Industry warns on primary woody biomass

  • Market: Biomass, Electricity
  • 15/09/22

The the EU's revised 2018 renewable energy directive (RED III) could see primary woody biomass subject to a cap and excluded from financial support, if provisions adopted by the European Parliament are agreed into law with EU member states.

Industry association Bioenergy Europe welcomed the parliament's vote to keep counting all forms of biomass for energy — including primary woody biomass — as a renewable energy source under the EU's 2030 target. But contentious amendments received support in plenary on 14 September. Parliament now wants to cap the share of primary woody biomass at levels seen in 2017-2022 and remove the eligibility of primary woody biomass for financial support.

Members passed an additional amendment that called for a "phase-down", by 2030, of the share of fuels derived from primary woody biomass that count towards EU renewable targets. The phase-down will be based on an impact assessment to be carried out by the European Commission within three years of RED III being up and running.

The text adopted by parliament on 14 September still needs to be agreed into law, following negotiations with EU countries. EU countries reached a compromise in June confirming support for the European Commission's original July 2021 proposal that member states should not grant support to the production of energy from "saw logs, veneer logs, stumps and roots and avoid promoting the use of quality roundwood for energy except in well-defined circumstances".

EU countries do not currently mention or exclude primary woody biomass in their support schemes. But member states suggest use of woody biomass according to its "highest economic and environmental added value" as wood-based products. And member states want support schemes for bioenergy to be designed to avoid "incentivising unsustainable bioenergy pathways and distorting competition with the material sectors".

Caps and phase-downs would be "counterproductive" and limiting the use of bioenergy contradicts the commission's climate ambitions and affects the entire supply chain, Bioenergy Europe said. Policy director Irene di Padua strongly opposes excluding primary woody biomass from financial support schemes. "This undermines the viability of sustainable forest management practices, which would have an impact on the entire value chain," she said. "At the same time the parliament is asking member states to support a higher renewable target. It is difficult to see how restricting support for renewables would help reach that goal," di Padua said.

There needs to be a balance between avoiding the negative effects on biodiversity and the impact this could have on energy supply, EU commissioner Adina Valean said in parliament. "Restricting renewable targets to primary woody biomass would not send the right signal in the current context of tight energy supplies," she said.

Tackling tight energy markets saw commission president Ursula von der Leyen announce emergency measures including power demand reduction obligations and a price cap. If adopted by EU member states, not parliament, the cap would also oblige utilities to secure pellets at a wide discount to current spot market prices, in order to keep fuel costs at or under the planned €180/MWh cap.

The voted draft suggests a stipulation that member states consider "the available sustainable supply of biomass for energy and non-energy uses … as well as the principles of the circular economy and the biomass cascading use". But it adds that countries should be able to grant support for the production of energy from stumps or roots in the case of waste, or from residues from works on nature conservation and landscape management. Member states should avoid promoting the use of quality roundwood for energy except in well-defined circumstances such as wildfire prevention and salvage logging. Bioenergy Europe had said in a position paper earlier this month that the cascading principle should not be regulated at the European level.

The parliament also voted that member states should not give support to electricity-only plants from 2026, unless installations are in regions with a specific use status in their transition away from fossil fuels, or if they use carbon capture and storage, or — in exceptional justified cases — if the installations cannot be modified in a direction to cogeneration.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI

