Latest market news

EU ETS pilot phase for Beccs, Daccs in 2025: study

  • Market: Emissions
  • 23/04/21

The EU emissions trading system (ETS) should integrate bioenergy carbon capture and storage (Beccs) and direct air carbon capture and storage (Daccs), starting with a pilot phase in 2025 and moving to full EU ETS coverage in 2030-35, researchers suggest.

In a paper expected to be published at the end of May, researchers including Wilfried Rickels of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy suggest a path starting with the revision of the EU ETS in 2021, and leading up to 2040, when the EU could start designing a net-negative cap. An earlier version of the paper, Kiel Working Paper 2164, was published last September.

The researchers suggest that the revision of the EU ETS, due this summer, should include replacing free allowance allocations with a carbon border adjustment mechanism. This would further boost incentives for fossil CCS, which in turn could lead to declining costs for Beccs and Daccs — thanks to scale effects and increased competition and learning, and because transport and storage infrastructure can be shared with fossil CCS.

The researchers then suggest that in 2023 the EU continues to lower existing regulatory barriers for Beccs and Daccs regarding, among other things, permitted means of CO2 transport, monitoring and reporting regulations, and the EU taxonomy for sustainable activities.

By 2025, the researchers suggest launching the pilot phase, which would be evaluated between 2030-35, gradually moving towards full EU ETS coverage. Evaluating the effects should take into account the long lead times between investments and operation of Beccs and Daccs. If needs be, the policy should be adapted to ensure that the reward is sufficiently strong for investors to risk financing Beccs and Daccs.

Between 2035-40, scaling up should be allowed as marginal abatement costs increase and Beccs and Daccs become more competitive. And in 2040, the EU should start the "challenging task" of designing a net-negative cap.

Regarding the comment made late last year by the European Commission's Peter Zapfel that carbon removals will play a bigger role in the 2030s than in the 2020s, Rickels argues that whether or not negative emissions technologies have a quantitative impact in the EU ETS, the legal framework conditions should be created and the technology development supported.

Zapfel, head of governance and effort sharing at the commission's Directorate-General for Climate Action, said that "quality over speed is more likely to lead us to success" in setting up a carbon removals framework for the bloc.

But the market is overtaking politicians, Rickels warns. Several larger companies have announced net-zero or even — in the case of Microsoft — net-negative reduction targets. They will add to the dynamism of negative emissions technologies on the voluntary market, away from the EU ETS. More companies will follow suit and put increasing pressure on regulators and politicians to create standards for aspects such as eligibility or permanence, Rickels says.

Now that the EU's new reduction target has been finally agreed, its focus will shift towards how to reach it, Rickels points out. In this context, negative emissions technologies will have to play a role, he adds.

Rickels also expects other sectors — mainly buildings and transport — to be integrated in the EU ETS, and for agriculture to be merged with the land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) sector to form the "ALULUCF" sector. Afforestation credits would then offset agricultural emissions.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
18/09/24

