sale and purchase deed has been signed, with Timor Gap to participate in BUJV for the remainder of the project's lifespan, with the production-sharing contract for Bayu-Undan running to 30 June 2026 or until extraction ends, said operator Australian independent Santos. The deal follows an initial agreement in 2023 with Timor Gap on the proposed Bayu-Undan carbon capture and storage project, which Santos chief executive Kevin Gallagher recently described as the "next big project we really want to focus on" . BUJV includes the near-depleted gas field located 500km northwest of Australia in East Timorese waters, which formerly produced feedstock for the 3.7mn t/yr Darwin LNG terminal operated by Santos. Darwin LNG is preparing to receive next year the first gas from Santos' Barossa project , while Bayu-Undan continues to produce natural gas liquids and for the Australian domestic market. Santos will hold a 36.5pc interest in BUJV following the transfer, Japanese upstream firm Inpex 9.6pc, Tokyo Timor Sea Resources, owned by Japanese utility groups Jera and Tokyo Gas 7.7pc, Italian energy firm Eni 9.2pc and South Korean upstream firm SK E&S 21pc. Timor Gap is the majority shareholder in the Greater Sunrise LNG project, presently in the concept select phase . The Australian government is pressing for more action after years of stalled progress with concerns China could instead develop the field in partnership with East Timor. Greater Sunrise partners Timor Gap with 56.56pc, Australian independent Woodside with 33.44pc and Japanese utility Osaka Gas with 10pc. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Washington voters waver on GHG repeal: Poll
Washington voters waver on GHG repeal: Poll
Houston, 16 September (Argus) — Support for a repeal of Washington's carbon market in the upcoming November election may be softening, while a repeal targeting the state's plans to phase out natural gas may be gaining strength, according to a recent public opinion poll. The poll — which canvassed 403 registered state voters by phone and online earlier this month — indicates just under a clear majority of voters leaning towards a "no" vote on initiative 2117, which would repeal language in the state's Climate Commitment Act (CCA) authorizing the state's cap-and-trade program. A successful repeal would prevent local and state officials from creating a similar replacement for the "cap-and-invest" program. Data collected in the survey indicates that 46pc of those surveyed would vote against the repeal, with the bulk of voters identifying as Democrat, with 21pc Republican support. The repeal vote received 30pc support, with slightly more than half those surveyed in favor identifying as Republican, and a further 2pc of the total surveyed undecided on the issue. Washington's "cap-and-invest" program requires large industrial facilities, fuel suppliers and power plants to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 45pc by 2030 and by 95pc by 2050, from 1990 levels. Revenue from state allowance auctions and other related funds is required by state law to be used for critical climate projects throughout Washington. In contrast, initiative 2066 received a majority support in requiring the state to continue to provide natural gas to utility customers, at 47pc. The ‘no' vote to continue dissuading the use of natural gas in the state as part of the state's energy transition plan garnered 29pc, with a further 24pc undecided. Respondents identifying as Republican formed the bulk of the "yes" vote with 68pc. Initiative 2066 would repeal HB 1589, signed into law by governor Jay Inslee (D) earlier this year. The law creates planning requirements for certain utilities to comply with a network of state regulations and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets and transition away from natural gas in cost-effective ways. Let's Go Washington, a political action committee, has backed both initiatives over the past year, on the narrative that the state's plans to transition away from natural gas-use and the cap-and-trade program raise fuel and energy prices for families. The poll, conducted by Cascade PBS/Elway, had 43pc of respondents identify as Democrat, 24pc as Republican and 34pc as Independent. Respondents were primarily ages 36 and older, from western regions of the state and with the majority, at 34pc, from suburban areas. Under state law, either initiative will need to receive a majority of total votes cast to pass in the 5 November election. By Denise Cathey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
The Hague eyes sector agreement to support gas output
The Hague eyes sector agreement to support gas output
London, 16 September (Argus) — The new Dutch government aims to reach agreement with the oil and gas sector on support for domestic North Sea production, while introducing a new law to make gas supply more secure. The government in its new longer-term plan set out a new policy approach to its promise to "scale up" domestic gas production from the North Sea. A sector agreement would "increase investment security and the predictability of government policy", the cabinet said. Dutch domestic gas production is in long-term decline, although the climate and green growth ministry, and research organisation TNO, forecast some scope for domestic production to stay stable until around 2030 before dropping, depending on overall investment. Much like the previous government, the current administration has stated its intention to boost North Sea production . Former mining minister Hans Vijlbrief said last year that the government was moving to slow the rate of gas output decline "as much as possible". The previous coalition government had already been using tailor-made agreements with companies involving decarbonisation, while the new incoming coalition cabinet in May announced its intention to use this policy tool in other areas as well. The government released a more detailed outline of planned policies and legislative changes on 13 September, after the previous coalition agreement was published in mid-May. And by the fourth quarter, the government plans to consult on a new law to "strengthen crisis preparedness in the field of gas market and increase robustness for the gas system". This includes some EU-level developments, such as a focus on energy savings in the new European regulation on security of gas supply, the government said. And the cabinet said it would examine how "the government, in addition to the market, can take a more proactive role in ensuring that gas storages are filled". The Netherlands does not presently have a strategic gas reserve, unlike other countries such as Austria or Italy. And in the coalition agreement, the parties had set out to "establish reserves" for gas, in order to keep the giant Groningen gas field closed. By Till Stehr Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more