Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Range sees 6pc gain in realized 3Q NGL pricing

  • Market: Freight, LPG, Natural gas, Petrochemicals
  • 23/10/24

Marcellus gas producer Range Resources received a 6pc higher premium versus Mont Belvieu, Texas, on its natural gas liquids (NGL) production in the third quarter owing to its access to markets in Europe and Asia.

The Fort Worth, Texas, based producer received on average $25.96/bl for its NGLs, excluding derivatives, up 6pc versus last year. That exceeded average NGL prices at Mont Belvieu, Texas, by $4.10/bl.

"Our ability to market ethane propane and butane into the international markets drove the highest NGL premium in company history, at over $4/bl over the Mont Belvieu index," said chief executive Dennis Degner.

Range reported its natural gas liquids (NGL) production rose 5pc year over year to 10.2mn bl, or 111,465 b/d, in the third quarter as its gas production rose by 4pc to 1.5 bcf/d.

Range updated its full-year guidance on its NGL pricing to Mont Belvieu plus $2.10-$2.35/bl, up from the 75¢/bl to $1.50/bl estimated in the second quarter, owing to gains in propane and butane prices at Mont Belvieu, Texas and higher spot premiums for exported cargoes out of the US. Range's average NGL estimates assumes 53pc of its production is ethane, 27pc propane, and 8pc normal butane.

Mont Belvieu, Texas, LST propane averaged 72.9¢/USG in the third quarter, higher than the average of 68.9¢/USG in the third quarter of 2023. Mont Belvieu butane prices averaged 97.25¢/USG in the third quarter, up versus 83.47¢/USG last year.

Range credited its term commitments on Energy Transfer's Mariner East system, which pipes NGLs from Range and other Marcellus producers to its export facility at Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, with its higher realized prices on NGLs, particularly propane and butane, given higher netbacks from Europe and Asia.

"International demand and pricing for NGLs remained robust in the third quarter, leading to near maximum US export capacity utilization," Degner said. "Improving Panama Canal throughput access, and a growing global fleet of LPG ships improved waterborne freight rates, and these factors combined to drive export price premiums to new levels relative to the Mont Belvieu index, and Range's portfolio of transportation and sales contracts provided reliable access to these premium markets."

Argus-assessed prices for spot propane cargoes on a fob basis rose above Mont Belvieu +30¢/USG in mid-September, a multi-year high. Degner noted higher premiums on spot cargoes are expected to remain until US Gulf coast terminals expand capacity there in late 2025.

Netback to Northwest Europe vs Mont Belvieu $/t

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
07/11/25

State AGs: Groups' recycling work 'anticompetitive'

State AGs: Groups' recycling work 'anticompetitive'

Houston, 7 November (Argus) — A multistate coalition of US state attorneys general led by Florida are accusing environmental organizations of potentially violating state and federal antitrust laws by coordinating with large US corporations to impose "anticompetitive recycling practices." In a 29 October letter sent to the US Plastics Pact, The Consumer Goods Forum, and the Green Blue Institute, Florida attorney general James Uthmeier and attorneys general from Texas, Iowa, Nebraska and Montana said that by pushing major corporations to "align on restrictive plastic production and packaging standards" the environmental organizations are taking actions that could "unlawfully restrain competition, increase costs, and limit consumer choice." The letter states that by "collectively dictating what materials are deemed ‘recyclable'" the groups have driven up prices for consumers. "Radical environmental activists do not have the right, nor the avenue, to suppress business operations in our market," Uthmeier said in a separate statement, claiming the three groups were hindering the states' economic prosperity by coordinating business behavior, which he said would violate Florida's antitrust laws. The letters ask the environmental groups to explain how their "coordinated market activities" comply with state and federal antitrust laws, providing supporting documentation. The environmental groups targeted by the AGs promote voluntary packaging standards for major retail brands, offer recyclability guidelines and design frameworks that support sustainability. The Consumer Goods Forum said it has received the letter and will cooperate fully with the attorneys general to address the questions raised. The group said its programs are voluntary, transparent, and backed by antitrust compliance measures. The US Plastics Pact said it is reviewing the letter with legal counsel and remains confident its work complies with all applicable laws. Green Blue Institute has not responded to a request for comment. By Dona Davis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

