Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Trump’s LNG plans could shape Mexico’s gas ambitions

  • Market: Natural gas
  • 27/12/24

US president-elect Donald Trump's pledge to lift the pause on LNG export permits to non-free trade agreement (non-FTA) countries could reshape Mexico's LNG ambitions and its role in global gas trade.

Trump, set to take office on 20 January, has vowed to reverse a decision by President Joe Biden's administration in January 2024 to halt LNG export permits pending a study on their environmental and economic impacts.

This decision directly affects all seven LNG export terminals planned on Mexico's west coast, which together represent nearly 60 million tonnes (t)/year of projected export capacity. These projects rely on permits to sell LNG to non-FTA nations, making them pivotal in positioning the US and Mexico — bolstered by prolific gas production from the Permian Basin — as a top global LNG player.

Yet, even with permitting renewed under Trump, domestic US politics could pose risks to Mexico's LNG projects.

"The US has a fundamental interest in accelerating west coast Mexican LNG development," said Joe Webster, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center. "Constructing LNG terminals in this region would address the Permian Basin's increasingly ‘gassy' gas/oil ratio while strengthening energy ties with the Indo-Pacific."

But not everyone agrees. Another market source told Argus that Trump's recent rhetoric about regaining control of the Panama Canal suggests his government may favor US-based LNG facilities over Mexican projects. Additionally, the Republican-led Congress could complicate matters. In October, Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan proposed legislation to restrict gas exports to "corrupt governments," explicitly including Mexico. With Republicans controlling both chambers, such measures could gain traction if Trump backs them to further his broader agenda.

Trump's priorities lie in migration, security and inward investment, said Duncan Wood, president of the Pacific Council on International Policy. Trump is likely to leverage US-Mexico energy relations, including unresolved US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement disputes, to pursue these goals.

Permit deadlines loom

Four of Mexico's seven Pacific LNG projects already hold non-FTA permits, including Alliance LNG's Amigo project in Guaymas; Sempra's ECA Phase 2, Ensenada; Mexico Pacific's Saguaro Energia LNG Phases 1 and 2, Puerto Libertad; and Vista Pacifico, Topolobampo; a joint venture between Sempra, TotalEnergies, and CFEnergia. These permits have expiration dates requiring the projects to begin operations or apply for extensions.

Alliance and Vista Pacifico hold permits valid until 2027 and 2029, respectively, but Saguaro's permit expires in December 2025, and ECA Phase 2 must begin by March 2026. Without final investment decisions, these projects risk missing their deadlines, even with Trump's Department of Energy (DOE) potentially easing extensions.

The permitting pause in 2024 may have already delayed timelines and hurt investor confidence. Whether Trump's reversal mitigates this damage remains to be seen.

Meanwhile, the Biden administration's recent study on LNG permitting warns that unchecked approvals could increase global greenhouse gas emissions and raise domestic natural gas prices. While this study may carry little weight under Trump, it could entrench anti-LNG sentiment among Democrats. Still, as US LNG exports are expected to double by 2028, Democrats with national ambitions may adopt a more pragmatic stance, Webster said.

Trump also inherits a new dynamic with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Initial interactions between the two have been cordial but tense. "Mexico's stance on US LNG exports remains unclear," Webster said. While Sheinbaum aligns with environmental movements, her pragmatic streak may lead her to use LNG projects as leverage in negotiations with Trump.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
24/06/25

