Iran special: Could Tehran revive LNG export ambitions?
The lifting of US sanctions would be one obstacle toppled, but the need to produce more gas to feed projects presents another hurdle, writes Antonio Peciccia
Iran has long harboured LNG export ambitions, as the holder of the world's second-largest natural gas reserves, but while the possible removal of US sanctions could lead Tehran to revive those plans, they would still face many challenges.
Previous LNG project plans stalled over the past decade because of the international sanctions related to Tehran's nuclear programme. TotalEnergies and Shell abandoned two projects, the 10mn t/yr Pars LNG and 16.2mn t/yr Persian LNG, respectively, as sanctions escalated at the beginning of the last decade. An attempt to revive these two projects under the management of state-owned oil company NIOC following the 2015 nuclear deal also ran adrift after the US administration of President Donald Trump abandoned the deal and reimposed sanctions in 2018.
Iran had also planned a third liquefaction project, the 10.8mn t/yr Iran LNG, and had agreed with Muscat on construction of a pipeline that would allow some Iranian gas to be used as feedgas for Oman's 10.4mn t/yr Qalhat liquefaction plant, but this project has also made little progress in recent years. Start-up of the Khazzan and Ghazeer tight gas fields off Oman freed up more gas from the country's onshore fields to feed Qalhat, leaving little capacity available to liquefy extra supply.
While Persian LNG and Pars LNG were still at early stages of development, preparations for installing Iran LNG's liquefaction trains had been largely completed by early 2017. But the reintroduction of US sanctions prevented German industrial engineering firm Linde from exporting equipment for the trains to Iran.
And reviving Iran's LNG ambitions would face a more fundamental challenge in the need to free up enough gas to feed a major liquefaction project. The country is the world's third-largest gas producer, but also its fourth-largest gas consumer — from output of 244bn m³ in 2019, 224bn m³ was used domestically, leaving just 20bn m³ available for export by pipeline, mainly to Turkey and Iraq. About 13.5bn m³/yr of extra production would be needed to feed the 10.5mn t/yr Iran LNG.
Long maritime coming
Iran has been striving to accelerate development of key upstream assets in recent months, awarding a number of contracts to domestic firms, including for the offshore Farzad-B gas field that straddles the maritime border with Saudi Arabia, which is expected to add around 10bn m³/yr of output. And in December 2020, NIOC subsidiary Petropars began drilling work at the long-delayed phase 11 of the supergiant offshore South Pars field in the Mideast Gulf, with the aim of producing 1bn ft³/d (10.3bn m³/yr). Oil minister Bijan Namdar Zanganeh said last August that Iran aims to have South Pars gas reaching onshore facilities within a year. Petropars took over the project after TotalEnergies, which led the consortium that won the contract for developing phase 11 in 2017, withdrew in August 2018 after failing to secure a sanctions waiver from the US.
The supergiant reservoir of South Pars is shared with Qatar, where it is known as the North Field — and Qatari state-owned QP this year sanctioned a $28.75bn investment in four new LNG production trains to boost capacity to 110mn t/yr by 2025 from 77mn t/yr. Further developments will add two more trains to hit 126mn t/yr by the end of 2027. Qatar's decision in 2017 to lift its 2005 moratorium on further North Field development made Iran's South Pars development a more pressing issue for Tehran, given concerns over the potential impact that Qatar's huge expansion project will have on South Pars' reservoir pressure. But while QP is already weighing partnership bids from leading international oil firms — including TotalEnergies — to take up to 30pc in the project, Iran will struggle to draw investment interest. Even before sanctions were reimposed in 2018, TotalEnergies' South Pars investment plans steered clear of any LNG project commitment.
Related news posts
Australia’s Tamboran agrees NT gas sales deal
Australia’s Tamboran agrees NT gas sales deal
Sydney, 23 April (Argus) — Australian independent Tamboran Resources has signed a long-term gas sales agreement with the Northern Territory (NT) government for supplies from the Beetaloo joint venture's (BJV) proposed Shenandoah South pilot project. The binding deal for 40 TJ/d (1.07mn m³/d) on a take-or-pay basis from Shenandoah South in the onshore Beetaloo sub-basin of the NT equates to a total 131.4PJ (3.5bn m³) and begins in January-June 2026, running for nine years with an option to extend 6½ further years to 2042, Tamboran said on 23 April. This represent about two-thirds of the NT's present gas requirements and is conditional on the BJV entering a binding transportation agreement with pipeline operator APA for the planned 35km Sturt Plateau Pipeline , as well as reaching a final investment decision (FID) for Shenandoah South. Tamboran has a working interest of 47.5pc in Shenandoah South, which is aiming for a FID mid-year, following Canadian independent Falcon Oil and Gas' decision to reduce its participation from 22.5pc to 5pc in March to reduce its cost exposure to the project. BJV is operated by Tamboran, which holds a 50:50 interest in the Tamboran B2 joint venture with privately-held Daly Waters Energy controlled by US billionaire Bryan Sheffield. The BJV also holds a 10-year, 36.5 PJ offtake deal with Australian utility Origin Energy signed in 2022. The NT is dependent on gas-fired power generation. Continuing supply problems at Italian oil firm Eni's offshore Blacktip field has it currently sourcing gas from Australian independent Santos' depleting Bayu-Undan field in the Timor Sea and the onshore Mereenie joint venture . Tamboran is aiming in the long term to develop its proposed 6.6mn t/yr Northern Territory LNG project , for which it is aiming to complete initial engineering this year. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Balticconnector gas pipe recommissioned after rupture
Balticconnector gas pipe recommissioned after rupture
