US considering coal exports through military bases

  • Market: Coal
  • 15/10/18

A proposal by US interior secretary Ryan Zinke to use retired military bases in the US as transit points for coal and natural gas exports could enhance opportunities for western energy resources, industry members said today.

"Globally, the coal markets are still growing," said Lucas Pipes, an analyst with investment bank B Riley FBR. He pegged expected growth for seaborne markets at 1pc to 1.5pc/yr over the next 10 years. "And with little supply coming on line, the US is viewed more as a strategic supplier. New port capacity could play a longer-term role" in keeping US coal present in the global market.

The plan, confirmed by the Interior Department today, would potentially allow President Donald Trump's administration to circumvent efforts by environmental groups to halt development of private terminals on the west coast, namely Millennium's Longview terminal in Washington or the Oakland Bulk and Oversized Terminal in California.

"The president and secretary are committed to the men and women of coal country, and it should come as no surprise that secretary Zinke has put a number of options on the table to revitalize these communities and achieve ‘American energy dominance,'" the Interior Department said. It would not elaborate further on the plan.

What affect opening military bases to exporting would have on the coal industry will depend on the locations, among other things, Pipes said.

"What was mentioned was one base in Alaska, and that would have a small implication for coal," he said. "The rail costs to get there are substantial."

To benefit coal production in states such as Wyoming, Montana or Utah, the bases would have to be located in Washington, Oregon or California, Pipes said. He has not studied if any bases would have the required access to rail and the deep water port necessary to export coal.

"I think (the administration proposal) shows how important it is that the US has access to the Asian energy markets," said Wendy Hutchinson, a senior vice president with Millennium Bulk Terminals-Longview, which is attempting to build a coal export facility in Washington. "My preference, of course, would be for the coal to go through our terminal."

US coal producers have become increasingly reliant on exports as the US power sector has turned away from coal-fired generation in favor of renewables and natural gas-fired units.

US exports have climbed over the last two years and are on track to reach a five-year high this year. But the benefit of the increase has largely been limited to Appalachian and Illinois basin producers.

Just 7.8mn short tons (7.07mn metric tonnes) of coal was shipped out of terminals in California, Washington and Alaska from January to August, according to US Census Bureau data. While that was up from 5.63mn st in the same period of 2017, it represented just 3.6pc of what PRB and western bituminous coal producers are estimated to have produced during that time.

More coal was shipped through Westshore Terminals in Vancouver, Canada, but it is unclear how much of the 20mn t of loadings the terminal reported were from US producers.

Meanwhile, exports from eastern US terminals and the Gulf of Mexico totaled 63.3mn st and represented 36pc of Appalachian and Illinois basin coal production.

At the same time, all major US coal basins have been delivering less coal to domestic customers this year, government fuel receipts data show.

Cloud Peak Energy, which operates three coal mines in Wyoming, said it welcomes the effort to increase exports out of the Western United States.

"The development of an export terminal in the Pacific Northwest of the United States would significantly enhance US allies' access to secure, high-quality, low-sulfur coal and should be welcomed on both sides of the Pacific," a spokesman for the company said.

Like a proposal earlier this year to deem coal-fired generation necessary to baseload energy, this plan also cites national security interest because it allows the nation's allies better access to US-produced energy.

Cloud Peak already provides coal to customers in Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong through Westshore Terminals.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

'Weeks, months' to reopen Baltimore waterway: professor

'Weeks, months' to reopen Baltimore waterway: professor

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — It could take weeks or even months to clear debris and reopen the waterway under the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, according to a engineering professor at the nearby Johns Hopkins University. As of Wednesday, there was no official timetable for the reopening of the Port of Baltimore after a major highway bridge over the Patapsco River was hit in the early hours of 26 March by a container ship and collapsed, with the debris and ship blocking the waterway. "I'd be shocked if it's weeks, but I don't think it'll take even a year" to clear the waterway, structural engineer and Johns Hopkins professor Benjamin Schafer said Wednesday. He expects the rebuild of the bridge to take significantly longer. "I've lived through quite a few civil infrastructure projects and they're rarely less than 10 years. So I think that's what we're looking at," Schafer said. He noted that it took five years to build the original Francis Scott Key Bridge and seven years to repair the Sunshine Skyway Bridge in Tampa Bay, Florida, after a similar collapse in 1980. Still, "this is definitely not a national supply chain crisis," John Hopkins operations management professor Tinglong Dai said Wednesday. "The effect will be mostly local, mostly minimal and mostly temporary." The bridge collapse and port closure is also unlikely to trigger a global supply chain crisis, he said. The Port of Baltimore is an important but "niche" port specializing in automobile imports and exports, Dai added. "The supply chain has evolved...I have already seen a lot of rerouting happening." Automakers started adjusting their supply routes away from the top port for US vehicle imports the day of the collapse, including General Motors, Ford and Mercedes-Benz. Baltimore is also a major port for coal exports, which may start to shift to terminals to the south in Hampton Roads, Virginia. Freight rates for ships that carry coal could see increases in global markets Other commodities like asphalt and caustic soda that move through the port will see challenges, while organic agriculture imports may see less problems due to seasonal flows. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Hampton Roads may have space for Baltimore coal exports


