Opec+ Baku deliberations complicated by US sanctions

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 18/03/19

Opec and its non-Opec partners are holding their first Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee (JMMC) of the year in Baku today, with divergent views emerging on the need to extend the current output restraint agreement beyond its expiry at the end of June.

Saudi Arabian oil minister Khalid al-Falih has warned that the group, known collectively as Opec+, still has plenty of work to do to return balance to global oil markets, once again signalling that the alliance may need to extend its production restraint deal beyond the first half of this year. But others in the 25-country coalition appear less keen to commit to the idea of an extension, in part because US sanctions on member countries Iran and Venezuela are distorting the near-term market outlook.

Russia, among others, argues that Washington's lack of transparency over its implementation of sanctions on Iranian oil exports last November led to a more than $20/bl drop in prices after waivers were granted at the last minute to eight buyers for a significant 1mn b/d. The US must decide whether to extend waivers to buyers at the end of a 180-day period. The deadline for the US decision on sanctions is 3 May, after the producer group's next scheduled extraordinary ministerial conference on 17-18 April.

The current conflicting views could potentially set up a series of difficult negotiations among members as they decide on their next steps, at the planned April and June ministerial Opec and non-Opec meetings in Vienna.

To avert dissension among member countries over the divisive issue of US sanctions, Saudi oil minister Khalid Al-Falih announced before the start of the closed-door JMMC a new item on today's agenda — whether or not to recommend to the full 25-member alliance cancelling the upcoming April ministerial meeting. April could be too early to make any production decisions for the second half of the year, given the lack of clarity on US policy on Iran sanctions, he said.

This would allow time for the group to assess the market impact of whatever decision the US ultimately makes about sanction waivers in early May, and leave a final decision on whether to extend the current production agreement for the next ministerial meeting scheduled for late June in Vienna.

The JMMC reviews the market outlook and makes recommendations to the full ministerial conference on the group's production policies aimed at rebalancing global oil markets.

The sanctions issue aside, there are also conflicting views on the state of the market. Some members of the alliance, including Russia, believe the market is already balanced while others, such as Saudi Arabia, see rising inventories. "We have always disagreed with the Opec secretariat technical board," al-Falih said. "They don't have a monopoly on technical analysis. We are seeing inventories building. Our target has always been to bring inventories to a normal level.

"My assessment is that as we gather today… the job still remains ahead of us," al-Falih said. "We are nowhere near complete in terms of restoring the fundamentals."

And despite continuing sanctions-related supply disruptions in Opec producers Iran and Venezuela, al-Falih said he still sees OECD inventories, particularly in the US, beginning to rise. "We have been observing production and exports from Iran and Venezuela. And the fact of the matter is that they have not declined precipitously, to the point where we see that there are inventory builds from late in the fourth quarter 2018 and still into 2019," he said.

Al-Falih noted that "the overall supply situation remains long for the first quarter, and is forecast to stay long for the rest of the year. We need to stay the course, certainly until June. But we remain ready to continue monitoring supply and demand, and doing what we need to in the second half of 2019 to keep the markets balanced."

Russian energy minister Alexander Novak echoed his Saudi counterpart, saying that the group is looking at market fundamentals to decide what to do beyond June. But he stopped short of suggesting whether an extension will be required.

Novak said that the uncertainties caused by US sanctions on Iran and Venezuela make it exceedingly difficult for the group to decide before May or June what action, if any, is needed for the second half of the year. "It is clear that the sanctions have had an extremely negative and long-term impact on the market," Novak said. "We all remember the [price] fall of 2018, and remember how sanctions on Iran caused the market to collapse by almost $20/bl in a matter of months. We don't know what will happen in April, and that is something that prevents us to make any viable decision for the second half of 2019."

The US State Department is still weighing up the possibility of renewing some of the Iranian sanctions waivers when they expire on 3 May.