Cheaper power key to reach UK’s climate targets

Cheaper power key to reach UK’s climate targets

Edinburgh, 24 June (Argus) — The UK's climate plan credibility has improved slightly but no progress has been made to make electricity cheaper, which is key to hit the country's emissions targets, independent advisory body Climate Change Committee (CCC) said in its progress report. The report assesses the UK's progress towards its net zero goals under the current government, which took power in July 2024. The CCC found the UK's 2050 target remains reachable but climate action needs to accelerate, even though policies to cut greenhouse gas emissions have improved. Only half of the 16 key indicators assessed by the CCC, with a relevant benchmark or target, are on track — including offshore and onshore wind operational capacity, sustainable aviation fuel, electric vehicle (EV) charging points and distances travelled by car. EV car sales, heat pump installations, woodland creation and peatland restoration are "slightly off track", while the ratio of electricity to gas prices for households and industries is "significantly off track", the CCC said. The committee noted no progress has been made on actions to lower the cost of power. The government is planning to consult on this "in due course", but CCC urged for actions and timelines. The CCC has identified "ten priority actions" for the year ahead, with cutting the cost of electricity for households and businesses again at the top. Cheaper power will support industrial electrification and "speed up the uptake of clean electric technologies, such as heat pumps and electric vehicles," the CCC said. The transition to renewables will eventually reduce the country's reliance on volatile wholesale gas prices, which are the main driver of electricity prices, it said. "But the government can take immediate action to accelerate this by moving policy costs associated with past schemes, and those that are not directly related to the cost of electricity generation, off electricity bills," the CCC said. Removing electricity policy costs — levied on the unit price of electricity at 20 times the rate of gas — would reduce annual electricity bills by £190 ($258) for a typical household with a gas boiler and by £490 for a typical household with a heat pump, CCC found. "This would bring UK prices into the range of other countries who are ahead on heat pump roll-out," it said. The CCC report assessed policy development from July 2024 to 23 May 2025, so does not take into account policies announced in the recent spending review nor the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme intended to reduce electricity costs by up to £40/MWh for more than 7,000 electricity-intensive businesses. UK emissions reached 413.7mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) in 2024, including its share of international aviation and shipping, down by 50pc from 1990 and by 2.5pc from 2023, according to the CCC. The year-on-year reductions come mainly from the electricity supply — declining gas generation — and the industry sector. The government will increasingly need to focus on transport, building, agriculture and aviation to reach its emission reduction targets, the CCC said. The report points to encouraging trends in EVs and in heat pump installations, which grew by 56pc on the year, and in woodland creations, but it reiterated action on these fronts must accelerate. Although much of the progress stems from policies set by previous government, the CCC said "bold policies" introduced this year are promising, such as removing planning barriers on renewable deployment and the reinstatement of the 2030 phase-out date for gasoline and diesel vehicles. The market share of new EVs increased on the year in 2024, by nearly 20pc. But CCC noted aviation sector emissions are increasing. The share of sustainable aviation fuel increased to 2.1pc last year from 0.7pc in 2023, but a lot more is required to reach the 10pc SAF mandate by 2030. By Caroline Varin Distribution of past emissions reductions and future emissions savings by sector.pdf Distribution of past emissions reductions and future emissions savings by sector Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Iran fires missiles at US military base in Qatar


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Iran fires missiles at US military base in Qatar

London, 23 June (Argus) — Iran today fired missiles at a US base in Qatar in retaliation for the weekend attack on its nuclear facilities. The Iranian military said the US' Al-Udeid base was its target. The Qatari government said it intercepted the missiles and there were no deaths or injuries. Tensions in the region have been stretched since the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities at the weekend. US president Donald Trump today again expressed a desire for regime change in Tehran, which in turn said US military interests were now legitimate targets. Earlier, Qatar closed its airspace and the US and UK embassies there issued safety warnings to their citizens, suggesting this Iranian attack was flagged and expected. The price of Ice Brent crude fell by as much as 4.5pc in the wake of the Iranian attack to an intraday low of $72.48/bl, having hit a five-month high of $81.40/bl earlier in the day. The Iranian move echoes its attacks on US military targets in Iraq after the US' killing of senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in January 2020. Perhaps mindful of this, foreign firms operating in Iraq today started removing some employees from the country. Regional airlines began cancelling and rerouting flights across the Middle East, with flight tracking showing almost no flights in the air above the Mideast Gulf. By Ben Winkley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump again brings up regime change in Iran


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Trump again brings up regime change in Iran

