EU adopts revised WSR, no ban on scrap exports to OECD
A European Parliament committee voted on Thursday to adopt new regulations that will place restrictions on exports of scrap metal from the EU to non-OECD countries but resisted pressure to adopt similar restrictions on exports to OECD importers.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) adopted a position on revisions to the European Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR) that was largely unchanged from the initially proposed legislation in November 2021.
Under the amended WSR, exports of non-hazardous waste for recovery, under which classification ferrous and non-ferrous scrap metal falls under EU law, will be allowed only to non-OECD countries that apply for consent and demonstrate their ability to treat waste sustainably via third-party audits.
The ENVI Committee would not commit to equivalent restrictions on exports to OECD countries, which means there is no direct restriction on exports of ferrous scrap from the EU to Turkey, the largest importer of ferrous scrap from the block by a distance.
But the Committee said the European Commission will monitor waste exports to OECD countries more closely to ensure that shipments are managed in an environmentally sound manner in line with EU regulation and that they do not adversely affect the management of domestic waste in their country.
European metals recycling trade associations told Argus that they fear this commitment to the monitoring of exports to OECD countries provides the European steel industry with an instrument to push for suspension of scrap metal exports at any time.
"Since the design has not yet been determined, there is considerable planning uncertainty and trade could be severely disrupted if bureaucratic problems arise in the course of implementation," representatives of German trade associations BVSE and VDM said.
"The tension between recyclers and producers on this issue has not yet been resolved. Unfortunately, it can be assumed that the steel and metal industry will continue to fight against metal exports."
That tension between the steel and recycling industries has grown increasingly rancorous this year as the steel lobby has ramped up calls for scrap metal to be kept within Europe in the face of soaring energy costs for steelmakers and the progression of decarbonisation plans that involve the transition from blast furnaces to electric arc furnaces that consume more scrap.
European trade associations reiterated that even the restrictions imposed on exports to non-OECD countries will be harmful to the recycling sector. Non-OECD countries including India, Pakistan and China are major consumers of EU ferrous, aluminium, copper and stainless steel scrap.
A survey of 111 companies by the European Recycling Association (EuRIC) found that more than 50pc of metals recyclers expect a decrease in employment owing to the WSR revision and that more than 80pc expect a decrease in turnover, with 84pc of that segment stating that the decrease will correspond to more than 20pc of their annual turnover.
"The procedures for the export of recycled materials still classified as waste laid down in the Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR) are burdensome, costly, and time-consuming," EuRIC said in a letter yesterday. "European recyclers are therefore in favour of an ambitious revision of the WSR that effectively combats illegal shipments while levelling the playing field with extracted raw materials."
Aside from the export restrictions, the WSR revision also proposes new rules to improve information exchange and transparency on intra-EU waste shipments, including the development of uniform criteria for waste classification and a requirement to digitalise the exchange of information and documents on trade within a central electronic system.
The legislation is also intended to improve the EU's ability to tackle illegal waste shipments.
The WSR amendment will now move to a vote for adoption in the European Parliament's January plenary sitting, which will form the basis for the parliament's negotiating position with EU governments on the final form of the legislation.
