Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Hungary wants Russian oil ban off the agenda at EU meet

  • Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 25/05/22

Hungary has asked EU leaders not to discuss the bloc's proposed Russian oil embargo at their European Council meeting next week as it "would run the serious danger of dismantling European unity", Hungarian foreign minister Peter Szijjarto said Wednesday.

It is unlikely that the European Commission will have time to come up with a solution to the difficulties that an embargo would cause Hungary's economy before the council meets, Szijjarto said.

"This problem was created by the European Commission, so the solution must be also proposed by the European Commission," he said. "We see it unrealistic that such a comprehensive solution will be proposed this week."

Szijjarto reiterated that Hungary will oppose an EU-wide ban on Russian oil imports as long as "it makes the country's energy supply impossible". He has previously said that reconfiguring Hungary's 161,000 b/d Szazhalombatta refinery to run solely on non-Russian crude will cost €500mn-550mn and that a further €200mn would need to be spent on boosting pipeline capacity to ensure Hungary has enough alternative supply to Russian Urals.

"The European Council had a decision in Versailles that eliminating dependence on Russian energy sources should always take into account the different energy supply structures of the EU member countries. That didn't happen," Szijjarto said, adding that the European Commission has "no right" to take a different position to the European Council.

The European Commission is the EU's executive arm, responsible for drafting laws and drawing up proposals for new legislation, while the European Council is made up of the heads of state or government of the 27 EU member states.

Hungary's reluctance to discuss the Russian oil ban at the upcoming council meeting dampens prospects for an imminent deal, although senior EU officials remain upbeat. "I'm still confident that we can resolve the topic before the European Council," the council's president Charles Michel said during a visit to Sweden today.

Michel acknowledged that agreeing to phase out Russian oil imports requires a "lot of dialogue" and political effort. "We're working very hard to stay united, but also to take decisions," said Michel. "Is it easy? No. I sincerely hope that we'll be able again to show that we're united," he said.

German economy minister Robert Habeck said on 24 May that the EU could agree an embargo on Russian oil within a few days. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said she is "hoping" an agreement might be reached in "days", although she later told news service Politico that the oil ban might not be an "appropriate" topic for EU leaders due to its technical nature.

The European Council is due to meet on 30-31 May


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
06/11/25

MEG shareholders approve Cenovus deal

MEG shareholders approve Cenovus deal

Calgary, 6 November (Argus) — MEG Energy shareholders today approved selling the Canadian oil sands producer to larger rival Cenovus Energy, clearing the way for the merger to close by year-end. The vote in favor of the cash-and-stock deal that values MEG at about C$8.6bn ($6.2bn) brings an end to a lengthy pursuit of the oil sands company by Cenovus and Strathcona Resources. All three companies are based in Calgary, Alberta. The deal was approved by "more than 86pc of the votes," MEG board chair James McFarland said during Thursday's shareholders meeting. Two-thirds support was required for the transaction to go through. Cenovus is among the largest oil sands producers and will grow to 750,000 b/d of output in the region after acquiring MEG's 110,000 b/d Christina Lake asset. Cenovus' neighbouring Christina Lake project to the southwest is one of the biggest oil sands projects in the industry at about almost 250,000 b/d. Cenovus's overall third quarter production came in at 833,000 b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d), including production outside of the oil sands region. Cenovus executives plan to increase output at MEG's Christina Lake asset to 150,000 b/d by the end of 2028 , more than the 135,000 b/d targeted by MEG's management. Cenovus would do this by utilizing unused oil treating capacity along with adding a sixth steam generator that it has in inventory. Cenovus said it expects C$150mn in annual cost savings from the deal in the near-term, rising to C$400mn/yr in 2028 and beyond. MEG's second-largest shareholder, Strathcona Resources, put the company in play with a hostile takeover bid earlier this year before Cenovus swooped in to strike a deal. Strathcona with its 14.2pc share of MEG vowed to vote against the Cenovus-MEG deal and those votes were key with Cenovus admitting on 21 October it had come up short of the two-thirds support required. Since then, Strathcona dropped its bid and made a side deal with Cenovus to throw its support behind the proposed transaction. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Airports named for planned US flight cancellations


