H2 storage needs to exceed existing gas storage: GIE
Hydrogen storage capacity needed in Europe would fall "far short" of demand by 2050, even if all available gas storage facilities were repurposed, gas infrastructure body GIE said in a report based on a proposed European Hydrogen Backbone (EHB) project.
The report focuses on 19 EU member states, as well as the UK and Switzerland, the same framework used by EHB. Maximum possible hydrogen storage capacity in these 21 countries using existing gas storage sites could reach 264.7TWh by 2050, according to GIE, but this would be well below storage needs of 466.4TWh, based on the ratio of gas storage capacity to estimated demand (see table).
The group identifies about 1.1PWh of working gas capacity in these countries with demand of about 4.62 PWh/yr, but the much lower volumetric energy density of hydrogen compared with natural gas would greatly reduce the energy that can be stored in existing storage site.
Repurposing all salt caverns — the most suitable sites for large-scale hydrogen storage — could provide about 50TWh of hydrogen storage space by 2030. But this would also be insufficient to meet hydrogen storage needs of 72.2TWh. And the majority of this space would be concentrated in Germany, which would account for 39.5TWh of Europe's salt cavern storage.
Other storage facilities far behind
Salt caverns are the only kind of storage facility whose suitability for hydrogen is already proven, according to GIE's report.
Hydrogen is already being stored in salt caverns in Teesside in the UK, as well as in Texas.
First hydrogen storage is expected at a lined rock cavern site in Sweden in 2022, and studies on hydrogen storage in depleted gas fields and aquifers are continuing.
Still, porous structures such as depleted gas fields and aquifers are "showing fair potential to cover further storage needs for pure and blended hydrogen", GIE said.
The group expects that the levelised cost of hydrogen storage will be cheapest in salt caverns, followed by depleted gas fields, aquifers and hard rock caverns.
Total potential hydrogen storage capacity of salt caverns in Europe is about 85PWh, of which 23PWh is located onshore, according to a 2020 study cited by GIE. Offshore capacity is concentrated in salt domes under the North Sea, but the economic and ecological viability of such caverns is still unclear.
While this would be more than enough capacity to meet Europe's needs, exploiting it would require "a tremendous number" of sites to be developed, GIE said. And the high concentration of caverns in northwest Europe and a few clusters in the continent would make balancing a hydrogen network difficult because many countries would not have access to them. There are considerable barriers to development and major practical limitations to relying on salt caverns alone, GIE said.
Repurposing existing storage sites could take 1-7 years, depending on existing infrastructure, while the development of new sites would take 3-10 years, it said.
Salt caverns typically take 3-7 years to develop, with much of that period taken up by permitting, and depleted gas fields and aquifers — which would account for 215TWh of hydrogen after repurposing — take 3-10 years to be developed.
But it is difficult to generalise findings for underground storage because of the varying geological characteristics of each site, GIE said.
H2 storage, expected demand and available supply | TWh | |||
Country | Hydrogen storage need 2030 | Hydrogen storage need 2050 | Potential hydrogen storage capacity: salt caverns | Potential hydrogen storage capacity: all types |
Austria | 1.9 | 10.4 | 0.0 | 22.9 |
Belgium | 4.4 | 22.3 | 0.0 | 2.2 |
Czech Republic | 1.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 10.4 |
Denmark | 0.7 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 3.3 |
Estonia | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Finland | 1.4 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
France | 8.2 | 43.1 | 2.5 | 31.9 |
Germany | 15.9 | 111.4 | 39.5 | 61.4 |
Greece | 2.2 | 10.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Hungary | 0.8 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 16.8 |
Ireland | 0.4 | 7.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Italy | 8.3 | 56.2 | 0.0 | 47.1 |
Luxemburg | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Netherlands | 6.3 | 31.6 | 0.9 | 34.6 |
Poland | 3.6 | 36.5 | 2.2 | 9.3 |
Slovakia | 0.6 | 5.7 | 0.0 | 12.0 |
Slovenia | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Spain | 7.3 | 39.2 | 0.0 | 8.2 |
Sweden | 2.0 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
UK | 6.9 | 57.9 | 3.7 | 4.8 |
Total | 72.1 | 466.5 | 50.1 | 264.9 |
— GIE |
Related news posts
BHP to expand gas-fired West Australia power station
BHP to expand gas-fired West Australia power station
