Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Japan buys more US oil amid trade talks but limits loom

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 19/08/25

Japan increased its crude imports from the US amid bilateral trade talks, but refinery configurations and logistical constraints are likely to cap the extent of Japanese refiners' use of US oil.

"We know that in light of President Trump's intentions, there has been discussion about Japan's potential purchase of US crude," a representative from Japanese refiner Idemitsu said at a company result briefing earlier this month. "From that perspective, we are also exploring diversification possibilities and have made a small purchase."

The Idemitsu representative's comment came after recent Japan-US trade talks around US president Donald Trump's threats of tariffs. Japan will expand its energy purchases from the US under a bilateral trade agreement announced in late July. The agreement remains ambiguous on whether there will be an increase in crude oil purchases, an official from the country's trade and industry ministry (Meti) said.

Japan's purchases of US crude rose while the trade talks were taking place. The country bought 190,000 b/d of US crude in May, a 180pc rise from a year earlier, data from Meti show. This is the largest monthly volume of crude that Japan has imported from the US since December 2018, based on Argus' records of Meti data.

But procuring US crude poses specific challenges for Japanese refiners, such as longer voyage times and limitations arising from refinery configurations. Idemitsu intends to study the barriers to transporting oil from the US Gulf coast to Japan, as the route takes more time than transporting from the Middle East, and the Japan-US voyage often passes the Panama Canal, where cargo capacities are limited and congestion may occur. The company is also examining the difference in properties of US crude compared with Middle Eastern crude.

Dependence on Middle East crude

"We are importing and studying US crude, aiming to mitigate our heavy dependence on the Middle East, thinking, ‘What if something happens?'" the Petroleum Association of Japan's president Shunichi Kito, who also serves as representative director and chairman of Idemitsu, said in July.

The higher volume of US crude in May reduced the share of Middle East crude in Japan's total imports that month to 90.5pc, down from 95.3pc a year earlier. But Japan subsequently cut its purchases from the US to 9,300 b/d in June, a 95pc drop from May, which again raised its share of Middle East imports to 97.7pc.

Japanese refiners are only exploring US crude and will not switch to it immediately, because their refinery configurations are designed to process Middle Eastern crude, said Kito.

"Frankly, we have no major alternative to Middle Eastern crude," he said, adding that "probably no units can process 100pc-pure US crude in Japan."

Importing a large amount of US crude is difficult from an economic perspective because of the disadvantages of the Japan-US oil route compared with the Middle East route, said the Idemitsu representative during the aforementioned company results briefing.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
29/08/25

US court rules against Trump emergency tariffs

US court rules against Trump emergency tariffs

Washington, 29 August (Argus) — President Donald Trump overstepped his authority to place emergency tariffs on most goods imported into the US, a federal appeals court said in a sweeping decision today that will remain on hold until at least 14 October. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a split 7-4 ruling, affirmed a lower court ruling from May that said Trump did not have the ability to unilaterally impose tariffs under a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The ruling, if upheld, would invalidate many of the tariffs that Trump has imposed since taking office and eventually require the US to issue refunds, although the ruling does not apply to separate sectoral tariffs such as those on steel and automobiles. Trump has used IEEPA to impose tariffs of 10-50pc on nearly all global trading partners, although he has exempted most energy imports. Among those tariffs are Trump's unilateral decision to increase tariffs to 50pc on Brazil in retaliation for criminal charges against its former president, along with the 50pc tariffs on India ostensibly in retaliation for purchasing Russian crude. The appeals court today put its ruling on hold until at least 14 October to provide the White House time to file an appeal to the US Supreme Court. If the administration files an appeal, the decision would remain on hold until the Supreme Court rejects the appeal or reaches a final decision, which means the tariffs will remain in effect in the near-term. Trump, in a social media post, criticized the ruling from what he says is a "Highly Partisan Appeals Court". He said with the "help" of the Supreme Court, where Republican appointees have a 6-3 majority, the tariffs will ultimately be upheld. Trump has previously said it would be "impossible" to pay back the tariffs he has imposed. "If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America," Trump wrote today. The US Court of International Trade, in a ruling in May, previously found that Trump's emergency tariffs under IEEPA were unlawful and that any tariffs collected would need to be refunded to importers. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on 29 May quickly imposed an administrative stay putting that ruling on hold, and held oral arguments on 31 July. The court, in its ruling today, said it was not deciding if IEEPA authorized the president to issue tariffs, but instead said it was deciding whether Trump's country-specific "reciprocal" tariffs and separate tariffs tied to drug trafficking were lawful. The court noted that IEEPA does not explicitly mention the word tariff, making it seem "unlikely" that Congress intended to give the president "unlimited authority to mention tariffs." The court also said the tariffs ran afoul of what is known as the "majority questions doctrine", which states that it is up to Congress to decide questions of major economic significance. In a dissent, circuit judge Richard Taranto and three other judges said they believed IEEPA provided an open congressional grant of emergency authority to impose import tariffs By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Brazil starts process for reciprocating US tariffs


