UK to maintain double counting for waste biofuels

  • Market: Biofuels
  • 07/22/21

The UK government is not planning to remove "double rewarding wastes" under its Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO) scheme, in contrast to the EU which wants to stop waste and advanced biofuels benefiting from being counted at twice their energy content.

The UK's RTFO sets an annual obligation on fuel suppliers to supply a certain volumetric share of renewable fuels. The UK government recognises the benefits of using waste feedstocks and intends to continue "incentivising them with a higher reward than crops", the UK Department for Transport (DfT) said today during its quarterly low-carbon fuels stakeholder meeting. But this will be kept "under review", the department added.

Under the EU's proposal to revise its recast Renewable Energy Directive (RED II), published last week as part of a wider package of climate and energy legislation, waste and advanced biofuels produced from feedstocks listed in Annex IX A and B of the directive will no longer be eligible for double counting to meet national mandates from 2025. But the share of advanced biofuels, biogas and renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBO) used in aviation and maritime will be counted at 1.2 times their energy content.

The EU also proposed a sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) mandate for jet fuel suppliers, which would require aircraft landing at EU airports to use blended jet fuel with a 2pc SAF share by 2025, 5pc by 2030, 20pc by 2035, 32pc by 2040 and 63pc by 2050. Synthetic aviation fuels, including hydrogen, would rise from a 0.7pc share by 2030 to 11pc by 2045 and 28pc by 2050.

To counter tankering strategies, where aircraft heading to airports with more expensive refuelling services take on larger volumes than needed to save on fuel costs, the EU has proposed that the amount of aviation fuel uplifted by aircraft operators at EU airports must be at least 90pc of their annual fuel requirements.

The UK's DfT said it will publish a consultation to establish a UK SAF mandate "very soon" and that it will take steps to mitigate the potential risk of tankering in the UK.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
03/15/24

Lack of snow reduces Mississippi flood risk: NWS

Lack of snow reduces Mississippi flood risk: NWS

Houston, 15 March (Argus) — The Mississippi River faces below normal flood risk this spring because of historically low snowpack, meaning barges carrying fertilizer and other commodities may experience fewer delays from high water. The lack of snowpack in the Mississippi River basin resulted from persistent drought since last September and unseasonably warm temperatures across the Northern Plains, which prevented a base layer of heavy snow from forming, the National Weather Service (NWS) said in its final spring flood outlook on 14 March. Meteorologist Brennan Dettmann told Argus there is no snowpack in Minnesota, with only a light covering along the northern border, making for one of five driest years since the NWS began recording snowpack in 1872. There is no snow at the Minneapolis-St Paul International Airport this week compared to 10 inches of snow on the ground a year ago. This year, the most amount of snow on the ground at the airport was 7 inches on 14 February, according to NWS. Risk of flooding for the upper Mississippi River and tributaries will be entirely dependent on rainfall, with much of the basin already in a precipitation deficit because of the drought. Barges have been navigating through the upper Mississippi and will soon reach the Twin Cities after locks open tonight at midnight . This time last year, tows were just breaking the ice on Lake Pepin , signaling safe passage to begin through the upper Mississippi River. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

MEPC 81 likely to advance marine decarbonisation agenda


03/15/24
News
03/15/24

MEPC 81 likely to advance marine decarbonisation agenda

Singapore, 15 March (Argus) — The Marine Environment Protection Committee 81st session (MEPC 81) is expected to clarify steps to hit net zero targets for the sector, market participants at the Asia Pacific Maritime 2024 conference in Singapore said. The MEPC 81, spearheaded by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), will take place at the IMO headquarters in London from 18-22 March. The MEPC tackles environmental issues such as curbing ship-source pollution to sea and air, ballast water management, ship recycling, and pollution preparedness and response. The IMO had announced a net zero greenhouses gas emissions target by 2050 at the 80th MEPC session on 7 July 2023. Market participants are hopeful that discussions at this year's MEPC would include measures targeted to clarify and accelerate the implementation of maritime decarbonisation. "We saw the establishment of new IMO targets at MEPC80, but what remained unestablished was the mechanism for how to achieve these targets," chief technology officer for energy and fuels at Denmark's Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Centre for Zero Carbon Shipping, Torben Nørgaard, said. "As such, in March this year, at MEPC81, we expect to kick-start implementing the necessary measures to activate these new targets." "It is generally understood that in order to meet the targets and provide more certainty, mid-term measures should include a technical element and an economic element," Andreea Miu, the head of decarbonisation at the UK-based Sustainable Shipping Initiative, said. "MEPC81 is expected to advance the conversation on these as well as any building blocks required to operationalise such measures." Miu suggested that the meeting could cover more practical subjects like greenhouse gas (GHG) standards, carbon intensity measures, economic assessments and carbon pricing mechanisms. Discussions on how the maritime industry would handle onboard and on-land carbon capture could also take place at MEPC81 next week, Methanol Institute's chief operating officer Chris Chatterton said. The market can anticipate "a great drive around the short-term and mid-term measures that will be essential for driving the transition and creating tools and mechanisms to regulate the industry towards the newly established targets", Nørgaard said. "More clarification is needed on what the elements of a just and equitable transition will be, how funds will be collected and distributed equitably across member states globally," Miu pointed out, emphasising that it would be critical to have fair access to technology and suitable measurements of the needs of countries disproportionately affected by climate change. By Cassia Teo Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Singapore’s Feb B24 demand lowest in more than a year


