Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Australia's carbon credit issuances nearly match demand

  • Market: Emissions
  • 15/04/25

Demand for Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) rose almost six-fold in the first compliance year of Australia's reformed safeguard mechanism, although total carbon unit surrenders were nearly matched by issuances of the new safeguard mechanism credits (SMCs).

A total of 138 facilities out of 219 covered under the scheme surrendered 7.05mn ACCUs and 1.38mn SMCs for the July 2023-June 2024 financial year to manage their excess emissions, up sharply from 1.22mn units a year earlier, according to data released by the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) on 15 April. But the combined 8.44mn units surrendered were nearly matched by 8.3mn of SMC issuances to 63 facilities — of which almost 7mn will be now held for future compliance, potentially weighing on market sentiment around ACCUs in the short to medium term.

The final SMC issuances for 2023-24 were below the maximum potential of 9.2mn first disclosed by the Climate Change Authority in November 2024. But that was significantly higher than initially forecast and impacted ACCU spot prices in the following months.

Some market participants had been expecting most of the SMCs to have been issued to coal miners, who benefitted from a change in the method used to estimate fugitive methane emissions, but oil and gas extraction accounted for just as many issuances as coal mining, each with around 3.07mn units, or 37pc of the total, CER data released on 15 April. Metal ore mining and processing, including ferrous, non-ferrous and precious metals, accounted for around 13pc of all issuances, followed by chemicals and other industries.

Biggest SMC issuances and surrenders

Shell has emerged as the company that received the largest number of SMCs at a facility level, with its Prelude floating LNG (FLNG) terminal issued with 1.07mn units as it reported scope 1 emissions of 1.85mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) for a baseline of 2.93mn t of CO2e.

UK-South African firm Anglo American received a higher combined volume of 1.64mn SMCs, of which 1.02mn came from its Capcoal coal mine and 622,997 from its Grosvenor coal mine in Queensland. Chevron received 622,554 SMCs across its Gorgon and Wheatstone operations, while Australian independent Santos was issued 205,500 units across four facilities (see table).

Meanwhile, SMC surrenders were registered across 27 facilities. Coal miners in New South Wales (NSW) and Queensland made the bulk of these surrenders at 991,857 units, including Anglo American and Australian mining company Stanmore Resources (see table).

Net emissions fall

Baselines were reset under the reformed safeguard mechanism, which applies to facilities that emit more than 100,000t of CO2e in a compliance year across several sectors, and now face a 4.9pc/yr decline rate until 2029-30. Scope 1 emissions covered under the scheme fell from 138.7mn t of CO2e in 2022-23 to approximately 136mn t of CO2e in 2023-24, representing 31pc Australia's total emissions in that year.

Net safeguard emissions fell to 127.8mn t of CO2e from 137.9mn t of CO2e a year earlier following the surrender of ACCUs and SMCs.

The total liability in 2023-24 reached around 9.2mn t of CO2e across 142 facilities, of which around 0.8mn t CO2e remained in an excess situation on 1 April 2025, according to the CER. The 0.8mn t of CO2e is from five facilities under the operational control of three companies, two of which are in voluntary administration.

The third company, Australian independent Fitzroy, failed to manage an excess of 583,079t of CO2e for its Ironbark No. 1 and Carborough Downs Coal Mine facilities for 2023-24. It has entered an enforceable undertaking with the CER and has committed to surrender the required units, start feasibility studies to investigate carbon abatement opportunities at the two facilities, and ensure neither is in an excess emissions situation for the 2024-25 year on 1 April 2026.

