US gas price volatility likely to continue
The past 18 months have been a wild ride for natural gas prices, as well as for the bottom line of investors and companies that are subject to their gyrations.
Spot prices in production and demand centers of the US have broken volatility records in recent months, while producers have reversed their course on hedging as gas prices collapsed.
The next few years portend more of the same.
"I think volatility is here to stay for the foreseeable future," Citi analyst Paul Diamond told Argus. "The underlying issues causing that step change in the last 24 months are not going away."
If one measures volatility by the number of days an asset moves by more than 7pc in value, 2022 was the most volatile year for natural gas prices since at least the beginning of the shale era. In 2022, the price for day-ahead delivery at the US benchmark Henry Hub in Louisiana rose or fell by more than 7pc on 65 occasions, the most of any year since at least 2009, according to an Argus analysis.
So far, the Henry Hub has done so 21 times this year. At that rate, 2023 will be more volatile than 2022.
How volatility returned to gas markets
After the shale revolution of the 2000s brought cheap and efficient techniques for increasing domestic gas production, including horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," US gas prices enjoyed a long decade of low volatility. On average, the US benchmark only moved by more than 7pc on 17 days/yr between 2009-2021 — about one-third the 2022 rate.
That period of relative price stability ended sometime around the fourth quarter of 2021 when prices rose on an unexpected increase in power demand and record-high LNG exports. Despite tight supplies and high prices, producers mostly stuck to their promises to investors to maintain capital discipline, declining to increase production at pace with demand.
Producers stuck to their script even when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, threatening gas supply to Europe and causing a global energy crisis in which overseas appetite for US gas soared, lifting prices even higher.
The prompt-month price — the price for delivery of gas every day in the following calendar month — for the Henry Hub in December 2021 averaged $3.86/mmBtu. In May 2022, the price was more than twice as high, at $8.16/mmBtu. It averaged over $7/mmBtu in subsequent months, peaking at $9.68/mmBtu on 22 August, the highest since 23 July 2008.
When the 2 Bcf/d (57mn m3/d) Freeport LNG export terminal in Texas went off line in June after a fire, record-high gas consumption kept prices afloat even as domestic supply instantly increased. When the consumption leveled off as cooling demand fell, however, prices began to fall, insulated from the overseas chaos by an absence of LNG export capacity. The price drop accelerated when the US experienced historically low heating demand in January and February, pushing inventories from a deficit to a surplus to the five-year average.
In the two months ended yesterday, the Henry Hub prompt-month price averaged $2.47/mmBtu.
Why volatility could be here to stay
While some of the volatility of recent months has been because of unforeseen events — the war in Ukraine, the fire at Freeport LNG, historically mild weather — much of the volatility to come is expected to arise because of structural uncertainty currently being built into the gas market.
One piece of that uncertainty is what price crude oil and gas will be fetching when LNG export terminals begin coming on line in late 2024 and beyond. For example, if oil prices are low and producers in the Permian respond by pulling back on drilling, that will reduce associated gas production, which could starve LNG terminals. Low gas prices could also reduce production in the Haynesville, which would be hard to make up for in the Marcellus and Utica shales, where pipeline takeaway capacity limits production growth.
If LNG terminals are delayed, prices could plunge as domestic supply races ahead of demand.
"As we add more LNG demand along the Gulf Coast, the timing between LNG facilities, the pipelines to feed them, and the production to meet the new demand all has to be in sync," BTU Analytics analyst Connor McLean told Argus. "If the timing slips for any of those pieces, we are likely to see the market react strongly until the other pieces catch up."
On top of the uncertainty, the steady retirement of coal-fired power plants has reduced the ability of electrical utilities to switch from coal to gas when supplies of one or the other are constrained. And while gas consumption continues to rise, regional opposition to the construction of new pipelines has led to a slowdown in expansions of pipeline capacity.
The increased reliance on gas can make market participants react more strongly to price signals than they would have otherwise.