03/14/24
News
03/14/24

Singapore’s Feb B24 demand lowest in more than a year

Singapore, 14 March (Argus) — Singapore's consumption of biofuels blended bunkers fell to its lowest for more than a year in February with a slowdown in demand from shipowners and charterers, according to statistics from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA). Consumption of B24 — made of 24pc used cooking oil methyl ester (UCOME) and 76pc very low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) — was seen at 15,600t in February, down by 65.5pc on a month on month basis and the lowest compared with monthly volumes consumed throughout 2023. "Many SMEs are still testing biofuels, but the larger players aren't increasing their demand because they are meeting their CO2 reductions through other energy saving devices in the short term," a London-based broker said. A key buyer in Singapore confirmed that its purchases have been limited for Singapore and a key Malaysian port in February, corroborating the sharp reduction in demand for bio-bunkers in February. Singapore's consumption of B24 stood at 60,800t for January and February this year, up slightly compared with the same period in 2023. The steady and dramatic rise in demand throughout 2023, that ended with the record-high 518,000t of consumption, has stagnated, with spot sales dipping. "No one is prepared to pay the premiums," a key international trader said, referring to the average of $189/t spread on B24 over VLSFO in the past year, calculated based on Argus' data. "Owners were doing trials on different volumes, but charterers are not paying premium and so owners are not lifting much," the trader added. It remains to be seen when demand will pick up, a key Singapore-based trader said, despite the pressure on shipowners to meet CII ratings by reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from this year. Among other emerging alternative marine fuels, demand for liquefied natural gas (LNG) touched the record highest at 26,900t as key players have explored the option of bunkering LNG in Singapore in the past couple of months. Singapore's VLSFO consumption dipped to 2.55mn t for February, down from 2.86mn t seen in January. Demand for marine gasoil (MGO) also dipped, from 317,000t in January to 296,800t in February. But consumption of high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) was maintained at 1.6mn t for January and again February. Total bunker consumption in Singapore year to date stood at 9.4mn t, up from 8.1mn t in the same period last year. Overall consumption of bunkers in 2023 rose sharply through the year and hit a record high of 51mn t. By Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Q&A: LNG-to-H2 a pragmatic path to decarbonise shipping