Australia's SMC issuances 2023-24t CO2e
FacilityOperatorSectorSMCs issued
FLNGSHELL AUSTRALIA Oil and gas extraction1,077,261
Capcoal MineANGLO COAL (CAPCOAL MANAGEMENT) Coal mining 1,022,648
Ichthys LNG ProjectINPEX Operations Australia Oil and gas extraction768,900
Grosvenor MineANGLO COAL (MORANBAH NORTH MANAGEMENT)Coal mining 622,997
Gudai-Darri MineMount Bruce Mining Metal ore mining 474,391
Kooragang IslandORICA AUSTRALIA Other basic chemical product 430,751
Gorgon OperationsCHEVRON AUSTRALIA Oil and gas extraction388,803
Carmichael Coal MineAdani Mining Coal mining 351,232
APN01 Appin Colliery - ICHENDEAVOUR COAL Coal mining 320,457
TAHMOOR COAL MINETAHMOOR COAL Coal mining 269,773
Wheatstone OperationsCHEVRON AUSTRALIA Oil and gas extraction233,751
Port Kembla SteelworksBLUESCOPE STEEL (AIS)Basic ferrous metal 232,088
Myuna CollieryCENTENNIAL MYUNA Coal mining 155,043
Ravenswood MineRAVENSWOOD GOLD Metal ore mining 132,501
Bulga Coal ComplexBULGA COAL MANAGEMENT Coal mining 128,269
WOR01South32 Worsley Alumina Basic non-ferrous metal 117,189
Newman Power StationAPA TRANSMISSION (ROY HILL) Electricity generation114,505
Condabri Talinga OranaORIGIN ENERGY UPSTREAM OPERATOROil and gas extraction104,047
Wambo Coal MineWAMBO COAL Coal mining 82,414
Spring Gully Reedy Creek CombabulaORIGIN ENERGY UPSTREAM OPERATOR Oil and gas extraction81,761
FairviewSantos Oil and gas extraction74,850
Pluto LNGWoodside Burrup Oil and gas extraction73,370
Pinjarra Alumina RefineryAlcoa of Australia Basic non-ferrous metal 70,123
Virgin Australia National Transport VIRGIN AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS Air and space transport67,430
CEM NSW Berrima MaldonBoral Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 63,844
MoranbahIncitec Pivot Other basic chemical product 63,529
CSBP Kwinana FacilityCSBP Fertiliser and pesticide 62,865
Curtis Island GLNG PlantGLNG OPERATIONS Oil and gas extraction60,273
ArcadiaSantos Oil and gas extraction57,996
Nowra PlantShoalhaven Starches Grain mill and cereal product 52,520
Ningaloo Vision FPSOSantos Oil and gas extraction51,109
Solomon Power StationFMG SOLOMON Electricity generation49,749
QGC UpstreamQGC PTY Oil and gas extraction47,428
King of the HillsGREENSTONE RESOURCES (WA) Metal ore mining 40,725
Arrow Surat OperationsArrow Energy Holdings Oil and gas extraction37,987
Birkenhead OperationsADBRI Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 29,000
Moorvale Coal MinePEABODY ENERGY AUSTRALIA Coal mining 26,921
Roma HubSantos Oil and gas extraction21,545
Clermont Coal OperationsClermont Coal OperationsCoal mining 21,521
V/LineV/Line CorporationRail passenger transport 20,960
Lake Vermont MineTHIESS Coal mining 19,541
NKS01 Nickel West KalgoorlieBHP NICKEL WEST Basic non-ferrous metal 17,666
Duketon South OperationsRegis Resources Metal ore mining 16,319
Daunia MineBM Alliance Coal Operations Coal mining 15,936
Fisherman's LandingCEMENT AUSTRALIA (QUEENSLAND) Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 15,005
