Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Q&A: Antwerp port plans 10mn t/yr NH3 imports by 2030

  • Market: Fertilizers, Hydrogen
  • 22/11/23

Infrastructure build-out will be essential in the development of low-carbon ammonia value chains to meet Europe's clean energy import ambitions. Ahead of the Argus Clean Ammonia Conference Europe in Antwerp this month, Argus spoke with the programme manager for hydrogen at the Port of Antwerp-Bruges, Maxime Peeters. Capacity build-out, ammonia cracking, hydrogen transportation and bunkering solutions were discussed. Edited highlights follow.

REPowerEU has set a target of 20mn t/yr of green hydrogen consumption by 2030, one fifth of which should be covered by ammonia imports. What are the main developments taking place at the Port of Antwerp to facilitate this?

We are the biggest petrochemical cluster in Europe, so hydrogen and hydrogen derivatives already play quite an important role inside the port. There is existing infrastructure for ammonia, methanol and LNG.

We have existing import capacity, users, infrastructure and transit towards Germany for instance through barge, rail and pipeline. Today we have one large ammonia terminal in the port operated by BASF. Ammonia is both imported and produced on site and then used in Antwerp or transited towards Germany. That's how it works today.

Of course if we look at the 10mn t/yr hydrogen import ambition of Europe, there will be a much bigger need of ammonia imports, as ammonia is one of the major import molecules. We will need much more ammonia capacity, as well as methanol capacity.

We did a study with a coalition of several industrial partners — the hydrogen import coalition — looking at the Belgian and German markets and what needs to be done to make Belgium an import hub.

Germany will have an import demand by 2030 of around 90TWh/yr. We have the ambition to import a third of that — 30TWh. And for Belgium, we will need 10-15TWh of imports by 2030. That's a total of 45TWh/yr, or the equivalent of 1.2mn-1.5mn t hydrogen. That's roughly 6-10mn t/yr ammonia, or over 600,000m³ of open access ammonia capacity.

We've spoken to all of our tank-storage providers in the port, and in aggregate we have plans in place to meet 600,000m³ of additional open access ammonia capacity by 2030. We now need to move forward and reach financial investment decisions for several terminals. Most of them have an ambition to be on line by 2027, because the demand is there by 2030 with European targets. A lot of projects are already working on their permitting and they are having very detailed negotiations with capacity bookers, so we are moving in a very positive direction.

How has the current cost environment with increased inflation, energy and borrowing costs affected planned developments?

We talk to a lot of production projects globally and we do see that there is an increase of costs.

Borrowing money is more expensive and with inflation generally we have higher capital expenditure. The hydrogen import coalition did a recalculation of projected project costs from 3-4 years ago, and we found that costs of wind turbines, electrolysers and other included expenses meant that the total cost has escalated by 33pc. It is also harder to find EPC contractors willing to bear the risk. But we don't see any big roadblocks. Of course, there will be some filtering of those less mature and robust projects but that's normal in a maturing market.

What are the ports plans for ammonia cracking?

Most of the potential ammonia terminals want to build an ammonia cracker by 2027.

We'll have our first mid-scale cracker in Antwerp already in 2024 by Air Liquide, with scale-up planned for 2027. Advario and Fluxys are jointly developing a large scale ammonia terminal - a total of 200,000m³ combined with a cracker, to be operational by 2027. VTTI also plans to build a terminal, and we have SeaTank, Vesta and LBC who are all looking at developing ammonia capacity. Vopak has acquired new land in the port and plans to retrofit an old refinery site for new energy capacity, including ammonia. So a lot of market initiative is taking place.

Belgium's federal cabinet approved €250mn funding for a hydrogen transport network in July this year. What plans are in place for this?

The hydrogen import coalition estimates around 50pc of ammonia imports will be cracked for the hydrogen market, and 50pc will be used for ammonia uses in Belgium and Germany.

On the cracking level we need to distribute the hydrogen. The Belgian federal hydrogen strategy is supporting this with funds and with the appointment of a hydrogen network operator this year. The strategy has set forth that we will have an open access hydrogen backbone in Antwerp by 2026. Subsidies will only be applicable if the infrastructure is built by 2026, so 2026 is locked for a hydrogen network in Antwerp. Connection to Germany is planned for 2028, with extensions to the Netherlands and France by 2030.

The port of Antwerp is the fifth largest bunkering hub in the world. The port is already offering hydrogen bunkering options on a small scale. Do you have plans to facilitate any ammonia bunkering solutions?

Yes. We have a multi-fuel strategy. It sets forward that by 2025 we will make sure shipping lines that come here have the option to bunker the fuels that they want.

LNG is already possible at the port. We are working hard on both methanol and ammonia. We are working with bunkering companies, shipping lines, fuel suppliers and regulators to make sure that its possible in our port. We already get a lot of questions from shipping lines actually on the availability of ammonia and methanol.