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Hampton Roads may have space for Baltimore coal exports

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — Terminals in Hampton Roads, Virginia, may have some available capacity to take rerouted coal shipments from Baltimore, Maryland, despite increasing exports from a year earlier for the seventh consecutive month in February. Coal loadings at Hampton Roads reached an estimated 3.31mn short tons (st) (3mn metric tonnes) last month, rising 7.8pc from February 2023, according to the Virginia Maritime Association. Still, historic Hampton Roads export data going back to 1993 showed that combined shipments from the three terminals in the region peaked at 5.48mn st in April 2012, which is nearly 66pc higher than last month's exports. This suggests that Hampton Roads terminals may have capacity to load additional coal volumes that were originally booked to ship out of terminals upstream from the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, which collapsed on Tuesday morning, closing the Port of Baltimore for an indefinite period of time. The two Baltimore coal terminals cut off by the bridge collapse, Consol Energy's Consol Marine Terminal and CSX's Curtis Bay Coal Piers, have a combined export capacity of about 34mn st. Railroad Norfolk Southern (NS), which operates the Lamberts Point terminal at Hampton Roads, said today it is working with impacted international customers and port partners to "provide alternate routing solutions." "Ports on the east coast are resilient and have the capacity to serve the flow of freight," NS said. Lamberts Point terminal handled 1.19mn st of coal in February, a 20pc jump from February 2023. Despite this increase, that is still down from the 2.18mn st exported from the terminal in April 2012. Dominion Terminal Associates (DTA) exported 1.24mn st of coal in February from the Hampton Roads area, which is down 30pc from April 2012, while exports from the nearby Pier IX terminal were down 53pc to 727,023st last month. DTA's co-owners, Alpha Metallurgical Resources and Arch Resources, and Pier IX's owner Kinder Morgan all did not respond for immediate comment. By Anna Harmon Hampton Roads coal exports in 2012 st Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

RMKO, Atlas to develop Sumatra coal crushing plant


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

RMKO, Atlas to develop Sumatra coal crushing plant

Manila, 27 March (Argus) — Indonesian coal mining contractor RMKO has partnered with domestic producer Atlas Resources to develop a coal crushing plant and other supporting mining infrastructure in south Sumatra. The crushing plant and other facilities are targeted for completion by the second half of this year, said RMKO, which is a subsidiary of coal logistics firm RMK. The plant will be built at Atlas' Mutara hub, which consists of five separate concessions in the Musi Rawas and Musi Banyuasin regency in south Sumatra and has coal reserves totalling 85mn t. Atlas has already acquired a road construction permit that will connect Mutara to the Sriwijaya Bara logistics jetty 137km away. The coal crushing plant is expected to boost coal transportation from mines to clients outside the region, the company said. RMKO will construct and operate the coal crushing plant that will have a capacity of 650 t/hr. Other services will include stockpile management, loading services and plant maintenance. The 36bn rupiah ($2.28mn) plant will be funded by RMK with Atlas paying back the investment through coal production equivalent to 200,000 t/month for five years, as well as the cost of operations and maintenance services, RMKO said. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore bridge collapse forces freight changes