London, 22 April (Argus) — The Finland-Estonia Balticconnector gas pipeline has been re-commissioned, with commercial flows starting at the beginning of today's gas day. There were renominations for 12.5GWh of flows towards Finland and 78.2GWh in the opposite direction for today as of early afternoon, suggesting net flows towards Estonia of around 66GWh. Finnish demand remains relatively low, while stocks at Finland's Inkoo LNG terminal need to be mostly depleted before the upcoming arrival of a new cargo on 26 April. The Balticconnector was taken off line on 8 October following a rupture caused by a dragging anchor . The system operators of Finland and Estonia said at the time that the pipeline could return in April at the earliest, meaning the initial timeline set out for repairs has been met. The recommissioning of the Balticconnector could allow Finnish prices to realign with those in the Baltic markets now that the two areas are connected again. During the Balticconnector's absence, Finland was entirely reliant on LNG deliveries to Inkoo, meaning prices were highly volatile and frequently held significantly above prices further south. Price differentials reached a peak of nearly €58/MWh ($62/MWh) in mid-January as a cold snap caused Finnish power-sector gas demand to soar while stocks at Inkoo were relatively low. That said, the basis between the two markets has narrowed significantly since mid-March, and the Finnish price has on several days held lower than in the Baltics ( see graph ). By Brendan A'Hearn Finnish vs Estonian-Latvian prices Oct 2023-present €/MWh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
ExxonMobil turns up heat on climate activists
ExxonMobil turns up heat on climate activists
New York, 22 April (Argus) — In the run-up to the annual proxy voting season, ExxonMobil is tightening the screws on climate activists it accuses of wasting the company's resources by repeatedly submitting the same shareholder proposals that have been resoundingly defeated in the past. In its 2024 proxy statement released this month, the top US oil major lays out the case against what it describes as "serial proponents" of ballot measures that abuse the shareholder proposal process by pushing their own narrow agenda at the expense of long-term shareholders. The campaign builds on a lawsuit filed against two investors at the start of the year that were leading the clamour for ExxonMobil to accelerate its climate goals and target emissions from customers. Dutch activist group Follow This and sustainable investment firm Arjuna Capital withdrew their motion in light of the lawsuit, but the oil major has continued with its legal action, arguing that "important issues remain for the court to decide". ExxonMobil is also calling for a stricter interpretation of rules governing the proxy process on the part of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The lawsuit follows a growing backlash against environmental, social and governance investing by Republican-led states that has taken aim at large asset managers including BlackRock. The pushback has seen the SEC water down new climate risk disclosure rules following an intense lobbying effort by big business. And US bank JP Morgan chief executive Jamie Dimon recently slammed the White House's LNG export pause as "not only wrong but also enormously naive". The high watermark of the shareholder climate push came in 2021 when a tiny hedge fund overthrew a quarter of ExxonMobil's board with help from institutional investors concerned with the company's lagging financial performance. The difference between then and now is that oil industry profits have bounced back in the intervening years as the debate has shifted in favour of energy security following the war in Ukraine, sending ExxonMobil's share price to new highs. As a result, support for climate motions at oil companies has declined. ExxonMobil has four shareholder measures on the ballot for this year, down from 13 a year ago. Over at Chevron, the second-biggest US oil major, investors will vote on four shareholder proposals, down from eight in 2023. ExxonMobil is encouraging shareholders to vote against the proposals calling on it to cut executive pay incentives for emissions reductions, as well as carry out reports into pay in relation to gender and racial bias, the impact on workers and communities of the energy transition, and plastics. Ballot measures at Chevron include calls to implement reports on tax transparency and human rights practices. Early warning system? Only 3.55pc of the 140 resolutions filed at ExxonMobil annual meetings between 2014 and 2023 passed, the company says. The cost of considering each proposal is as much as $150,000. But proposals that initially attract only a small amount of shareholder support can sometimes act as an early warning system that spurs changes in company strategy further out, climate activists argue. ExxonMobil's lawsuit is an "aggressive effort to chill consideration among its shareholders about how the company is adapting its business model in light of the need for a fair and fast transition away from fossil fuels", advocacy group the Union of Concerned Scientists campaign director Kathy Mulvey says. Shareholder advocate As You Sow, criticised in ExxonMobil's proxy statement, accuses the major of attacking shareholder democracy. The board "should consider proposals on their merits, rather than assaulting the long-standing rights of company owners or their representatives", the group's president, Danielle Fugere, says. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japan's Jera shuts Chiba gas-fired power unit
Japan's Jera shuts Chiba gas-fired power unit
Tokyo, 22 April (Argus) — Japan's largest electricity producer by capacity Jera has shut the 360MW No.1-4 combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) units at its Chiba power complex because of a technical problem. Jera closed on 22 April the CCGT units at the 4.38GW Chiba complex in east Japan's Chiba prefecture, according to a notice by Japan Electric Power Exchange (Jepx). It is unclear when the units will be brought back on line. The unexpected shutdown is likely to have limited impact on Japan's power market as the country has experienced mild weather lately that has capped power consumption. Jera consumed 16.7mn t of LNG in April-December 2023, lower by 4.8pc compared with the same period a year earlier, according to the firm's latest financial results. Japan's total power demand averaged 83GW during 15-21 April, down by 3pc from the previous week, data show from nationwide transmission system operator the Organisation for Cross-regional Co-ordination of Transmission Operators. Japan plans to add 1.1GW of thermal capacity during the week to 28 April, with the addition of 11.5GW outstripping the closure of 10.4GW, according to Argus' survey based on a Jepx notice. The difference incorporates the net increase this week in gas-fired capacity of 2GW and the net drop in coal-fired capacity of 887MW. By Reina Maeda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more