Sydney, 17 April (Argus) — Australian resources firm BHP plans to increase power generation at its 154MW Yarnima gas and diesel-fired facility near the Pilbara iron ore mining hub of Newman in Western Australia (WA) state. The proposal, according to documents filed with WA's Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), will see output increase by 85MW to a total of 239MW through gas reciprocating engines and associated infrastructure with up to 120MW of nominal new capacity to be built in stages. Peak scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the project are predicted to be 480,030 t/yr of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), while scope 3 emissions related to supplying the gas are expected to be 37,260t CO2e/yr. Power demand at BHP's iron ore operations in the Pilbara is forecast to increase from 150MW currently to 1GW by 2040, as the company reduces its GHG emissions through electrification of its rail and mining fleets and must balance renewables with firmed generation. The iron ore mining sector is a large-scale producer of Australian GHG emissions through its Pilbara-based operations. Displacing liquid fuels such as diesel, which Australia consumes at an average rate of around 500,000 b/d by electrifying processes and switching to lower CO2-emitting sources such as gas, is expected to trend as Australia's largest polluters meet government mandates . Yarmina currently runs a 35MW diesel-fired temporary power station as part of its installed capacity. Canadian energy firm TransAlta earlier this year lodged plans to build a new 150MW gas-fired power station for BHP's Nickel West operations in WA's Northern Goldfields region. WA's domestic market is likely to be short on gas later this decade despite being Australia's largest LNG export state, the Australian Energy Market Operator (Aemo) has warned in its Western Australia Gas Statement of Opportunities. Aemo's modelling released last year shows the closure of WA's state-owned coal-fired power stations will drive increased requirements for gas-fired electricity generation in the next decade. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US Gulf lowest-cost green ammonia in 2030: Report
US Gulf lowest-cost green ammonia in 2030: Report
New York, 16 April (Argus) — The US Gulf coast will likely be the lowest cost source of green ammonia to top global bunkering ports Singapore and Rotterdam by 2030, according to a study by independent non-profits Rocky Mountain Institute and the Global Maritime Forum. Green ammonia in Singapore is projected to be sourced from the US Gulf coast at $1,100/t, Chile at $1,850/t, Australia at $1,940/t, Namibia at $2,050/t and India at $2,090/t very low-sulphur fuel oil equivalent (VLSFOe) in 2030. Singapore is also projected to procure green methanol from the US Gulf coast at $1,330/t, China at $1,640/t, Australia at $2,610/t and Egypt at $2,810/t VLSFOe in 2030. The US Gulf coast would be cheaper for both Chinese bio-methanol and Egyptian or Australian e-methanol. But modeling suggests that competition could result in US methanol going to other ports, particularly in Europe, unless the Singaporean port ecosystem moves to proactively secure supply, says the study. In addition to space constraints imposed by its geography, Singapore has relatively poor wind and solar energy sources, which makes local production of green hydrogen-based-fuels expensive, says the study. Singapore locally produced green methanol and green ammonia are projected at $2,910/t and $2,800/t VLSFOe, respectively, in 2030, higher than imports, even when considering the extra transport costs. The study projects that fossil fuels would account for 47mn t VLSFOe, or 95pc of Singapore's marine fuel demand in 2030. The remaining 5pc will be allocated between green ammonia (about 1.89mn t VLSFOe) and green methanol (3.30mn t VLSFOe). Rotterdam to pull from US Gulf Green ammonia in Rotterdam is projected to be sourced from the US Gulf coast at $1,080/t, locally produced at $2,120/t, sourced from Spain at $2,150/t and from Brazil at $2,310/t. Rotterdam is also projected to procure green methanol from China at $1,830/t, Denmark at $2,060/t, locally produce it at $2,180/t and from Finland at $2,190/t VLSFOe, among other countries, but not the US Gulf coast . The study projects that fossil fuels would account for 8.1mn t VLSFOe, or 95pc of Rotterdam's marine fuel demand in 2030. The remaining 5pc will be allocated between green ammonia, at about 326,000t, and green methanol, at about 570,000t VLSFOe. Rotterdam has a good renewable energy potential, according to the study. But Rotterdam is also a significant industrial cluster and several of the industries in the port's hinterland are seeking to use hydrogen for decarbonisation. As such, the port is expected to import most of its green hydrogen-based fuel supply. Though US-produced green fuels are likely to be in high demand, Rotterdam can benefit from EU incentives for hydrogen imports, lower-emission fuel demand created by the EU emissions trading system and FuelEU Maritime. But the EU's draft Renewable Energy Directive could limit the potential for European ports like Rotterdam to import US green fuels. The draft requirements in the Directive disallow fuel from some projects that benefit from renewable electricity incentives, like the renewable energy production tax credit provided by the US's Inflation Reduction Act, after 2028. If these draft requirements are accepted in the final regulation, they could limit the window of opportunity for hydrogen imports from the US to Rotterdam to the period before 2028, says the study. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Shale discipline even at $200/bl: Ex-Pioneer CEO
Shale discipline even at $200/bl: Ex-Pioneer CEO