Asia-Pacific faces $815bn/yr green financing shortfall

Asia-Pacific faces $815bn/yr green financing shortfall

Singapore, 18 September (Argus) — Asia-Pacific holds significant investment opportunities in the energy transition, but obstacles such as insufficient public funding, lack of regulation and investment risks have resulted in a financing shortfall in the region. The Asia-Pacific region needs at least $1.1 trillion/yr in climate financing, but actual investment falls short by at least $815bn/yr, said Singapore's ambassador for climate action Ravi Menon at a conference in Singapore last week, referencing data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). There is existing green funding in the region such as from the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which estimated its investments amounted to $10.7bn in 2023, and bilateral arrangements like the $600mn India-Japan fund, established by India's National Investment and Infrastructure Fund and Japan Bank for International Co-operation in October 2023. But this is insufficient, especially as the region's energy demand is only set to rise further. Energy demand in Asia is growing by 2.9pc/yr, the highest of any region in the world, said Menon. Renewables such as solar and wind are now more cost-competitive than fossil fuels, but the region needs more grid connectivity and capacity to make renewable energy a viable option. Building transmission lines and energy storage in the region alone will cost about $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years, added Menon. Obstacles to capital flows Total energy investment worldwide is expected to exceed $3 trillion in 2024, with about $2 trillion going to clean technologies and slightly over $1 trillion toward fossil fuels, according to the IEA's World Energy Investment 2024 report. Fossil fuel financing by the world's 60 largest banks rose to $705bn in 2023 , up by 4.8pc from $673bn in 2022, with the rise largely driven by LNG financing. The continued investments in fossil fuels and fossil fuel-based technologies will lead to more carbon-intensive infrastructure, divert capital from clean energy alternatives and undermine climate targets, derailing Asia-Pacific from its energy transition goals. Emerging economies typically have "many developmental needs" to take care of, hence public financing in these countries cannot shoulder the overall trajectory of growth of energy transition financing, said the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis' (IEEFA) sustainable finance and climate risk research lead Shantanu Srivastava at the IEEFA Energy Finance 2024 conference earlier this month. Many smaller economies rely on financing from multilateral development banks (MDBs), but this comes in "bits and pieces" and with many strings attached, he added. It is hence essential to bring in private capital, but the region faces challenges in attracting private investments. The lack of a sound climate information architecture hampers accurate assessment and tracking of climate risks, which impedes investors' ability to make decisions and prevents the scale-up of climate finance, according to the IMF. Other measurable risks — such as political risk, credit risk, and foreign exchange risk — often significantly raise the risk premium of investments into the region. Investors tend to expect higher returns on investments with higher risk premiums, but there are limited investment opportunities available which would provide such returns and this prevents foreign capital from scaling, according to Srivastava. Insufficient regulatory and government measures in the region as well as the inconsistency of existing ones also deter private investors, as these increase project execution risks. Policy continuity and long-term visibility of what the country is going to do is essential as a "policy flip-flop" deters investor confidence, Srivastava said. Tools to attract more climate finance Blended finance is necessary to mobilise private capital for Asia's energy transition, according to Menon. Governments and development finance institutions could provide concessional or risk capital in the form of grants and limited guarantees, while MDBs can provide technical assistance in the form of development expertise, capacity building and institutional support, he said. Finance can also be encouraged through sovereign sustainable bonds, which can stimulate local sustainable bond markets by setting long-term price benchmarks, boosting liquidity, and serving as models for private issuers, according to IEEFA. The issuance of these bonds also signal a dedicated government commitment to sustainability goals and can drive the development of a robust and transparent regulatory environment, IEEFA added. This is crucial for the long-term growth and stability of the region's sustainable bond markets, which is essential for boosting investors' confidence. Another method is through revenue generation tools, such as carbon pricing and carbon taxes, according to the Financing Just Transition Through Emission Trading Systems report released earlier this month by think-tank Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI). Carbon pricing sends a strong signal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and indicates the government's intent to intensify efforts related to energy transition, which encourages private capital flow, stated the ASPI report. Carbon pricing also has the potential to generate substantial revenue, which can be allocated to climate funds to support low-carbon technology innovation and aid enterprises in making green investments, to aid low-carbon transition efforts, the ASPI report added. By Joey Chan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

California regulator floats future LCFS linkage


17/09/24
News
17/09/24

California regulator floats future LCFS linkage

Monterey, 17 September (Argus) — California would welcome bringing US low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) programs together in a common market, one of the state's top regulators said on Tuesday. Such a linkage is unlikely to occur in the near future, but California Air Resources Board (CARB) deputy executive director Rajinder Sahota said it is something worth pursuing. "I totally think we should link our LCFS programs," she said at the Argus North American Biofuels, LCFS and Carbon Markets Summit in Monterey, California. Sahota said California and other LCFS states are working on a system that could allow the trading of compliance credits between companies covered by each program, but did not provide any other details. Her comments mark a change in tenor from CARB, which historically has said a linkage would be difficult given the differing starting points and carbon intensity targets of each program. Oregon's Clean Fuels Program (CFP) started five years after California's LCFS, while Washington launched its Clean Fuel Standard just last year. New Mexico is working on its own program that will begin by 2026. Oregon and Washington regulators at the conference said there have not been any formal discussions about a linkage, but did not completely dismiss the idea, highlighting the close informal coordination between the states. "All puzzles can be solved eventually," said Bill Peters, interim director of the CFP. By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

California still eyeing 2025 start to LCFS changes


17/09/24
News
17/09/24

California still eyeing 2025 start to LCFS changes

Monterey, 17 September (Argus) — California regulators plan to propose changes to the state's Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) in coming days in hopes of ensuring updates to the program take effect in early 2025. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) will soon issue a new rulemaking package for a 15-day public comment period, Rajinder Sahota, the agency's deputy executive officer, said today at the Argus North American Biofuels, LCFS & Carbon Markets Summit in Monterey, California. "We will be working very hard to ensure we have the targets in place" by 1Q, she said. On a practical level, CARB will have to adopt any amendments to the LCFS by early January or will be forced to start over. California law requires the agency to wrap up a rulemaking within 12 months of the first proposal. Sahota declined to say what changes, if any, to the most recent language would be part of the next 15-day package. The previous language included a 9pc "step down" in the carbon intensity requirement in 2025 and also contemplated a 20pc/yr cap on a company's credit generation from soybean- and canola-oil-based biodiesel or renewable diesel to begin in 2028. That new language "is coming very shortly," she said. The agency's board is scheduled to hold a hearing on the proposed changes on 8 November and could adopt the new language at that session. The LCFS requires yearly reductions in the carbon intensity of on-road transportation fuels. Fuels with scores above the targets produce deficits, which must be offset with credits generated from distribution to the market of approved, lower-carbon alternatives. California currently requires a 20pc drop in carbon intensity by 2030. The ongoing rulemaking could bump that carbon intensity reduction up to 30pc. Surging use of renewable diesel and outsized credit generation from renewable natural gas have overwhelmed deficit generation to create a glut of credits available for future compliance. LCFS credits do not expire, and 26.1mn metric tonnes of credits — 16pc more than all the new deficits generated in 2023 — were available for future compliance by the end of March. Credits fell in May to trade at $40/t, the lowest level for current quarter credits since June 2015, but have since rebounded as the CARB process has played out. But credit prices are still well below their historical highs. Argus on Monday assessed spot LCFS credits at $58/t. By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK launches global clean power alliance