London, 28 March (Argus) — The "best bet" to achieving global energy security is through mitigation funding and multilateral cooperation, according to the World Resources Institute (WRI). WRI highlighted that governments are funding more domestic renewable energy projects but have increased oil and gas production in the name of "energy security" at home in the years following the Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The recent rebrand of energy transition funding to energy security funding has allowed some developed nations to justify domestic oil and gas licences and drag their feet on multilateral financial commitments. This is causing "real worry" among climate-vulnerable developing nations, WRI chief executive Ani Dasgupta said. He said that although the initial "shock" to the world's energy markets after the invasion of Ukraine "quickly went away", it has triggered "real worry among poorer countries that when push comes to shove, it won't be an even game, or have a fair outcome." Developing countries have long complained about the lack of access to climate funding. Richer nations have only recently met the $100bn/yr target in climate finance to developing countries agreed in 2009, while discussions on setting a new climate finance goal for 2025 at Cop 29 in Baku in November could prove difficult. President of the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) Denis Sassou-Nguesso said last year that the $100bn/yr in climate financing to developing countries promised by rich countries "never reached us", adding that the annual UN Cop climate conferences have become little more than a talking shop. "Just after the invasion of Ukraine, every country started to think about energy security," Dasgupta said. "In theory, good things could have happened, countries could have concluded that their best bet to getting energy security is by going renewable". But it was not the case in key consumer countries or regions, Dasgupta pointed out. China bought the majority of Russian gas following the EU's withdrawal, he said, and has since upped production at coal-fired power stations despite an "extraordinary" acceleration towards renewables set for 2023-28, according to Paris-based energy watchdog IEA . In Europe, the UK and Norway continue to award new oil and gas licences . "In the US, the fossil fuel lobby argues that the best route to energy security is to invest more in fossil fuels". But the best route is to invest in more renewables, he said. "Even if the US produces a large amount of oil and gas, it is still a traded commodity, and so you have to pay a price for it that is set globally." The US special presidential co-ordinator for energy security Amos Hochstein has also suggested in September that a widening climate finance gap could ultimately threaten global security. "We have seen the percentage of dollars spent on the energy transition outside the OECD, in developing and middle income countries actually go down instead of up…" By Madeleine Jenkins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Japan’s Renova starts Miyagi biomass power plant


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Japan’s Renova starts Miyagi biomass power plant

Tokyo, 28 March (Argus) — Japanese renewable power developer Renova started commercial operations today at its 75MW Ishinomaki Hibarino biomass-fired power plant in northeast Japan's Miyagi prefecture. The power plant is designed to consume an undisclosed volume of wood pellets and palm kernel shells (PKS) to generate around 530 GWh/yr of electricity. Renova originally targeted to start up the power plant in May 2023 but postponed the start-up multiple times. Renova has been forced to delay the start-up schedules at several of its power plants. It previously targeted to begin commercial operations of the 75MW Omaezaki biomass power plant this month but postponed it to July, as the final adjustment of boiler and turbine units is taking longer than expected. It delayed the launch of the 74.8MW Tokushima Tsuda biomass power plant in September before it began commercial operations in December 2023 . Japan imported 1mn t of wood pellets during January-February, up by 14pc from the same period in 2023, according to the finance ministry. PKS purchases fell by 24pc to 466,186t. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Electrification key to cut UK offshore emissions: NSTA


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Electrification key to cut UK offshore emissions: NSTA

London, 27 March (Argus) — The UK offshore oil and gas industry must make "decisive emissions reduction actions now and on an ongoing basis", with asset electrification and low carbon power central to making cuts, regulator the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) said today. "Where the NSTA considers electrification reasonable, but it has not been done, there should be no expectation that the NSTA will approve field development plans", the regulator said in a new emissions reduction plan. The NSTA set out "four clear contributing factors to decarbonising the industry" — including asset electrification, investment and efficiency and action on flaring and venting. It will also look at "inventory as a whole", ramping up scrutiny on assets with high emissions intensity. Relevant companies must produce emissions reduction action plans for offshore assets, the NSTA said. New developments with first oil or gas after the beginning of 2030 must be either fully electrified or run on "alternative low carbon power with near equivalent emission reductions", the NSTA said. New developments with first oil or gas before 2030 should be electrification-ready at minimum. If electrification is not reasonable, other power emissions reductions must be sought, the regulator said. The offshore industry must from 1 June provide "a documented method of the split of projected flaring and venting figures into categories", and must from 1 June 2025 have a plan and budget to "deliver continuous improvements in flaring and venting", it said. New developments — including tie-backs — must be planned on the basis of zero routine flaring and venting, which every asset must reach by 2030. Industry flaring almost halved between 2018-22, the NSTA said. The regulator has flagged a particular focus on methane emissions. The NSTA may require developers to agree to cease production of assets with high emissions intensity "with reference to societal carbon values", it said. Societal carbon values are calculated by the UK government to reflect the marginal cost to society of additional CO2 emissions. It will discuss end dates for production for assets with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity 50pc over the average for the UK offshore, and which intend to produce oil or gas beyond 2030. This represents a slight watering down of the initial plan the NSTA consulted on last year. The North Sea Transition Deal, agreed in 2021, commits the UK offshore industry to reducing its production emissions of GHGs by 10pc by 2025, by 24pc by 2027 and by 50pc by 2030, from a 2018 baseline. Industry has itself committed to a 90pc reduction by 2040 and a net zero basin by 2050, the NSTA said. It "would welcome industry owning and delivering these reductions", it said, adding that its plan is focused on emissions cuts and "emissions offsetting will not be considered towards meeting the obligations." By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Germany sees no return to easy EU climate decisions