Cockburn OperationsADBRI Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 14,615
Boyne Smelters LimitedRIO TINTO ALUMINIUM Basic non-ferrous metal 9,745
MangoolaMANGOOLA COAL OPERATIONS Coal mining 9,018
Liberty Bell BayLiberty Bell Bay Basic ferrous metal 8,762
Port Latta Pelletising PlantGRANGE RESOURCES (TASMANIA) Basic ferrous product 7,519
Australian Gas Networks (Vic) Australian Gas Networks HoldingGas supply7,487
Opal Australian Paper Maryvale MillPAPER AUSTRALIA Pulp, paper and paperboard 7,041
Moolarben Coal MineMOOLARBEN COAL OPERATIONSCoal mining 4,609
Jax MineJax Coal Coal mining 4,082
Baralaba Coal MineBARALABA COAL COMPANY Coal mining 3,841
CTC WA FacilityCENTURION TRANSPORT CO. Road freight transport 3,527
Daunia MineWHITEHAVEN DAUNIA Coal mining 3,353
South West Queensland PipelineAPA (SWQP) Pipeline and other transport 2,633
Queensland Nitrates Ammonium Nitrate PlantQueensland Nitrates Basic chemical manufacturing2,382
Mount Pleasant OperationsMACH Energy Australia Coal mining 2,304
Dongara OperationsADBRI Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 2,264
Collinsville MineNC COAL COMPANYCoal mining 1,899
Bell Bay SmelterRIO TINTO ALUMINIUM (BELL BAY) Basic non-ferrous metal 1,770
Australia's SMC surrenders 2023-24t CO2e
Facility OperatorSectorACCUs surrenderedSMCs surrendered
DEN01Dendrobium Coal Coal mining40,000196,075
United Coal MineUNITED COLLIERIES Coal mining52,973190,000
Moranbah North MineANGLO COAL (MORANBAH NORTH MANAGEMENT) Coal mining0183,699
Mandalong MineCENTENNIAL MANDALONG Coal mining32,254155,043
South Walker CreekSTANMORE RESOURCES Coal mining36,538132,501
Hunter Valley Operations mineHV OPERATIONS Coal mining60,00085,876
APLNG FacilityCONOCOPHILLIPS AUSTRALIA OPERATIONS Oil and gas extraction085,774
Murrin Murrin OperationsMURRIN MURRIN OPERATIONS Metal ore mining045,593
Kwinana Pigment PlantTronox Management Basic chemical040,869
Kwinana Alumina RefineryAlcoa of Australia Basic non-ferrous metal52,72937,849
Dawson MineANGLO COAL (DAWSON MANAGEMENT)Coal mining24,05628,862
Wagerup Alumina RefineryAlcoa of Australia Basic non-ferrous metal 37,27126,498
Phosphate HillIncitec Pivot Fertiliser and pesticide025,168
Chandala Processing PlantTronox Management Basic chemical023,215
Cloudbreak MineCHICHESTER METALS Metal ore mining8,41119,262
Solomon MineFMG SOLOMON Metal ore mining42,92619,178
NKW01 Nickel West Kwinana FacilityBHP NICKEL WEST Basic non-ferrous metal62,72017,666
Coppabella Coal MinePEABODY ENERGY AUSTRALIA PCI Coal mining015,719
Qenos Altona ManufacturingQENOS Basic chemical013,601
RailTHE PILBARA INFRASTRUCTURERail freight transport4,0029,163
Angaston OperationsADBRI Cement, lime, plaster and concrete08,968
Western Port WorksBlueScope Steel Basic ferrous metal07,642
OtwayBEACH ENERGYOil and gas extraction22,8686,935
Multinet Network and South Gippsland PipelineMULTINET GAS (DB NO. 2) Gas supply04,545
Drake MineDrake Mine Management Coal mining2,2444,082
Iron Bridge MineIB Operations Metal ore mining2,4142,146
RailtonCEMENT AUSTRALIA (GOLIATH) Cement, lime, plaster and concrete0681