17/09/24
News
17/09/24

UK launches global clean power alliance

London, 17 September (Argus) — The UK has announced the formation of an alliance designed to speed up the "clean transition" in developing countries, as well as a renewed focus on increased and reformed climate finance. The alliance, which will be built using a "phased and inclusive approach", aims to accelerate the roll-out of renewables across the globe, UK foreign minister David Lammy said today, highlighting the importance of clean power in decarbonising key sectors such as transport. The alliance is also looking to unlock much more global finance to "close the energy gap by allowing more countries to leap-frog fossil fuels to renewable power systems", Lammy said. Other focus areas for the group will include boosting innovative clean energy deployment and diversifying critical mineral production and supply, Lammy said. The recently elected Labour government has pledged to decarbonise the UK's own power supply by 2030. Climate finance Unlocking "much, much more" climate and nature finance is critical to Lammy's approach to the climate crisis, he said, and the UK will push for an "ambitious" new climate finance goal, known as the NCQG, at November's UN Cop 29 climate conference. The NCQG is the next stage of the $100bn/yr target that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing countries over 2020-25. The UK is examining how the country can deliver its existing climate finance commitments "given the dire financial inheritance from the last government" ahead of its upcoming spending review, Lammy said. Lammy also called for more innovation in development finance, particularly concerning multilateral development banks. The UK supports a capital increase for the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development subject to reforms, Lammy said, while a guarantee for the Asian Development Bank will be laid before the UK parliament next month, which the foreign minister said would "unlock $1.2bn" for developing countries in the region. The UK will also appoint new special representatives for climate change and nature to support its diplomatic work in the areas, Lammy announced today. By Victoria Hatherick Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

German CCS debate heats up as government advances


17/09/24
News
17/09/24

German CCS debate heats up as government advances

Berlin, 17 September (Argus) — The debate on carbon capture and storage (CCS) is heating up in Germany, as the federal government finalises its carbon management strategy and environmental groups reiterate their warnings on the associated risks. Environmental group Greenpeace today slammed Berlin's plan to support CCS technology as part of its nascent carbon management strategy. Greenpeace pointed to the technical risks and high costs, and that Europe's only larger CCS sites — Norway's Sleipner and Snohvit — have already encountered "unexpected" problems. Germany's federal ministry of economic affairs and climate action stressed in a strategy paper last week that CCS is categorised as safe and "not a high-risk technology". The ministry started consultations last week on its strategy with other relevant ministries, with a draft to be sent to parliament in the next few weeks. The paper stresses that funding will be available only for dealing with technically unavoidable and "hard-to-abate" emissions, based on a "scoring model" developed by the economy ministry that analyses CCS use based on costs, technological availability, avoidance potential, emission source and lock-in risk. The cement, lime and thermal waste treatment sectors have been given an "A" score, as their emissions are deemed "technically unavoidable", with steam crackers scoring a "B", allowing these sectors to be considered eligible for support. Blue hydrogen, the glass industry and gas-based direct reduced iron (DRI) technology in the steel industry are rated "C", and aluminium, gas-fired power plants, combined-heat-and power (CHP) plants, and blast furnace technology in the steel industry are rated "D". The development of CO2 infrastructure should be "private-sector and market-driven" and "as competitive as possible", the paper said, but some "hedging mechanisms" for investors may be necessary in the "ramp-up" phase to mitigate the risks for first movers and leverage the long-term potential for economies of scale. Support would go beyond Germany's carbon contracts for difference (CCfDs), and possibly imply some kind of state backing via public bank KfW. CCfDs are among the existing funding instruments planned for certain CCS applications for larger industry firms, along with decarbonisation aid for medium-sized companies presented last month . The ministry plans to set up a CO2 infrastructure working group to co-ordinate planning, possibly alongside other working groups on areas such as CO2 use or storage. The annual quantities of CO2 to be sequestered in Germany are estimated at 34mn-73mn t of CO2 in 2045. Germany's amended draft carbon storage bill, which forms the legal framework for the pipeline-based transport and storage of CO2, is now under parliamentary scrutiny. And Germany will deal with carbon removal and the targets for "technical sinks" in its long-term strategy on negative emissions, which the government aims to present by the end of this year. By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more