Related news posts
Mitsui makes delayed exit from Paiton power project
Mitsui makes delayed exit from Paiton power project
Tokyo, 1 May (Argus) — Japanese trading house Mitsui completed on 30 April the ¥109bn ($690mn) sale of its stake in Indonesia's 2,045MW Paiton coal-fired power plant in east Java following multiple delays. Mitsui originally tried to complete its exit by the end of March 2022 . It said the procedures with Paiton's offtaker Indonesian state-owned power firm Persero took more time than expected without providing further details. Japanese thermal power producer Jera withdrew from Paiton by selling its 14pc share in 2021. Mitsui sold its 45.515pc share in Paiton Energy, as well as a 45.515pc stake in Netherlands-based subsidiary Minejesa Capital and a 65pc stake in Singapore-based IPM Asia that are related companies of the Paiton project. Mistui sold the stakes to RH International (RHIS), which is a Singapore-based subsidiary of Thai power producer Ratch, and Indonesian power company Medco Daya Abadi Lestari's subsidiary Medco Daya Energi Sentosa (MDES). Paiton Energy is now owned by RHIS, MDES and Qatar-based company Nebras Power. Mitsui did not disclose their ownership ratios. Paiton consists of the 615MW No.7, 615MW No.8 and the 815MW No.3 units, which sell electricity to Persero through an unspecified long-term contract. Mitsui now holds 9.6GW of power capacity assets globally, with 8pc being coal-fired projects. The exit from Paiton cut its coal-fired ratio by 8 percentage points, while raising its renewable ratio by 3 percentage points to 32pc. Growing global pressure against coal-fired power generation likely prompted Mitsui to exit Paiton. Energy ministers from G7 countries this week pledged to accelerate "efforts towards the phase-out of unabated coal power generation". By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads
New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads
Washington, 30 April (Argus) — US rail regulators today issued a final rule designed to help customers switch railroads in cases of poor rail service, but it is already drawing mixed reviews. Reciprocal switching, which allows freight shippers or receivers captive to a single railroad to access to an alternate carrier, has been allowed under US Surface Transportation Board (STB) rules. But shippers had not used existing STB rules to petition for reciprocal switching in 35 years, prompting regulators to revise rules to encourage shippers to pursue switching while helping resolve service problems. "The rule adopted today has broken new ground in the effort to provide competitive options in an extraordinarily consolidated rail industry," said outgoing STB chairman Martin Oberman. The five-person board unanimously approved a rule that would allow the board to order a reciprocal switching agreement if a facility's rail service falls below specified levels. Orders would be for 3-5 years. "Given the repeated episodes of severe service deterioration in recent years, and the continuing impediments to robust and consistent rail service despite the recent improvements accomplished by Class I carriers, the board has chosen to focus on making reciprocal switching available to shippers who have suffered service problems over an extended period of time," Oberman said today. STB commissioner Robert Primus voted to approve the rule, but also said it did not go far enough. The rule adopted today is "unlikely to accomplish what the board set out to do" since it does not cover freight moving under contract, he said. "I am voting for the final rule because something is better than nothing," Primus said. But he said the rule also does nothing to address competition in the rail industry. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) is reviewing the 154-page final rule, but carriers have been historically opposed to reciprocal switching proposals. "Railroads have been clear about the risks of expanded switching and the resulting slippery slope toward unjustified market intervention," AAR said. But the trade group was pleased that STB rejected "previous proposals that amounted to open access," which is a broad term for proposals that call for railroads to allow other carriers to operate over their tracks. The American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association declined to comment but has indicated it does not expect the rule to have an appreciable impact on shortline traffic, service or operations. Today's rule has drawn mixed reactions from some shipper groups. The National Industrial Transportation League (NITL), which filed its own reciprocal switching proposal in 2011, said it was encouraged by the collection of service metrics required under the rule. But "it is disheartened by its narrow scope as it does not appear to apply to the vast majority of freight rail traffic that moves under contracts or is subject to commodity exemptions," said NITL executive director Nancy O'Liddy, noting it was a departure from the group's original petition which sought switching as a way to facilitate railroad economic competitiveness. The Chlorine Institute said, in its initial analysis, that it does not "see significant benefit for our shipper members since it excludes contract traffic which covers the vast majority of chlorine and other relevant chemical shipments." By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Oversupply and fragmentation challenge steel market
Oversupply and fragmentation challenge steel market
