Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Freight nadir disrupts LNG pricing structures

  • Market: Freight, Natural gas
  • 20/11/24

Prompt spot charter rates for LNG carriers have bucked the usual seasonal trend and reached record lows in recent weeks — limiting the scope for price signals to direct or redirect LNG flows, and help balance the global market.

The recent weakness in prompt charter market values has been focused in the Atlantic basin. This stands in contrast with the Novembers of previous years, when the Atlantic has mostly kept at a premium to the Pacific because of European floating storage.

The ARV2 prompt rate for US-northwest Europe by tri-fuel diesel-electric (TFDE) carriers was already approaching its record low — set in March 2021 — in the first half of October, passing it later in the month and staying lower. But while the ARV1 prompt rate for Australia-northeast Asia by TFDE carriers had held a sizeable premium to the ARV2 rate, recent falls in the Pacific rate pushed it below its record low — also set in March 2021 — on 15 November, probably partly as some vessels were repositioned to the Pacific from the Atlantic.

Sublet market

The weak LNG freight market mainly reflects the quick pace of newbuild vessel deliveries in recent months and weak demand for loadings from liquefaction capacity additions. It also reflects minimal incentive for floating storage or inter-basin sailing — at least for those companies not sat on surplus shipping. Around 60 new LNG carriers are due on the water this year, nearly double 2023's 31 deliveries. And the pace of new deliveries will quicken next year, when 91 are scheduled to be delivered.

But record low rates and, perhaps more importantly, the fact they are holding there for a sustained period, also reflects a structural shift in LNG freight supply in recent years, which was papered over by a run of strong fourth quarters in 2021-23, and which severely limits the market's ability to react to price signals. Atlantic prompt rates had risen above $250,000/d by January 2021, with exceptionally low vessel availability leaving some firms unable to deliver US cargoes to Asia over Europe, despite a substantial premium for Pacific deliveries. At points that winter, participants reported no open vessels in the entire market.

While already moving in this direction at the end of the last decade, winter LNG freight in the past few years has had few TFDE or two-stroke vessels — and for substantial periods, none — offered for prompt spot charters by shipowners themselves within the season. Instead, nearly all vessel supply has taken the form of charterers seeking to sublet carriers they have previously secured for fixed terms — be it for short or long periods.

This has stemmed, in no small part, from record high rates during the fourth quarter of recent years leading to a flurry of term chartering ahead of winter. Most firms have preferred the risk of a shipping surplus than the risk of a shortage, after a tight freight market in the middle of winter 2020-21 left some firms having to cancel loadings because they could not find vessels to deliver them.

Term chartering was slower this summer than in recent years, and yet almost no owners were left with open vessels ahead of winter, according to market participants. This means carriers offered for subletting are poised to make up the vast bulk of supply in the winter spot charter market — even before charterers piled into the market just before the end of the summer, racing to find carriers as the floating storage incentive failed to emerge and the inter-basin arbitrage closed. And the vast majority of carriers coming on to the water in the latter half of this year are already tied to term charters, with few speculative newbuild orders likely to deliver in the next couple of years.

Owners holding open shipping in such a weak market would have been better able to remove vessels from the market when rates fell below their operational costs — deemed by some market participants to a little over $20,000/d, at least for TFDE carriers — effectively acting as a supply-side response to price signals. But this is not an option available to charterers holding surplus ships, with the exception of carriers taken on bareboat charters, pushing them to seek employment at rates below this threshold.

For the many firms sat on spare shipping that they initially hoped they could use themselves or sublet in a stronger market, this has taken the form of actual charters or — more commonly — finding employment within their portfolios, such as aggressively competing for fob cargoes or undertaking inter-basin deliveries, even when the spot arbitrage has been closed.

New shipping economics

Asian LNG markets had continued to command a premium to Europe, although it was insufficient to cover the additional shipping costs — based on spot charter rates — for delivery of US cargoes to Asia rather than Europe, assuming spot deliveries around the Cape of Good Hope route.

