Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

German election impacts on energy and mobility sectors

  • Market: Oil products
  • 17/02/25

Germany heads to the polls on 23 February, with its political parties divided over how to revive the country's struggling economy and shape climate policy in the face of continued concern over high energy costs.

How the next government's policies are shaped could significantly impact regional energy markets and Germany's role as a key player in the European economy over the next four years. But most parties appear in agreement over maintaining the outgoing government's stance on Russian gas.

Opinion polls suggest that support for the conservative CDU/CSU party has cooled in recent months, but it is still expected to be tasked with forming the next government. It is all but impossible for one party to win an absolute majority in the German parliament, so parties typically have to form a coalition. Support for the far-right AfD has grown in recent months, but the party still trails by some distance in second place. The CDU/CSU says it will not form a coalition with the AfD, so barring a dramatic surge in support for the latter in the final days of campaigning, a CDU-led coalition — possibly including the Social Democrats (SPD) and Greens — is likely to be in charge by the end of the month.

The AfD's stance on energy and climate change is largely at odds with most other parties, but the CDU/CSU, SPD and Greens have some common ground. They all acknowledge the Paris climate agreement and EU Green Deal and seek to adhere to emissions reduction mandates, and they all plan to extend the scope of the EU emissions trading system (ETS).

The three parties' manifestos chime on a need to reduce energy prices — which are widely seen as a key factor in the downturn in German industrial output — while transitioning to cleaner forms of transport and prioritising climate protection. But the parties diverge on how best to achieve these goals.

Many energy-intensive industries in Germany have struggled with high gas prices since Russia embarked on its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The three parties all say they will bring down energy prices by adjusting taxes and subsidies, and increasing power generation. The parties aim to cut network fees and electricity taxes as much as possible within the EU, and the SPD and Greens plan to encourage the European Commission to compensate energy-intensive industries for high power prices.

The three all agree that further expanding renewable energy is the best way to reduce energy prices but, unlike the SPD and Greens, the CDU/CSU is unwilling to close coal-fired power plants until they are replaced, and it wants to assess whether it is technically and financially feasible to reactivate mothballed nuclear power plants. The AfD wants to expand coal-fired and nuclear generation and halt the expansion of solar and wind.

Gas goals

The CDU/CSU, SPD and Greens all support replacing fossil gas with hydrogen in power generation and manufacturing in the near future. How soon that can happen is up in the air. Industrial groups have cited hydrogen's high costs and constantly changing legal framework as barriers to its expansion, calling for the simplification of national and EU hydrogen legislation, the continuation of subsidies for domestic production, and more consumer incentives to substitute natural gas. But the CDU/CSU also wants to reverse the gas boiler ban introduced by the outgoing government, which mandated that new buildings install heating systems using at least 65pc renewable energy from January 2024. Instead, it proposes subsidising low-emission heating solutions — regardless of the technology on which they are based.

If implemented, this could check the decline in residential gas demand, although gas consumption is likely to become less attractive after the heating and road sectors are included in the EU ETS from 2027, pushing gas costs up. The CDU/CSU has made it clear that it intends to continue adhering to the Paris and EU climate agreements, but says this is conditional on the "competitiveness of the German economy" and "social load limits". The AfD not only seeks to end putting a price on CO2 emissions altogether, it also wants to undo the EU emission reduction mandates as a whole.

Crucially, none of the potential coalition partners plans to reverse course on Russian gas — unlike the AfD, which is calling for the lifting of all sanctions on Russia, including those on gas and oil imports into the EU. The AfD also intends to reopen the undamaged pipe B of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to restart flows of Russian gas to Europe, and repair and reopen the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipes that were damaged in September 2022.

Vorsprung durch technik?

On the question of the future of mobility in Germany, there is significant disagreement between the parties that might find themselves in a coalition government. While the SPD and Green party believe that e-mobility will be most relevant and want to maintain the ban on registering internal combustion engine (Ice) cars from 2035, the CDU and AfD advocate for "technology openness" and want to reverse these agreements.