How do you see market uptake of blue versus green ammonia?

Our position is that the long-term solution is green. But in the beginning, there won't be enough green. We will need blue in a transition period.

We have existing technology for carbon capture and storage which can drastically reduce the carbon emitted. It's a stepping stone towards green. In terms of the currently known status of the European targets, we only see a role for green. The blue market is more related to ETS emissions and reducing these.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
15/11/25

US lifts tariffs on most fertilizer imports: Update

US lifts tariffs on most fertilizer imports: Update

Adds detail on the lack of full exemption status for ammonia and recent Nola urea futures trade Houston, 14 November (Argus) — US president Donald Trump said today key nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers, among other agricultural products , are exempt from US import tariffs that were implemented in April, but ammonia's status under the tariff modification remains unclear. After just seven months in place, tariffs that have curbed imports to US shores and elevated the price of fertilizers have been lifted, according to a modification to Executive Order 14257 issued by the White House today. Fertilizers exempted from the tariffs include urea, ammonium nitrate, UAN, ammonium sulfate, TSP, DAP and MAP. Ammonia could qualify for tariff exemptions, but eligibility will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the secretary of commerce and the US Trade Representative, depending on the terms of existing or ongoing trade negotiations with each country. Potassium fertilizers like MOP were already exempt from import tariffs. The modification to the tariffs went into effect for goods imported starting 13 November. January Nola urea futures traded down roughly $30/st late Friday afternoon to $360/st fob following the announcement, but otherwise activity was largely subdued given the modifications' proximity to the weekend. Fertilizer values will likely begin to price-in the change in trade policy starting Monday. Most fertilizer exporting countries, except for Russia , faced tariff rates of 10-15pc, with some suppliers even facing up to 30pc tariffs, resulting in major shifts in fertilizer trade. Exporters have avoided the US, favoring alternative destinations for their supply. But trade flows could normalize now that fertilizers are now tariff-free. The tariffs have contributed to eroding fertilizer affordability relative to crop prices in the US this year, driving fertilizer prices to multi-year highs and significantly curbing demand for nutrients across the country. Lower cost imports could help unwind farmer reluctance to enter the market leading up to the spring season in 2026. The announcement should provide importers and distributors with some certainty headed into next spring after months of being kept on edge by shifting US trade policy. By Calder Jett and Sneha Kumar Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

US lifts tariffs on fertilizer imports


14/11/25
News
14/11/25

US lifts tariffs on fertilizer imports

Houston, 14 November (Argus) — US president Donald Trump said today key nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers, among other agricultural products, are exempt from US import tariffs that were implemented in April. After just seven months in place, tariffs that have curbed imports to US shores and elevated the price of key fertilizers have been lifted, according to a modification to Executive Order 14257 issued by the White House today. Fertilizers exempted from the tariffs include ammonia, urea, ammonium nitrate, UAN, ammonium sulfate, DAP and MAP. Potassium fertilizers like MOP were already exempt from import tariffs. The modification to the tariffs will go into effect for goods imported starting 13 November. Most fertilizer exporting countries, except for Russia , faced tariff rates of 10-15pc, with some suppliers even facing up to 30pc tariffs, resulting in major shifts in fertilizer trade. Exporters have avoided the US, favoring alternative destinations for their supply. But trade flows could normalize now that fertilizers are now tariff-free. The tariffs have contributed to eroding fertilizer affordability relative to crop prices in the US this year, driving fertilizer prices to multi-year highs and significantly curbing demand for nutrients across the country. Lower cost imports could help unwind farmer reluctance to enter the market leading up to the spring season in 2026. By Calder Jett and Sneha Kumar Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

India’s Fact opens phosrock offers in tender


14/11/25
News
14/11/25

India’s Fact opens phosrock offers in tender

London, 14 November (Argus) — Indian fertilizer producer and importer Fact received offers for Moroccan and Togolese phosphate rock at firmer prices in its latest tender, which closed on 11 November. The tender had sought offers for 44,000t of minimum 31.75pc P2O5 phosphate rock for shipment to Cochin on India's southwest coast on 15-30 December. Indagro submitted the lowest offer for Moroccan phosphate rock at 18,121 rupees/t cfr ($204/t cfr), or Rs15,622/t fob ($176/t fob). Sun International offered Togolese rock at Rs19,372/t cfr ($218/t cfr), or Rs16,693/t fob ($188/t fob). But the Togolese phosphate rock offered by Sun International contains 36pc P2O5, while Argus understands that the Moroccan rock offered by Indagro contains 31.75pc P2O5 — matching Fact's minimum requirement. This means that Sun International's offer is equivalent to around $606/t P2O5 cfr, which is lower than the equivalent for Indagro's offer of around $643/t P2O5 cfr. Indagro's offer for 31.75pc P2O5 rock at $204/t cfr is slightly above the midpoint of prices for 70BPL (32pc P2O5) rock delivered to Indian ports in the third quarter at $202/t cfr, as assessed by Argus . Sun International's offer for 36pc P2O5 rock at $218/t cfr is also up from prices for Togolese 77-79BPL (35.2-36.2pc P2O5) product delivered in the third quarter at $209-212/t cfr west coast India. By Tom Hampson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Plug Power warns pausing DOE activities risks loan