But for firms sitting on surplus carriers that they are unable to sublet even close to their term charters on the vessels, or sublet at all, there has remained an incentive to continue delivering US LNG to Asia to recoup at least some of their freight costs so long as the additional boil-off and return fuel costs are covered.

Together with the inter-basin arbitrage being open for much of the past summer, during which some fourth-quarter US cargoes would have been marketed and then sold into Asia, firms with shipping they deem a sunk cost continuing to deliver to Asia have bolstered inter-basin flows.

In turn, this has weighed on European receipts, even when the arbitrage has been closed on strong European demand and comparatively weak Asian interest in more purchases, leaving Europe to bid higher and higher relative to Asia as price signals have failed to result in a sufficient redirection of flows to Europe and balance fundamentals between the two basins.

European prices in recent days have instead had to inch closer to prices on Asia-Pacific markets — so those markets' premium is not sufficient to even cover the additional boil-off and return fuel costs — and European values even turned to a premium over Asia last week. This eventually spurred a large number of diversions of laden carriers to Europe through mid-November, which has helped to balance out global supply. Almost 10 carriers laden with LNG from the US or west Africa have been diverted away from routes towards Asia in recent days, and were sailing for European delivery, although it remains to be seen how long lived this change in flows might be, given that European prices softened against Asian values in recent days.

Forward rates for fixtures throughout this winter remain close to prompt rates' nadir, and even more ships could come to the spot charter market as more US LNG flows to Europe instead of Asia. This suggests that Europe's need to compete at almost price-parity with Asia — rather than just hold at enough of a discount so that the additional spot freight costs are not covered — to keep enough LNG flowing in its direction may remain, at least in the short-term.

But beyond next quarter, together with expected LNG supply increases in the US, carriers tied to short-term winter charters are due to come off-charter as the season draws to a close. And if rates do remain at such lows, owners taking back these ships will eventually be faced with a decision on whether to seek new fixtures or take them into short-term lay-up.

LNG carrier deliveries (no. of carriers)