New York, 16 April (Argus) — Public independent shale oil producers will remain disciplined and keep production steady even if crude prices soar on geopolitical tensions, according to the former chief executive officer of Pioneer Natural Resources. "Even if oil gets to $200/bl, the independent producers are going to be disciplined," Scott Sheffield said today at the Columbia Global Energy Summit in New York. Public independents showed restraint when oil prices jumped in the immediate aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, as they focused on improving shareholder returns rather than ramping up production to take advantage of short-term prices, he said. One benefit of the recent wave of consolidation is that it may kickstart some growth in a sector that has showered shareholders with excess cash via dividends and share buybacks in recent years. Before Pioneer agreed to be bought for $59.5bn by ExxonMobil late last year, the company was only increasing output at around 5pc a year. Once the acquisition closes, the top US oil major is going to grow Pioneer's assets at 10-15pc a year, said Sheffield. "That's an example where somebody is stepping up and adding production," he added. Global crude prices have moved very little since the weekend when Israel and allies thwarted a massive missile and drone attack from Iran. WTI today fell by just 5¢/bl to $85.36/bl while June Ice Brent fell by 8¢/bl to $90.02/bl. The industry veteran stepped down as chief executive at the end of last year but remains on the board of Pioneer. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australian new environment agency to speed up approvals
Australian new environment agency to speed up approvals
Sydney, 16 April (Argus) — The Australian federal government announced today it will introduce new legislation in the coming weeks to implement the second stage of its Nature Positive Plan, which includes setting up a national environment protection agency to speed up approval decisions. The planned Environment Protection Australia (EPA) will initially operate within the Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water until it transitions to become an independent statutory agency, with "strong new powers and penalties" to better enforce federal laws, the government said on 16 April. The EPA chief will be an independent statutory appointment, similar to the Australian federal police commissioner, so that "no government can interfere" with the new agency's enforcement work. The agency will be able to audit businesses to ensure they are compliant with environment approval conditions and issue environment protection orders to anyone breaking the law. Penalties will be increased, with courts able to impose fines of up to A$780mn ($504mn) or jail terms for up to seven years in cases of extremely serious intentional breaches of federal environment law. EPA will also be tasked with speeding up development decisions, including project assessments in areas such as renewable energy and critical minerals. Almost A$100mn will be allocated to optimise the approval processes, with its budget directed to support staff to assess project proposals and help businesses comply with the law. A new independent body Environment Information Australia (EIA) will also be created to provide environmental data to the government and the public through a public website. EIA will need to develop an online database giving businesses quicker access to data and helping EPA to make faster decisions. It will also need to publish state of environment reports every two years. The government said that an audit ordered by environment minister Tanya Plibersek last year found that around one in seven developments could be in breach of their offset conditions, when a business had not properly compensated for the impact a development was having on the environment, highlighting "the need to urgently strengthen enforcement". The planned new legislation is part of the federal government's reform of Australia's environmental laws including the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Resource project decisions are currently made by the environment minister, with the move to an independent agency will removing any perception of political interference in such decisions, the government said when it first announced the reforms in late 2022. The first stage of the reform was completed late last year with new laws passed to create the Nature Repair Market, with further stages expected to be implemented in the future, the government said. Tight timing Resources industry body the Chamber of Minerals and Energy of Western Australia (CMEWA) welcomed the announcement that the federal government will take a "staged approach" to the implementation of the reforms but noted the timing of EPA's implementation was "tight". "We continue to hold reservations about the proposed decision-making model and will continue to advocate for a model that balances ecologically sustainable development considerations and includes the [environment] minister as the decision maker," CMEWA chief executive Rebecca Tomkinson said. The Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) said that it had been advocating for the creation of EIA, whose future collated data "will provide greater certainty and reduced costs for both government and project proponents", which "may shave years off project development". But it was cautious about potential "unintended consequences" stemming from more bureaucracy. "Australia has one of the most comprehensive environmental approvals processes in the world and the MCA has been clear about the significant risks of duplicative, complex and uncertain approvals processes pose to the minerals sector, the broader economy and the environment if we do not get this right," it warned. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more