The SPD says that it wants Germany to remain a leader in car manufacturing, but with its focus on electric vehicles (EVs). In order to encourage consumers to buy EVs that are "made in Germany", it proposes tax cuts for domestically manufactured units. This might be a lesson learned from unintended consequences of the general subsidy for EV purchases that was phased out at the end of 2023 — this was as beneficial for foreign EV manufacturers as domestic ones. The Green party supports the same tax cuts, provided the car is mostly manufactured within Europe.

The SPD and Green party also believe that eFuels should primarily be used in aviation or shipping, rather than on the road. They aim to establish a climate-neutral European aviation sector through rules to prevent ‘carbon leakage', with the Greens even aiming to make domestic flights unnecessary.

The Conservatives and the AfD take a completely different approach — they believe that the market should decide which mode of mobility will prevail. Based on this belief, their main goal is to reverse the EU policy of banning new Ice car registrations from 2035. The CDU and AfD instead both aim to make Ice cars — probably running on eFuels — a financially competitive alternative to EVs. They do not believe it is the government's responsibility to influence markets in one way or another. For the AfD, this extends to not using public funds to finance vehicle charging infrastructure. The two parties also agree that EU fleet emission limits, or at least associated penalties, should be abolished to avoid subjecting the German car manufacturing industry to additional pressure.

The CDU's lead in the polls — and the performance of the AfD — reflects the priorities of Germany's voters, which are focused most heavily on immigration and the state of the economy, with energy and climate policies much further down the list. The CDU leads approval ratings on expected handling of economic issues. So the party's view on how far Germany's shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy dovetails with reviving economic competitiveness could play a role in dictating the pace of the energy transition in Europe's largest economy in the years ahead.

German power generation mix GW

Change in gas demand by sector, y-o-y GWh/d

German gas demand by year

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Market risks grow as Trump threatens Iran: Update


18/06/25
News
18/06/25

Market risks grow as Trump threatens Iran: Update

Updates with details throughout Washington, 18 June (Argus) — The prospect of wider escalation in the Middle East if the US joins Israel's attacks on Iran is affecting marine insurance, freight and middle distillate prices, even though the flow of energy commodities out of the Mideast Gulf so far remains unfettered. US president Donald Trump, in wide-ranging remarks throughout the day, hinted at a potential US role in Israel's bombing campaign against Iran. But he also suggested that a diplomatic solution is still possible, noting that he has yet to make a decision on whether to target Iran. Trump told reporters at around 3:10pm ET that he would shortly convene another meeting with his top national security advisers to discuss US options. Speaking from Tehran earlier in the day, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warned of "irreparable damage" to the US if it joins the attacks. Trump, in remarks to reporters at the White House this morning, said he presented an "ultimate ultimatum" to Tehran. And as for a potential US air raid on Iran, Trump said: "I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do." Speaking from the Oval Office in the afternoon, Trump said, "I'd like to make a final decision one second before it's due." Khamenei, in a televised address today, denounced Trump's "absurd, unacceptable rhetoric to openly demand that the Iranian people surrender to him". Iran will oppose any "imposed peace", Khamenei said. The escalating conflict in the Middle East is causing a surge in Europe-bound freight rates for medium range tankers loading in the US Gulf coast. Mideast Gulf middle distillate premiums are at multi-month highs. Additional War Risk Premiums in the Mideast Gulf could rise sharply in the coming days, as the number of insurance underwriters willing to commit at current levels appears to be shrinking. Some LNG carriers that have held off from transiting the strait of Hormuz in recent days have since sailed through or have approached the strait, while no carriers loaded in the Mideast Gulf have slowed from sailing via the strait. Few barriers to US participation Domestically and internationally, there is no significant pushback against a potential US involvement. But the isolationist wing of Republican politicians and media figures loyal to Trump, including former Fox New anchorman Tucker Carlson, is urging him to avoid involvement in an Israel-Iran war. Trump's extensive commentary suggests a perceived need to push back on criticism of his sudden eagerness to involve the US in another war in the Middle East after years of lambasting his predecessors for having done so. Trump told reporters this afternoon that "Carlson called and apologized the other day because he thought he said things that were a little too strong." The argument Trump says he is trying to make is that preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon may be worth a military intervention. "I'm not looking to fight," Trump said. "But if it's a choice between fighting or having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do." The US intelligence community assessed, most recently in April, that Iran has not restarted work on nuclear weapons despite building up enriched uranium stockpiles since 2018, when Trump terminated a functioning agreement that curbed that program. "I've been saying for 20 years, maybe longer, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon," Trump said today. Mixed messages on talks Trump claimed that Iran's government has reached out to him for a diplomatic solution and has expressed willingness to send a high-ranking official to the White House. The offer is "courageous", Trump said, but added, "I said it's very late to be talking." Iran's mission to the UN subsequently denied a request for a meeting at the White House. Iran after the Israeli attack canceled a round of talks scheduled to take place in Oman on 15 June. Khamenei, in his remarks today, hinted at a "suspicion" that the US diplomatic approach had been part of Israel's preparation for military strikes. "Considering their recent remarks, this suspicion is growing stronger day by day," Khamenei said. Trump said he began to consider the possibility of US military action in the immediate aftermath of the Israeli attack. "The first night was devastating, and it really knocked the one side off," Trump said. Russian president Vladimir Putin reached out with an offer to mediate in the Israel-Iran conflict, Trump said. The conversation took place on 14 June, according to the Kremlin. "I said, do me a favor, mediate your own," Trump said, referring to Russia's war in Ukraine. "Let's mediate Russia first. OK?" By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Mexican president floats 'general agreement' with US