Compliance set to rise

Overall compliance by the countries participating in the output restraint agreement was close to 90pc in February, up slightly on January, al-Falih said. This would "easily" exceed 100pc in March, he said. Under the latest iteration of the "Declaration of Cooperation", agreed in December, Opec pledged to cut 810,000 b/d to 25.94mn b/d in January-June, while the non-Opec participants committed to a cut of 380,000 b/d to 17.91mn b/d. Combined, the alliance would cut 1.2mn b/d to 43.84mn b/d.

But, while this indicates near perfect compliance by the group in February, much of it comes down to Saudi Arabia making higher than called for cuts under the new agreement. Al-Falih said Riyadh will produce around 9.8mn b/d in March and slightly lower than this level in April. That is a sharp 500,000 b/d below the country's production target of 10.31mn b/d. Saudi exports are expected to average 7mn b/d in March and around 100,000 b/d lower than this in April.

The Saudi cuts have offset over-production by other producers participating in the agreement, including Iraq, Russia, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan. Al-Falih noted that the countries "are facing ramp-down situations within their industry, so to offset it we sort of went the extra mile". But "obviously, that is not an indefinite compensation that is going to continue", he said.

In a number of bilateral meetings held yesterday, al-Falih said some of the countries with low conformity levels have all recommitted to adjusting their production lower, in line with the targets. "I have met with each and every one of them — they have all assured me that they are on their way in a very short order, to catch up on their commitments," he told a press briefing.

Iraq's oil minister Thamir Ghadhban, also in Baku for the meeting, reiterated his country's commitment to the production cuts after poor compliance with its allocation in January and February.

"There was a decision by us to have strict adherence to what we agreed to," he said. "And in March, in the last 16 days, we have closed tightly our exports and we reduced it significantly — at least 200,000 b/d or 250,000 b/d less than in February. So we expect more adherence and better conformity in March."

Iraq, which pledged to cap its production at 4.51mn b/d in the first half of this year, produced 4.625mn b/d in the first two months of the year, according to Argus estimates. Iraq's compliance will rise significantly this month as the country takes some production offline at a number of its fields, Ghadhban said.

Russia's Novak said Moscow will be in full compliance with its commitment by the end of March or early April.

"When signing the agreement in December, we clearly communicated that it will take us a couple months to reach the targeted level," Novak said. Throttling back production in Russia is more complex because winter weather creates a number of factors that need to be taken into account.

"We need to apply special techniques," Novak said. "We need to shut down fields and we need to be careful not to destroy the potential of our fields." And "besides, we don't have one or two companies operating, we have close to 200 companies in our oil and gas space, which also means a special effort is needed to achieve our mentioned targets," he said.

Kazakhstan's oil minister Kanat Bozumbayev said his country cut production significantly in the second half of March and will remain at these lower levels for the rest of the 6-month period.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
23/04/24

Vancouver Aframax rates at 6-month lows ahead of TMX

Vancouver Aframax rates at 6-month lows ahead of TMX

Houston, 23 April (Argus) — An oversupply of Aframax-size crude tankers on the west coast of the Americas in anticipation of the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pressured Vancouver-loading rates to six-month lows on 19 April. With the 590,000 b/d TMX project expected to commence commercial service on 1 May, shipowners have positioned more vessels to be on the west coast to satisfy anticipated demand in Vancouver, but that demand has yet to materialize, leaving the Aframax market oversupplied for now, market participants said. Aframax rates from Vancouver to the US west coast began falling in mid-to-late March as an increase of ballasters added to tonnage in the region, helping drop the rate to ship 80,000t of Cold Lake on that route to $1.50/bl on 19 April from $2.55/bl on 21 March, according to Argus data. The rate held at $1.50/bl on 22 April, the lowest since 2 October and just 3¢/bl higher than the lowest rate since Argus began assessing the route on 21 April 2023. Similarly, the Vancouver-China Aframax rate also fell to a six-month low of $6.59/bl for Cold Lake on 19 April, down from $7.78/bl on 2 April, according to Argus data. In addition to the ballasters, two Aframaxes — the Jag Lokesh and the New Activity — are hauling Argentinian crude to the US west coast and are expected to begin discharging on 3 and 6 May, respectively, according to Vortexa. The Argentinian port of Puerto Rosales is mostly restricted to Panamaxes but can accommodate smaller Aframaxes. Downward pressure from across canal A recent slump in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Aframax market, due in part to falling Mexican crude exports to the US Gulf coast , has exerted additional downward pressure, a shipowner said. "Though markets at each side of the (Panama) Canal are different, softer sentiment looms in the region," the shipowner said. Last week, a charterer hired two Aframaxes for west coast Panama-US west coast voyages, the first at WS102.5 and the second at WS95, equivalent to $12.71/t and $11.78/t, respectively, as multiple shipowners competed for the cargoes. The Vancouver Aframax market typically draws from the same pool of vessels as the west coast Panama market. For example, the Yokosuka Spirit , one of the Aframaxes hired to load in west coast Panama, discharged a Cold Lake cargo in Los Angeles on 21-22 April after loading in Vancouver in mid-March, according to Vortexa and market participants. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Oman’s PDO to hit 700,000 b/d crude before 2030 target


