Speak to a specialist

Share a few details and one of our specialists will be in touch to discuss next steps – whether that’s answering questions, arranging a demo, or finding the right solution for your needs. You may also qualify for a no-cost trial.

You can unsubscribe from these updates at any time. We manage your personal data in accordance with our privacy policy.
Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US mills look for Colombian, Indonesian met coke

  • Market: Coking coal, Metals
  • 23/07/26

Steel mills in the US are looking to source metallurgical coke from the seaborne market because of planned maintenance at domestic plants, market participants said this week.

The US steel industry usually meets all of its coke requirements domestically and has not imported large volumes of metallurgical coke since 2016. But two mills now plan on sourcing material from Colombia or Indonesia to substitute their own production, sources told Argus.

"One major steel mill is [currently] looking for imported coke and another one would be looking for a lot of imported coke next year," a trader said today.

The mills have had trouble with their own coke ovens and need to overhaul their operations, a metallurgical coke supplier said. At least one mill has already approached suppliers in Colombia and Indonesia with firm requirements. The mills could be in the market for seaborne coke throughout 2027, market participants said today.

By Austin Barnes

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
26/08/26

Alberta premier rejects energy leverage in US trade war

Alberta premier rejects energy leverage in US trade war

Calgary, 26 August (Argus) — Alberta premier Danielle Smith is rejecting calls to curtail or place surcharges on Canadian hydrocarbons exports to the US, proposing instead that Canada be "too friendly, kind and helpful to resist" in the long-time allies' renewed trade war . Such a strategy would aim at "deescalating and doubling down on diplomacy with members of the US congress and governors from both parties" Smith said Wednesday, which would "give the American people and their leaders the time they need to reverse these terrible policies after the November midterms." Smith's comments countered calls from the leader of the Alberta's official opposition party for the federal government to tax energy exports to the US as leverage in the trade dispute, following the breakdown in trade talks over the weekend. Ontario premier Doug Ford — who briefly placed a tariff on its electricity exports to the US during the early rounds of the trade dispute in March 2025 — said Wednesday that "everything's on the table" in the current trade dispute, but any broader action would require coordination with other provinces. Quebec premier Christine Frechette, whose province provides hydropower throughout New England and New York, said earlier this week she did "not want to exclude anything in terms of measures." Smith warned Wednesday that leveraging Canadian energy exports could incur "an equal and opposite and even more forceful reaction" from the US that could hurt the country significantly. That could include reciprocal tariffs or curtailments on US oil and gas and refined products exports to Canada, which "would bring the economies of Ontario and Quebec to a grinding halt." The US could replace Canadian imports with heavy crude from Venezuela by reversing flows on existing pipelines, Smith said, which may mean losing the US as a customer "entirely and maybe forever". The premier expressed support for expanding Alberta hydrocarbon flows to eastern Canada and recent federal government measures aimed at insulating Canadian firms from the impact of the trade dispute. Canadian prime minister Mark Carney has previously downplayed the prospect of restricting energy exports to the US, but noted over the weekend that Canada provides the US with 85pc of its electricity imports, 95pc of its natural gas imports and 60pc of crude oil imports. "I don't think they want us to stop sending any of that," he said. By Behbod Negahban Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Canada to double tariff on US steel, aluminum

25/08/26
News
25/08/26

Canada to double tariff on US steel, aluminum

Washington, 25 August (Argus) — Canada will set 50pc tariffs on imported US steel and aluminum from 8 September as part of a retaliatory package targeting $28bn of imports from its southern neighbor. The move doubles Canadian tariffs on US steel and aluminum from 25pc, matching US taxes of 50pc on imports of those products from Canada. The Canadian government announced the retaliatory package of tariffs on Tuesday, days after the US implemented a 50pc tariff on cement, plywood and other imports from Canada. The new US tariffs took effect on 22 August. The latest US tariffs and Canada's retaliatory tariffs do not apply to energy, potash fertilizer or critical minerals, but they will add additional costs to other key US imports. Raising tariffs on cars and auto parts will further disrupt the integrated North American auto industry. Trade talks between the US and Canada ended abruptly last week, and no new talks are planned. US president Donald Trump and Canadian province Ontario premiere Doug Ford traded insults on social media and on TV in the past two days. Trump on Tuesday said the US is considering renaming the shared Lake Ontario to "Lake America". Trump on Monday threatened to double tariffs on cars and auto parts made in Canada to 50pc from 1 January. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Q&A: ElectraLith targets $2,500/t lithium refining