ARV charter rates 2019-24

ARV freight rates vs 3-yr avg

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
16/07/25

US refiners lobby to revive expired biofuel credits

US refiners lobby to revive expired biofuel credits

New York, 16 July (Argus) — A group of small oil refiners asked US officials at a recent meeting to not just grant exemptions from years-old biofuel blend mandates but to also provide lucrative program credits they can sell to other companies. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed record-high biofuel blend mandates for the next two years, but farm groups fear that a backlog of exemption requests threaten those targets. There are more than 180 unresolved exemption requests stretching over 10 years after courts struck down various denials during former-president Joe Biden's term. Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, oil refiners and importers must annually blend biofuels or buy Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits from those that do. But refiners that process 75,000 b/d or less of crude and can prove "disproportionate economic hardship" are able to request full exemptions which can mean tens of millions of dollars in reduced compliance costs. In a 20 May meeting with EPA officials, a coalition of small refiners made the case that President Donald Trump's administration should not just grant broad relief from 2019-2022 mandates but also issue "replacement RINs" for any refiners that already complied. EPA should issue these RINs "with adequate lead time" before compliance deadlines and ensure they have "adequate shelf life", according to a proposal shared with EPA by a coalition lawyer and obtained by Argus through a Freedom of Information Act request. The agency should even consider giving companies more credits than they submitted if RINs are cheaper now, the group argued. RINs from those years are otherwise expired and would be useless if returned as is. "Hardship relief is more critical now than ever", the group of 14 companies argues, given rising biofuel quotas. The issue is politically tricky for EPA, since widespread waivers threaten biofuel and crop demand, and has been the subject of numerous court fights over the years. The first Trump administration handed out exemptions generously , but current officials have not yet staked out a clear position. EPA told Argus it is taking steps "to reduce the backlog as soon as possible". Living RIN the past EPA could potentially return credits on a staggered timeline or impose conditions on their use to avert market turmoil, according to lawyers and lobbyists experienced in waiver issues. The proposal alludes to this, noting however that "any conditions on RIN return that are intended to address potential market reactions must strike the appropriate balance to ensure flexibility to small refineries". Biofuel groups have lobbied against retroactive waivers but said that EPA could minimize the damage by making other oil companies blend more biofuels. The agency should ensure that any exemptions "will be made up in the market", said Emily Skor, president of ethanol lobby Growth Energy, at a hearing last week. But the refiners' proposal argues that EPA is not required to do so if it grants exemptions retroactively. The agency has estimated future exemptions when calculating the percentage of biofuels individual refiners must blend — frustrating large producers that then shoulder more of the burden of meeting high-level targets — but doing the same with past-year waivers is more legally risky. The small refiners float a less aggressive approach for other compliance years. The proposal notably makes no reference to petitions for relief from 2016-2018 quotas. EPA under Biden rejected 31 petitions for those years but did not require companies to surrender additional RINs, potentially making any push for extra relief a tougher sell despite courts' skepticism of the underlying denials. And for 2023 and beyond, the refiners say that EPA should rely on "merit-driven scoring". EPA already consults with the Department of Energy, which scores hardship for individual applicants, though the importance of this feedback has varied over the program's history. The coalition also wants EPA to rescind three 2023 compliance year denials issued during the final days of Biden's term, which affected two Calumet refineries and one CVR Energy refinery. RINto the future The coalition's proposal is notable since small refiners — apart from a handful recently calling for a "seat at the table" — have largely not publicized their asks of the Trump administration, leading traders to speculate wildly on policy shifts. RIN prices have been volatile as a result. The coalition includes 14 companies that submitted 41 petitions that courts have told EPA to reconsider as well as 37 requests for more recent years, the proposal says. They are represented by independent attorney Claudia O'Brien, who did not respond to a request for comment. The documents obtained by Argus do not list all companies involved in the effort, but lawyers for Calumet, Par Pacific and Placid Refining were scheduled to attend the May meeting in person with top EPA appointees Aaron Szabo and Alexander Dominguez, while others attended virtually. O'Brien said in a separate email that Hunt Refining, REH Company, and Ergon were part of the coalition. The policy requests represent the position of one group and not necessarily all 34 refineries EPA estimates are eligible for future waivers. It is not clear how officials responded at the meeting or what options they are weighing now. EPA wants to finalize new blend mandates before November and has said it plans to communicate its approach to exemptions beforehand. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Trump touts $92bn in investments in AI, energy


15/07/25
News
15/07/25

Trump touts $92bn in investments in AI, energy

Washington, 15 July (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today his administration would fast-track permitting and take other steps to support billions of dollars in recently announced investments in Pennsylvania tied to artificial intelligence and energy production. Trump said an estimated $92bn in investments announced Tuesday would ensure the future will be "designed, built and made right here in Pennsylvania." The investments include data centers to support artificial intelligence, gas-fired power plants, nuclear power plants, pipeline upgrades, and natural gas supply agreements, although many of the projects announced appear to be early in development. "We're building a future where American workers will forge the steel, produce the energy, build the factories," Trump said at the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon University. Among the projects are plans to invest billions of dollars on the redevelopment of retired coal plants into sites that would host new gas-fired plants that would be co-located with data centers. Technology firms hope that developing data centers next to power plants will sidestep the years-long wait that would be required to upgrade the grid to supply their facilities with electricity. "You're going to build your own electric factory, and you're gonna make your own electricity," Trump said. "You can sell it back into the grid, you'll even make money from the electric business." Those projects include a plan by the firm Frontier Group to develop the site of the retired 2.7GW Bruce Mansfield coal plant into a "significantly larger" gas plant that would also host a "prospective" data center. Investment firm Knighthead Capital Management said it plans to repurpose the retired Homer City coal-fired power plant into a data center that will include 4.4GW in gas-fired power generation. Other projects will upgrade existing power plants. The firm Capital Power said it will spend $3bn over the next decade to expand a gas plant in Shamokin Dam, Pennsylvania. Google said it has reached a $3bn agreement for electricity from two hydropower facilities in Pennsylvania. Constellation Energy said it was investing $2.4bn to upgrade its Limerick nuclear power plant. Trump said he was directing his administration to issue permits quickly for power plants proposed to supply electricity for data centers, with an apparent joke that the world's largest power plant would obtain environmental permits in "about a week" and about two weeks for nuclear plants. "These are permits that would have taken you literally 10 years to get," Trump said. "It's crazy all over the country, but we're freeing it up." The Trump administration has argued that making the US the leader in AI is one of its highest priorities. US interior secretary Doug Burgum said the administration determined early on that "losing the AI arms race" to China would be an "existential threat" such that it justified a declaration of an "energy emergency" to increase domestic energy production. "Energy dominance means prosperity at home, it means peace abroad, it's how we end wars, it's how we build and advance every industry we have," Burgum said. The administration has cited its support for AI to justify slowing the development of wind and solar projects they see as incompatible with the industry's demand for baseload power. Trump said wind "doesn't work" for data centers, and Burgum said he was "completely opposed to having unreliable, unaffordable intermittent energy as our future." Other administration officials have touted efforts to build more fossil fuel infrastructure. "This administration, we're going to make it much, much easier to build new power plants, new infrastructure, even transmission lines, natural gas pipelines," US energy secretary Chris Wright said during an interview with CNBC on the sidelines of the summit. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump to limit US weapon use by Ukraine