22/04/24
News
22/04/24

Oman’s PDO to hit 700,000 b/d crude before 2030 target

Muscat, 22 April (Argus) — Oman's state-controlled PDO has several new greenfield projects that it is looking to bring on stream that should see it reach, and blow past, its target for 700,000 b/d of crude before the end of the decade. Speaking at the Oman Petroleum and Energy show in Muscat today, PDO's managing director Steve Phimister said the company has a portfolio of new "sizeable" projects in the pipeline and expects to reach 700,000 b/d by the "middle of the decade". "But what we would not be going to see in the next couple of years are multibillion dollar projects like Yibal Khuff or Rabab Harweel," he added. PDO's Yibal Khuff — one of Oman's most technically complex upstream projects — came online in 2021 and production was 20,000 b/d in 2022, according to the latest available data for production. Rabab Harweel , Oman's largest enhanced oil recovery (EOR) project, came onstream in 2018 and is producing more than 70,000 b/d. PDO adds around 10,000-15,000 b/d to its production on an average every year, according to Phimister. "Our strategy is to go above 700,000 b/d," he said. "We could, in principle, go quite way above 700,000 b/d of black oil, depending on oil price, shareholder's desire on where they want to invest". But he said PDO wants to grow in "a sustainable way" while "balancing out emission targets." The company in 2021 pledged to reach net zero carbon emissions from its operations by 2050 . The company is likely to hold onto its previous capital expenditure plans, although this is subject to final approval, Phimister said. "We have invested roughly the same amount of capital in the last few years and continue to do so," he said, adding that PDO now has a dual challenge of growing old business while reducing carbon emissions. PDO's planned capital expenditure for last year was $5bn and operating expenditure was at $2bn, in line with 2022 levels. The Omani state owns 60pc of PDO, Shell holds 34pc and TotalEnergies has 4pc. By Rithika Krishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