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
29/04/25

DG Fuels eyes larger, later Louisiana SAF plant

DG Fuels eyes larger, later Louisiana SAF plant

New York, 29 April (Argus) — US renewable fuels company DG Fuels intends to produce more sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) than it initially planned at its flagship Louisiana project, albeit on a later timeline. DG Fuels president Christopher Chaput told Argus that the company is working to reach a final investment decision on its Louisiana facility by the first quarter of next year and is on track to start delivering "meaningful" amounts of SAF from the site in 2030, later than initially expected. The company continues to look at other potential facilities across the country but is prioritizing its Louisiana plant, which will use the Fischer-Tropsch chemical process to gasify agricultural waste into low-carbon fuels. "Not exclusively, but we are focusing really, really, really hard on the first project, which is Louisiana," Chaput said. Potential sites in Nebraska and Minnesota are the next-furthest along, and the company still owns land in Maine where it could build a similar SAF plant. The facilities would use similar technology but draw from different feedstocks, such as local forest or agricultural waste, and different types of hydrogen. The plan in Louisiana is to produce blue hydrogen, which involves capturing carbon emissions and is eligible for a federal tax credit. That Louisiana facility has also expanded in size, and Chaput says it could ultimately produce 195-200mn USG/yr of fuel — up from estimates last year and an initial projection of 120mn USG/yr. Chaput says the plant's size — which would give it the highest capacity of all Fischer-Tropsch SAF plants planned globally according to Argus estimates — will be an advantage for ultimately producing a cost-competitive fuel. Other potential DG Fuels facilities would be similarly large, a different approach from some other US developers like Aether Fuels, Natural State Renewables and now-defunct Fulcrum Bioenergy that have eyed a similar production process on smaller sites. Some biofuel producers already operational today use a separate process to produce SAF, hydroprocessing vegetable oils and animal fats, and have higher production capacities. But that pathway could ultimately be limited by feedstock constraints and competition from renewable diesel, analysts say, which has spurred investors and airlines to look at other potential pathways. While plants eyeing production in the 2030s might be less exposed to immediate policy risks, biofuel producers in the US have struggled to start 2025 as margins crash from the halting rollout of a new federal tax credit and delayed blend mandates. President Donald Trump's aggressive efforts to curb renewables have scared climate tech start-ups, though Trump has also voiced general support for some other clean energy sources, including biofuels. A government loan to support US refiner Calumet's efforts to produce more SAF was briefly halted this year and then [unpaused]( https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2656961) after a Republican US senator intervened. And policies abroad — including increasingly stringent SAF mandates in the EU and UK — could ultimately support clean fuel developers in the US even if incentives shift stateside. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Trump return complicates climate talks: Cop 30 head


29/04/25
News
29/04/25

Trump return complicates climate talks: Cop 30 head

New York, 29 April (Argus) — This year's UN Cop 30 climate talks will proceed with a key goal of scaling up climate finance, but US president Donald Trump's disruptive return to the White House has made efforts to reduce emissions more challenging, according to the Brazilian official leading the summit. Continuing the fight to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions "is going to be a slightly uphill battle, but I think it's the right one," Brazil climate secretary and Cop 30 president André Corrêa Do Lago said Tuesday at the BNEF Summit in New York City. "The international context could help a little more", Corrêa Do Lago said, drawing laughter from the audience. Trump moved quickly after beginning his second term to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement, an exit that will formally take effect in January 2026. He has started to impede US development of renewable energy projects he sees as boondoggles, but he is facing challenges to his attempts to halt government funding and tax credits for the sector. It is unclear if the US will send a delegation to the Cop 30 summit this year, which is scheduled to take place in Belem, Brazil, in November. Corrêa Do Lago said that invitations have not yet been sent to prospective participants. He also made a distinction between the US government and others in the US, including state and businesses leaders, that have pledged to continue supporting GHG emissions reductions even as the Trump administration moves to boost oil and gas. Publicly, countries have not changed their tune on climate in response to the US policy shifts. But Corrêa Do Lago said that privately there are "some that say, ‘God, how am I going to convince my people that I have to try to lower emissions if the richest country in the world is not doing the same?'" Corrêa Do Lago said that this year's summit needs to focus less on technical negotiations over documents that might never be implemented as a result, and more about making an economic appeal for decarbonization and hosting more of a "Cop of solutions, a Cop of action". He reiterated the Brazilian government's goal of increasing climate financing for developing countries from the target set at Cop 29 of $300bn/yr by 2035 to the far higher target of $1.3 trillion/yr. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

