US court weighs tossing 2021 offshore lease sale
An offshore oil and gas lease sale that President Joe Biden's administration held last year appears at risk of being invalidated or suspended, depending on how a court responds to a lawsuit by environmentalists.
That 17 November offshore lease sale drew $192mn in high bids from Chevron, ExxonMobil, BP and other companies that bid on 303 tracts in the US Gulf of Mexico. The Biden administration had tried to defer the sale, but it was forced to move forward by a federal judge in Louisiana who last summer barred any further "pause" of leasing.
But a separate federal judge last week hinted there could be problems with the environmental analysis behind the sale, called Lease Sale 257. That has set off alarms among offshore producers, who worry an unfavorable ruling could jeopardize their investments or reveal confidential bidding strategies based on proprietary drilling information.
"It is impossible for Lease Sale 257 to be 're-held' in a fair and competitive manner," Chevron land manager Kyle Gallman wrote in a court declaration on 24 January.
The judge overseeing the case, US district court judge Rudolph Contreras, is reviewing a lawsuit from environmentalists that faults the Interior Department for "incredulously" saying that while the lease sale could result in the production of up to 1.1bn bl of crude and 4.4 Tcf of natural gas, holding the sale would actually reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Contreras, in a 19 January order, asked the Biden administration to brief the court on how it would proceed to a "hypothetical" court ruling requiring a do-over of the government record supporting the sale. Among his questions were whether offshore companies would have to submit a new round of secret bids in that case, and how the results of Lease Sale 257 would be affected if he vacated the underlying record.
That hypothetical has sparked alarm from offshore producers. Chevron, Shell, BP and ExxonMobil in court filings said it would be impossible to fairly redo the sale based on new bids, since their secret bids are now public. Louisiana and industry groups have also urged the court to uphold the record.
"Given the significant commercially disruptive consequences of impacting the results of Sale 257 — especially now that the sealed bids have been opened — any form of relief that threatens the progression of Sale 257 must be avoided," industry group American Petroleum Institute said.
The Interior Department has yet to formally award leases from last year's sale, according to a 24 January court response. If the court requests a redo of the record, Interior said it could prepare a new climate analysis and then decide whether to affirm or void the leases, without having a new round of confidential bids. But Interior said if the record is thrown it, it would have no choice but to void every lease and refund all money it received.
"The vacatur of the sale would remove any discretion that Interior has over Lease Sale 257 because it would entirely negate the sale," Interior said.
The environmental groups behind the lawsuit, in their own court response, say vacatur is the only way to make sure Interior starts from a "blank slate" when determining whether to hold the lease sale. They noted that when Interior updated its climate analysis for an upcoming sale of acreage in Alaska's Cook Inlet, it found not holding the sale would avoid 31mn metric tonnes of CO2, rather than reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Related news posts
Volatile energy prices risk the transition: IEF
Volatile energy prices risk the transition: IEF
Houston, 18 September (Argus) — High or volatile energy prices risk undermining emissions reductions efforts, International Energy Forum (IEF) secretary-general Joseph McMonigle said today at the Gastech conference in Houston, Texas. "If the public starts to connect high prices and volatility to the energy transition, we're in big trouble and we risk losing public support for the transition and climate policy," he said. McMonigle made his comments on a panel with several energy ministers, who discussed the issues of balancing energy security concerns with transitioning to cleaner fuel sources for electricity. When asked what he would consider a "call to action" for the global energy sector, McMonigle suggested investments in emerging technologies. "I think to allow trading of carbon credits is really important to accelerate the transition," he said. "Also, to provide financing for CCS (carbon capture and storage), which I think is one of the technologies that does not have enough investment behind it." By David Haydon Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Citgo auction result delayed amid last-minute motions
Citgo auction result delayed amid last-minute motions