25/08/26
News
25/08/26

Q&A: ElectraLith targets $2,500/t lithium refining

London, 25 August (Argus) — Australian lithium technology firm ElectraLith recently received an $A2.9mn ($2.1mn) government grant to fund it's direct lithium extraction technology. Chief executive Charlie McGill spoke to Argus about the challenges of water scarcity and building lithium processing capacity outside China. Edited highlights follow: Your latest funding award is focused on refining rather than extraction. What does the pilot involve? The pilot will be deployed at a customer's operation in Western Australia and is designed to demonstrate the refining side of our technology. We'll take an intermediate spodumene-derived stream and convert it into battery-grade lithium hydroxide or lithium carbonate. What is important to understand is that our broader system combines extraction and refining, but the refining stage can also operate independently. That's why this pilot is valuable. It lets us prove that part of the flowsheet in a commercial setting while we continue advancing integrated opportunities elsewhere. Beyond Australia, we're progressing discussions around pilot programmes in Latin America, most likely Chile, as well as a number of opportunities in the US that we hope to advance over the next six to 12 months. Where do you think ElectraLith's competitive advantage lies? At its core, the company is an intellectual property business rather than a manufacturing business. The value does not come from building boxes or producing membranes ourselves. It comes from the way we configure existing technologies and use electrodialysis to extract and refine lithium without consuming water or chemicals within the process itself. One lesson we've learnt is that not every part of a system needs to be developed in-house. We've partnered with membrane suppliers because they are experts in membranes, just as we're focused on developing the extraction and refining technology. That approach allows us to move faster and avoid taking on unnecessary capital and technical risk. How important is water scarcity to the future of lithium development? I think water is becoming one of the defining issues for parts of the industry, particularly in regions where communities are already concerned about competing demands on scarce resources. The obvious example is Chile's Atacama desert, where water availability is under constant scrutiny, but there are also parts of North America where the same pressures exist. In those regions, reducing water use is not simply an environmental benefit. It can influence whether a project is accepted by local communities and ultimately whether it gets built. At the same time, the advantage is not limited to water-stressed assets. Removing water and chemicals also removes a large component of operating costs. So even where water is plentiful, there is still a strong economic case for simplifying the process. You've previously suggested costs could be around half that of your competitors. Can you say more? As with most things in lithium, it depends on the resource. For a good-quality brine, we generally think about costs around $2,500/t, plus or minus roughly 20pc. Some Chilean brines can perform materially better because lithium concentrations are high and power costs can be relatively favourable. At the other end of the spectrum, lower-grade resources or locations with expensive electricity will inevitably sit above that range. What matters more than the headline number is understanding that electricity and resource quality are usually the biggest cost drivers. What is the biggest challenge facing direct lithium extraction today? The industry has largely moved beyond proving that lithium can be extracted in different ways. The challenge now is proving that those technologies can operate reliably at scale. There are a number of promising approaches, including adsorption, ion exchange, solvent extraction and electrochemical systems such as ours. What separates them is not necessarily pilot-scale performance, but whether they can be deployed repeatedly across different resources and continue operating efficiently over long periods. That is why the next wave of pilot projects is so important. The sector remains relatively young and there is still no clear incumbent technology. Why are governments increasingly focused on refining? A large share of global lithium refining still takes place in China, even though lithium production is spread across countries such as Australia, Chile and Argentina. As a result, many governments have realised that mining alone does not create a complete supply chain. If you want domestic battery materials industries, you also need refining capacity and the technical expertise that comes with it. Five years ago the industry spent much of its time discussing resources. Increasingly the discussion is shifting towards processing, refining and qualification because those are the areas where some of the biggest bottlenecks now exist. Where should governments direct support if they want more lithium supply? Refining would be at the top of the list. Recycling has an important future role, but there simply are not enough end-of-life batteries available today for it to solve the industry's near-term supply challenge. In the meantime, governments that want more local lithium processing need to help projects move from pilot scale to commercial operation. Funding can play a role in that, but so can faster permitting and reducing barriers that slow the deployment of new refining capacity. By Chris Welch Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brazil, US to meet on tariffs after Lula-Trump call