29/08/25
News
29/08/25

Brazil starts process for reciprocating US tariffs

Sao Paulo, 29 August (Argus) — Brazil has started the process of developing reciprocal tariffs against the US, vice-president and trade minister Geraldo Alckmin said, a move designed to speed up negotiations. Brazil's foreign trade chamber, Camex, has 30 days to determine how the 50pc tariffs the US imposed on Brazil effective 6 August can be countered under the country's economic reciprocity law approved in April. The law authorizes retaliation through goods, services and intellectual property. There is no time frame for the process of imposing reciprocal tariffs after the initial 30-day deliberation period. "Brazil will not give up on its sovereignty," Alckmin said this week during a visit to Mexico, where he signed two cooperation agreements on biofuels with Mexico as well as a letter of intent on agriculture. "I hope that [this process] will help accelerate dialogue and negotiations [with the US], which is what president Lula has been asking us to do." The move comes weeks after President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had said that Brazil would not reciprocate the tariffs but seek to negotiate. Brazil has been working to counter the tariffs' effect on its economy by supporting companies in efforts to find new markets , and by approving a line of credit to small businesses hurt by the measures. Earlier this month, Brazil asked the World Trade Organization to intervene in the dispute over tariffs. The US typically runs a trade surplus for goods and services with Brazil, which has totaled more than $400bn over the last 15 years, finance minister Fernando Haddad said in a televised interview in early July. In the first half of 2025 the US' trade surplus with Brazil reached $2.3bn, a more than seven-fold increase from a year before, according to US-Brazil chamber of commerce Amcham. By Maria Frazatto Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Canada opens major projects office in Calgary


29/08/25
News
29/08/25

Canada opens major projects office in Calgary

Calgary, 29 August (Argus) — Canada launched its new Major Projects Office (MPO) today, part of prime minister Mark Carney's effort to help the country pivot away from over-dependence on the US for trade and fast-track infrastructure projects. The office, which will be based in the oil and gas hub of Calgary, Alberta, has a mandate to both streamline and accelerate regulatory approval processes, acting as a single point of contact in an effort to get "nation-building projects built faster," Carney said. The office will consider projects named to a special, but yet-to-be-unveiled, "National Interest Projects" list, which will be able to avoid certain regulatory hurdles that have discouraged applications in the past. They will include ports, railways, energy corridors, critical mineral developments and clean energy initiatives, according to the government. Former Trans Mountain chief executive Dawn Farrell will oversee the office. She held the top role at the federally-owned pipeline company for two years ending in August 2024, overseeing the C$34bn ($25bn) 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) project, which had been mired in regulatory red tape for years. "The government will announce the first set of nation-building projects in the coming weeks," said Carney. The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers estimates that the oil and gas industry has about more than C$100bn worth of projects planned or waiting for a final investment decision. The office is a product of Bill C-5, passed by Parliament in June in response to the trade hostilities started by the US administration under President Trump. Carney this spring campaigned on providing Canadians with both an answer to Trump's rhetoric and to kickstart a lagging economy that has been stifled by unfriendly policies for investors. Having the office headquartered in Calgary, but with offices also in other major Canadian cities, represents an olive branch to Alberta that is frequently at odds with the federal government. The province has demanded changes to onerous federal policies, mostly relating to energy, warning Carney that a national unity crisis could unfold otherwise. Energy has arguably been Canada's largest bargaining chip in the ongoing trade war with the US, but Carney has so far has so far refused to remove restrictive policies inherited from his predecessor Justin Trudeau, despite calls from industry to scrap them. This includes the oil tanker ban on British Columbia's north coast, an industrial carbon tax, and an emissions cap on oil and gas producers that they say amounts to a cap on production. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Exxon blames oil group exit on climate principles