US EPA grants more waivers from biofuel quotas


07/11/25
News
07/11/25

US EPA grants more waivers from biofuel quotas

New York, 7 November (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration today granted small refiners even more exemptions from federal biofuel blend mandates, raising the stakes of a debate about whether larger oil companies should shoulder more of the burden. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granted two full exemptions from the program's annual blend requirements, halved obligations in response to 12 petitions, and denied two others. The agency requires oil refiners and importers to annually blend biofuels or buy credits from those who do, though small facilities that process 75,000 b/d or less can request program waivers that can save them tens of millions of dollars. The agency used the same methodology as its sweeping August decision , which responded to a historic backlog of petitions and granted most refiners some relief from years of mandates. New petitions poured in afterwards, including from refiners that had not requested waivers in years. And more decisions could come soon, with EPA committing Friday to "address new petitions as quickly as possible" and to try to meet a legal requirement to decide requests within 90 days. Farm and biofuel groups fear that widespread waivers curb demand for their products and have lobbied the Trump administration to follow through on a plan to make oil companies without exemptions blend more biofuels in future years to offset past exemptions for their smaller rivals. Particularly for higher-cost products like renewable diesel and biogas, any dip in demand can prompt biorefineries to slash output. The debate has intensified in recent weeks after a refiner granted generous exemptions in August announced plans to convert a renewable diesel unit back to crude. "The impact on biofuel and agriculture markets will be devastating" without compensating for these exemptions in future biofuel quotas, said Geoff Cooper, president of the ethanol lobby Renewable Fuels Association. EPA already planned on estimating future exemptions from 2026-2027 requirements when finalizing biofuel mandates those years. But the agency has added more work to its plate with a subsequent plan to force large oil refiners to compensate for either all or half of the biofuel volumes lost to actual and expected exemptions from 2023-2025 requirements. The impact of older exemptions is less significant since the credits are expired. The challenge for EPA is that small refiners can submit new or revised petitions at any time, including for years-old mandates. That makes it hard for EPA to accurately forecast future exemptions, and biofuel groups have feared that the agency could muddle the effects of its "reallocation" plan by underestimating volumes ultimately lost to program waivers. Indeed, EPA with its Friday decisions has already waived more requirements than it predicted earlier this year. The agency last forecast that exemptions from 2023 and 2024 mandates would amount to around 1.4bn Renewable Identification Number credits (RINs) of lost demand — but now, the waivers have already reduced obligations those years by 1.92bn RINs, according to program data. If EPA sticks to its plans, that means large refiners will have to blend an even greater share in future years than expected. But if the Trump administration waters down its reallocation idea, biofuel demand could sink more than previously forecast too. There is also the risk that EPA underestimates exemptions for the 2025 compliance year. EPA last forecast that exemptions from those requirements will amount to 780mn RINs of lost demand but has not yet decided any of the 12 pending petitions for that year. Many more requests are likely. Small refiners add to their winnings The August exemptions were a windfall for some oil companies. HF Sinclair, which owns multiple small refineries, last week reported $115mn from lower compliance costs as well as a $56mn indirect benefit from "commercial optimization" of its RIN credit position. And HF Sinclair won more Friday, winning full waivers from 2023 and 2024 biofuel mandates for the "east" section of a larger 125,000 b/d complex in Tulsa, Oklahoma that before September had not previously requested relief in at least three years. The company also won partial relief for two other units from 2021 mandates. Phillips 66 won four years of partial relief for its 66,000 b/d Montana facility, as did Big West Oil for its 35,000 b/d Utah plant. Silver Eagle won exemptions from 2023 blend mandates for two smaller units it owns in Wyoming and Utah. The only Friday denials were for Chevron's 45,000 b/d Utah refinery, which applied for the first time in years just last month. But the increasingly generous relief for small refiners is likely to provoke further backlash from larger oil companies, which argue that making them blend more biofuels is anticompetitive and illegal. EPA is months behind schedule on setting biofuel mandates for 2026 and 2027 and has a deadline Friday to tell a court more about how its reallocation plan affects its timeline. Biofuel groups have asked the court to force the agency to finalize program updates by year-end. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brazil’s Renovabio upheld by supreme court justice