Houston, 18 September (Argus) — The US court-appointed special master overseeing the auction of US refiner Citgo plans to object to a last-minute motion from the Venezuelan government to delay the sale process by four months. The Republic of Venezuela and state-owned oil company PdV filed a motion on Tuesday seeking a four-month pause in the sale of its refining subsidiary Citgo, which is being auctioned off to satisfy debts owed by PdV. Special master Robert Pincus said in a court filing today that he intends to object to Venezuela's motion for a pause. The last-minute motion from Venezuela comes days after the US District Court for the District of Delaware was expected to announce results of the winning bidder. The court asked for a second extension to the auction process in August, delaying announcing a successful bidder to on or about 16 September with a sale hearing on 7 November. But Pincus is now dealing with last-minute legal challenges filed last week outside of the Delaware courts by so-called "alter ego" claimants seeking to "circumvent" the Delaware court's sales process and "jump the line" for enforcing claims against PdV, the special master said in a filing last week. Bidders for Citgo's 804,000 b/d of refining capacity, terminals, retail fuel stations and other plants expect the assets to be sold free and clear of future claims by PdV creditors. Unresolved legal liabilities could lower the value bidders are willing to pay for Citgo, decreasing the pool of money available to those owed by PdV. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US seeks to purchase 6mn bl for SPR
US seeks to purchase 6mn bl for SPR
Washington, 18 September (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration is trying to purchase 6mn bl of sour crude for delivery to the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) as part of a plan to issue solicitations when prices are "favorable for taxpayers." The US Department of Energy (DOE) today released a solicitation to purchase up to 6mn bl of sour crude for delivery in February-May to the SPR's Bayou Choctaw site in Louisiana. If the purchase is successful, it would be the largest single purchase since the Biden administration launched its crude purchase program in early 2023. The solicitation offers a chance for the administration to buy crude for the SPR at a lower price than earlier purchases. Nymex WTI crude futures for delivery in February settled at $68.41/bl on Tuesday. The lowest-priced crude purchase under Biden was a 1.7mn purchase at a price of $72/bl in June 2023, and the average purchase price is about $76/bl. Bids for the solicitation are due by noon ET on 25 September. DOE has already purchased more than 50mn bl of sour crude for the SPR, of which 30mn bl have already been delivered. On 9 September, DOE said it purchased 3.42mn bl of sour crude for the SPR's Bryan Mound storage site at a price of $72.46/bl from the trading firm Macquarie Commodities Trading. The crude will be delivered in January-March, adding to an earlier purchase of nearly 2.5mn bl that will be delivered to the Bryan Mound site over the same time frame. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Wash. regulators plan for cap-and-trade vote
Wash. regulators plan for cap-and-trade vote
Monterey, 18 September (Argus) — Washington regulators are making a "contingency" plan in the event of a successful repeal of the state's emissions cap-and-trade program. Initiative 2117, which looks to repeal the state's cap-and-trade program and prevent any similar program from taking its place, will be on state ballots for the 5 November election. "We are doing contingency planning in case the ballot measure passes and will update our covered entities when we do have information — and I know this initiative is creating a lot of uncertainty," said Stephanie Potts, senior planner with the state Department of Ecology today at the Argus North American Biofuels, LCFS & Carbon Markets Summit in Monterey, California. The agency also remains focused on continuing to implement the program, "assuming it continues," she said. Washington's "cap-and-invest" program requires large industrial facilities, fuel suppliers, and power plants to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 45pc by 2030 and by 95pc by 2050, from 1990 levels. The department is in an ongoing rulemaking process to expand and amend its carbon offset protocols, and also continues work to gather input for linkage with the Western Climate Initiative, a linked carbon market between California and Quebec. Potts said Washington expects to have a linkage agreement in place by the end of next year. The uncertainty introduced by the ballot initiative over the fledgling market's future has tempered carbon credit prices and activity this year. Argus assessed Washington carbon allowances (WCAs) for December delivery at $30.25/metric tonne on 4 March, their lowest price since the program's inception in 2023. The drop in prices at that time coincided with a statement by Ecology outlining how a successful repeal would end the agency's authority over the program. Earlier this year, the state Office of Financial Management (OFM) released a fiscal impact statement on a successful repeal that assumed an effective repeal date would be 5 December. By Denise Cathey and Jessica Dell Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more