29/08/25
News
29/08/25

Exxon blames oil group exit on climate principles

New York, 29 August (Argus) — ExxonMobil says it has ended its membership with the US oil lobbying group American Exploration and Production Council (AXPC) because of the group's "aggressive" opposition to environmental regulations, though oil industry leaders with knowledge of AXPC's advocacy question that justification. While AXPC and ExxonMobil share "high-level positions on climate change", AXPC's positions on specific policies have "increasingly diverged from ExxonMobil's climate principles", the company said in the methodology of its third annual lobbying report , which has not been reported previously. Specifically, ExxonMobil noted AXPC "pushing back aggressively" on methane regulations from the administration of former US president Joe Biden, as well as AXPC's stance on development and land access issues "to repeal as many of [the Biden administration's] regulations as possible, which is inconsistent with ExxonMobil's more nuanced approach to these issues". ExxonMobil said in the report that it supports federal methane regulations as they are "the most effective way to reduce methane emissions at scale". But AXPC's positions and advocacy in these policy areas have been virtually identical for years with other trade groups that ExxonMobil listed in its report as "aligned" with its own climate policy positions, particularly the largest US oil lobbying group American Petroleum Institute (API), three oil company leaders who work closely with API and AXPC told Argus . The company leaders, who asked to remain anonymous to avoid infighting that might hamper joint lobbying efforts, said they were surprised by how ExxonMobil described AXPC in its report. They said the statements did not fairly or accurately represent the group's positions or advocacy. Moreover, they described AXPC and API as working in lockstep with one another on many issues, including by coordinating advocacy efforts through frequent meetings and jointly signing letters to federal agencies. Oil companies that are members of multiple trade groups typically work to ensure those groups are aligned and speak as a unified voice on key policy issues to make lobbying efforts more effective, the leaders said. ExxonMobil declined to comment for this story. 'Practical' regulations AXPC supports "cost-effective, practical methane regulations and balanced management of energy production on federal lands", AXPC chief executive Anne Bradbury told Argus . AXPC declined to comment on ExxonMobil's characterization of its positions and advocacy. AXPC, which ExxonMobil joined in 2010 through its $41bn acquisition of independent producer XTO Energy, was the only organization ExxonMobil deemed "misaligned" with its own climate policy positions out of 65 groups in which ExxonMobil was a member and had identified as "active and potentially influential" in the climate policy space. AXPC represents large independent producers, a category which included XTO before ExxonMobil acquired it. XTO in 2020 completed the relocation of its headquarters from Fort Worth, Texas, to ExxonMobil's Houston-area campus. While ExxonMobil in 2024 "worked to bring AXPC closer in alignment with ExxonMobil climate principles to the greatest extent possible", it decided to end its membership in 2025, the company said in the report. ExxonMobil's last effective day of membership was 31 December 2024, AXPC confirmed to Argus . Image rehabilitation efforts ExxonMobil in recent years has sought to repair its checkered reputation on climate issues by speaking more forcefully about its commitment to play a leading role in combating climate change. "I'm fully aware that there are many who question ExxonMobil's commitment [to combating climate change] because of what was said over 30 years ago or what they think Exxon knew back then," ExxonMobil chief executive Darren Woods said in November 2023. "I'm more interested in what ExxonMobil knows today" — that "the need to address the very real threat of climate change" is "one of the major problems facing the world today", and that "world-scale problems like climate change need world-scale companies to help solve them — like ExxonMobil", he said. After US president Donald Trump won re-election in November 2024, Woods called on Trump to not withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, as he did in 2017 after Trump won his first presidential term. The departure from AXPC is ExxonMobil's second such trade group withdrawal since shareholders voted in 2021 to have the company issue annual reports describing if and how its lobbying activities align with the Paris climate agreement's goal of minimizing global warming. In 2022 it terminated its membership in the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA), which ExxonMobil said stemmed from "misalignment on climate priorities and other policy considerations". Aside from its alignment with the various lobbying groups on climate policy and advocacy, ExxonMobil said its assessment of its membership with the groups also considered potential risks related to "shareholder relations" and its "corporate reputation". ExxonMobil's most recent lobbying report appears to have been released in early January, months after Trump won a second term on a campaign that included pledges to undo wide swaths of US environmental regulations. This would also put the report's publication date less than three months after the oil and gas watchdog group Fieldnotes uncovered confidential documents showing AXPC's plans to combat a proposed fee on methane emissions. ExxonMobil is aided in its image rehabilitation efforts by its greater capacity to comply with methane regulations relative to smaller producers, such as those represented by IPAA. This is because larger firms can more easily afford the equipment, workers and other resources needed to curtail methane emissions without compromising their core business, Wood Mackenzie director of Americas upstream Ryan Duman said. Larger players can also leverage their relationships with marketers and midstream providers to capture and sell gas that would have previously been lost. ExxonMobil also has a "commercial advantage" in supporting stricter methane regulation because its status as a major US LNG exporter forces it to consider the fugitive emissions criteria of their potential customers, "particularly in Europe", Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy senior research associate Ira Joseph said. ExxonMobil's competitive advantage in complying with such regulation would also enable it "to acquire competitors that are unwilling or unable to comply", Joseph said. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EIA delays some reports after staffing cuts: Correction