18/06/25
News
18/06/25

Mexican president floats 'general agreement' with US

Mexico City, 18 June (Argus) — Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum said she proposed to US president Donald Trump that their countries could sign a "general agreement" on key cross-border problems, suggesting the deal could be made before the US, Mexico and Canada free trade agreement (USMCA) is renegotiated. The presidents were set to meet this week at the G7 summit in Canada, but Trump left early and had a "good call" with Sheinbaum on the phone instead, Sheinbaum and the White House said. Sheinbaum said today she proposed Mexico and the US sign a single agreement on cross-border security, including drugs crossing into the US, migration and commerce — topics Trump flagged as major issues between the countries. Mexico has mostly managed to steer clear of Trump's on-again/off-again trade action , but has not been able to convince Trump to remove steep import tariffs on steel, aluminum and automotive parts. Sheinbaum previously said she hoped to get Trump to remove these tariffs by addressing security and migration issues while getting support from the US to stem the flow of arms into Mexico. Trump on Monday described ongoing trade negotiations as an easy process. "We are dealing with really, if you think about it, probably 175 countries, and most of them can just be sent a letter saying, 'It will be an honor to trade with you, and here's what you're going to have to pay to do'", Trump said. But that same day he pushed back on calls from Canada and the EU to negotiate trade deals, arguing that their approach is too complicated. "You get too complex on the deals and they never get done," Trump said. Canada and the US also aim to strike a trade deal within 30 days, Canadian prime minister Mark Carney said on Monday after meeting with Trump. Trump has been pushing Mexico into an early renegotiation of the USMCA. But the talks with Canada and the call with Mexico suggest Trump could finalize separate deals with Mexico and Canada before the USMCA's renegotiations are finished. By Cas Biekmann Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump talk of Iran attacks spreads market risks