15/07/25
News
15/07/25

Trump to limit US weapon use by Ukraine

Washington, 15 July (Argus) — President Donald Trump's change of position on continued US weapons supply to Ukraine has revived a dilemma his predecessor had to consider: whether to place limits on Kyiv's ability to carry out strikes deep inside Russia's territory. Trump on Monday approved a plan to continue supplying US weapons to Ukraine, which will be financed by contributions from the EU and other NATO members. But he told reporters Tuesday that he is not considering providing long-range missiles to Ukraine and said that Kyiv "shouldn't target Moscow" with US weapons. The range of western-supplied missiles is well short of the distance from the Ukraine-Russia border to Moscow. Former president Joe Biden's administration last year gave authorization to Kyiv to use western weapons against targets in Russian regions bordering northeast Ukraine and against military targets beyond the Russian-Ukrainian border. Other NATO members also have removed most restrictions on use of their weapons. The Biden administration warned Kyiv against attacks on Russian energy infrastructure. But Ukraine used its own military drones to target Russia's sprawling oil infrastructure last year, causing some disruptions but barely affecting the exports of Russian crude and refined products. Few such attacks have taken place this year, but Washington-based experts attribute that to a change in Ukrainian military tactics, which now target air fields, weapons depots and command centers instead of Russian energy infrastructure. Trump on Monday said he would impose "secondary tariffs" on Russia — meaning penalties for countries buying Russian oil and other products — unless Moscow takes steps in the next 50 days to stop its war in Ukraine. "At the end of 50 days, if we don't have a deal, it's going to be too bad," Trump said Tuesday. "The tariffs are going to go on and other sanctions." The Kremlin has had a restrained reaction to Trump's threat, saying "we certainly need time to analyze what was said in Washington" and advising to wait for President Vladimir Putin to respond directly. "We want to understand what the statement about '50 days' means," Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday. "We previously heard of '24 hours' and '100 days'", Lavrov said, likely referencing Trump's vow to stop the fighting in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office, subsequently amended by the White House to a pledge to stop the war in Ukraine within 100 days into his second term. The White House on 25 March announced that Moscow and Kyiv had agreed to implement the "energy ceasefire", but the Kremlin immediately attached new conditions to the agreement and continued attacks on civilian energy infrastructure in Ukraine. Trump in late March promised to impose a 25pc "secondary tariff" on Russian oil sales if the energy ceasefire deal failed. On 27 May, he gave Putin a two week deadline to make progress in peace talks with Ukraine. The Trump administration so far has refrained from imposing additional sanctions against Moscow and even exempted Russia from punitive tariffs imposed on nearly every US trading partner in April. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US claims energy-focused Indonesia trade deal