29/08/25
News
29/08/25

EIA delays some reports after staffing cuts: Correction

Corrects the name of delayed biofuels report in 5th paragraph. Washington, 29 August (Argus) — The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) has delayed the publication of a handful of reports and is proposing the cancellation of another after losing about 30pc of its staff since President Donald Trump began his second term. The delays to reports on uranium prices, solar panel shipments and biofuels are the latest sign of strain at the agency since it lost more than 100 staff from voluntary buyouts and other cuts pursued by the Trump administration. Earlier this year, EIA dropped plans to release its I n ternational Energy Outlook this year because of a loss of key staff. Oil and gas producers, utility executives, traders, regulators, analysts and others often rely on data and reports from the EIA, an independent agency that is responsible for collecting and analyzing energy data. EIA declined to comment on whether staffing affected the timing of its reports, but said it was committed to publishing reliable data. "We remain committed to meeting high statistical standards, and we will not publish any data or analysis that doesn't meet those standards," EIA said. An annual report on uranium purchases and prices that since 1996 had been published by June is now set for release in September, according to the agency's website. EIA's annual renewable diesel fuel and other biofuels plant production capacity report, initially set for release in August, should be coming out in September, an agency official said. EIA has yet to release a monthly report on solar photovoltaic modules since last December, and today the agency proposed canceling the report entirely. The last version of the report showed that shipments of solar modules increased to a peak wattage of 33GW in 2023, a sixfold increase to 2013, while the price per peak watt had fallen in half. "EIA has determined that the value of the data collected by the survey no longer exceeds the burden of collecting and publishing it," the agency said in a formal notice requesting comment on its plan to end the report. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more