Related news posts
US economic growth slows to 1.6pc in 1Q
US economic growth slows to 1.6pc in 1Q
Houston, 25 April (Argus) — The US economy in the first quarter grew at a 1.6pc annual pace, slower than expected, while a key measure of inflation accelerated. Growth in gross domestic product (GDP) slowed from a 3.4pc annual rate in the fourth quarter, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reported on Thursday. The first-quarter growth number, the first of three estimates for the period, compares with analyst forecasts of about a 2.5pc gain. Personal consumption slowed to a 2.5pc annual rate in the first quarter from a 3.3pc pace in the fourth quarter, partly reflecting lower spending on motor vehicles and gasoline and other energy goods. Gross private domestic investment rose by 3.2pc, with residential spending up 13.9pc after a 2.8pc expansion in the fourth quarter. Government spending growth slowed to 1.2pc from 4.6pc. Private inventories fell and imports rose, weighing on growth. The core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, which the Federal Reserve closely follows, rose by 3.7pc following 2pc annual growth in the fourth quarter, although consultancy Pantheon Macroeconomics said revisions to the data should pull the index lower in coming months. The Federal Reserve is widely expected to begin cutting its target lending rate in September following sharp increases in 2022 and early 2023 to fight inflation that surged to a high of 9.1pc in June 2022. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
India’s Gail to shut Dabhol LNG terminal for monsoon
India’s Gail to shut Dabhol LNG terminal for monsoon
Mumbai, 25 April (Argus) — Indian state-controlled gas distributor Gail is planning to shut its 5mn t/yr Dabhol LNG terminal on the west coast from 15 May, ahead of monsoon rains. Gail will also stop importing LNG from mid-May at the terminal, a company official told Argus . This is because of the lack of a breakwater facility at the terminal, which prevents it from anchoring ships in turbulent seas. The breakwater facility was expected to be completed in January, but the cause of the delay is unknown. The terminal is likely to resume operations from the end of September, similar to its plans in 2023 , as this shutdown over the monsoon season is routine. Gail is set to receive a total of 139,635t LNG at the Dabhol terminal in May, which will arrive in two separate shipments from the US' 5.75mn t/yr Cove Point export facility. Both cargoes will be the last that the terminal will receive before it shuts in mid-May. It has received 583,326t of LNG at the terminal since the beginning of the year, lower by 4pc on the year, data from market analytics firm Kpler show. The Dabhol terminal only receives about 2.9mn t/yr of LNG, despite having a nameplate capacity of 5mn t/yr, because it is not used during the monsoon season. Gail intends to gradually increase the capacity of the Dabhol terminal to 12mn t/yr by April 2030–March 2031. By Rituparna Ghosh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules
EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules
Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Libya eyes progress on Eni-led oil and gas project
Libya eyes progress on Eni-led oil and gas project
London, 24 April (Argus) — Libya intends to move ahead with a $4bn-5bn oil and gas project proposed by Eni, months after putting the project on hold because of widespread opposition. The country's Supreme Council for Energy last month essentially cleared the way for block NC-07 to be awarded to a consortium of Italy's Eni, France's TotalEnergies, Abu Dhabi's Adnoc and Turkey's state-owned Turkish Energy after a technical review found Libyan institutions lacked the financial means to develop the project alone, according to leaked minutes of the meeting seen by Argus . More recently, Turkey's energy minister Alparslan Bayraktar said on 19 April that an agreement on NC-07 was close. "We are about to sign," he said. On 16 April, Libya's acting oil minister Khalifa Rajab Abdulsadek signalled the project was still on the cards. Eni did not comment. State-owned NOC could not be reached. Tripoli-based prime minister Abdelhamid Dbeibeh and NOC had been on the cusp of awarding NC-07 to the Eni-led consortium in January before widespread opposition forced Dbeibeh to order a review addressing concerns . Plans envisage at least 200mn ft³/d of gas and an unspecified amount of oil. The moves reflect a growing impetus by Libya's oil leadership to drive forward long-delayed projects as it seeks to boost oil production capacity from 1.2mn-1.3mn b/d to 2mn b/d and double gas output to around 3.5bn ft³/d over the next three to five years. Libya is also set to begin negotiations with TotalEnergies and ConocoPhillips in Paris next month over their demand for better terms at Waha Oil Company in return for investing in expanding production capacity, an oil industry source told Argus . This is also likely to prove controversial as many in the industry and beyond are opposed to altering contractual terms. The apparent fresh push comes just weeks after the ousting of oil minister Mohamed Oun , who had opposed awarding NC-07 to the consortium and rejected several other oil and gas deals pursued by the Tripoli-based government and NOC. Opponents of the deal have said that the consortium was set to receive a share of production that is too high and that current operator state-owned Agoco could develop the field for a fraction of the cost. The oil ministry under Oun had also suggested that NC-07 could have been put to a public tender rather than be the subject of direct negotiations. Proponents of the NC-07 deal said Libya must rapidly move ahead with projects to ensure domestic demand is met and the country can continue to export gas. The Supreme Council for Energy said Libya will face a severe gas shortage by 2026 on its current trajectory and become a gas importer unless development projects are implemented. While Libya's political divisions persist, its oil sector has enjoyed a greater level of stability over the past two years. Forced production shutdowns have been few and far between while interest from international oil companies has grown. But accusations of improper conduct in the oil industry have increased in tandem. One of the key challenges facing Libya's oil sector is project implementation. A landmark $8bn deal for Eni to develop offshore gas fields was signed in early 2023, but Argus understands that there has been little progress on implementation. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more