Viewpoint: Asia delivered, cargo bunker markets diverge
The delivered bunker fuel market is likely to become even more dislocated from the cargo market in the lead-up to the January 2020 implementation of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) cap on sulphur content in marine fuels. This will have adverse implications for marine fuel market participants that need to hedge their physical exposure — and could encourage a switch to swaps that settle on delivered bunker prices, in order to reduce any increase in basis risk.
Market participants in Singapore hedge their bunker positions using swaps that settle against Singapore 380cst physical cargo spot assessments. But this is an imperfect hedging tool, given the fuel oil cargo market has different characteristics and dynamics than the delivered bunker market.
The cargo market trades in fixed quantities of 20,000t for loading 15-30 days from the trading date, while delivered bunkers mostly trade in smaller clips of 500-3,000t for delivery 4-12 days out. And dynamics in the two markets are different, with cargo markets influenced predominantly by regional price differences and arbitrage flows, while delivered bunkers are more exposed to changes in local supply and demand, as well as blending economics.
Delivered bunker premiums can sometimes experience large increases in volatility as a result. Delivered cash premiums for 380cst bunker fuel to Singapore 380cst cargo assessments shot up to a record $25-35/t in November 2018, well above more normal levels of $12-16/t. The volatility was a result of weak demand from refiners to use fuel oil as a feedstock, as well as shutdowns of secondary units, which boosted supplies of low-density and low viscosity fuel oil — as well as straight-run fuel oil — to the regional trading hub of Singapore. This left the market with a grade mismatch and created a shortage of 380cst bunker fuel.
IMO deadline looms
There is now only around a year before the IMO implements its 0.5pc sulphur cap, down from current levels of 3.5pc, meaning there is a high likelihood that the importance of Singapore cargo assessments as a pricing basis for delivered bunker fuel will fall even further. There are two main reasons for the declining relevance of the cargo assessments — they can be subject to manipulation when compliant fuels become available and speculative activity in the swaps market picks up; and premiums can fluctuate strongly because of uncertainty over the availability of barges and tank storage, as well as possible terminal congestion.
The IMO-driven shift in the entire marine fuels supply chain towards a low-sulphur, lower-viscosity product raises the question of whether suppliers will keep a sufficient number of dirty barges available. It is unclear how much of the high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) market will remain intact after 2020 as it remains difficult to gauge how many vessels will have scrubbers installed, as well as the level of non-compliance. But it is safe to assume that the large majority of the 60,000 or so vessels in the global fleet will no longer opt for HSFO and so will instead have to switch to burning a 0.5pc low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO) or gasoil blend.
The exact composition of the supply pool remains unclear, with tank operators struggling to estimate how much HSFO, LSFO and low-sulphur marine gasoil they will need to store. This is likely to lead to terminal congestion should there be insufficient supplies of possibly incompatible IMO-compliant fuels. These logistical factors are likely to lead to large swings in delivered bunker premiums.
Delivered, physical assessments diverge
It makes sense for the market to adopt the use of financial derivatives that settle on a delivered bunker price assessment, rather than on a physical cargo assessment, given the correlation between the two is bound to weaken after the IMO regulations take effect. Delivered swaps are not readily susceptible to manipulation as they are preferably based on actual deals reported. And over-the-counter swaps markets are more liquid than the physical market, enabling suppliers and owners to react to price swings more effectively.
Any sharp decline in crude prices would most likely lead suppliers to hold off on satisfying the surge in demand from owners, as they bet on prices picking up again later. Owners could therefore find better value in the swaps market, where contracts would trade closer to prevailing market conditions. The opposite would apply during a rising market, with suppliers choosing to sell paper contracts that are trading higher than what they would be able to fetch in the physical market.
Related news posts
Ammonia-fuelled vessel trialled in Singapore
Ammonia-fuelled vessel trialled in Singapore
Singapore, 15 March (Argus) — Ammonia as a marine fuel has been trialled in Singapore on a dedicated vessel, in another step towards the port's multi-fuel bunkering capability. The trial, carried out in phases over a period of seven weeks, used ammonia in combination with diesel in the combustion process. The Maritime and Port of Authority of Singapore (MPA), along with government agencies, research partners and industry partners were involved in the trial process, said the MPA and Australian green energy, metals and technology firm Fortescue. Completion of the trial saw the Fortescue Green Pioneer receive flag approval from the Singapore Registry of Ships, along with a notation by classification society DNV to use ammonia, in combination with diesel, as a marine fuel. The trial had two of the four-stroke engines on the Fortescue Green Pioneer loaded with 5m³ (3t) of liquid ammonia supplied by Dutch storage firm Vopak from its 10,000m³ Banyan terminal on Jurong island. The Fortescue Green Pioneer was converted to run on ammonia, in combination with marine gasoil, following its first land-based testing in Australia in 2022. Ammonia has been promoted as a viable low-carbon alternative fuel for the marine shipping industry that is striving to cut its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. But the use of ammonia as a fuel has often focused on its safety risks because of its toxicity, while burning ammonia releases another GHG nitrous oxide. The Singapore trial was done in phases to ensure safe port operations and the safety of the ship's crew, as well as engineers, the MPA and Fortescue said. The crew and engineers have been having safety training since October 2023. "The Fortescue Green Pioneer is proof that safe, technical solutions for ammonia power engines exist," said Fortescue chairman Andrew Forrest. Alternative marine fuel demand in Singapore is likely to grow because of higher consumption of biofuels, as well as the rise of bio-methanol for bunkering. Singapore is also exploring using ammonia as a fuel for power generation. By Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Nigeria tightens sulphur cap on oil products: Update