15/07/25
News
15/07/25

US claims energy-focused Indonesia trade deal

Washington, 15 July (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today he has secured a trade deal with Indonesia that would involve additional sales of US energy and agricultural commodities and Boeing aircraft. The deal, which Jakarta has yet to confirm, would commit Indonesia to buying $15bn worth of US energy commodities, $4.5bn of agricultural products and 50 Boeing aircraft, Trump said via his social media platform. Speaking to reporters earlier on Tuesday, Trump said the US, under the deal, would impose a 19pc tariff on all imports from Indonesia while that country would impose no tariffs on US products. Trump said he finalized the trade deal after speaking with Indonesia's "Highly Respected President" Prabowo Subianto Tuesday morning. Prabowo has just concluded a trade deal with the EU, which would result in mutual lowering of tariffs on trade. No other details on the US-Indonesia deal were immediately available from the White House and US trade agencies. Trump last week threatened to impose a 32pc tariff on all imports from Indonesia, beginning on 1 August. Indonesia's government has already directed state-owned Pertamina to assess the potential for importing refined products from the US. That directive coincided with a parallel push by Pertamina to shift away from importing oil products from Singapore and import more fuel from the Middle East and the US. The Trump administration since 5 April has been charging a 10pc extra "Liberation Day" tariff on most imports — energy commodities and critical minerals are exceptions — from Indonesia and nearly every foreign trade partner. Trump last week publicized letters sent to leaders of 24 countries, including Indonesia, dictating new, higher tariff rates he said would apply beginning on 1 August. The Trump White House said in April it expected to sign "90 deals in 90 days" following his "Liberation Day" tariffs. The US has clinched only one limited trade deal, which keeps in place a 10pc tariff on US imports from the UK while granting a lower-tariff import quota for UK-made cars. Trump has announced a deal with Vietnam, setting tariffs at 20pc, but other terms remain unknown. A preliminary trade deal with China, agreed in early May, established a separate 10 August deadline for reaching an agreement on tariffs. The US administration is engaged in talks with the EU, Canada and Mexico despite Trump's threats to raise tariffs on imports from those destinations to 30-35pc. Brazil, on the other hand, said it would reciprocate with higher tariffs on US products after Trump threatened to impose a 50pc tariff on imports from Brazil. Trump has justified imposing his "Liberation Day" tariffs by citing an economic emergency caused by allegedly unfair trade practices in foreign countries. His emergency-based tariff authority is facing challenges in US courts, with two lower-level courts ruling already in May that the White House could not impose such tariffs. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold a hearing on 31 July in a case pitting the administration against a group of plaintiffs, including many US states. The US Court of International Trade, in an initial ruling on 28 May, found that Trump's emergency tariffs were unlawful and ordered the administration to rescind the import taxes and to refund already collected duties. The appeals court has suspended that decision until at least the 31 July hearing. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Alt-fuel ship orders fall in 1H25: DNV


15/07/25
News
15/07/25

Alt-fuel ship orders fall in 1H25: DNV

Sao Paulo, 15 July (Argus) — Ship orders for new alternative-fuelled vessels fell to 151 in the first half of 2025 compared with 179 a year earlier, according to Norway-based classification agency DNV. These orders represented 19.8mn gross tonnes, up by 78pc from the same period in 2024. LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for 87 of the new orders in the first half, followed by 40 methanol-fuelled ships, 17 LPG-powered vessels, and four hydrogen and three ammonia-fuelled ships. Orders stood at 19 in June, up from 16 in May, with two of these LPG-fuelled carriers. The total fleet of ships that could run on LPG stood at just over 150 in the final quarter of last year , with around 126 on order by 2028 following the latest additions, as orders lag other fuel types despite low prices because of safety issues and a lack of four-stroke engines. New orders, 1H 2025 Fuel Number of vessels LNG-fueled 87 Methanol-fueled 40 LPG-fueled 17 Hydrogen-fueled 4 Ammonia-fueled 3 DNV Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more