ExxonMobil turns up heat on climate activists


22/04/24
News
22/04/24

ExxonMobil turns up heat on climate activists

New York, 22 April (Argus) — In the run-up to the annual proxy voting season, ExxonMobil is tightening the screws on climate activists it accuses of wasting the company's resources by repeatedly submitting the same shareholder proposals that have been resoundingly defeated in the past. In its 2024 proxy statement released this month, the top US oil major lays out the case against what it describes as "serial proponents" of ballot measures that abuse the shareholder proposal process by pushing their own narrow agenda at the expense of long-term shareholders. The campaign builds on a lawsuit filed against two investors at the start of the year that were leading the clamour for ExxonMobil to accelerate its climate goals and target emissions from customers. Dutch activist group Follow This and sustainable investment firm Arjuna Capital withdrew their motion in light of the lawsuit, but the oil major has continued with its legal action, arguing that "important issues remain for the court to decide". ExxonMobil is also calling for a stricter interpretation of rules governing the proxy process on the part of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The lawsuit follows a growing backlash against environmental, social and governance investing by Republican-led states that has taken aim at large asset managers including BlackRock. The pushback has seen the SEC water down new climate risk disclosure rules following an intense lobbying effort by big business. And US bank JP Morgan chief executive Jamie Dimon recently slammed the White House's LNG export pause as "not only wrong but also enormously naive". The high watermark of the shareholder climate push came in 2021 when a tiny hedge fund overthrew a quarter of ExxonMobil's board with help from institutional investors concerned with the company's lagging financial performance. The difference between then and now is that oil industry profits have bounced back in the intervening years as the debate has shifted in favour of energy security following the war in Ukraine, sending ExxonMobil's share price to new highs. As a result, support for climate motions at oil companies has declined. ExxonMobil has four shareholder measures on the ballot for this year, down from 13 a year ago. Over at Chevron, the second-biggest US oil major, investors will vote on four shareholder proposals, down from eight in 2023. ExxonMobil is encouraging shareholders to vote against the proposals calling on it to cut executive pay incentives for emissions reductions, as well as carry out reports into pay in relation to gender and racial bias, the impact on workers and communities of the energy transition, and plastics. Ballot measures at Chevron include calls to implement reports on tax transparency and human rights practices. Early warning system? Only 3.55pc of the 140 resolutions filed at ExxonMobil annual meetings between 2014 and 2023 passed, the company says. The cost of considering each proposal is as much as $150,000. But proposals that initially attract only a small amount of shareholder support can sometimes act as an early warning system that spurs changes in company strategy further out, climate activists argue. ExxonMobil's lawsuit is an "aggressive effort to chill consideration among its shareholders about how the company is adapting its business model in light of the need for a fair and fast transition away from fossil fuels", advocacy group the Union of Concerned Scientists campaign director Kathy Mulvey says. Shareholder advocate As You Sow, criticised in ExxonMobil's proxy statement, accuses the major of attacking shareholder democracy. The board "should consider proposals on their merits, rather than assaulting the long-standing rights of company owners or their representatives", the group's president, Danielle Fugere, says. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US reimposes Venezuela oil sanctions


19/04/24
News
19/04/24

US reimposes Venezuela oil sanctions

The most immediate impact of the decision is likely to be a re-routing of Venezuelan oil flows, write Haik Gugarats and Kuganiga Kuganeswaran Washington, 19 April (Argus) — The US administration on 17 April reimposed sanctions targeting Venezuela's oil exports and energy-sector investments, and set a deadline of 31 May for most foreign companies to wind down business with state-owned oil firm PdV. The US decision rescinds a sanctions waiver issued in October that allowed Venezuela to sell oil freely to any buyer and invite foreign investment in the country's energy sector. The waiver, which was due to expire on 18 April, was tied to Caracas' agreement to hold a competitive presidential election and allow opposition politicians to contest it. Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro's government reneged on this deal by refusing to register leading opposition candidate Maria Corina Machado or an alternative candidate designated by her, a senior US official says. The US considered the potential effects on global energy markets and other factors in its decision, but "fundamentally, the decision was based on the actions and non-actions of the Venezuelan authorities", the official says. Separate sanctions waivers granted to Chevron and oil field service companies Halliburton, SLB, Baker Hughes and Weatherford will remain in place. Chevron will be allowed to continue lifting oil from its joint venture with PdV, solely for imports to the US. US-bound Venezuelan crude volumes averaged 133,000 b/d last year, up from nothing in 2022. Chevron says its Venezuela output was 150,000 b/d at the end of 2023. Argus estimated Venezuela's crude output at 850,000 b/d in March, up by 150,000 b/d on the year. PdV says it will seek to change the terms of its nine active joint ventures , starting with Spain's Repsol, in a bid to boost production. Sanctions impact The reimposition of sanctions will primarily affect Venezuelan exports to India and China. India has emerged as a major new destination for Venezuelan crude since the US lifted sanctions in October, having imported 152,000 b/d in March. Two more Venezuelan cargoes are heading to India and expected to arrive before the 31 May deadline. The VLCC Caspar left the Jose terminal on 14 March and is expected to arrive at an as-yet-unknown Indian west coast port on 26 April. The Suezmax Tinos left Venezuela on 18 March and is due at Sikka on 30 April. Chinese imports of Venezuelan Merey, often labelled as diluted bitumen, have been lower since October. Independent refiners in Shandong, which benefited from wide discounts on the sanctioned Venezuelan crude, cut back imports to just a fraction of pre-relief levels as prices rose, while state-controlled PetroChina was able to resume imports under the waiver. The Merey discount to Brent had already widened in anticipation of the reimposition of sanctions. Separate US authorisations previously issued to Repsol and Italy's Eni to allow oil-for-debt deals with PdV and enable a Shell project to import natural gas from Venezuela's Dragon field to Trinidad and Tobago are expected to remain in place. Repsol imported 23,000 b/d of Venezuelan crude to Spain last year and 29,000 b/d so far this year, according to data from oil analytics firm Vortexa. US sanctions enforcers as a rule do not disclose the terms of private sanctions licences, and the European companies were not immediately available to comment. The US would still consider future requests for sanctions waivers for specific energy projects, another senior official says. The US administration says it will consider lifting the sanctions again if Maduro's government allows opposition candidates to participate in the July presidential election. The US' action on 17 April "should not be viewed as a final decision that we no longer believe Venezuela can hold competitive and inclusive elections", a third senior official says. Chinese imports of Venezuelan crude Venezuelan crude exports Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US restricts future oil leasing in NPR-A


