Scope 3 target would boost emissions: ExxonMobil
ExxonMobil has no target for reducing carbon emissions from the use of its products because adopting one would increase global greenhouse gas emissions, chief executive Darren Woods said.
Tracking such Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions makes sense for measuring global progress on combating climate change, but there are "significant downsides" at the company level, Woods said today at the CERAWeek by S&P Global conference in Houston, Texas. For instance, if ExxonMobil had a Scope 3 reduction target, the company would produce less natural gas, and someone else would produce more coal, which would increase global carbon emissions, he said.
"We are growing our LNG business. Every ton we produce backs out coal somewhere in the world," Woods said.
Likewise, ExxonMobil's refineries have the world's lowest carbon intensities, so reducing gasoline and diesel production would make room for more output from a producer with an inferior environmental profile, he said.
"The world does not benefit from that," Woods said.
While ExxonMobil does not have a target for reducing emissions from its products, it plans to achieve net-zero carbon emissions from its operations by 2050, and by 2030 net-zero emissions from its oil and gas production in the Permian basin. It is also continuing efforts to stop pipeline emissions and curtail routine gas flaring, Woods said.
The company has earmarked $17bn for low-carbon projects through 2027, including a planned carbon capture and storage project in Baytown, Texas, that would decarbonize chemical production at the site and allow others to also permanently store carbon emissions. But helping others reduce emissions is not recognized by Scope 3 measures, Woods said.
It is not the production of oil and gas that contributes to climate change, but the combustion of those commodities that adds to emissions, Woods said. Carbon capture and sequestration can help address those emissions "without destroying your economies, without wiping out your industrial processes, without backing out of 100s of years of investment in power generation," he said.
Related news posts
Vancouver Aframax rates at 6-month lows ahead of TMX
Vancouver Aframax rates at 6-month lows ahead of TMX
Houston, 23 April (Argus) — An oversupply of Aframax-size crude tankers on the west coast of the Americas in anticipation of the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pressured Vancouver-loading rates to six-month lows on 19 April. With the 590,000 b/d TMX project expected to commence commercial service on 1 May, shipowners have positioned more vessels to be on the west coast to satisfy anticipated demand in Vancouver, but that demand has yet to materialize, leaving the Aframax market oversupplied for now, market participants said. Aframax rates from Vancouver to the US west coast began falling in mid-to-late March as an increase of ballasters added to tonnage in the region, helping drop the rate to ship 80,000t of Cold Lake on that route to $1.50/bl on 19 April from $2.55/bl on 21 March, according to Argus data. The rate held at $1.50/bl on 22 April, the lowest since 2 October and just 3¢/bl higher than the lowest rate since Argus began assessing the route on 21 April 2023. Similarly, the Vancouver-China Aframax rate also fell to a six-month low of $6.59/bl for Cold Lake on 19 April, down from $7.78/bl on 2 April, according to Argus data. In addition to the ballasters, two Aframaxes — the Jag Lokesh and the New Activity — are hauling Argentinian crude to the US west coast and are expected to begin discharging on 3 and 6 May, respectively, according to Vortexa. The Argentinian port of Puerto Rosales is mostly restricted to Panamaxes but can accommodate smaller Aframaxes. Downward pressure from across canal A recent slump in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Aframax market, due in part to falling Mexican crude exports to the US Gulf coast , has exerted additional downward pressure, a shipowner said. "Though markets at each side of the (Panama) Canal are different, softer sentiment looms in the region," the shipowner said. Last week, a charterer hired two Aframaxes for west coast Panama-US west coast voyages, the first at WS102.5 and the second at WS95, equivalent to $12.71/t and $11.78/t, respectively, as multiple shipowners competed for the cargoes. The Vancouver Aframax market typically draws from the same pool of vessels as the west coast Panama market. For example, the Yokosuka Spirit , one of the Aframaxes hired to load in west coast Panama, discharged a Cold Lake cargo in Los Angeles on 21-22 April after loading in Vancouver in mid-March, according to Vortexa and market participants. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
USGC LNG-VLSFO discount to steady itself
USGC LNG-VLSFO discount to steady itself
New York, 23 April (Argus) — The premium for US Gulf coast (USGC) very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) to LNG is expected to linger but not widen this spring, maintaining interest in LNG as a bunkering fuel. US Gulf coast LNG prices slipped from a premium to a discount to VLSFO in March 2023 and have remained there since. The discount surpassed 200/t VLSFO-equivalent in January (see chart). Both LNG and VLSFO prices are expected to remain under downward pressure due to high inventories, which could keep the current LNG discount steady. The US winter natural gas withdrawal season ended with 39pc more natural gas in storage compared with the five-year average, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Henry Hub natural gas monthly average prices dropped below $2/mmBtu in February, for the first time since September 2020, Argus data showed. The EIA expects the US will produce less natural gas on average in the second and third quarter of 2024 compared with the first quarter of 2024. Despite