London, 30 April (Argus) — Participants in the Turkish and European long steel markets at a major industry event this week anticipated a difficult remainder of 2024, expecting demand to be generally supplied by local capacities. With the Chinese Metallurgical Industry Institute forecasting a 1.7pc drop in Chinese steel demand in 2024 and the country's steel output expected to remain stable, Chinese exports are likely to continue putting pressure on global rebar prices. China's overall steel exports this year so far are on course to exceed the 91.2mn t shipped in 2023. Traders were concerned over the Chinese real estate sector, which, along with infrastructure construction, drives the bulk of Chinese steel demand but has been plagued by a mismatch between housing demand and supply in recent years. Markets outside of China are also likely to be well-supplied for the rest of the year or longer, with a weak construction outlook in Europe and with steel capacity on an upward trend in India and southeast Asia. Government investment in construction projects is likely to drive Indian steel demand to at least 190mn t by 2030, said Somanath Tripathy of the Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL). But in the near term Indian demand growth has been sluggish while output has increased, with steelmakers Tata and JSW both reaching record steel output in the financial year of 2023-2024. Meanwhile, participants had weak expectations for the European and Turkish rebar markets for the rest of the year. Expectations of a recovery in the European steel sector have largely been pinned on the likelihood the European Central Bank will reduce interest rates at some point in the second half of the year. But a German trader noted while this move would lend some support, high interest rates are far from being the only challenge for the sector. The EU construction sector faces increasingly high costs, partly caused by sustainability requirements, participants noted, slowing investment and weighing on property demand by pushing up prices. The combination of high interest rates and inflation in Turkey, as well as dwindling export options, means several Turkish steel mills are currently running at near 50pc of capacity. Turkish rebar exporters face stiff competition in most export markets from Chinese suppliers, whose fob prices are currently around $70/t lower than Turkey, as well as from north African producers. The challenge for Turkish exporters is structural, with the business model of importing scrap and exporting steel no longer as viable due to higher scrap demand from other regions as well as the significantly lower energy costs of north African and Middle Eastern producers. Some market participants noted in this context, the introduction of the European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) could favour Turkish EAF mills in the long run, who are no longer competitive in terms of price in most markets, but whose use of scrap versus direct reduced iron (DRI) makes their production less carbon-intensive than other EAF-based producers in the region. Turkish producers are working to make sure they will be compatible with EU environmental requirements, a Turkish mill source said. But government support for these efforts has been lacking, he added. Overall, protectionist measures have significantly harmed Turkey's export options, as has the outbreak of conflicts and tensions in the region over the past two years. Some Turkish mills have lost up to half of their regular export sales as a result of the halt of exports to Israel and a slowdown in sales to Yemen as a result of the conflict in Gaza and Houthi vessel attacks. Until European prices pick up significantly and north Africa is selling at capacity, Turkish long steel exports will not be competitive in the near future, a trader noted. By Brendan Kjellberg-Motton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Climate change to heavily disrupt mining: PwC
Climate change to heavily disrupt mining: PwC
London, 30 April (Argus) — More than 70pc of the world's production of copper, cobalt and lithium could face significant or high drought risks by 2050, up from less than 10pc currently and posing a significant challenge to future supply growth, according to accounting firm PwC. Under a low-emissions scenario — which imagines global carbon emissions rapidly decreasing — more than 70pc of cobalt and lithium production and around 60pc of the world's bauxite and iron production will be at risk by 2050, according to PwC's 2024 Climate Risks to Nine Key Commodities Report . More than half of the world's copper production will be disrupted by 2050 in a low-emissions scenario and over 70pc in a high-emissions scenario. PwC warns that unless commodity producers and buyers take preventive action now, their operations are likely to be increasingly disrupted. "Climate change is already fracturing the stability of the natural world, and it will increasingly fracture the stability of global supply chains unless adaptive measures are taken," said global sustainability leader Will Jackson-Moore. Some companies are responding to the growing drought risk by investing in water management systems to prevent wastage. Others are considering infrastructure adaptations, such as building elevated storage facilities in flood-prone areas. Several mining companies in Chile have invested in desalination plants, the report notes. According to PwC's 2024 Annual Global CEO Survey , 47pc of chief executives have taken proactive measures to safeguard their workforces and physical assets from climate change. To continue building resilience and adapting to climate risks, businesses must assess impacts, work with suppliers and communities, establish a climate strategy, make transparent disclosures, leverage adaptive products and services and participate in multi-stakeholder efforts, the latest report concludes. By Cristina Belda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more