19/04/24
News
19/04/24

US restricts future oil leasing in NPR-A

Washington, 19 April (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration today finalized a rule to prohibit future oil leasing on nearly half of the 23mn-acre National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPR-A), adding to a flurry of recent environmental regulations that have frustrated oil interests. The rule will make it harder for oil producers to expand beyond development in the northeast section of NPR-A, where ConocoPhillips is developing its $8bn Willow drilling project. The rule outright bans new leasing on 10.6mn acres of the reserve, including around the ecologically sensitive Teshekpuk lake "special area" that is believed to hold large volumes of crude. The rule also restricts future leasing on an additional 2mn acres in the NPR-A that includes other special areas. "These natural wonders demand our protection," Biden said. "I am proud that my administration is taking action to conserve more than 13mn acres in the western Arctic." The US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) said it received more than 100,000 comments on its proposal to limit oil leasing in the NPR-A, a federal area established in 1923 where commercial oil production began only in 2015. The restrictions came after former president Donald Trump tried to increase drilling in the NPR-A through a plan to allow leasing on an additional 7mn acres, including around Teshekpuk lake. With the rule complete, BLM said it plans to solicit input on whether to revise the boundaries of the "special areas" and identify additional lands in NPR-A that could qualify for protection. Biden administration officials previously described the rule as creating a "one-way ratchet" for conservation that a new administration could not reverse. The rule will not affect existing oil and gas leases in NPR-A, including Biden's decision in 2023 to approve the Willow project, which is expected to reach a peak output of 180,000 b/d and that environmentalists strongly opposed. BLM said the 10.6mn acres of NPR-A that it closed to leasing has only medium or low potential for oil and gas resources. Environmentalists cheered the new NPR-A restrictions, with Sierra Club executive director Ben Jealous calling it a "major victory" for the arctic. But oil industry groups say the restrictions are a step in the wrong direction, adding to other recent regulations they say will make it hard to produce energy on federal land. BLM recently finalized more stringent bonding requirements for onshore and offshore land, in addition to finalizing a plan to lease federal land for conservation. "This misguided rule from the Biden administration sharply limits future oil and natural gas development in Alaska's National Petroleum Reserve, a region explicitly intended by Congress to bolster America's energy security," American Petroleum Institute senior vice president of regulatory affairs Dustin Meyer said. The administration has been working to finish regulations in recent weeks ahead of an upcoming deadline where any rule could be subject to "disapproval" in 2025 under the Congressional Review Act. The exact deadline remains in flux because it depends on how long the US Congress stays in session, but it could arrive as early as next month. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more