24/08/26
News
24/08/26

Brazil, US to meet on tariffs after Lula-Trump call

Sao Paulo, 24 August (Argus) — Brazilian and US representatives will meet this week to discuss US tariffs on Brazilian imports imposed in July, following a phone call between the presidents of both countries last week. The US' trade representative Jamieson Greer reached out to the Brazilian government shortly after presidents Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Donald Trump spoke on the phone last week , according to Brazilian officials. Lula told Trump then that the US' 25pc tariffs on Brazilian products were "unfounded". Brazil's trade minister Marcio Rosa and representatives from the foreign affairs ministry will meet with the US' Office of Trade Representative (USTR) this week, the Brazilian government said, but a specific date was not disclosed. The USTR imposed the tariffs as a result of a year-long "Section 301" investigation into unfair Brazilian trade practices, citing a restrictive ethanol market as one of the reasons for the probe. Other factors included concerns over organized crime, corruption, deforestation and unfair competition from Brazil's digital payments system, Pix. Although many products — such as pig iron, iron ore, rare-earth metals, crude, coffee and beef — are exempt from the tariffs, many others, such as ethanol, sugar and beef tallow, are not. By Lucas Parolin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

India’s steel sector backs government mining reforms

24/08/26
News
24/08/26

India’s steel sector backs government mining reforms

Mumbai, 24 August (Argus) — India's reforms for mining taxation that were introduced this month will create policy certainty, remove the overhang of retrospective tax claims and strengthen domestic iron ore supply, industry experts said. The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act (MMDR) 2026, which came into effect from 22 August, restricts states from independently imposing new mining-related taxes and cesses. Any levies must now adhere to conditions and restrictions laid down by the central government, according to the act. This followed a July 2024 ruling where the Supreme Court's eight-judge majority held that royalty paid by mining firms is separate from taxes and is simply a payment for the right to extract minerals. The court also ruled that state governments have the power to impose their own taxes on mineral rights. The court in August 2024 also ruled that Indian state governments can demand previous dues on taxes from mining firms but not for the period prior to 1 April 2005. "The recent [amendment] removes two very important things. One is uncertainty from your business models and two, the retrospective overhang, which after crores of investment, can completely jeopardise your economics," Rashmi Group chief of strategy and corporate affairs Arnab Kumar Hazra told Argus at an industry event in Kolkata. Rashmi Group is an industrial conglomerate with various divisions including iron and steel, ferro-alloys and power. After the 2024 ruling, states started imposing their own taxes on minerals, leading to non-uniform taxes across different regions, market participants said. The retrospective tax provision exposed the mining sector to substantial liabilities, with some estimates pegging the dues at 2 trillion rupees ($20.9bn). NMDC, India's largest merchant iron ore mining firm, estimates its potential tax liability in Karnataka at about Rs158bn, subject to the outcome of the state's proposed retrospective mineral tax law and related legislative developments. Under the amendment, any mineral tax demand is invalid if the state had not collected the tax before the new law took effect. But taxes or cesses already collected by state governments before the law was implemented will not be refunded, according to the act. The amendment has strengthened confidence in mining by creating a more uniform tax framework, curbing states' scope to introduce new levies and eliminating retrospective tax demands, industry participants said. The reforms will also raise availability of iron ore in the domestic market, strengthening raw material security and reducing import dependence, state-owned producer Steel Authority of India (Sail) said last week. "With improved viability and development of its captive mines, Sail will be able to make additional iron ore available for sale in the market, in accordance with the applicable regulatory framework," the company said in a statement. State governments are now likely to speed up the auctioning of mines to bolster revenues after the amendment, Hazra said. By Amruta Khandekar Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Related Products

Argus Steelmaking Raw Materials Outlook

Argus Steelmaking Raw Materials Outlook

Monthly 24-month forecasts for crude steel, iron ore and metallurgical coal, with data-driven insights for smarter sourcing and strategy.

Find out more

Argus Scrap Markets

Argus Scrap Markets

Independent scrap prices and market intelligence across global ferrous and non-ferrous markets, grounded in transparent methodologies for confident, real-time decisions.

Find out more

Argus Rare Earths Analytics Service

Rare earth price forecasts with short and long-term views supported by detailed market fundamentals for trade, supply and demand

Find out more

Argus Seaborne Coal Outlook

Independent analysis, trusted price forecasts, and data analytics to help you make optimum decisions.
Find out more

Argus Pipe Logix Line Pipe Service

Price assessments, outlooks and market-moving commentaries, news and analyses for the line pipe market.
Find out more
Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more