Nigeria tightens sulphur cap on oil products: Update
Updates throughout London, 14 March (Argus) — Nigeria has set the sulphur content limit on refined oil products to 200ppm, effective from 1 March, according to a letter from the country's downstream regulatory body NMDPRA seen by Argus . Oil products containing sulphur levels above 200ppm are no longer permitted to discharge in Nigeria, the NMDPRA said. The sulphur limit for all oil products will be gradually reduced to 50ppm, although a timeframe has not been given. One market participant suggested the sulphur cap for gasoline may be lowered to 150ppm in the short to medium term. Some oil products recently imported to Nigeria contained up to 1,200ppm of sulphur, the NMDPRA said. The old sulphur cap in Nigeria was 1,000ppm for gasoline and 3,000ppm for diesel, according to a source. The regulator did not list penalties for non-compliance but said market participants should be "mindful of the excess sulphur content in products going forward". Enforcement of the new cap will begin at the port of origin through the online documentation process that importers have to complete, a source at the NMDPRA told Argus . Only cargoes with approved third-party certification of sulphur content below the specified limit will be approved to sail for Nigeria. A second set of tests will be conducted on cargoes when they arrive in Nigeria and only those that meet the specifications will be allowed to discharge, the NMDPRA source said. A cargo of 2,000ppm diesel has already been prevented from discharging, according to one market participant. The new sulphur limit will not hamper Nigeria's new 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery in the long run as it is configured to produce Euro V specification oil products, which should mean its road fuels contain no more than 10ppm sulphur. But according to market participants, the refinery has yet to start up its secondary units, including desulphurisation units. Since starting up, the refinery has offered at least one 60,000t cargo of 700ppm sulphur gasoil for loading on a Long Range 1 (LR1) vessel and recently agreed to supply a 20,000t clip of gasoil to a local downstream marketer later this month, according to market participants. The Major Energies Marketers Association of Nigeria told Argus last week that supply of diesel from Dangote to the domestic market is "imminent". Dangote has applied for a waiver to supply 600ppm diesel to the domestic market, the NMDPRA source said. The waiver was likely to be granted this week but would be for a limited quantity of products, the source added. The Dangote refinery has worked with the NMDPRA over the past month to gain approval for the start of secondary units that will enable it to produce diesel with a sulphur content of about 55ppm, according to a market participant. The Netherlands, one of Europe's top gasoline suppliers to west Africa, tightened its rules governing the quality of road fuel exports in April last year . It requires road fuels produced for export to low- and middle-income countries to adhere to a limit of 50ppm sulphur. Belgium is due to follow suit . By George Maher-Bonnett and Adebiyi Olusolape Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
MAN to produce SCR converter for ammonia engines
MAN to produce SCR converter for ammonia engines
London, 14 March (Argus) — German manufacturer MAN Energy Solutions has announced it will begin series production of an ammonia-ready selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalytic converter shortly. SCR technology is typically equipped for the purpose of minimising nitrogen oxide (NOX) tailpipe emissions. MAN said this system will be able to reduce NOX emissions by 90pc on cruise ships and cargo vessels, helping to meet International Maritime Organisation (IMO) regulations on NOX in emission control areas (ECA). MAN said the SCR will also aid in improving fuel consumption efficiency. The SCR system has passed final inspection by MAN Energy solutions and Japanese engineering and shipbuilding firm Mitsui E&S, the latter of which will be taking deliveries of the product. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Singapore’s Feb B24 demand lowest in more than a year
Singapore’s Feb B24 demand lowest in more than a year
Singapore, 14 March (Argus) — Singapore's consumption of biofuels blended bunkers fell to its lowest for more than a year in February with a slowdown in demand from shipowners and charterers, according to statistics from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA). Consumption of B24 — made of 24pc used cooking oil methyl ester (UCOME) and 76pc very low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) — was seen at 15,600t in February, down by 65.5pc on a month on month basis and the lowest compared with monthly volumes consumed throughout 2023. "Many SMEs are still testing biofuels, but the larger players aren't increasing their demand because they are meeting their CO2 reductions through other energy saving devices in the short term," a London-based broker said. A key buyer in Singapore confirmed that its purchases have been limited for Singapore and a key Malaysian port in February, corroborating the sharp reduction in demand for bio-bunkers in February. Singapore's consumption of B24 stood at 60,800t for January and February this year, up slightly compared with the same period in 2023. The steady and dramatic rise in demand throughout 2023, that ended with the record-high 518,000t of consumption, has stagnated, with spot sales dipping. "No one is prepared to pay the premiums," a key international trader said, referring to the average of $189/t spread on B24 over VLSFO in the past year, calculated based on Argus' data. "Owners were doing trials on different volumes, but charterers are not paying premium and so owners are not lifting much," the trader added. It remains to be seen when demand will pick up, a key Singapore-based trader said, despite the pressure on shipowners to meet CII ratings by reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from this year. Among other emerging alternative marine fuels, demand for liquefied natural gas (LNG) touched the record highest at 26,900t as key players have explored the option of bunkering LNG in Singapore in the past couple of months. Singapore's VLSFO consumption dipped to 2.55mn t for February, down from 2.86mn t seen in January. Demand for marine gasoil (MGO) also dipped, from 317,000t in January to 296,800t in February. But consumption of high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) was maintained at 1.6mn t for January and again February. Total bunker consumption in Singapore year to date stood at 9.4mn t, up from 8.1mn t in the same period last year. Overall consumption of bunkers in 2023 rose sharply through the year and hit a record high of 51mn t. By Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.