06/11/25
News
06/11/25

Airports named for planned US flight cancellations

Houston, 6 November (Argus) — Forty North American airports will see traffic cut by 10pc starting Friday if no deal is reached to reopen the federal government, US transportation secretary Sean Duffy said today as the shutdown hit its 37th day. Airports that would see flights cancelled include Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International, George Bush Houston Intercontinental, Los Angeles International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport and Ontario International Airport in Canada ( see table ). Since 1 November, total flight cancellations within, to and out of US airports totaled more than 870 flights as of 11:20 ET today, while more than 25,900 flights have been delayed, according to flight-tracking company FlightAware. The count includes mechanical, weather, and other incidents. United Airlines said today that its long-haul international and hub-to-hub flights will not be impacted by the planned traffic cancellations, but rather regional and domestic mainline flights that are not between hub airports will be the focus of cancellations. Air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents have been working without pay since the partial US government shutdown started on 1 October. Staffing shortages prompted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to periodically issue temporary ground stops at some airports because of a lack of air traffic controllers, while TSA staff shortages led to hours-long security check-ins. Even before the shutdown the FAA has been far short of its targeted number of air traffic control employees. Controllers have seen a 3,800 worker shortage during the shutdown, National Air Traffic Controllers Association president Nick Daniels said late last month. Earlier this week Duffy blamed the shutdown on Democrats, warning if they did not vote to reopen the government within a week, the country would see "massive cancellations." "We are going to proactively make decisions to keep the airspace safe," Duffy said in a press conference on Wednesday. By Hunter Fite US/Canada airports subject to 10pc traffic cuts Anchorage International Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Los Angeles International Portland International, Oregon Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Newark Liberty International New York LaGuardia Philadelphia International Boston Logan International Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Orlando International Phoenix Sky Harbor International Baltimore/Washington International Honolulu International Chicago Midway San Diego International Charlotte Douglas International Houston Hobby Memphis International Louisville International Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Washington Dulles International Miami International Seattle/Tacoma International Dallas Love George Bush Houston Intercontinental Minneapolis/St Paul International San Francisco International Ronald Reagan Washington National Indianapolis International Oakland International Salt Lake City International Denver International New York John F Kennedy International Ontario International Teterboro Dallas/Fort Worth International Las Vegas Harry Reid International Chicago O`Hare International Tampa International US transportation secretary Sean Duffy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UAE's Adnoc holds line on 5mn b/d crude capacity push


06/11/25
News
06/11/25

UAE's Adnoc holds line on 5mn b/d crude capacity push

Dubai, 6 November (Argus) — Abu Dhabi's state-owned Adnoc is pressing ahead with plans to lift crude production capacity to 5mn b/d by 2027, undeterred by this year's lower oil prices and the significant capital required to sustain output from ageing fields. Adnoc reported in May 2024 that its maximum sustainable capacity had reached 4.85mn b/d, up from 4.65mn b/d previously. Upstream chief executive Musabbeh al-Kaabi gave the same figure this week on the sidelines of the Adipec conference in Abu Dhabi. Adnoc's long-term investment programme remains intact, and onshore and offshore drilling activity is "extremely busy" as the company ramps up brownfield expansions to complete the final stretch of its capacity-build plan, al-Kaabi said. "Raising capacity to 5mn b/d will require massive investment to sustain," he added, noting that some of Abu Dhabi's legacy fields will need continual infill drilling and redevelopment to offset natural decline. Al-Kaabi framed the strategy as both a commercial and policy priority, echoing projections made by Adnoc chief executive Sultan al-Jaber in his Adipec opening speech that global oil demand will remain above 100mn b/d through 2040 and beyond. "Because Abu Dhabi crude is among the lowest-carbon barrels globally, it's our responsibility to ensure secure and affordable supply," al-Kaabi said. He also underscored the importance of maintaining spare capacity as a strategic buffer, despite the financial cost of holding back supply. "It's in our interest to ensure the market is stable whenever there is demand for low-carbon crude. Stability and predictability are great for investment," he said. In a high oil price environment, "it takes only two or three years of maximum production to recover all costs", he added. The maximum sustainable capacity of the 22-member Opec+ alliance is under renewed scrutiny, with the group due to begin updating each member's production baseline to calculate targets for 2027. Opec+ agreed in September on a mechanism to assess members' maximum sustainable capacity, but the process is expected to be contentious, as countries often claim inflated figures to secure higher output quotas. The UAE has already secured two upward quota revisions in 2022 and 2023 to reflect its growing capacity. Given the pace of capacity gains in the last few years and how close Adnoc is to its target, the company may announce it has reached 5mn b/d capacity ahead of schedule. By Bachar Halabi and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US to cut 10pc of flights at some airports: Duffy