13/11/25
News
13/11/25

Plug Power warns pausing DOE activities risks loan

Houston, 13 November (Argus) — US hydrogen and electrolyzer manufacturer Plug Power warned investors that suspending activities related to its Department of Energy (DOE) loan guarantee carries a risk of losing access permanently to the low-cost federal financing. "Our decision to temporarily suspend activities related to the DOE loan could adversely affect our access to low-cast capital, delay project execution, and expose us to potential termination or modification of the DOE loan guarantee," the company said in a 10-Q form filed earlier this month with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Plug Power announced this week that it was suspending activities related to the $1.7bn loan guarantee while it considers reallocating capital away from previously announced plans. The loan facility, granted in the final days of the outgoing administration of President Joe Biden, was supposed to have financed the development of up to six green hydrogen plants in the US. However, all of those activities were put on hold after the administration of President Donald Trump paused clean energy commitments made under Biden pending further review. After months of engaging with Trump's DOE , Plug Power suspended activities related to the loan in November, including "projects previously contemplated in New York and Texas," according to the filing. Suspending activities on the projects may result in the DOE terminating the loan guarantee commitment if the agency determines Plug Power is not meeting required conditions or projected milestones, the company said. Plug Power has spent $250mn so far on the $800mn Texas project and expected to cover $400mn with the DOE loan. The company had been seeking an equity partner to make up the remainder of the cost. Since suspending the activities, Plug Power has announced a spate of deals to raise liquidity and pivot away from federal support, including joint development projects with renewable fuel producers, international electrolyzer deals, and signing away electricity rights to raise cash. Plug Power did not respond to a request from Argus for comment. By Jasmina Kelemen Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ammonia viable bunker fuel under IMO plan: Fortescue


13/11/25
News
13/11/25

Ammonia viable bunker fuel under IMO plan: Fortescue

Sydney, 13 November (Argus) — Ammonia could emerge as a cost-effective alternative to conventional bunker fuels under the International Maritime Organization's proposed carbon levy and reward system, according to Australian mining firm Fortescue. The IMO first drafted its net-zero Framework in April 2025 aiming to achieve net zero by 2050 — by penalising vessels that emit above a set emission threshold and rewarding those below the threshold for adopting low-carbon fuels. Details on the rewards and penalties have yet to be finalised after a meeting to adopt the draft amendments was stalled last month due to pressure from some member states, including the US. A new meeting has been scheduled for October next year. The industry is hopeful the IMO's net-zero framework will be adopted, as it could help offset high costs for low-carbon fuels such as green ammonia, Fortescue project manager Matthew Garland said at the Low Carbon Fuels and CCUS Summit on 5 November in Perth. Fortescue currently uses very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) in its bulk carriers transporting iron ore to China. But the use of VLSFO for marine bunkering could become more expensive if the IMO introduces penalties for its usage. These penalties are projected to raise around $11-12bn annually by 2030, which the IMO plans to redistribute as incentives for lower-emission fuels. Green ammonia, a lower-emission alternative to VLSFO, remains costly due to its lower energy density, which means ships require about 2.2 times more ammonia than VLSFO, plus a small amount of pilot fuel, Garland said. Under the IMO's proposed carbon rewards, green ammonia could receive up to A$1,000/t ($656/t) in incentives, potentially bringing it close to cost parity with VLSFO under Fortescue's cost modelling. An ammonia vessel could achieve a maximum emissions reduction of 70pc if it uses the lowest-emission green ammonia continuously, Fortescue said. The company is already testing ammonia as a marine fuel with its Green Pioneer dual-fuel vessel , which completed a voyage from the Netherlands to southern France using ammonia bunkered at Rotterdam earlier this year. Australian miner BHP and China's largest shipping company Cosco have signed a deal to charter two ammonia-dual-fuelled bulk carriers , BHP announced in July. The vessels are expected to be delivered in 2028. But these are not necessarily using the lowest-emission ammonia. Australia's current green ammonia production is negligible, as the vast majority is produced from fossil fuels. But the Australian federal Labor government awarded A$814mn in production credits under its Hydrogen Headstart programme to Murchison Green Hydrogen for its planned 900,000 t/yr green ammonia plant in Western Australia (WA) earlier this year. By Grace Dudley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more