lower production, the US will have the most natural gas in storage on record when the winter withdrawal season begins in November, says the EIA. As a result, the agency forecasts the Henry Hub spot price to average less than $2/mmBtu in the second quarter before "increasing slightly" in the third quarter. EIA's forecast for all of 2024 averages about $2.20/mmBtu. US Gulf coast VLSFO is facing downward price pressure as demand falls and increased refinery activity signals a potential supply build . Rising Gulf coast refinery activity was likely behind some of the drop in prices. Gulf coast refinery utilization last week rose to 91.4pc, the highest in 12 weeks and up by 0.9 percentage points from the prior week. US Gulf coast suppliers are also eyeing strong fuel oil price competition from eastern hemisphere ports such as Singapore and Zhoushan, China, importing cheap Russian residual fuel oil. In general, LNG's substantial discount to VLSFO has kept interest in LNG for bunkering from ship owners with LNG-burning vessels high. The EIA discontinued publishing US bunker sales statistics with the last data available for 2020. But data from the Singapore Maritime & Port Authority, where the LNG–VLSFO discount widened to over $200/t VLSFOe in February, showed Singapore LNG for bunkering demand increase 11.4 times to 75,900t in the first quarter compared with 6,700t in the first quarter of 2023 and 110,900t for full year 2022. By Stefka Wechsler US Gulf coast LNG vs VLSFO $/t VLSFOe Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
India’s Chhara LNG terminal faces commissioning delay
India’s Chhara LNG terminal faces commissioning delay
Mumbai, 23 April (Argus) — Indian state-owned refiner HPCL's 5mn t/yr Chhara LNG import terminal is again facing delays in receiving and unloading its commissioning cargo, a market source told Argus . Fender failure at the terminal has caused problems in berthing the LNG vessel. The fender acts as a buffer or cushion between the ship hull and the dock, and prevents damage as a result of contact between the two surfaces. HPCL on 22 April issued a tender offering the commissioning LNG cargo , which is onboard the 160,000m³ Maran Gas Mystras. The vessel is currently laden offshore the terminal and ready to redeliver to another Indian LNG terminal on 25-30 April, according to HPCL. The company is seeking bids at a fixed price, and custom duty has already been paid by the firm. Indian firm Gujarat State Petroleum (GSPC) facilitate HPCL's purchase of the cargo on 26 March, with the cargo for delivery over 9-12 April. HPCL has put up the commissioning cargo for auction, and it can be discharged from any alternative port in India. LNG terminals closer to Chhara include Indian state-controlled importer Petronet's 17.5mn t/yr Dahej, Shell's 5.2mn t/yr Hazira or state-owned gas distributor Gail's 5mn t/yr Dhabol LNG terminal. HPCL also has not awarded a tender that is seeking another early-May delivery cargo , which closed on 19 April. Commissioning of the Chhara LNG terminal has been delayed since September 2022 owing to pipeline issues. The terminal is the country's eighth LNG import facility, which would lift total regasification capacity to 52.7mn t/yr from 47.7mn t/yr currently. The pipeline runs from the terminal and connects the city gas distribution network from Lothpur to Somnath district in Gujarat. There has been a delay in opening the pipeline as it passes through the eco-sensitive zone of the Gir wildlife sanctuary for 25.816km, a government document shows. The facility was completed in February, but is set to be closed from 15 May-15 September ahead of the completion of a breakwater facility , which is required to ensure safe LNG tanker berthing during India's monsoon season. No specific timeline has been given for building the breakwater, but the terminal will be able to operate year-round once it is completed. By Rituparna Ghosh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Kuwait’s KPC agrees VLSFO term supply contract with QE
Kuwait’s KPC agrees VLSFO term supply contract with QE
Singapore, 23 April (Argus) — Kuwait's KPC hassigned a term agreement with fellow state-owned firm Qatar Energy (QE) to supply very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) for loading over July 2024 through to June 2025. The VLSFO supplied amounts to 1.2mn t/yr (21,000 b/d). KPC finalised the term contract at around a $8-9/t premium against the average of Singapore 0.5pc marine fuel spot assessments, according to a source close to the company. QE has expanded its own bunkering infrastructure at the port of Ras Laffan and started relying on VLSFO supplied from Kuwait's 615,000 b/d al-Zour refinery since early last year. The VLSFO supplied is mainly to meet the country's bunkering and power generation demand. QE had a previous mini term VLSFO agreement with KPC last year. KPC supplied around 1-2 Medium Range size vessels of VLSFO each month from January 2023 to March this year, according to global trade analytics platform Kpler. The announcement of the term deal left the market unfazed, said a Dubai based fuel oil trader, as KPC has regularly offered term tenders over the year. Supplies to QE has been continuing since last year, with the deal merely being a renewal of their previous agreement, the trader added. This is KPC's third official term contract concluded since the start-up of al-Zour in late 2022. The first term contract was awarded for second-half 2023 loading to Shell, with the second to ExxonMobil for first-half 2024 loading. The terms of the two contracts stated a minimum of 80,000 t/month and a maximum of 720,000 t/month of VLSFO, with KPC having discretion over the total volume. Al-Zour can produce around 11mn-12mn t/yr of VLSFO at full capacity, with around half of it allocated for exports. By Asill Bardh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more