European aviation emissions to surpass pre-Covid levels


29/04/25
News
29/04/25

European aviation emissions to surpass pre-Covid levels

London, 29 April (Argus) — Carbon emissions from the European aviation industry are on course to surpass 2019 levels this year, according to a new study by clean energy lobby group Transport & Environment (T&E). Flights departing from European airports — in the EU, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and the UK — emitted around 187.6mn t of CO2 in 2024, 8pc higher than in 2023 and just 2pc short of 2019, the year before the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, the study said. Meanwhile, 8.4mn flights departed from airports in Europe last year, which was 4pc lower than in 2019. T&E forecasts that aviation emissions will rise to 195.2mn t this year, 4pc higher than 2019 levels, even after taking into account a 2pc mandate on sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) use. European flight numbers are expected to surpass pre-pandemic levels for the first time this year. Long-haul flights emitted the most CO2 last year, with London to New York flights accounting for 1.4mn t, London to Dubai 1.2mn t and London to Singapore 1.1mn t. T&E criticised carbon pricing in Europe, pointing out that airlines do not have to pay for carbon emissions on intercontinental flights, according to EU, Swiss and UK Emissions Trading Systems (ETS), as their carbon allowances only apply to flights within Europe. This means that airlines operating within these carbon markets do not have to pay for emissions on the biggest-polluting routes. The group claims that up to 70pc of carbon emissions fell outside of these carbon markets last year and were therefore exempt. T&E is pushing the EU and UK to expand their ETS, saying they could have generated an extra €7.5bn in 2024. The EU will review its ETS next year. By Amaar Khan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Thailand’s PTTEP posts higher 1Q oil, gas sales


29/04/25
News
29/04/25

Thailand’s PTTEP posts higher 1Q oil, gas sales

Singapore, 29 April (Argus) — Thai state-controlled upstream firm PTTEP's oil and gas sales rose in the first quarter of 2025, but revenues fell slightly on a decline in crude prices. PTTEP's sales over January-March totalled 484,000 b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d), up by 2pc from the same period a year earlier on higher production from its G1/61 project and a rise in crude oil sales from the Malaysia Block K project. But sales dropped by 3pc on the quarter, primarily because of lower crude oil and condensate sales from its overseas projects — namely Oman's Blocks 6 and 61, and Algeria's Hassi Bir Rekaiz project — and a drop in gas sales volumes because of a maintenance shutdown at its G2/61 project. The firm has signed an amendment to the gas sales agreement for its Arthit project to raise the daily contracted quantity of natural gas supplied to parent company and trading firm PTT from 280mn ft³/d to 330mn ft³/d from June onwards. This is to "help address domestic natural gas demand and reinforce national energy security," said the firm. PTTEP in April acquired additional stakes in Apico, a joint venture partner in the Sinphuhorm onshore oil field in northeastern Thailand, raising its share from 80.487pc to 90pc. This has in turn led to a higher share of production volumes from the project, which produced an average of 105mn ft³/d of gas and 222 b/d of condensate in 2024. The company is also currently progressing towards taking a final investment decision (FID) on its Arthit carbon capture and storage (CCS) project. Front-end engineering design for the project has been completed and the firm is currently preparing agreements, it said. PTTEP aims to reduce 700,000-1mn t/yr of CO2 emissions through this CCS project. The firm recorded revenues of $2.185bn for January-March, down by 1pc on the year and by 9pc on the quarter. Its average selling price fell to $45.74/boe on a decline in crude prices, said the firm. This resulted in the firm's profit for the first quarter falling by about 7pc on the year and by 9pc on the quarter to $488mn. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Environmental markets wary of Trump's next moves