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

Germany sees no return to easy EU climate decisions

Brussels, 26 March (Argus) — German environment minister and green party politician Steffi Lemke has warned that easy decision-making processes for climate change and environment policies in the EU are unlikely to return after the election in June. This comes after a key EU vote on a provisional deal for climate, nature and environment was withdrawn because of a lack of member state support. Global challenges and geopolitic "are all too profound" to go back to what the EU decision-making process was like five years ago, Lemke said. But she noted that ultimately depends on the EU elections results in June and "how far extreme and populist parties gain majorities". This comes as the adoption the nature restoration law was cancelled yesterday after a number of countries, including Hungary, withdrew their support. Lemke said the vote was supposed to be "a formality" but that it is now unclear whether the law can still pass in this legislative period. The European Parliament had previously approved the nature restoration law, agreed with EU states, that commits EU countries to restoring at least 30pc of habitats in poor condition by 2030, 60pc by 2040, and 90pc by 2050. Lemke said that not adopting the nature restoration law would leave the EU more exposed to climate change. "We'll not be able to manage climate risks without nature in order," she said. Unstable ecosystems exacerbate the problems faced because of climate change, for the economy, infrastructure, human health, she said. "It's also about protecting agriculture from climate change". "US insurers are withdrawing from different regions because they can't insure climate risks anymore". "We shouldn't make the mistake of scoring easy points against climate and environmental protection," she added. "Climate-friendly states will try to get [the law] up for adoption at a later date," she added. When asked whether Germany has some responsibility for encouraging others to block provisional agreements on EU laws, she said that the country has not always been an "easy negotiation partner". But Lemke pointed out that Germany had finally approved many important laws, most recently the packaging and packaging waste regulation . The phase-out of the internal combustion engine had been particularly difficult for the German government. Other member states have also encountered major difficulties in securing government approval or parliamentary support, she said, pointing again the geopolitical situation after Russia's attack on Ukraine. Many countries have seen populist parties and right-wing extremist parties fueling uncertainty, and have had to contend with the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and global inflation. "This had made democratic governance significantly more difficult in the member states themselves, but also in Europe," she said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Jera delays Hekinan NH3-coal co-firing test: Correction


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

Jera delays Hekinan NH3-coal co-firing test: Correction

Corrects trial period in first paragraph Osaka, 26 March (Argus) — Japan's largest power producer by capacity Jera has pushed back a trial to co-fire 20pc of fuel ammonia with coal at its Hekinan power plant to after the end of March. Jera previously said the co-firing demonstration at the 1GW Hekinan No.4 unit will start on 26 March at the earliest . But the company has decided to push this back. The trial will begin sometime after the end of this month, Jera said on 25 March. It took more time to test run equipment ahead of the demonstration, with safety the main priority, it added. It is unclear when exactly the company will start the trial to co-fire 20pc of ammonia with coal. Jera aims to demonstrate 20pc co-firing of ammonia with coal ahead of planned commercial operations in the April 2027-March 2028 fiscal year. It also hopes to achieve a 50pc mixture on a commercial basis in the first half of the 2030s. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more