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse forces freight changes

Washington, 26 March (Argus) — Vessel traffic in and out of the Port of Baltimore, Maryland, has been suspended indefinitely in the wake of a container ship collision early today that brought down the Francis Scott Key Bridge, an accident that will force the rerouting of coal, car and light truck shipments. The prolonged closure of one of the largest ports on the US east coast could have a ripple effect on trade flows across much of the US, as shippers grapple for alternatives in the absence of a certain reopening timeline. Search and rescue efforts are still ongoing in the Patapsco River, after the 116,851dwt Dali headed to Colombo, Sri Lanka, slammed into a bridge support. The crew had lost control of the vessel. The Dali is owned by Grace Ocean and managed by Synergy Marine Group. The Maryland Port Administration said it does not know how long it will take for the shipping channel to be cleared and for traffic to resume. Shipping companies are bracing for a closure of at least two weeks, but many expect the clean-up effort could take significantly longer. President Joe Biden vowed the federal government will provide whatever resources are needed to get the port "up and running again as soon as possible." The port is a major trade hub for steam and coking coal, automobiles and scrap metal. Many market sources are still trying to determine whether the disruption will be dramatic enough to move prices. But coal markets were already being affected today. Baltimore is home to two key coal export terminals: eastern US railroad CSX's Curtis Bay Coal Piers and coal producer Consol Energy's Consol Marine Terminal. The facilities are upstream of the bridge, meaning ships will not be able to serve them until the route reopens. The terminals handle thermal and coking coal from Northern and Central Appalachia. They have a combined export capacity of 34mn short tons (30.8mn metric tonnes). The two terminals loaded 2.4mn t of coal in February, up from 2.1mn t a year earlier, according to analytics firm Kpler, mostly exports to India and China. An India-based trader said that the suspension of coal exports will probably raise prices in India, as brick kilns enter the peak production season in the summer. Buyers could look to petroleum coke as a substitute, but the higher sulphur content may not be appealing to some users despite the higher calorific value. Prices for deliveries to northern Europe are also likely to rise given that the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium combined are the second-largest market for North Appalachian coal. April API 2 futures rose by $2/t to $113.30/t. The incident has added a "level of volatility [which] could have big implications," a European paper broker said. The lack of information has prompted some coal producers to hold off on activating force majeure clauses in their contracts. Curtis Bay is served only by CSX, while CSX and fellow eastern carrier Norfolk Southern serve Consol. CSX said it is in contact with existing coal customers and contingency plans are being implemented. The railroad at this point intends to keep Curtis Bay open but will continue to assess the circumstances moving forward. Norfolk Southern did not respond to questions. Some scheduled Baltimore coal exports may be redirected to the other three eastern US coal export terminals in Hampton Roads, Virginia, but such reroutings likely will entail increased costs. Not all coal mines will be able to shift terminals. Such decisions will depend on available capacity in Hampton Roads. Exports from the three terminals in January reached a five-year high , signaling somewhat limited capacity. Mine location and railroad access may also determine whether coal can be rerouted, an industry source said. But some producers do not have much of a choice about trying to send coal to Hampton Roads. They may need the cash so will be forced into a decision. The producers most vulnerable to delays may be Consol and Arch Resources. Arch's Leer coking coal mine may be in the best position because it co-owns Dominion Terminal Associates in Hampton Roads with Alpha Metallurgical Coal Resources. The sudden lack of export capacity could put a floor under US coal prices, which have mostly been falling since last year amid low domestic demand. The competition to replace Baltimore coal exports could prevent further cuts, another coal trading source said. Metals sources say the accident will have only isolated effects on the global ferrous scrap market, but many market participants are still assessing the situation. The port is the 10th largest ferrous scrap export port in the US, and over the last five years an average of 44,000 metric tonnes/month of ferrous scrap was exported from Baltimore, according to US Department of Commerce data. But the port closure is likely to affect other freight. Baltimore is the nation's top handler of automobile traffic. Motor vehicles and parts accounted for about 42pc of all Baltimore port imports and 27pc of all exports, according to state data. The Port of Baltimore handled 847,158 cars and light trucks in 2023. "It's too early to say what impact this incident will have on the auto business — but there will certainly be a disruption," said John Bozzella, chief executive of industry trade group Alliance for Automotive Innovation. Dry bulk freight rates likely unaffected Several sources told Argus Baltimore's closure is unlikely to have a major impact on dry freight rates despite short-term interruptions to coal transports. "We are in the shoulder months with less demand for thermal coal," a shipbroker said, suggesting mild global temperatures means the collapse "may not have too much of an impact" on freight markets overall. Vessel traffic in ports such as Charleston, South Carolina, and Savannah, Georgia, may increase on diversions from Baltimore. Kpler identified 17 vessels that will likely be impacted because they are either in the Port of Baltimore or were expected to load there in the coming days. By Abby Caplan, Gabriel Squitieri, Luis Gronda, Evan Millard and Brad MacAulay Port of Baltimore coal terminals Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US bridge collapse may weigh on dry freight rates


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

US bridge collapse may weigh on dry freight rates

New York, 26 March (Argus) — The collapse of a major bridge in the Port of Baltimore, Maryland, will likely put downward pressure on dry bulk rates as ship traffic in and out of the port remains closed indefinitely. Market participants differ on the extent of any such market pressure, however. "We are in the shoulder months with less demand for thermal coal," a shipbroker said, suggesting mild global temperatures meant the collapse "may not have too much of an impact" on dry freight markets overall. Some coal suppliers will be able to load their cargoes at ports such as Hampton Roads, said two shipbrokers. This could partly mitigate any potential downward pressure on rates from suspended vessel traffic in Baltimore that would come from decreased cargo demand. But a third shipbroker doubted much US coal could be diverted to other east coast ports. Panamax rates would likely decline because "coal, unlike other commodities cannot easily pivot to alternate ports," she said. The loss of cargo could expand Panamax tonnage supply in the Atlantic, she said. "It is conceivable that Panamax intended for coal will now head south as long as they can present grain clean lengthening tonnage lists which will drive down rates." Meanwhile, vessel traffic in ports such as Charleston, South Carolina, and Savannah, Georgia, may increase on diversions across many shipping segments from Baltimore, according to market contacts. By Gabriel Squitieri and Luis Gronda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more