03/14/24
News
03/14/24

Q&A: LNG-to-H2 a pragmatic path to decarbonise shipping

Singapore, 14 March (Argus) — Australian project developer Pilbara Clean Fuels (PCF) and marine fuels firm Oceania Marine Energy are working with classification society RINA on an "end-to-end" low-carbon LNG production and marine bunkering project at Port Hedland in Western Australia that provides a path to zero emissions for the adoption of LNG as a marine fuel. Argus spoke to RINA technical director Antonios Trakakis and head of decarbonisation and innovation Jan-Paul de Wilde, as well as PCF managing director Robert Malabar, about their project and the overall outlook for maritime decarbonisation on the sidelines of the Asia Pacific Maritime 2024 conference and exhibition in Singapore. Edited highlights follow. RINA is developing a concept for a new dry-bulk ship design with an innovative LNG marine fuel system involving pre-combustion carbon removal and hydrogen production for the Pilbara to Asia dry-bulk trade route. Why have you chosen to pursue this technology to meet upcoming International Maritime Organisation (IMO) targets? Trakakis: In shipping, what we've been always trying to do is find solutions based on what we have on hand. In our solution we start with LNG, which offers an immediate reduction in GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions. We have arrived at an innovative ship design running on LNG which achieves 10pc less fuel consumption compared to the state of the art dual-fuelled ship of today, which is substantial. And yet at less cost, so we do more with less. The [IMO] regulation does not invite us to invest in green fuel to find which green fuel we're going to choose. The regulation requires from us to start immediately the reduction of CO2 emissions. If you run on LNG, if you leave aside the methane slip, on a tank-to-wake basis then the GHG savings of LNG are 26-27pc compared with fuel oil. Malabar: Switching to LNG from fuel oil gets you compliant with IMO's requirements to 2030-35. So why do anything more immediately? How does your design provide a pathway for achieving deeper GHG emissions cuts beyond 2035? Malabar: Combining low-carbon LNG with onboard hydrogen production through steam methane reforming and carbon capture provides a pathway for dry bulk shipping to comply with IMO 2023 GHG regulations, and also achieve a path to the IMO net zero by 2050 target. We would gradually add blue hydrogen produced onboard to the fuel mix of the vessel. Our design comes with flexibility. If the trajectory [of the IMO GHG reduction targets] does change then the proportion of hydrogen fuel can be increased earlier. Trakakis: Our technique employs pre-combustion carbon capture, in that we break the molecule of methane, we preserve the carbon atom as CO2 which we then liquefy and store onboard for disposal onshore, then we use the hydrogen directly onboard as a fuel. So our process is a carbon capture technique. We're the first ones to introduce and this has been introduced now in a ship design, and we hope soon to see ships built with this. But we want to stress that the use of hydrogen production onboard is not needed before 2035. Has there been interest in your vessel design from others in the industry? Trakakis: We have confirmed interest from a prominent Greek owner Maran Dry, Angelicoussis Group and we see that this concept has been adopted by Chinese yards and South Korean yards, with a lot of interest from Chinese yards especially. We hope that by June we'll have the design of many bulk carriers and tankers. What are your thoughts on some of the other alternative marine fuels being pursued like green methanol and green ammonia? Trakakis: For us, there is not enough green energy to justify the hype in green fuels [e-fuels like ammonia and methanol]. There is also not the will to sustain the cost of green fuels, which will be the most expensive solution. All the green energy currently produced on earth is just enough to produce green ammonia and methanol for shipping. Do we really believe that all the green energy on earth will be used for shipping? We also can't deny that green ammonia and methanol present large safety risks. Biofuels is a good solution but will play mostly a role for existing ships, and we don't expect biofuels to be available in the quantities we need going forward, as there's going to be huge competition with other industries. Decarbonisation is not only a problem of shipping, which is only around 3pc of total emissions. It's a global problem. What are the others going to do? I don't hear other industries talking about ammonia and methanol. Cement, fertiliser, steel, power are going to hugely depend on carbon capture. Does your vessel design technology present a lower safety risk compared with using methanol or ammonia? Trakakis: Absolutely Malabar: From the oil and gas perspective, the way they deal with more hazardous material is to minimise the time you actually have it, minimise the inventory of it, hence we produce hydrogen onboard as you need it and use it almost immediately. How important is it that the industry develops a global mechanism to close the cost gap between conventional and alternative fuels, maybe through a carbon tax on shipping? De Wilde: I think costs are the elephant in the room here. We're always talking about technical solutions and I think they're already there. There are no insurmountable regulatory and technical issues. As soon as there's money on the table, things will decarbonise as soon as we want to. All the money has to be raised either through levies or taxes to close the price gap with traditional fuels. What role can classification societies like RINA play in building collaboration within the maritime sector? De Wilde: RINA is principally a classification society. But the role of classification societies goes beyond survey and certification of ships nowadays and our customers are expecting a bit more from us. In that role we're also actively participating in finding solutions, so hence our engagement with other industry partners. We have to propose pragmatic solutions, not just solutions that work on paper but solutions that are immediately workable. We have to stress that the choice of fuel is eventually up to the shipping industry as a whole. What we're doing in this context is promoting pragmatic and immediately available solutions. But we as RINA are not in a position to push any solutions to the industry. By Lauren Moffitt Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Integration key to maritime decarbonisation: APM


03/14/24
News
03/14/24

Integration key to maritime decarbonisation: APM

Singapore, 14 March (Argus) — Collective and integration in value chain efforts are critical in the push for maritime decarbonisation beyond legislation alone, said keynote panellists at the Asia Pacific Maritime (APM) 2024 conference in Singapore. The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) aims to develop and scale up a safe and efficient, multi-fuel bunkering at Singapore's ports, while urging all registered ships registered to "participate in design of ships to mitigate risks", said the MPA's assistant chief executive (industry and transformation) Kenneth Lim on 13 March. It would be good for industry stakeholders involved in alternative marine fuels use to "document down what you have learnt, what are some of the gaps, and if there are design issues, operational issues or procedural issues. Then it is a value chain effort to come together to solve some of these problems or challenges," he said. Demand for alternative marine fuel in Singapore is expected to increase on higher biofuel consumption and growing use of bio-methanol for bunkering. The MPA announced a short-listed 11 design proposals for electric harbour craft on 23 February , progressing towards the industry's goal to hit net zero emissions for this sector by 2030. Other key issues facing the industry are safety training for seafarers and new ways of thinking of lifecycle assessments, said Denmark's Mærsk Mc-Kinney Moller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping's chief technology officer (Energy and Fuels) Torben Norgaard. The maritime industry needs to translate decarbonisation into an opportunity for global economies to "enable new ways of thinking about natural resources", he added. The importance of energy efficiency and methods like shipboard carbon capture are some ways to move the decarbonisation solutions forward, said Singapore-based Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation's chief technology officer Sanjay Kuttan. "We [also] need to start thinking of circularity and circular economy. The ability for shipping to use green steel and recycled steel in ship building process will also contribute to decarbonisation," said Kuttan. Collaboration, transparency and sharing of new knowledge among key stakeholders in this sector is vital in creating a more resilient maritime industry to reach decarbonisation targets, said the UK's Sustainable Shipping Initiative's head of decarbonisation Andreea Miu. What is needed is an open mind to realise the complexities of the shipping industry and that "there is no single solution, no single risk mitigation framework that will work for everyone… or single fuel", she added. "We need to operate in a manner that is safe, inclusive, diverse, accessible, reliable, transparent, affordable, fuel efficient, respectful, low carbon, adaptable and, last but not least, resilient to shocks and disruptions," Miu concluded. By Cassia Teo Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.