18/06/25
News
18/06/25

Trump talk of Iran attacks spreads market risks

Washington, 18 June (Argus) — The prospect of wider escalation in the Middle East if the US joins Israel's attacks on Iran is affecting marine insurance, freight and middle distillate prices, even though the flow of energy commodities out of the Mideast Gulf so far remains unfettered. US president Donald Trump's repeated hints at a potential US role in Israel's bombing campaign against Iran prompted Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to warn of "irreparable damage" to the US if it joins the attacks. Trump in remarks to reporters at the White House today said he presented an "ultimate ultimatum" to Tehran and said of a potential US air raid on Iran, "I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do." Khamenei in a televised address today denounced Trump's "absurd, unacceptable rhetoric to openly demand that the Iranian people surrender to him." Iran will oppose any "imposed peace", Khamenei said. "The harm the US will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily," Khamenei said. The escalating conflict in the Middle East is causing a surge in Europe-bound freight rates for medium range tankers loading in the US Gulf coast. Mideast Gulf middle distillate premiums are at multi-month highs. Additional War Risk Premiums (AWRP) in the Mideast Gulf could rise sharply in the coming days as the number of insurance underwriters willing to commit at current levels appears to be shrinking. Some LNG carriers that have held off from transiting the strait of Hormuz in recent days have since sailed through or have approached the strait, while no carriers loaded in the Mideast Gulf have slowed from sailing via the strait. Few barriers to US participation Domestically and internationally, there is no significant pushback against a potential US involvement. The isolationist wing of Republican politicians and media figures loyal to Trump are urging him to avoid involvement in an Israel-Iran war. A group of Democratic senators on Tuesday circulated legislation to require Trump to ask for congressional authorization to use force against Iran, but senate majority leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) would not commit to allowing a vote on the resolution. "Dismantling Iran's nuclear program is what this is all about," Thune said in a televised interview Tuesday. "It can happen diplomatically, voluntarily, or can happen via force." There is also no unanimity among the other G7 leaders on the future course of conflict. The group in a statement on 16 June that Trump endorsed called Iran "the principal source of regional instability and terror." The Pentagon is ready to execute on any order by Trump, US defense secretary Pete Hegseth told a Senate panel today. Hegseth declined to say if Trump made any decision on an attack. Mixed messages on talks Trump claimed today that Iran's government has reached out to him for a diplomatic solution and has expressed willingness to send a high ranking official to the White House. The offer is "courageous", Trump said, but added that "I said it's very late to be talking." Iran's mission to the UN subsequently denied a request for a meeting at the White House. Trump said today that Russian president Vladimir Putin reached out with an offer to mediate in the Israel-Iran conflict. The conversation took place on 14 June, according to the Kremlin. "I said, do me a favor, mediate your own," Trump said, referring to Russia's war in Ukraine. "Let's mediate Russia first. Okay?" By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Israel-Iran conflict raises European middle distillates


18/06/25
News
18/06/25

Israel-Iran conflict raises European middle distillates

London, 18 June (Argus) — The continuing and escalating conflict between Israel and Iran is rallying European jet fuel and diesel values, due to fears of supply tightness. The rise in middle distillate values has outstripped those in crude in the past week, suggesting European jet fuel and diesel markets are pricing in the risk of substantial supply constraint arising from Israeli-Iranian tensions. This has not happened yet, with the conflict in a sixth day. Front-month Ice gasoil futures — the underlying value in Argus' European jet fuel and diesel assessments — settled at $731/t on Tuesday, 17 June, up by $45.75/t on the day. This was the highest settlement since 20 February, and the largest daily increase since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. Argus priced cif northwest European jet fuel and fob ARA diesel at $789.75/t and $744.50/t on Tuesday, the highest assessments since January. Refining margins for cif northwest European jet fuel and diesel to North Sea Dated crude were $5.17/bl and $4.07/bl higher on the week, at $22.46/bl and $22.45/bl respectively, at Tuesday's close. This is the widest jet fuel crack in a year and the widest diesel crack since February. Although supply has not yet been affected, freight sources told Argus they expect Additional War Risk Premiums (AWRPs) in the Mideast Gulf to rise sharply in the coming days, which could weigh heavily on arbitrage economics to Europe and dissuade shippers from sending product to the region. Loadings of 10ppm diesel and jet totaled 430,000 b/d and 460,000 b/d respectively from ports in the Mideast Gulf in May, according to Kpler, or 11pc and 28pc of global daily loadings. With much of this heading to European destinations, the prospect for disruption is clear. Prompt supply concerns are also reflected through the difference between front- and second-month Ice gasoil futures contracts. The backwardation structure steepened from $9.75/t on Monday to $15/t at Tuesday close. Backwardation between the second- and third-month contracts stretched to $10/t on Tuesday, the widest since February. This suggests concern that supply issues could persist for several months. Europe was already facing unworkable diesel arbitrages for cargoes loading from east of Suez ports for northwest European destinations. Seasonal European jet fuel demand usually relies on supply from the Middle East, the largest jet fuel exporting region to Europe. By Amaar Khan and George Maher-Bonnett Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more