Washington, 23 June (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is trying to articulate what it ultimately aims to achieve in Iran, after directly involving the US in the Israel-Iran war over the weekend. Senior administration officials took to the TV news shows on Sunday to assert that Washington is not trying to topple the government in Iran. They claimed that the US bombing raids, in the early hours of Sunday Tehran time, caused irreparable damage to Iran's nuclear program. And they suggested that the US will not carry out additional air strikes unless Iran retaliates against US interests in the region or targets vessel traffic in the strait of Hormuz. But Trump then contradicted his own administration's message by posting on his social media platform: "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Iran has responded with tough rhetoric to the US air strikes but did not hit back at US interests across the region, even though Iran and Israel continued to exchange missile attacks. Tehran said today that US airstrikes have expanded the range of legitimate military targets for its armed forces, while a senior Iranian lawmaker said the parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed". The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through on that rhetoric. In the past, Tehran has targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Crude oil futures, which in the run-up to the US attack already reflected risk premiums associated with potential disruption to oil flows from the Mideast Gulf, rose in early trading in Asia today but eased later in the day. Trump, who has frequently touted declines in oil prices during his second administration, posted today: "EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!" He then posted, "To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!" The Energy Department cannot mandate how much crude US oil companies produce, but it does control the US emergency oil stocks. Uncertainty ahead The Pentagon has been more restrained than Trump and his national security advisers in providing an assessment of the air strikes. Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, general Dan Caine said on Sunday that initial assessments indicated that Iran's nuclear facilities suffered "extremely severe damage and destruction" but noted that it was too early to say whether Iran maintains any nuclear capability. Trump by contrast posted about "monumental damage" and asserted that "obliteration is an accurate term" in reference to Iran's nuclear sites. "Sometimes we have a tendency to think that a military solution can insert some certainty into a situation," said retired general Joe Votel, who commanded Middle East-based US forces in 2016-19. "But I think what we're seeing here is that there still is a significant amount of uncertainty about what is going to take place." It will take time to accurately assess the impact of US air strikes on Iran's nuclear program, Votel said today during a discussion hosted by think tank the Middle East Institute. The UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said on 22 June that no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US strikes. The eventual shape of Iran's response is a further cause of uncertainty, Votel said. "Do they have a surprise for us, if they held something in reserve that we're going to see revealed here?" An Iranian counter-attack aimed at the US would invite more US strikes. But if Iran's response proves muted or non-existent, "will we be going back?," he asked. "And then, how does all this conclude?" The US embassy in Qatar today issued a "shelter in place" warning to US citizens in the country, which hosts the largest US air force base in the region. The US embassy did not cite a specific threat, noting that the warning was out of an "abundance of caution". The UK embassy issued a similar warning to British citizens. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Subsidised bio-LNG deemed eligible under FuelEU


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Subsidised bio-LNG deemed eligible under FuelEU

London, 23 June (Argus) — Subsidised bio-LNG and other types of alternative fuels are deemed eligible under FuelEU Maritime Regulation, according to sources with knowledge of the matter. FuelEU allows emissions reductions supported under other legal frameworks, such as the support schemes under RED, in order to encourage greater investment in less carbon-intensive marine fuels. Under Directive (EU) 2018/2001 (RED), the greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions are counted towards member states' targets, while under FuelEU the targets are set to shipping companies. Excluding subsidised marine fuels may otherwise lead to competitive disadvantages for smaller sectors, such as European biomethane. The European Commission has not yet issued an official statement. Demand for bio-LNG has risen sharply this year with the start of FuelEU Maritime in January, requiring ship-owners to reduce their GHG emissions by 2pc in 2025, with targets steadily rising to 80pc in 2050. Subsidised, bunker dob bio-LNG in Northwest Europe was last assessed at €78.09/MWh ($89.55/MWh) on Thursday, while its unsubsidised counterpart was assessed at €93.59/MWh. By Madeleine Jenkins Bio-LNG vs Gas Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes

Dubai, 23 June (Argus) — A senior Iranian lawmaker says parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed" in response to US airstrikes on three nuclear sites early Sunday — a move that would severely disrupt global oil flows. Esmaeil Kowsari — a member of the national security and foreign policy commission, and a former high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — told state-owned Press TV that lawmakers had reached a consensus that closure would be the appropriate response. Argus understands that while members of parliament were all in agreement, the issue was not formally put to a vote. Kowsari said the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security body. His comments have drawn global attention as markets await Iran's response to the strikes, which US president Donald Trump ordered against nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The Fordow site is heavily fortified and located underground. The Natanz facility had already been targeted by Israeli strikes, prompting a series of retaliatory missile and drone exchanges between Iran and Israel. Iranian officials, including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had repeatedly warned Washington that any direct military action would trigger a response causing "irreparable" harm to the US. . Variety of options The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through. It has, however, previously targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Closure of the strait is one of several retaliatory options regularly floated by Iranian political and military leaders. Others include military strikes on US bases across the Mideast Gulf. The US maintains installations in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Asked whether closing the strait was under consideration, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi declined to confirm, saying only that "there are a variety of options available to us". Araqchi travelled to Moscow late on Sunday and is expected to meet Russian president Vladimir Putin on Monday. Moscow has condemned the US strikes. Ali Akbar Velayati, a long-time adviser to Khamenei, also issued a veiled threat to Washington, saying: "West Asia is not Greenland, and the strait of Hormuz is fundamentally different from the Panama Canal." The comment referenced earlier threats by Trump to assert US control over Greenland and the Panama Canal during the early days of his second term. US secretary of state Marco Rubio warned that any attempt by Iran to close the strait would be "a terrible mistake." "It's economic suicide for them if they do it, and we retain options to deal with that," he said. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more