28/04/25
News
28/04/25

Environmental markets wary of Trump's next moves

Houston, 28 April (Argus) — US President Donald Trump's recent threat of legal challenges against state climate and clean energy policies has roiled environmental markets waiting to learn the scope and avenues those confrontations could take. Trump's 8 April executive order, which directed the Department of Justice (DOJ) to consider contesting state policies that threaten "American energy dominance", targeted California's cap-and-trade program by name, but it may also extend to other policies, including renewable portfolio standards (RPS). But uncertainty about the extent of the administration's ambitions has injected another variable into an already volatile economic landscape. Market anxieties may not fade soon. US attorney general Pam Bondi has until early June to report on actions she has taken and make recommendations for other steps by the White House or Congress. Conservatives in some states already have asked her to scrutinize particular programs. Administration arguments One angle from which the DOJ could attack state programs is the well-trod "dormant Commerce Clause", a legal doctrine that says state laws cannot discriminate against or impose undue burdens on another state's economic activity. But such a challenge is more difficult if a program is merely stipulating, "if you want to come to our state, our electricity market or our fuel market, here are the rules to play by", according to Matthew Dobbins, a partner at Vinson & Elkins and member of the law firm's environment and natural resources team in Houston. Courts have dismissed lawsuits that tried this approach against low-carbon fuel standards in California and Oregon , as well Colorado's RPS. In addition, an appeals court last year threw out a case against Washington's cap-and-invest program, ruling it did not overstep in its handling of in-state versus out-of-state electricity suppliers. The US Supreme Court may soon decide whether to hear an appeal of the case. More broadly, a 2023 Supreme Court decision upholding a California law restricting interstate pork sales based on animal treatment makes such dormant Commerce Clause challenges "a lot harder", according to Nico van Aelstyn, partner at Sheppard Mullin in San Francisco. The DOJ could try using the "Equal Sovereignty" doctrine, which stipulates that one state's rights cannot exceed another's, van Aelstyn said. This has been used in cases against California's vehicle emissions standards and other states' climate "superfund" laws, which penalize oil and gas companies for historical emissions. But van Aelstyn described it as "not really tested yet." That administration has also been hoping to fast-track Supreme Court rulings on the executive orders by justifying them through "declared emergencies," according to Dobbins. This use of emergency powers will likely reveal how far the court will go to "pressure test" the administration's requests for speedy judicial relief, as justices work through a growing emergency docket through the end of term in June or July. Relitigating the past Amid growing trade tensions between the US and Canada, the DOJ could also revive a 2019 lawsuit against California's cap-and-trade program. A US district court at the time ruled that federal purview over foreign affairs does not preempt the state linking its program with Quebec's. Although the first Trump administration appealed the ruling, former president Joe Biden withdrew the case, leaving the matter undecided with one claim potentially still ripe for judicial review. "What that'll probably come down to is how much Canada has expressed its anger . . . and if the administration is willing to go 'all in' on trying to provoke one of our largest trading partners," Dobbins said. But even if California severed ties with Quebec, the province is a small part of the market, and its absence is unlikely to cripple the state's program. Meanwhile, in the markets… Trump's executive order has put states and US companies alike on the back foot, adding to a "shock and awe" barrage from tariffs and potential rollbacks to federal clean electricity incentives , said Tom Harper, a partner on consultant Baringa's energy advisory team in New York City. That volatility has led clean energy developers and buyers to hold off on decisions until they have a bit more stability. "You're almost in a state of paralysis because you can't go and deploy a team on a project. You can't go and arrange finance because the cost is moving day to day," Harper said. The tariffs have also fed growing concerns about the US economy, which have spilled into environmental markets. The California Carbon Allowance (CCA) market, already a bit bearish because of ongoing delays to planned program changes, plunged the day after Trump's executive order. Argus assessed CCAs for December delivery that day at $26.74/t — at the time their lowest price since November 2022. The lack of certainty around federal legal developments continues to whittle away at bullish signals, leaving market participants to wait for a clear outcome. Adding another layer of uncertainty is the fact that disputes may spill outside of the court system. Following the same logic as of Trump's " national energy emergency ", the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) could hypothetically issue an emergency order to halt carbon and clean energy programs. The recent resignation of a Democratic commissioner, giving Trump the ability to install a Republican majority, could facilitate that pathway. But using FERC to shutter these programs would be on weak legal footing, van Aelstyn said. The Trump administration has no issue using extrajudicial tools to enforce its policies, such as its January pause on federal funding that left states like California — which receives more than $100bn in backing and grants from the US government each fiscal year — grappling with potential budget holes. Two federal courts have said the administration must dole out the funds, but agencies have been slow to comply. "If they can withhold congressionally appropriated research funds for universities because they don't like their policies with regard to free speech on their campuses, what else might they do?" van Aelstyn said. "Withhold Medicaid funding to states where they don't like their renewable energy standards?" By Denise Cathey and Patrick Zemanek Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more