07/11/25
News
07/11/25

Brazil’s Renovabio upheld by supreme court justice

Sao Paulo, 7 November (Argus) — Brazilian Supreme Court justice Nunes Marques has issued two votes rejecting constitutional challenges to Renovabio's biofuels program. The cases — ADI 7596, filed by the Democratic Renewal Party (PRD) in February 2024, and ADI 7617, filed by the Democratic Labour Party (PDT) in April 2024 — questioned the legality and fairness of mandatory carbon reduction targets imposed on fossil fuel distributors. In both decisions, the minister dismissed claims of discrimination and disproportion, affirming that Renovabio complies with constitutional principles such as equality, free enterprise, and environmental protection. He emphasized that the program's costs are ultimately borne by fuel consumers, not distributors, and that the policy aligns with Brazil's climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. Marques also rejected arguments that Renovabio's program was improperly designed to benefit private interests or lacked legislative legitimacy. He defended the program's structure, including the use of Cbio decarbonization credits, as a market-based mechanism to incentivize biofuels without public subsidies. With the votes now public, the Supreme Court will deliberate the merits of both cases. A majority ruling is required to confirm or overturn the constitutionality of the program. By Rebecca Gompertz Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Prices rise in French biomethane RGGO auction


06/11/25
News
06/11/25

Prices rise in French biomethane RGGO auction

London, 6 November (Argus) — The European Energy Exchange (EEX) nearly sold out of available French biomethane renewable gas guarantees of origin (RGGOs) at its November auction, with average prices reflecting those in the over-the-counter (OTC) market since the August auction. As the final auction of 2025, this completes the average 2025 auction price for French RGGO taxes. All but 1MWh of the offered 144GWh of RGGOs were sold in the 5 November auction for a weighted average price of €13.98/MWh. EEX calculated the reference price for the auction at €13.96/MWh. Prices averaged €12.18/MWh in the previous auction, when 107GWh of RGGOs traded in August. Initially, 147GWh produced in March-June was eligible to go into the auction . Three French municipalities pre-empted 2.98GWh of the volumes before the auction, up from 2.16GWh from one municipality before the August auction. Argus assessed French uncertified RGGOs for 2025 production at €13.90/MWh on 30 October. Bids for French uncertified RGGOs had been around €12.50/MWh at the time of the previous auction. Certified, ETS-eligible RGGOs did not sell at a premium to uncertified or non-ETS eligible volumes. As in previous auctions, EEX cannot transfer ownership of the Proof of Sustainability for any volumes sold, which limits their use for compliance. For volumes sold in the OTC market, Argus assessed certified, ETS-eligible French RGGOs from any feedstock at a €9.10/MWh premium to uncertified equivalent. The French government now applies a floor for declared tax levels for 75pc of the sale of RGGOs that are not used in transport. This is based on 75pc of the average reference prices from auctions the previous year to the production. The average of the EEX reference prices for the four 2025 auctions is €10.86/MWh, which would mean a floor of €8.14/MWh. Argus assessed 2026 vintage uncertified RGGOs at €16/MWh on 30 October. Only RGGOs from subsidy-supported biomethane, where the subsidy contract was signed after 9 November 2020, are auctioned on the EEX. Around 405GWh of biomethane RGGOs were auctioned in 2025. By Emma Tribe Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

No FID for Lake Charles LNG until equity selldown


05/11/25
News
05/11/25

No FID for Lake Charles LNG until equity selldown

Houston, 5 November (Argus) — Energy Transfer will not commit to a final investment decision (FID) on its proposed 16.5mn t/yr (2.2bn ft³/d) Lake Charles LNG export facility in Louisiana until it has sold off 80pc of equity stakes in the project, co-chief executive Mackie McCrea told investors today. The project currently is fully owned by Energy Transfer, casting doubt on the company's plan to reach FID by the end of the year. Investor MidOcean Energy signed a preliminary agreement in April to fund 30pc of the project's construction costs in exchange for 30pc of offtake, or about 5mn t/yr, but the two sides have yet to finalize the deal. Nearly all of the project's offtake is contracted, with 11.9mn t/yr set aside to binding agreements. But the "last, big, most important box" is adding equity partners, McCrea said. McCrea said "we've got our work cut out for us" to sell down equity stakes before needing to reset the terms of its engineering, construction and procurement contract with contractors Technip Energies and KBR. "Let me make this real clear: We will not proceed with LNG until we have secured 80pc of equity partners similar to ourselves," McCrea said. The midstream firm has sought for years to convert the existing Lake Charles import facility into an export terminal. Shell signed on with a 50pc stake in 2019 but pulled out the following year as part of cost-cutting measures during the Covid-19 pandemic. Energy Transfer also has extensive assets in crude oil and NGL infrastructure. "When you're chasing billions of dollars in projects, several of which we've already announced, we've got to be careful stepping out on something like this," McCrea said. "We're not an LNG company like we compete with. We're a pipeline company that has a regas facility converting part of it to LNG." Lake Charles LNG, located in southwest Louisiana, is fully permitted by US federal regulators through 2031 after receiving extensions from the US Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission earlier this year. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more