05/11/25
News
05/11/25

US to cut 10pc of flights at some airports: Duffy

Houston, 5 November (Argus) — The US will begin to cut airline traffic by 10pc at high volume airports starting this Friday if no deal is reached to reopen the federal government, US transportation secretary Sean Duffy said today as the shutdown hit its 36th day. During a press conference Duffy said that the 10pc cut in airline traffic will be applied to 40 different airports, which will be named tomorrow. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will hold meetings with airlines and airports tonight to collaborate on the schedule reductions. Air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents have been working without pay since the partial US government shutdown started on 1 October. Staffing shortages prompted the FAA to periodically issue temporary ground stops at some airports because of a lack of air traffic controllers, while TSA staff shortages led to hours-long security check-ins. Even before the shutdown the FAA has been far short of its targeted number of air traffic control employees. Controllers have seen a 3,800 worker shortage during the shutdown, National Air Traffic Controllers Association president Nick Daniels said late last month. Earlier this week Duffy blamed the shutdown on Democrats, warning if they did not vote to reopen the government within a week, the country would see "massive cancellations." Since 1 November, total flight cancellations within, to and out of US airports totaled more than 795 flights as of 4pm ET today, while more than 21,600 flights have been delayed, according to flight-tracking company FlightAware. The count includes mechanical, weather, and other incidents. "We are going to proactively make decisions to keep the airspace safe," Duffy said. If the pressures continue to build through the shutdown, additional measures will be necessary, FAA administrator Bryan Bedford said. By Hunter Fite Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US high court questions Trump's tariff powers


05/11/25
News
05/11/25

US high court questions Trump's tariff powers

Washington, 5 November (Argus) — President Donald Trump's legal rationale for tariffs targeting major US trading partners ran into a skeptical review during a Supreme Court hearing on Wednesday, including from the justices appointed by him. The high court heard an appeal of two decisions by lower courts that found Trump's administration has overstepped its authority by placing emergency tariffs on most goods imported into the US. Trump has cited a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which previous presidents only used to impose targeted economic sanctions, to impose tariffs on all US trading partners. IEEPA omits references to tariffs. But the Trump administration justifies imposing them by citing two words in the text of the law — that "regulation" of "importation" is among the possible measures that the president can take to address an economic emergency. Tariffs are a foreign policy issue, which the Constitution delegates to the executive branch, solicitor general John Sauer argued on behalf of the administration. Tariffs are not a tax but a regulatory tool, Sauer said. The revenue from tariffs is incidental to the exercise of Trump's regulatory power in foreign policy domain, Sauer said. Both liberal and conservative justices challenged those arguments. Trump's reliance on a law never before used to impose tariffs raises the "major questions doctrine", said Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative. Roberts was referring to recent Supreme Court decisions, which state that it is up to Congress to decide prominent questions of economic significance. The president has a constitutionally granted authority over foreign policy but in this case, he exercised it by imposing "taxes on Americans, and that has always been the core power of Congress," Roberts said. The possibility that future presidents would use tariffs to advance unrelated policy priorities featured prominently in questions from the bench. "Could the president impose a 50pc tariff on gas-powered cars and auto parts to deal with the 'unusual and extraordinary threat' from abroad of climate change?", conservative justice Neil Gorsuch asked. Sauer acknowledged that the scenario was "highly likely", albeit not under Trump, as "this administration would say 'that's a hoax.'" The legal argument advanced by Trump means that former president Joe Biden could have declared a climate emergency, imposed tariffs and then used the tariff revenue for his student loan relief program, liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor said. "That's all Biden would have had to do with any of his programs." Gorsuch also challenged the government's argument that Congress can at any time remove the power of the president to impose tariffs under emergency authorities. "Congress, as a practical matter, can't get this power back once it handed it over," Gorsuch said. An extension of presidential powers can be enacted with a simple majority but has to be removed by a veto-proof majority, Gorsuch said. "It's a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch and away from the people's elected representatives." The legal cases before the court pit the Trump administration against a group of private companies and, separately, a coalition of states, who argued that IEEPA does not explicitly authorize Trump to use the tariffs he imposed. Conservative justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated that he would be open to defending the presidential authority to impose tariffs in at least some specific emergency situations, citing Trump's imposition of a 25pc tariff on imports from India in a bid to stop Indian purchases of Russian oil. Next steps The Supreme Court could take weeks, if not months, to make a decision. Trump's preferred outcome is for the high court to overturn the lower courts' decisions and keep the tariffs he imposed in place. "With a Victory, we have tremendous, but fair, Financial and National Security," Trump posted ahead of the hearing. "Without it, we are virtually defenseless against other Countries who have, for years, taken advantage of us." If the Supreme Court decides to keep the lower courts' decisions in place, Trump's administration would have to immediately lift the so-called "fentanyl" tariffs affecting Canada, Mexico and China and the so-called "reciprocal" tariffs of 10pc and higher, in place since 5 April on nearly every US trading partner. The courts' decisions will not affect tariffs Trump imposed on imports of steel, aluminum, cars and auto parts, as the administration has used other, unequivocal legal trade authorities. The Supreme Court would separately have to decide what to do about the revenue collected from emergency tariffs. One of the lower courts ordered that the defendants who challenged tariffs in courts must receive refunds, while another court ordered that all importers must receive refunds. The US government's tariff revenue ran at about $30bn/month as of August, according to an estimate by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more